Using electronic aids to daily living after acquired brain injury: A study of the learning process and the usability

References

• Lange M L. The future of electronic aids to daily living. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2002; 56: 107–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H J, Burke D T, Dowd M M, George J. Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 147–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B A, Emslie H C, Quirk K, Evans J J. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomised control and crossover study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2001; 70: 477–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright P, Rogers N, Hall C, Wilson B, Evans J, Emslie H C, Bartram C. Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 787–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H J, Burke D T, Dowd M M, Robinson Boone K A, Park G J. Electronic memory aids for an outpatients brain injury: Follow-up findings. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 187–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg M M, Ehlhard L, Fickas L, Sutcliffe A. A pilot study exploring electronic mail in users with acquired cognitive linguistic impairments. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 609–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade T K, Troy J C. Mobile phones as a new memory aid: A preliminary investigation using case studies. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 305–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg M M, Mateer C A. A three pronged approach to memory rehabilitation. Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation, M M Sohlberg, C A Mateer. Guildford Press, New York 1989; 136–175
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assistive Technology 2000; 12: 123–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shone Stickel M, Ryan S, Rigby P J, Jutai J W. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 115–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmer J, Bakheit A M. The benefits of environmental control systems as perceived by disabled users and their cares. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 62: 394–398
   Google Scholar
• Allen B, Ekberg J. An integrated approach to Smart House technology for people with disabilities. Medical Engineering and Physics 1996; 18: 203–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith R O. Technology and occupation: contemporary viewpoints. The role of occupational therapy in developmental Technology Model. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000; 45: 339–340
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broek M D, Downes J, Johnson Z, Dayus B, Hilton N. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 455–462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur N, Glisky E, Wilson B A. External memory aids and computers in memory rehabilitation. Handbook of memory disorders2nd ed., A D Baddlely, M Kopelman, B A Wilson. John Wiley, UK 2002; 757–784
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B A. Memory rehabilitation in brain-injured people. Cognitive neurorehabilitation, D T Stuss, G Winocur, 1999; 333–346
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B A, Baddeley A, Evans J J, Shiel A J. Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1994; 4: 307–326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg C, Granqvist A, Bartfai A, Söderström M. Facile system demonstration report, Deliverable 6.4, Facile Project: Danderyds sjukhus AB. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson A, Karlsson G, Söderström M, Tham K. A training apartment with electronic aids to daily living: lived experiences of persons with brain damage. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2004; 58: 261–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B A, Cockburn J, Baddeley A. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test2nd ed. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds, SuffolkEngland 1991, IP 286EL, Swedish Version 2000, Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB
   Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Gud G, Rodhe N, Sunnerhagen K S, Sundh V, Östensson M L. The functional independence measure in sweden: experience in outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1996; 28: 51–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wechsler D. WAIS-R Manual. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Psychological Corporation, Cleveland, OH 1981
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M A, Poatajo H, Pollock N. Canadian occupational performance measure3rd ed. CAOT Publications ACE, Toronto, ON 1998
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B A. Rehabilitation without error. Psychologist 2002; 15: 240–241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B A, Evans J J. Error free learning in the rehabilitation of individuals with memory impairments. Journal of Head Trauma 1996; 11: 54–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen I, Dekker Beelen A. Validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure: a client-centred outcome measurement. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 660–667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K, Henriksson C. Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the canadian occupational performance measure. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 6: 84–89
   Google Scholar
• Scholte op Reimer W JM, Thijsen M CE, Van Kuyk-Minis M AH. Reliability and validity of the canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 402–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger M, Bobitt R A, Carter W B, Gilson B S. The Sickness impact profile: development and final version of health status measure. Medical Care 1981; 19: 787–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP): an instrument for overall health assessment; a basic evaluation. Journal for Drug therapy and Research 1988; 13: 167–169
   Google Scholar
• Ahlsiö B, Britton M, Murray V, Theorell T. Disablement and quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1984; 15: 886–890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fughl-Meyer A R, Bränholm I B, Fughl-Meyer K S. Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clinical Rehabilitation 1991; 5: 25–33
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellen N J. Nonparametric for the behavioral sciences2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Singapore 1988
   Google Scholar
• Kemp B J. Quality of life while aging with a disability. Assistive Technology 1999; 11: 158–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Strock A. Users perceptions of the impact of electronic aids to daily living through the acquisition process. Assistive Technology 2004; 16: 63–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis E A, Szymkowiak A, Gregor P, Newell A F, Hine N, Wilson B A, Evans J, Shah P. Usable technology? Challenges in designing a memory aid with current electronic devices. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 77–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg M M, Mateer C A. The use of external aids. Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach, M M Sohlberg, C A Mateer. Guildford Press, New York 2001; 194–229
   Google Scholar
• Kapur N, Glisky E, Wilson B A. Technological memory aids for people with memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 41–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A M, Cockburn J M, Wade D T. A subjective memory assessment questionnaire for use with elderly people after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 1995; 9: 238–244
   Google Scholar
• Van Straten A, den Haan R J, Limburg M, van den Bos G A. Clinical meaning of the stroke-adapted sickness impact profile-30 and the sickness impact profile-136. Stroke 2000; 31: 2610–2615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar