Modeling the integrated mine-to-client supply chain: a survey

References

• Statista, Mining – statistics & facts, 2017. Available at https://www.statista.com/topics/1143/mining/.
   Google Scholar
• Técnico e Mineração, Mineração no Brasil Atual e sua Influência na Economia Nacional, 2014. Available at https://tecnicoemineracao.com.br/mineracao-brasil-atual-e-sua-influencia-na-economia-nacional/.
   Google Scholar
• T. Bjørndal, I. Herrero, A. Newman, C. Romero, and A. Weintraub, Operations research in the natural resource industry, Int. Tran. Oper. Res. 19 (1–2) (2012), pp. 39–62. ISSN 1475-3995. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3995.2010.00800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Caccetta, Application of optimisation techniques in open pit mining, in Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources, A. Weintraub, C. Romero, T. Bjørndal, R. Epstein, and J. Miranda, eds., Springer, Boston, MA, 2007, pp. 547–559.
   Google Scholar
• E. Kozan and S.Q. Liu, Operations research for mining: A classification and literature review, ASOR Bull. 30 (1) (2011), pp. 2–23. Available at https://eprints.qut.edu.au/48661/.
   Google Scholar
• B.S. Pimentel, G.R. Mateus, and F.A. Almeida, Mathematical models for optimizing the global mining supply chain, in Intelligent Systems in Operations: Methods, Models and Applications in the Supply Chain, B. Nag, ed., Business Science Reference, Hershey, New York, 2010, pp. 133–163. ISBN 9781615206063. Available at https://books.google.com.br/books?id=2f7Qjx3oofIC.
   Google Scholar
• F.P. Costa, Aplicações de técnicas de otimização a problemas de planejamento operacional de lavra em minas a céu aberto, PhD thesis, PPGEM–UFOP, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• A.M. Newman, E. Rubio, R. Caro, A. Weintraub, and K. Eurek, A review of operations research in mine planning, Interfaces 40 (3) (2010), pp. 222–245. doi:10.1287/inte.1090.0492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Osanloo, J. Gholamnejad, and B. Karimi, Long-term open pit mine production planning: A review of models and algorithms, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 22 (1) (2008), pp. 3–35. doi:10.1080/17480930601118947.
   Google Scholar
• M.G. Raj, H. Vardhan, and Y.V. Rao, Production optimisation using simulation models in mines: A critical review, Int. J. Oper. Res. 6 (3) (2009), pp. 330–359. doi:10.1504/IJOR.2009.026937.
   Google Scholar
• S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning, and Operation, 6th ed., Pearson Education Limited, Edingurgh Gate, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Blom, A.R. Pearce, and P.J. Stuckey, Short-term planning for open pit mines: A review, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 0(2018), pp. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nehring, E. Topal, and P. Knights, Dynamic short term production scheduling and machine allocation in underground mining using mathematical programming, Min. Technol. 119 (4) (2010), pp. 212–220. ISSN 1474-9009. doi:10.1179/1743286310Y.0000000001.
   Google Scholar
• E. Kozan and S.Q. Liu, A demand-responsive decision support system for coal transportation, Decis. Support Syst. 54 (2012 1), pp. 665–680. ISSN 0167-9236. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923612002278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Meagher, R. Dimitrakopoulos, and D. Avis, Optimized open pit mine design, pushbacks and the gap problem—A review, J. Min. Sci. 50 (3) (2014), pp. 508–526. ISSN 1573-8736. doi:10.1134/S1062739114030132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Laurich and B. Kennedy, Planning and design of surface mines, in Surface Mining chapter 5.2, B.A. Kennedy, ed., Port City Press, Baltimore, 1990, pp. 465–469
   Google Scholar
• H. Lerchs and F. Grossman, Optimum design of open pit mines, CIM Bull. 58 (1965), pp. 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Picard, Maximal closure of a graph and applications to combinatorial problems, Manage. Sci. 22, 11 (1976), pp. 1268–1272. doi:10.1287/mnsc.22.11.1268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Underwood and B. Tolwinski, A mathematical programming viewpoint for solving the ultimate pit problem, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107 (1) (1998), pp. 96–107. ISSN 0377-2217. Availabe at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221797001410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.S. Hochbaum and A. Chen, Performance analysis and best implementations of old and new algorithms for the open-pit mining problem, Oper. Res. 48 (6) (2000), pp. 894–914. Available at https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/opre.48.6.894.12392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.W.A. Asad, Optimum cut-off grade policy for open pit mining operations through net present value algorithm considering metal price and cost escalation, Eng. Comput. 24 (7) (2007), pp. 723–736. ISSN 0264-4401. doi:10.1108/02644400710817961
   Google Scholar
• M.W.A. Asad and E. Topal, Net present value maximization model for optimum cut-off grade policy of open pit mining operations, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 111 (2011), pp. 741–750 ISSN 2225-6253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Jélvez, N. Morales, and H. Askari-Nasab, A new model for automated pushback selection, Comput.Oper. Res. 4 (2018). ISSN 0305-0548. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2018.04.015
   Google Scholar
• M. Rahmanpour and M. Osanloo, A decision support system for determination of a sustainable pit limit, J Clean Prod. 141 (2017), pp. 1249–1258. ISSN 0959-6526. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616315530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.A. Sari and M. Kumral, Dig-limits optimization through mixed-integer linear programming in open- pit mines, J.Oper.Res. Soc. 69, 2 (2018), pp. 171–182. doi:10.1057/s41274-017-0201-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Ahmadi and R.S. Shahabi, Cutoff grade optimization in open pit mines using genetic algorithm, Resour. Policy. 55 (2018), pp. 184–191. ISSN 0301-4207 Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142071730404X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Ahmadi and A.A. Bazzazi, Cutoff grades optimization in open pit mines using meta-heuristic algorithms, Resour. Policy. 60, (2019), pp. 72–82. ISSN 0301-4207. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Klingman and N. Phillips, Integer programming for optimal phosphate-mining strategies, J.Oper.Res. Soc. 39 (9) (1988), pp. 805–810. doi:10.1057/jors.1988.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Osanloo and M. Ataei, Using equivalent grade factors to find the optimum cut-off grades of multiple metal deposits, Min. Eng. 16 (2003 8), pp. 771–776. ISSN 0892-6875. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0892687503001638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Dowd, Risk assessment in reserve estimation and open-pit planning, Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. (Sec. A: Mining Industry) 103 (1994), pp. A148–A154.
   Google Scholar
• R. Dimitrakopoulos, Conditional simulation algorithms for modelling orebody uncertainty in open pit optimisation, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 12, 4 (1998), pp. 173–179. doi:10.1080/09208118908944041.
   Google Scholar
• R. Dimitrakopoulos, C.T. Farrelly, and M. Godoy, Moving forward from traditional optimization: Grade uncertainty and risk effects in open-pit design, Min. Technol. 111, 1 (2002), pp. 82–88. doi:10.1179/mnt.2002.111.1.82.
   Google Scholar
• B. Groeneveld and E. Topal, Flexible open-pit mine design under uncertainty, J. Min. Sci. 47 (2) (2011), pp. 212–226. ISSN 1062-7391. doi:10.1134/S1062739147020080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.W.A. Asad and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Implementing a parametric maximum flow algorithm for optimal open pit mine design under uncertain supply and demand, J.Oper.Res. Soc. 64 (2) (2013), pp. 185–197. ISSN 1476-9360. doi:10.1057/jors.2012.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Dimitrakopoulos, L. Martinez, and S. Ramazan, A maximum upside/minimum downside approach to the traditional optimization of open pit mine design, J. Min. Sci. 43 (1) (2007), pp. 73–82. ISSN 1573-8736. doi:10.1007/s10913-007-0009-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chatterjee, M.R. Sethi, and M.W.A. Asad, Production phase and ultimate pit limit design under commodity price uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248 (2) (2016), pp. 658–667. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715006451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Farmer and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Schedule-based pushback design within the stochastic optimisation framework, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 32 (5) (2018), pp. 327–340. ISSN 1748-0930. doi:10.1080/17480930.2017.1289606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ataee-Pour, A critical survey of the existing stope layout optimization techniques, J. Min. Sci. 41 (5) (2005), pp. 447–466. ISSN 1573-8736. doi:10.1007/s10913-006-0008-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.S. Nhleko, T. Tholana, and P.N. Neingo, A review of underground stope boundary optimization algorithms, Resour. Policy. 56 (2018), pp. 59–69. ISSN 0301-4207. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420717303495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Topal and J. Sens, A new algorithm for stope boundary optimization, J. Coal Sci. Eng. (China). 16 (2) (2010), pp. 113–119. ISSN 1006-9097. doi:10.1007/s12404-010-0201-y.
   Google Scholar
• D.S.S. Sandanayake, E. Topal, and M.W. Ali Asad, A heuristic approach to optimal design of an underground mine stope layout, Appl. Soft. Comput. 30 (2015), pp. 595–603. ISSN 1568-4946. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Grieco and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Managing grade risk in stope design optimisation: Probabilistic mathematical programming model and application in sublevel stoping, Min. Technol. 116 (2) (2007), pp. 49–57. ISSN 1474-9009. doi:10.1179/174328607X191038.
   Google Scholar
• B. King, M. Goycoolea, and A. Newman, Optimizing the open pit-to-underground mining transition, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 257 (1) (2017), pp. 297–309. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716305586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Whittle, M. Brazil, P.A. Grossman, J.H. Rubinstein, and D.A. Thomas, Combined optimisation of an open-pit mine outline and the transition depth to underground mining, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 268 (2018), pp. 624–634. ISSN 0377-2217. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Amaya, D. Espinoza, M. Goycoolea, E. Moreno, T. Prevost, and E. Rubio, A scalable approach to optimal block scheduling, in Proceedings of APCOM, The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Vancouver, BC, 2009, pp. 567–575.
   Google Scholar
• B. Koushavand, H. Askari-Nasab, and C.V. Deutsch, A linear programming model for long-term mine planning in the presence of grade uncertainty and a stockpile, Int. J. Min. Miner. Eng Sci. Technol. 24 (4) (2014), pp. 451–459. ISSN 2095-2686. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.05.006
   Google Scholar
• M.E. Gershon, Optimal mine production scheduling: Evaluation of large scale mathematical program- ming approaches, Int.J. Min. Eng. 1 (4) (1983), pp. 315–329. doi:10.1007/BF00881548.
   Google Scholar
• A. Lamghari and R. Dimitrakopoulos, A diversified Tabu search approach for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222 (3) (2012), pp. 642–652. ISSN 0377-2217. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Lamghari, R. Dimitrakopoulos, and J.A. Ferland, A variable neighbourhood descent algorithm for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty, J.Oper.Res. Soc. 65 (9) (2014), pp. 1305–1314. ISSN 1476-9360. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Askari-Nasab, K. Awuah-Offei, and H. Eivazy, Large-scale open pit production scheduling using mixed integer linear programming, Int. J. Min. Miner. Eng. 2 (3) (2010), pp. 185–214. doi:10.1504/IJMME.2010.037624.
   Google Scholar
• H. Askari-Nasab, Y. Pourrahimian, E. Ben-Awuah, and S. Kalantari, Mixed integer linear programming formulations for open pit production scheduling, J. Min. Sci. 47 (3) (2011), pp. 338. ISSN 1573-8736. doi:10.1134/S1062739147030117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Boland, I. Dumitrescu, and G. Froyland. A multistage stochastic programming approach to open pit mine production scheduling with uncertain geology. Optimization Online, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• T.B. Johnson, Optimum open pit mine production scheduling, PhD thesis, California Univ Berkeley Operations Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• B. Samanta, A. Bhattacherjee, and R. Ganguli, A genetic algorithms approach for grade control planning in a bauxite deposit. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Applications of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry, SME, Littleton, CO, 2005, pp. 337–342.
   Google Scholar
• C. Cullenbine, R.K. Wood, and A. Newman, A sliding time window heuristic for open pit mine block sequencing, Optim. Lett. 5 (3) (2011), pp. 365–377. doi:10.1007/s11590-011-0306-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Chicoisne, D. Espinoza, M. Goycoolea, E. Moreno, and E. Rubio. A new algorithm for the open-pit mine scheduling problem, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• R. Chicoisne, D. Espinoza, M. Goycoolea, E. Moreno, and E. Rubio, A new algorithm for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem, Oper. Res. 60 (3) (2012), pp. 517–528. doi:10.1287/opre.1120.1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Eivazy and H. Askari-Nasab, A mixed integer linear programming model for short-term open pit mine production scheduling, Min. Technol. 121 (2) (2012), pp. 97–108. doi:10.1179/1743286312Y.0000000006.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Li, E. Topal, and S. Ramazan, Optimising the long-term mine waste management and truck schedule in a large-scale open pit mine, Min. Technol. 125 (1) (2016), pp. 35–46. ISSN 1474-9009. doi:10.1080/14749009.2015.1107343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Li, E. Topal, and S. Ramazan, Optimising the long term mine landform progression and truck hour schedule in a large scale open pit mine using mixed integer programming, in Advances in Applied Strategic Mine Planning, R. Dimitrakopoulos, ed., Springer In- ternational Publishing, Cham, 2018, pp. 669–686. ISBN 978-3-319-69320-0.
   Google Scholar
• E. Moreno, M. Rezakhah, A. Newman, and F. Ferreira, Linear models for stockpiling in open- pit mine production scheduling problems, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 260 (2017 1), pp. 212–221. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716310335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Bakhtavar and H. Mahmoudi, Development of a scenario-based robust model for the optimal truck- shovel allocation in open-pit mining, Comput. Oper. Res. 8 (2018). ISSN 0305-0548. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2018.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• K. Fytas, J. Hadjigeorgiou, and J.L. Collins, Production scheduling optimization in open pit mines, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 7 (1) (1993), pp. 1–9. ISSN 1389-5265. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09208119308964677.
   Google Scholar
• R. Goodfellow and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Simultaneous stochastic optimization of mining complexes and mineral value chains, Math Geosci. 49 (3) (2017), pp. 341–360. ISSN 1874-8953. doi:10.1007/s11004-017-9680-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Montiel and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Optimizing mining complexes with multiple processing and trans- portation alternatives: An uncertainty-based approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 247 (2015 1), pp. 166–178. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715003720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Montiel and R. Dimitrakopoulos, A heuristic approach for the stochastic optimization of mine production schedules, J.Heuristics. 23 (5) (2017), pp. 397–415. ISSN 1572-9397. doi:10.1007/s10732-017-9349-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Weintraub, M. Pereira, and X. Schultz, A priori and a posteriori aggregation procedures to reduce model size in mip mine planning models, Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 30 (SupplementC) (2008), pp. 297–302. ISSN 1571-0653. doi:10.1016/j.endm.2008.01.051
   Google Scholar
• Y. Pourrahimian, H. Askari-Nasab, and D.D. Tannant, A multi-step approach for block-cave production scheduling optimization, Int. J. Min. Miner. Eng Sci. Technol. 23 (5) (2013), pp. 739–750. ISSN 2095-2686. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.08.019.
   Google Scholar
• E. Busnach, A. Mehrez, and Z. Sinuany-Stern, A production problem in phosphate mining, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 36 (1985 4), pp. 285–288. ISSN 01605682, 14769360. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2582414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Caccetta and S.P. Hill, An application of branch and cut to open pit mine scheduling, J. Global Optim. 27 (2) (2003), pp. 349–365. ISSN 1573-2916. doi:10.1023/A:1024835022186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Tolwinski and R. Underwood, A scheduling algorithm for open pit mines, IMA J. Manage. Math. 7 (3) (1996), pp. 247–270. doi:10.1093/imaman/7.3.247.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ramazan and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Traditional and new MIP models for production scheduling with in-situ grade variability, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 18 (2) (2004), pp. 85–98. doi:10.1080/13895260412331295367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Halatchev, A model of discounted profit variation of open pit production sequencing optimization, Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry-Proc. of the 32nd Int. Symposium on the Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry, APCOM 2005, AA Balkema Publishers, 2005, pp. 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gilani and J. Sattarvand, Integrating geological uncertainty in long-term open pit mine production planning by ant colony optimization, Comput Geosci. 87 ISSN 0098-3004, (2016), pp. 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.L. Mai, E. Topal, O. Erten, and B. Sommerville, A new risk-based optimisation method for the iron ore production scheduling using stochastic integer programming, Resour. Policy. (2018). ISSN 0301-4207. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301420717302763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Lamghari and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Network-flow based algorithms for scheduling production in multi-processor open-pit mines accounting for metal uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 (1) (2016), pp. 273–290. ISSN 0377-2217. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Lamghari and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Progressive hedging applied as a metaheuristic to schedule production in open-pit mines accounting for reserve uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253 (2016 3), pp. 843–855. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716301357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Inthavongsa, C. Drebenstedt, J. Bongaerts, and P. Sontamino, Real options decision frame- work: Strategic operating policies for open pit mine planning, Resour. Policy. 47 (2016 3), pp. 142–153. ISSN 0301-4207. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301420716300022.
   Google Scholar
• C. Alford, M. Brazil, and D.H. Lee, Optimisation in underground mining, in Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources, A. Weintraub, C. Romero, T. Bjørndal, R. Epstein, and J. Miranda, eds., Springer, Boston, MA, 2007, pp. 561–577.
   Google Scholar
• C. Musingwini, Optimization in underground mine planning - developments and opportunities, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 116 (2016), pp. 809–820. ISSN 2225-6253. doi:10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n9a1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.M. Carlyle and B.C. Eaves, Underground planning at stillwater mining company, Interfaces. 31 (4) (2001), pp. 50–60. ISSN 0092-2102. doi:10.1287/inte.31.4.50.9669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nehring, E. Topal, M. Kizil, and P. Knights, An investigation to integrate optimum long-term planning with short planning in underground mine production scheduling. Mine Planning and Equipment Selection (MPES) Conference, Fremantle,WA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• M. Nehring, E. Topal, M. Kizil, and P. Knights, Integrated short- and medium-term underground mine production scheduling, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 112 (2012), pp. 365–378 ISSN 2225-6253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Montiel, R. Dimitrakopoulos, and K. Kawahata, Globally optimising open-pit and underground mining operations under geological uncertainty, Min. Technol. 125 (1) (2016), pp. 2–14. ISSN 1474-9009. doi:10.1179/1743286315Y.0000000027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C. Sarin and J. West-Hansen, The long-term mine production scheduling problem, IIE Trans. 37 (2) (2005), pp. 109–121. ISSN 0740-817X. doi:10.1080/07408170490447339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Newman and M. Kuchta, Using aggregation to optimize long-term production planning at an underground mine, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176 (2) (2007), pp. 1205–1218. ISSN 0377-2217. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Topal, Early start and late start algorithms to improve the solution time for long-term underground mine production scheduling, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 108 (2008), pp. 99–107. ISSN 2225-6253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nehring, E. Topal, and J. Little, A new mathematical programming model for production schedule optimization in underground mining operations, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 110 (2010), pp. 437–446. ISSN 2225-6253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.R. Dindarloo, M. Osanloo, and S. Frimpong, A stochastic simulation framework for truck and shovel selection and sizing in open pit mines, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 115 (2015), pp. 209–219. ISSN 2225-6253. doi:10.17159/2411-9717/2015/v115n3a6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Topal and S. Ramazan, A new MIP model for mine equipment scheduling by minimizing maintenance cost, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2) (2010), pp. 1065–1071. ISSN 0377-2217. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Munirathinam and J.C. Yingling, A review of computer-based truck dispatching strategies for surface mining operations, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 8, 1 (1994), pp. 1–15. doi:10.1080/09208119408964750
   Google Scholar
• S. Alarie and M. Gamache, Overview of solution strategies used in truck dispatching systems for open pit mines, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 16 (1) (2002), pp. 59–76. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1076/ijsm.16.1.59.3408.
   Google Scholar
• C.N. Burt and L. Caccetta, Equipment selection for surface mining: A review, Interfaces. 44, 2 (2014), pp. 143–162. doi:10.1287/inte.2013.0732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Soumis, J. Ethier, and J. Elbrond, Truck dispatching in an open pit mine, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 3 (2) (1989), pp. 115–119. doi:10.1080/09208118908944263.
   Google Scholar
• S. Naoum and A. Haidar, A hybrid knowledge base system and genetic algorithms for equipment selection, Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 7 (1) (2000), pp. 3–14. doi:10.1108/eb021128.
   Google Scholar
• X. Gu, Q. Wang, X. Xu, J. Liu, T. Sun, and K. Du, Open pit waste removal optimization through equipment fleet scheduling, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 27 (12) (2017 12), pp. 2682–2690. ISSN 1003-6326. doi:10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60297-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.R. Patterson, E. Kozan, and P. Hyland, Energy efficient scheduling of open-pit coal mine trucks, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262 2 (2017), pp. 759–770. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717303132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.H. Ta, J.V. Kresta, J.F. Forbes, and H.J. Marquez, A stochastic optimization approach to mine truck allocation, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 19 (2005 3), pp. 162–175. ISSN 1389-5265. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13895260500128914.
   Google Scholar
• S.G. Ercelebi and A. Bascetin, Optimization of shovel-truck system for surface mining, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 109 (2009), pp. 433–439 ISSN 2225-6253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.H. Ta, A. Ingolfsson, and J. Doucette, A linear model for surface mining haul truck allocation incorporating shovel idle probabilities, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231 (3) (2013), pp. 770–778. ISSN 0377-2217. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Topal and S. Ramazan, Mining truck scheduling with stochastic maintenance cost, J. Coal Sci. Eng. (China). 18 (3) (2012), pp. 313–319. ISSN 1866-6566. doi:10.1007/s12404-012-0316-4.
   Google Scholar
• J. Benndorf, Application of efficient methods of conditional simulation for optimising coal blending strategies in large continuous open pit mining operations, Int. J. Coal Geol. 112 (2013), pp. 141–153. ISSN 0166-5162 Availabe at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516212002492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.E.V. Matamoros and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Stochastic short-term mine production schedule ac- counting for fleet allocation, operational considerations and blending restrictions, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 255 (2016 3), pp. 911–921. ISSN 0377-2217. Availabe at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716303873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Vagenas, Dispatch control of a fleet of remote-controlled/automatic load-haul-dump vehicles in underground mines, Int. J. Prod. Res. 29, 11 (1991), pp. 2347–2363. doi:10.1080/00207549108948087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Gamache, R. Grimard, and P. Cohen, A shortest-path algorithm for solving the fleet management problem in underground mines, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 166 (2005 2), pp. 497–506. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722170400222X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Beaulieu and M. Gamache, An enumeration algorithm for solving the fleet management problem in underground mines, Comput. Oper. Res. 33 (6) (2006), pp. 1606–1624. ISSN 0305-0548. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.W. Patty, Handbook of Operations Research Applications at Railroads, Vol. 222, Springer, New York, NY, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• R. Garcia-Flores, G. Singh, A. Ernst, and P. Welgama, Medium-term rail planning at Rio Tinto iron ore, Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM 2011), Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (MSSANZ), Perth, Australia, 2011, pp. 311–317.
   Google Scholar
• S.Q. Liu and E. Kozan, Scheduling trains as a blocking parallel-machine job shop scheduling problem, Comput. Oper. Res. 36 (10) (2009), pp. 2840–2852. ISSN 0305-0548. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054808002712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.Q. Liu and E. Kozan, Optimizing a coal rail network under capacity constraints, Flexible Serv. Manufact. J. 23 (2) (2011), pp. 90–110. ISSN 1936-6590. doi:10.1007/s10696-010-9069-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Salim and X. Cai, A genetic algorithm for railway scheduling with environmental considerations, Environ. Modell. Soft. 12 (4) (1997), pp. 301–309. ISSN 1364-8152. Availabe at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815297000261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Singh, A.T. Ernst, M. Baxter, and D. Sier, Rail schedule optimisation in the hunter valley coal chain, RAIRO-Oper. Res. 49, 2 (2015), pp. 413–434. doi:10.1051/ro/2014049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Singh, R. García-Flores, A. Ernst, P. Welgama, M. Zhang, and K. Munday, Medium-term rail scheduling for an iron ore mining company, Interfaces. 44, 2 (2014), pp. 222–240. doi:10.1287/inte.1120.0669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.B. Campos, Modelo de otimização para o planejamento da rede de serviços no transporte ferroviário de cargas, PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Esp{\’\i}rito Santo, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• L.B. Campos, M.M. Da Costa Cruz, and F.M. Pompermayer, Modelo integrado de apoio ao planejamento da rede de serviços no transporte ferroviário de cargas: Aplicação para transporte de minério de ferro, TRANSPORTES. 18 (2) (2010). doi:10.14295/transportes.v18i2.425
   Google Scholar
• C.H.F. de Faria and M.M. Da Costa Cruz, Simulation modelling of vitória-minas closed-loop rail network, Trans. Prob. 10 (SE) (2015), pp. 125–139. doi:10.21307/tp-2015-067.
   Google Scholar
• R.P.L. Meireles, Modelagem e Simulação da Malha Ferroviária em Circuito Fechado da Estrada de Ferro de Vitória a Minas, PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Esp{\’\i}rito Santo, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• A.L.M. Barros, Modelo de Otimização para Distribuição Horária de Lotes de Vagões Ferroviários GDE para Carregamento de Minério de Ferro, PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Esp{\’\i}rito Santo, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• I.E. Içyüz, J.P.P. Richard, E. Eskigun, and D. Acharya, A two-model solution approach for the monthly coal train reservations planning problem, Transp. Sci. 50, 3 (2016), pp. 926–946. doi:10.1287/trsc.2015.0654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Masoud, E. Kozan, G. Kent, and S.Q. Liu, A new constraint programming approach for optimising a coal rail system, Optim. Lett. 11 (4) (2017), pp. 725–738. ISSN 1862-4480. doi:10.1007/s11590-016-1041-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Reinhardt, M. Dada, and S. Chopra, Coal movement by railroad in the powder river basin, Energy Stud. Rev. 11 (1) (2002). doi:10.15173/esr.v11i1.440
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Nobrega, Modelagem matematica de um sistema de produção e transporte de minerio de ferro, PhD thesis, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS, Campinas, SP, Brasil, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ago, T. Nishi, and M. Konishi, Simultaneous optimization of storage allocation and routing problems for belt-conveyor transportation, J.Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf. 1 (2) (2007), pp. 250–261. doi:10.1299/jamdsm.1.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Boland, D. Gulczynski, and M. Savelsbergh, A stockyard planning problem, EURO J. Transp. Logist. 1 (3) (2012), pp. 197–236. ISSN 2192-4384. doi:10.1007/s13676-012-0011-z.
   Google Scholar
• N. Boland, D. Gulezynski, M.P. Jackson, M. Savelsbergh, and M.K. Tam, Improved stockyard management strategies for coal export terminal at Newcastle, Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Perth, W.A., 2011 December 12–16, pp. 718–724.
   Google Scholar
• S. Hanoun, B. Khan, M. Johnstone, S. Nahavandi, and D. Creighton, An effective heuristic for stockyard planning and machinery scheduling at a coal handling facility, Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2013 11th IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Bochum, Germany, 2013, pp. 206–211.
   Google Scholar
• G. Belov, N. Boland, M.W.P. Savelsbergh, and P.J. Stuckey, Local search for a cargo assembly planning problem, in Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming, H. Simonis, ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014, pp. 159–175. ISBN 978-3-319-07046-9
   Google Scholar
• G. Belov, N. Boland, M.W.P. Savelsbergh, and P.J. Stuckey, Exploration of models for a cargo assembly planning problem, ArXiv e-prints, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M. Savelsbergh and O. Smith, Cargo assembly planning, EURO J. Transp. Logist. 4 (3) (2015), pp. 321–354. ISSN 2192-4384. doi:10.1007/s13676-014-0048-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Binkowski and B.J. McCarragher, A Queueing model for the design and analysis of a mining stockyard, Discrete Event Dyn. Syst. 9 (1) (1999 1), pp. 75–98. ISSN 1573-7594. doi:10.1023/A:1008397332376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.T. Le, M. Johnstone, J. Zhang, B. Khan, D. Creighton, S. Hanoun, and S. Nahavandi, Complex simulation of stockyard mining operations, in Advances in Global Optimization, D. Gao, N. Ruan and W. Xing, eds., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015, pp. 529–537. ISBN 978-3-319-08377-3.
   Google Scholar
• M.M. Fioroni, L.A.G. Franzese, C.E. Zanin, J. Furia, L. de Toledo Perfetti, D. Leonardo, and N.L. Da Silva, Simulation of continuous behavior using discrete tools: Ore conveyor transport, 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, 2007, pp. 1655–1662.
   Google Scholar
• B. Xiao-Ping, Z.A. Yu-Hong, and L.A. Ya-Nan, A novel approach to study real-time dynamic optimization analysis and simulation of complex mine logistics transportation hybrid system with belt and surge links, Discrete Dyn. In Nat. Soc. 2015 (2015), pp. 1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/601578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. van Vianen, J. Ottjes, and G. Lodewijks, Belt conveyor network design using simulation, J. Simul. 10, 3 (2016), pp. 157–165. doi:10.1057/jos.2014.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Que, K. Awuah-Offei, and S. Frimpong, Optimising design parameters of continuous mining transport systems using discrete event simulation, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 30, 3 (2016), pp. 217–230. doi:10.1080/17480930.2015.1037056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.L. McNearny and Z. Nie, Simulation of a conveyor belt network at an underground coal mine, Min. Resour. Eng. 09 (03) (2000), pp. 343–355. doi:10.1142/S0950609800000299.
   Google Scholar
• K. Fagerholt, Optimal fleet design in a ship routing problem, Int. Tran. Oper. Res. 6 (5) (1999), pp. 453–464. ISSN 0969-6016. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969601699000106.
   Google Scholar
• M. Christiansen, K. Fagerholt, B. Nygreen, and D. Ronen, Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228 (3) (2013), pp. 467–483. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712009125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Christiansen, K. Fagerholt, and D. Ronen, Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives, Transp. Sci. 38 (1) (2004), pp. 1–18. Available at https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/trsc.1030.0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Steenken, S. Voßand, and R. Stahlbock, Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review, OR Spectr. 26 (1) (2004), pp. 3–49. ISSN 1436-6304. doi:10.1007/s00291-003-0157-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Stahlbock and S. Voß, Operations research at container terminals: A literature update, OR Spectr. 30 (1) (2008 1), pp. 1–52. ISSN 1436-6304. doi:10.1007/s00291-007-0100-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.H. Shih, Planning of fuel coal imports using a mixed integer programming method, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 51 (3) (1997), pp. 243–249. ISSN 0925-5273. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527397000789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Zeng and Z. Yang, Model integrating fleet design and ship routing problems for coal shipping. In Y. Shi, G.D. van Albada, J. Dongarra and P.M.A. Sloot, eds., Computational Science – ICCS 2007: 7th International Conference, Beijing, China, May 27 – 30, 2007, Proceedings, Part III, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 1000–1003. ISBN 978-3-540-72588-6.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Liu, A blending and inter-modal transportation model for the coal distribution problem, Int. J. Oper. Res. 5 (2008), pp. 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• M. Christiansen, K. Fagerholt, T. Flatberg, Ø. Haugen, O. Kloster, and E.H. Lund, Maritime inventory routing with multiple products: A case study from the cement industry, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 208 (1) (2011), pp. 86–94. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221710005606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.L. Boland and M.W.P. Savelsbergh, Optimizing the hunter valley coal chain, in Supply Chain Disruptions: Theory and Practice of Managing Risk, H. Gurnani, A. Mehrotra and S. Ray, eds., Springer London, London, 2012, pp. 275–302. ISBN 978-0-85729-778-5. doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-778-5_10.
   Google Scholar
• A. Arigoni, A. Newman, C. Turner, and C. Kaptur, Optimizing global thermal coal shipments, Omega. 72 (SupplementC) (2017), pp. 118–127. ISSN 0305-0483. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048316300792.
   Google Scholar
• J. Dong, F. Gao, S. Dai, X. Guan, R. Ma, and F. Lai, Purchasing and transport scheduling based on scenario tree in coal maritime supply chain with stochastic demand, Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Shenyang, China, 2014, pp. 3444–3449.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Drezner and H.W. Hamacher (eds.), Facility Location: Applications and Theory, Springer, New York, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• A. Klose and A. Drexl, Facility location models for distribution system design, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 162 (1) (2005 4), pp. 4–29. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377221703008191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T. Melo, S. Nickel, and F. Saldanha-Da Gama, Facility location and supply chain management - A review, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (2) (2009), pp. 401–412. ISSN 0377-2217. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.S. ReVelle, H.A. Eiselt, and M.S. Daskin, A bibliography for some fundamental problem cat- egories in discrete location science, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184 (3) (2008 2), pp. 817–848. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037722170700080X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kumral, Optimal location of a mine facility by genetic algorithms, Min. Technol. 113, 2 (2004), pp. 83–88. doi:10.1179/037178404225004940.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Zhou and L.J. Li, Joint capacity planning and distribution network optimization of coal supply chains under uncertainty, AIChE J. 64 (4) (2018), pp. 1246–1261. Availabe at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aic.16012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Paricheh and M. Osanloo, A simulation-based risk management approach to locating facilities in open-pit mines under price and grade uncertainties, Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory. 89 (2018), pp. 119–134. ISSN 1569-190X. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2018.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Bodon, C. Fricke, T. Sandeman, and C. Stanford, Modeling the mining supply chain from mine to port: A combined optimization and simulation approach, J. Min. Sci. 47 (2) (2011), pp. 202–211. doi:10.1134/S1062739147020079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C. Goodfellow and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Global optimization of open pit mining complexes with uncertainty, Appl. Soft. Comput. 40 (2016), pp. 292–304. ISSN 1568-4946 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494615007565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kumar and S. Chatterjee, Open-pit coal mine production sequencing incorporating grade blending and stockpiling options: An application from an Indian mine, Eng. Optim. 49, 5 (2017), pp. 762–776. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2016.1210312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Henderson, A short-run model for the coal industry, Rev. Econ. Stat. 37 (4) (1955), pp. 336–346. ISSN 00346535, 15309142. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1925847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Henderson, The Efficiency of the Coal Industry-An Application of Linear Programming, PhD thesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1958.
   Google Scholar
• G.H. Tzeng, D. Teodorović, and M.J. Hwang, Fuzzy bicriteria multi-index transportation prob- lems for coal allocation planning of Taipower, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95 (1) (1996), pp. 62–72. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377221795002472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.C. Pendharkar, A fuzzy linear programming model for production planning in coal mines, Comput. Oper. Res. 24 (12) (1997), pp. 1141–1149. ISSN 0305-0548. doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(97)00024-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.G. Márquez, Optimización de una red de transporte combinado para la exportación del carbón del interior de Colombia, Rev.EIA. (2011), pp. 103–113. ISSN 1794-1237. Available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-12372011000200008&nrm=iso
   Google Scholar
• A. Thomas, G. Singh, M. Krishnamoorthy, and J. Venkateswaran, Distributed optimisation method for multi-resource constrained scheduling in coal supply chains, Int. J. Prod. Res. 51, 9 (2013), pp. 2740–2759. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.737955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Abdekhodaee, S. Dunstall, A. Ernst, and L. Lam, Integration of stockyard and rail network: A scheduling case study, Proceedings of the Fifth Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• A. Thomas, J. Venkateswaran, G. Singh, and M. Krishnamoorthy, A resource constrained scheduling problem with multiple independent producers and a single linking constraint: A coal supply chain example, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 236 (3) (2014), pp. 946–956. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221713008084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Thomas, M. Krishnamoorthy, J. Venkateswaran, and G. Singh, Decentralised decision-making in a multi-party supply chain, Int. J. Prod. Res. 54, 2 (2016), pp. 405–425. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1096977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Canales-Bustos, E. Santibañez-González, and A. Candia-Véjar, A multi-objective optimization model for the design of an effective decarbonized supply chain in mining, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 193 (2017), pp. 449–464. ISSN 0925-5273. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527317302542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Cheng, S. Ning, X. Xia, and F. Yang, Modelling of coal trade process for the logistics enterprise and its optimisation with stochastic predictive control, Int. J. Prod. Res. 54, 8 (2016), pp. 2241–2259. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1062568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Balzary and A. Mohais, Consideration for multi-objective metaheuristic optimisation of large iron ore and coal supply chains, from resource to market, in Advances in Applied Strategic Mine Planning, R. Dimitrakopoulos, ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, pp. 297–316. ISBN 978-3-319-69320-0. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_20.
   Google Scholar
• F. Liu, T. Lv, M. Sajid, and X. Li, Optimization for China’s coal flow based on matching supply and demand sides, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 129 (2018), pp. 345–354. ISSN 0921-3449. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916302051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ravindran and D.L. Hanline, Optimal location of coal blending plants by mixed-integer programming, AIIE Trans. 12, 2 (1980), pp. 179–185. doi:10.1080/05695558008974505.
   Google Scholar
• R. Barbaro and R. Ramani, Generalized multiperiod MIP model for production scheduling and pro- cessing facilities selection and location, Min. Eng. 38 (1986), pp. 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• H.D. Sherali and R. Puri, Models for a coal blending and distribution problem, Omega. 21 (2) (1993), pp. 235–243. ISSN 0305-0483. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030504839390056Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.K.C. Chanda and K. Dagdelen, Optimal blending of mine production using goal programming and interactive graphics systems, Int. J.Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 9, 4 (1995), pp. 203–208. doi:10.1080/09208119508964748
   Google Scholar
• J. Lyu, A. Gunasekaran, C.Y. Chen, and C. Kao, A goal programming model for the coal blending problem, Comput. Ind. Eng. 28 (4) (1995), pp. 861–868. ISSN 0360-8352. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036083529500007N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.W. Lai and C.Y. Chen, A cost minimization model for coal import strategy, Energy Policy. 24 (12) (1996), pp. 1111–1117. ISSN 0301-4215. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421596000912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Liu and H.D. Sherali, A coal shipping and blending problem for an electric utility company, Omega. 28 (4) (2000), pp. 433–444. ISSN 0305-0483. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048399000675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.J. Peng, M.H. Zhou, M.Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, and Y.B. Huang, A dynamic optimization model of an integrated coal supply chain system and its application, Min. Sci.Technol. (China). 19 (6) (2009), pp. 842–846. ISSN 1674-5264. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674526409601538.
   Google Scholar
• S. Schellenberg, X. Li, and Z. Michalewicz. Benchmarks for the coal processing and blending problem, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016, GECCO ’16, Denver, CO, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 1005–1012. ISBN 978-1-4503-4206-3. doi:10.1145/2908812.2908945.
   Google Scholar
• P.C. Pendharkar and J.A. Rodger, Nonlinear programming and genetic search application for production scheduling in coal mines, Ann. Oper. Res. 95 (1) (2000), pp. 251–267. ISSN 1572-9338. doi:10.1023/A:1018958209290
   Google Scholar
• Y.F. Liao, C.H. Wu, and X.Q. Ma, New hybrid optimization model for power coal blending, Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2005. Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Vol 7, IEEE, Guangzhou, China, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• G. Xi-Jin, C. Ming, and W. Jia-Wei, Coal blending optimization of coal preparation production process based on improved GA, Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 1 (1) (2009), pp. 654–660. ISSN 1878-5220. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878522009001040.
   Google Scholar
• W. Candler, Coal blending – With acceptance sampling, Comput. Oper. Res. 18 (7) (1991), pp. 591–596. ISSN 0305-0548. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030505489190066Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Shih and H.C. Frey, Coal blending optimization under uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 83 (3) (1995), pp. 452–465. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377221794002436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kumral, Application of chance-constrained programming based on multi-objective simulated an- nealing to solve a mineral blending problem, Eng. Optim. 35, 6 (2003), pp. 661–673. doi:10.1080/03052150310001614837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.G. Conradie, L.E. Morison, and J.W. Joubert, Scheduling at coal handling facilities using Simulated annealing, Math. Methods Oper. Res. 68 (2) (2008), pp. 277–293. ISSN 1432-5217. doi:10.1007/s00186-008-0221-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ü.S. Sakallı and Ö.F. Baykoç, An optimization approach for brass casting blending problem un- der aletory and epistemic uncertainties, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 133 (2) (2011), pp. 708–718. ISSN 0925-5273. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527311002398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ü.S. Sakallı and Ö.F. Baykoç, Strong guidance on mitigating the effects of uncertainties in the brass casting blending problem: A hybrid optimization approach, J.Oper.Res. Soc. 64 (4) (2013), pp. 562–576. ISSN 1476-9360. doi:10.1057/jors.2012.50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ü.S. Sakallı, Ö.F. Baykoç, and B. Birgören, Stochastic optimization for blending problem in brass casting industry, Ann. Oper. Res. 186 (1) (2011 6), pp. 141–157. ISSN 1572-9338. doi:10.1007/s10479-011-0851-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Arigoni, Optimization techniques in coal markets: a global cost minimization and a multi-stage procurement strategy, PhD thesis, Colorado School of Mines. Arthur Lakes Library, Golden, Colorado, USA, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• J. Zhang and R. Dimitrakopoulos, Optimising a mineral supply chain under uncertainty with long- term sales contracts, in Advances in Applied Strategic Mine Planning, R. Dimitrakopoulos, ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, pp. 787–800. ISBN 978-3-319-69320-0. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_45.
   Google Scholar
• P. Bodon, C. Fricke, T. Sandeman, and C. Stanford, Combining optimisation and simulation to model a supply chain from pit to port, in Advances in Applied Strategic Mine Planning, R. Dimitrakopoulos, ed., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, pp. 251–267. ISBN 978-3-319-69320-0. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_17.
   Google Scholar
• M. Chakraborty and M.K. Chandra, Multicriteria decision making for optimal blending for beneficiation of coal: A fuzzy programming approach, Omega. 33 (5) (2005), pp. 413–418. ISSN 0305-0483. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048304001008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Li, G.H. Huang, C. Dong, and Y. Liu, An inexact fuzzy programming approach for power coal blending, J. Environ. Inf. 21 (2) (2013). ISSN 1684-8799. doi:10.3808/jei.201300238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Dai, X.H. Cai, Y.P. Cai, and G.H. Huang, A simulation-based fuzzy possibilistic programming model for coal blending management with consideration of human health risk under uncertainty, Appl. Energy. 133 (2014), pp. 1–13. ISSN 0306-2619. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914007831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Liu, G.H. Huang, Y.P. Cai, G.H. Cheng, Y.T. Niu, and K. An, Development of an inexact optimization model for coupled coal and power management in North China, Energy Policy. 37 (11) (2009), pp. 4345–4363. ISSN 0301-4215. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509003942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Luss, Operations research and capacity expansion problems: A survey, Oper. Res. 30, 5 (1982), pp. 907–947. doi:10.1287/opre.30.5.907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Singh, D. Sier, A.T. Ernst, O. Gavriliouk, R. Oyston, T. Giles, and P. Welgama, A mixed integer programming model for long term capacity expansion planning: A case study from the hunter valley coal chain, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220 (2012 1), pp. 210–224. ISSN 0377-2217. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221712000318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Benalcazar, J. Kamiński, and P. Saługa, The storage location problem in a coal supply chain: Background and methodological approach, Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi. 33 (1) (2017), pp. 5–14. ISSN 2299-2324. doi:10.1515/gospo-2017-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Promban and O. Kittithreerapronchai, Robust optimization for coal transportation planning, J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 12 (1) (2017), pp. 5609–5616. ISSN 1816-949X
   Google Scholar
• B.S. Pimentel, G.R. Mateus, and F.A. Almeida, Stochastic capacity planning and dynamic network design, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 145 (1) (2013), pp. 139–149. ISSN 0925-5273. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527313000376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar