219
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Kinetics and thermodynamics of beech wood pyrolysis mechanism

Pages 334-345 | Received 06 Apr 2023, Accepted 27 Jul 2023, Published online: 02 Aug 2023

References

  • Abdelouahed, L., et al., 2017. Comparative investigation for the determination of kinetic parameters for biomass pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 129, 1201–1213.
  • Alves, J.L.F., et al., 2022. Potential of macauba endocarp (Acrocomia aculeate) for bioenergy production: multi-component kinetic study and estimation of thermodynamic parameters of activation. Thermochimica Acta, 708, 179134.
  • Arshad, M.A., et al., 2014. An innovative reaction model determination methodology in solid state kinetics based on variable activation energy. Thermochimica Acta, 585, 25–35.
  • Arshad, M.A., et al., 2015. Relationship between Johnson–Mehl–Avrami and Sestak–Berggren models in the kinetics of crystallization in amorphous materials. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 413, 53–58.
  • Arshad, M.A., et al., 2016. Morphology, thermal stability and thermal degradation kinetics of cellulose-modified urea–formaldehyde resin. Bulletin of Materials Science, 39, 1609–1618.
  • Arshad, M.A., et al., 2017. Thermal degradation mechanisms of epoxy composites filled with tin particles. Polymer Composites, 38, 1529–1540.
  • Arshad, M.A., et al., 2018a. Kinetic approach to degradation mechanisms in polymer solar cells and their accurate lifetime predictions. Journal of Power Sources, 391, 134–147.
  • Arshad, M.A., et al., 2018b. Predicting thermal degradation mechanisms in urea–formaldehyde cellulose composites filled with tin particles. Polymer Composites, 39, 4341–4354.
  • Arshad, M.A., et al., 2020. Kinetics of dynamic percolation in polymer/carbon composites. Polymer Engineering and Science, 60, 423–433.
  • Arshad, M.A., 2020. Thermo-oxidative decomposition of multi-walled carbon nanotubes: kinetics and thermodynamics. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures, 28, 857–868.
  • Arshad, M.A., 2021a. Kinetics of crystallization mechanisms in high density polyethylene and isotactic polypropylene. Polymer Science Series A, 63, S23–S33.
  • Arshad, M.A., 2021b. A novel kinetic approach to crystallization mechanisms in polymers. Polymer Engineering and Science, 61, 1502–1517.
  • Arshad, M.A., 2023. Kinetics of crystallization mechanisms in poly(3-hexylthiophene) and poly(9,9-dihexylfluorene-alt-2,5-didodecyloxybenzene) conjugated polymers. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1273, 134270.
  • Blazquez, J.S., et al., 2022. A review of different models derived from classical Kolmogorov, Johnson and Mehl, and Avrami (KJMA) theory to recover physical meaning in solid-state transformations. Physica Status Solidi B, 259, 2100524.
  • Bu, Y., et al., 2022. Impact assessment of population migration on energy consumption and carbon emissions in China: a spatial econometric investigation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, 106744.
  • Chen, C., et al., 2017. Thermogravimetric pyrolysis kinetics of bamboo waste via asymmetric double sigmoidal (Asym2sig) function deconvolution. Bioresource Technology, 225, 48–57.
  • Chen, F., et al., 2022. Investigation of non-isothermal pyrolysis kinetics of waste industrial hemp stem by three-parallel-reaction model. Bioresource Technology, 347, 126402.
  • Cho, J., et al., 2012. Kinetics and reaction chemistry for slow pyrolysis of enzymatic hydrolysislignin and organosolv extracted lignin derived from Maplewood. Green Chemistry, 14, 428–439.
  • da Silva, G., et al., 2020. Single-step and multi-step thermokinetic study – deconvolution method as a simple pathway for describe properly the biomass pyrolysis for energy conversion. Energy Conversion and Management, 209, 112653.
  • Ding, Y., et al., 2016a. Estimation of beech pyrolysis kinetic parameters by shuffled complex evolution. Bioresource Technology, 200, 658–665.
  • Ding, Y., et al., 2016b. Thermal degradation of beech wood with thermogravimetry/Fourier transform infrared analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 120, 370–377.
  • Ding, Y., et al., 2017. Comparative pyrolysis behaviors and reaction mechanisms of hardwood and softwood. Energy Conversion and Management, 132, 102–109.
  • Flynn, J.H., et al., 1966. A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Letters, 4, 323–328.
  • Flynn, J.H., 1997. ‘Temperature Integral’ — its use and abuse. Thermochimica Acta, 300, 83–92.
  • Friedman, H.L., 1965. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. Journal of Polymer Science C: Polymer Symposia, 6, 183–195.
  • Gao, M., et al., 2020. Hierarchically porous biochar for supercapacitor and electrochemical H2O2 production. Chemical Engineering Journal, 402, 126171.
  • Gašparovič, L., et al., 2010. Kinetic study of wood chips decomposition by TGA. Chemical Papers, 64, 174–181.
  • Gautam, R.K., et al., 2021. Biochar for remediation of agrochemicals and synthetic organic dyes from environmental samples: a review. Chemosphere, 272, 129917.
  • Gogoi, M., et al., 2018. Assessments of pyrolysis kinetics and mechanisms of biomass residues using thermogravimetry. Bioresource Technology Reports, 4, 40–49.
  • Hameed, S., et al., 2019. A review on biomass pyrolysis models: kinetic, network and mechanistic models. Biomass and Bioenergy, 123, 104–122.
  • Hidayat, S., et al., 2021. Comprehensive kinetic study of imperata cylindrica pyrolysis via Asym2sig deconvolution and combined kinetics. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 156, 105133.
  • Hill, C.A., 2007. Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hupa, M., et al., 2017. Biomass combustion technology development – it is all about chemical details. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 36, 113–134.
  • Jahirul, M.I., et al., 2012. Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis - a technological review. Energies, 5, 4952–5001.
  • Lee, D., et al., 2022. Recent progress in the catalytic thermochemical conversion process of biomass for biofuels. Chemical Engineering Journal, 447, 137501.
  • Lee, J., et al., 2023. Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-based integrated renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, 113240.
  • Li, Y., et al., 2020. A critical review of the production and advanced utilization of biochar via selective pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 312, 123614.
  • Liu, Z., et al., 2020. Third-generation biorefineries as the means to produce fuels and chemicals from CO2. Nature Catalysis, 3, 274–288.
  • Ma, C., et al., 2022. Thermogravimetric pyrolysis kinetics study of tobacco stem via multicomponent kinetic modeling, Asym2sig deconvolution and combined kinetics. Bioresource Technology, 360, 127539.
  • Matthews, H.D., et al., 2022. Current global efforts are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5°C. Science, 376, 1404–1409.
  • Mishra, S., et al., 2021. Review on biomass gasification: gasifiers, gasifying mediums, and operational parameters. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 4, 329–340.
  • Muhammad, B., 2019. Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in developed, emerging and Middle East and North Africa countries. Energy, 179, 232–245.
  • Mumbach, G.D., et al., 2019. Thermal investigation of plastic solid waste pyrolysis via the deconvolution technique using the asymmetric double sigmoidal function: determination of the kinetic triplet, thermodynamic parameters, thermal lifetime and pyrolytic oil composition for clean energy recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 200, 112031.
  • Mumbach, G.D., 2022a. Investigation on prospective bioenergy from pyrolysis of butia seed waste using TGA-FTIR: assessment of kinetic triplet, thermodynamic parameters and evolved volatiles. Renewable Energy, 191, 238–250.
  • Mumbach, G.D., et al., 2022b. Prospecting pecan nutshell pyrolysis as a source of bioenergy and bio-based chemicals using multicomponent kinetic modeling, thermodynamic parameters estimation, and Py-GC/MS analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111753.
  • Ozawa, T., et al., 1965. A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bulletin of Chemical Society of Japan, 38, 1881–1886.
  • Papadikis, K., et al., 2009. Application of CFD to model fast pyrolysis of biomass. Fuel Processing Technology, 90, 504–512.
  • Perejón, A., et al., 2011. Kinetic analysis of complex solid-state reactions. A new deconvolution procedure. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 115, 1780–1791.
  • Peters, B., 2011. Validation of a numerical approach to model pyrolysis of biomass and assessment of kinetic data. Fuel, 90, 2301–2314.
  • Qiu, B., et al., 2022. Research progress in the preparation of high-quality liquid fuels and chemicals by catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: a review. Energy Conversion and Management, 261, 115647.
  • Ryu, S.W., et al., 2020. Recent advances in catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic waste for the production of petroleum-like hydrocarbons. Bioresource Technology, 310, 123473.
  • Sandberg, D., et al., 2013. Thermo-hydro and thermo-hydro-mechanical wood processing: an opportunity for future environmentally friendly wood products. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 8, 64–88.
  • Schröder, E., 2004. Experiments on the pyrolysis of large beechwood particles in fixed beds. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 71, 669–694.
  • Seo, M.W., et al., 2022. Recent advances of thermochemical conversion processes for biorefinery. Bioresource Technology, 343, 126109.
  • Shah, S., and Venkatramanan, V., 2019. Advances in microbial technology for upscaling sustainable biofuel production. In: V. K. Gupta, and A. Pandey (eds.), New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 6.
  • Shukla, P., et al., 2021. Lignocellulosic biomass-based engineered biochar composites: a facile strategy for abatement of emerging pollutants and utilization in industrial applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152, 111643.
  • Soria-Verdugo, A., et al., 2020. Comparison of wood pyrolysis kinetic data derived from thermogravimetric experiments by model-fitting and model-free methods. Energy Conversion and Management, 212, 112818.
  • Starink, M.J., 2003. The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments: a comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods. Thermochimica Acta, 404, 163–176.
  • Sun, X., et al., 2020. Feasibility of using biochar as buffer and mineral nutrients replacement for acetone-butanol-ethanol production from non-detoxified switchgrass hydrolysate. Bioresource Technology, 298, 122569.
  • Sunose, T., et al., 1971. Method of determining activation deterioration constant of electrical insulating materials. Research Report: Chiba Institute of Technol. (Science and Technology), 16, 22–31.
  • Tsai, W.T., et al., 2007. Fast pyrolysis of rice husk: product yields and compositions. Bioresource Technology, 98 (2007), 22–28.
  • UN, 2023. https://www.unep.org/, last retrieved on Sunday, July 16, 2023.
  • Valizadeh, S., et al., 2022a. Biohydrogen production from furniture waste via catalytic gasification in air over Ni-loaded ultra-stable Y-type zeolite. Chemical Engineering Journal, 433, 133793.
  • Valizadeh, S., et al., 2022b. Valorization of biomass through gasification for green hydrogen generation: a comprehensive review. Bioresource Technology, 365, 128143.
  • Venderbosch, R.H., et al., 2010. Fast pyrolysis technology development. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining, 4, 178–208.
  • Vlaev, L.T., et al., 2003. Non-isothermal kinetics of pyrolysis of rice husk. Thermochimica Acta, 406, 1–7.
  • Vyazovkin, S., et al., 2011. ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochimica Acta, 520, 1–19.
  • Vyazovkin, S., et al., 2014. ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for collecting experimental thermal analysis data for kinetic computations. Thermochimica Acta, 590, 1–23.
  • Wang, S., et al., 2017. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: a state-of-the-art review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 62, 33–86.
  • Wang, C., et al., 2021. Integrated harvest of phenolic monomers and hydrogen through catalytic pyrolysis of biomass over nanocellulose derived biochar catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 320, 124352.
  • Weber, K., et al., 2018. Properties of biochar. Fuel, 217, 240–261.
  • Xiang, W., et al., 2020. Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: a critical review. Chemosphere, 252, 126539.
  • Yang, H., et al., 2007. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 86, 1781–1788.
  • Yang, C., et al., 2022. Role of biomass as low-carbon energy source in the era of net zero emissions. Fuel, 328, 125206.
  • Zhou, H., et al., 2015. A novel method for kinetics analysis of pyrolysis of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin in TGA and macro-TGA. RSC Advances, 5, 26509–26516.
  • Zhu, L., and Zhong, Z., 2020. Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin on biomass pyrolysis kinetics. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 37, 1660–1668.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.