First use of a novel plug-and-play percutaneous circulatory assist device for high-risk coronary angioplasty

References

• Vogel RA, Shawl F, Tommaso C, O'Neill W, Overlie P, O'Toole J, et al. Initial report of the National Registry of Elective Cardiopulmonary Bypass Supported Coronary Angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15: 23–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bergelson BA, Jacobs AK, Cupples LA, Ruocco NA, Jr, Kyller MG, Ryan TJ, et al. Prediction of risk for hemodynamic compromise during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 70: 1540–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrari M, Scholz KH, Figulla HR. PTCA with the use of cardiac assist devices: risk stratification, short- and long-term results. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996; 38: 242–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson JJ, 3rd, Cohen M, Freedman RJ, Jr, Stone GW, Miller MF, Joseph DL, et al. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1456–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M, Medina A, Pavlovic D, Romero M, Segura J, et al. Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support in critical patients needing coronary interventions with stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002; 57: 467–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Figulla HR. Circulatory support devices in clinical cardiology. Current concepts. Cardiology 1994; 84: 149–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogel RA. Cardiopulmonary bypass support of high risk coronary angioplasty patients: registry results. J Interv Cardiol. 1995; 8: 193–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee MS, Makkar RR. Percutaneous left ventricular support devices. Cardiol Clin. 2006; 24: 265–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dembitsky WP, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Adamson RM, Daily PO, Moore CH, Holman WL, et al. Emergency resuscitation using portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 55: 304–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlhorn U, Brieske M, Fischer UM, Ferrari M, Brass P, Fischer JH, et al. LIFEBRIDGE: a portable, modular, rapidly available “plug-and-play” mechanical circulatory support system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80: 1887–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, Gauducheau E, de Vincentiis C, Baudet E, et al Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:816–22; discussion 22–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlt M, Philipp A, Zimmermann M, Voelkel S, Hilker M, Hobbhahn J, et al. First experiences with a new miniaturised life support system for mobile percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Resuscitation 2008;78, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Dembitsky WP, Moore CH, Holman WL, Jaski BE, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Adamson RM, et al. Successful mechanical circulatory support for noncoronary shock. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992; 11: 129–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vranckx P, Foley DP, de Feijter PJ, Vos J, Smits P, Serruys PW. Clinical introduction of the Tandemheart, a percutaneous left ventricular assist device, for circulatory support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2003; 5: 35–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrari M, Aboulhosn W, Figulla HR. Successful high-risk coronary angioplasty in a patient with cardiogenic shock under circulatory assist with a 16F axial flow pump. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 66: 557–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kar B, Forrester M, Gemmato C, Civitello A, Loyalka P, Myers T, et al. Use of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device to support patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006; 18: 93–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrari M, Figulla HR. Circulatory assist devices in cardiology. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2005; 130: 652–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nozari A, Safar P, Stezoski SW, Wu X, Kostelnik S, Radovsky A, et al. Critical time window for intra-arrest cooling with cold saline flush in a dog model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2006; 113: 2690–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronda E, Vitali E. Left ventricle assist systems: a possible alternative to heart transplantation for heart failure patients? Patient selection, techniques and benefit. Eur J Heart Fail. 1999; 1: 319–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potapov EV, Jurmann MJ, Drews T, Pasic M, Loebe M, Weng Y, et al. Patients supported for over 4 years with left ventricular assist devices. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006; 8: 756–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liden H, Karason K, Bergh CH, Nilsson F, Koul B, Wiklund L. The feasibility of left ventricular mechanical support as a bridge to cardiac recovery. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007; 9: 525–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar