Outcomes measurement of a wheelchair intervention

References

• DeRuyter F. The importance of Outcome Measures for Assistive Technology Service Delivery Systems. Technol Disabil 1997; 6: 89–104
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M J. Assistive Technology Outcomes Research: Impressions of an interested newcomer. International conference on Outcome Assessment in Assistive Technology, OsloNorway, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M J. A framework for the conceptual modeling of Assistive Technology Device Outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 1243–1251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M J, Vitaliti L T. A functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. Functional assessment and Outcomes Measures for the rehabilitation professional, S S Dittman, G E Gresham. Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Smith R O. Measuring the Outcomes of Assistive Technology: Challenge and innovation. Assist Technol 1996; 8: 71–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaPlante H G, Moss A J. Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: Prevalence, payment, need, and trends. Adv Data 1992; 1–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaye H, Kang T, LaPlante H G. Disability Statistics Report: Mobility device use in the United States. US Department of Education: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Gray D. Mobility impaired individuals with secondary conditions: Health, participation and environments, in final report submitted to Office of Disability and Health. CDC, Washington, DC 2003
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn D L, Smith R O. The importance of Outcome Measure for Assistive Technology service delivery programs. Technol Disabil 2004; 6: 89–104
   Google Scholar
• Routhier F. Mobility of wheelchair users: A proposed performance assessment framework. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 19–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Implementing Outcomes Measurement in an Assistive Technology service delivery system. Computer Helping People with Special Needs: 8th International Conference, ICCHP 2002, Linz, Austria, July 15 – 20, 2002 Proceedings, G Craddock. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 2002; 2398/2002: 782
   Google Scholar
• Jans L H, Scherer M J. Assistive Technology training: Diverse audiences and multidisciplinary content. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2006; 1–2: 69–77
   Google Scholar
• Mobility Focus, Team Rehab Report. Cannon Publications, Culver City, CA June, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Kittel A, DiMarco A, Steward H. Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(1/2/3)106–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weilandt T. Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended Assistive Technology (AT). Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2006; 1(1–2)29–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenker J A. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in Assistive Technology Device Outcomes Research. Assist Technol 2005; 17(1)7–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust K L, Smith R O. Assistive Technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes: A review and analysis of instruments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84(10)780–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F. Evaluating outcomes in Assistive Technology: Do we understand the commitment?. Assist Technol 1995; 7: 3–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dharne M. Content validity of Assistive Technology Outcome Measure (ATOM), Version 2. 29th Annual Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA) conference proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Dharne M. Reliability and validity of Assistive Technology Outcome Measure (ATOM), Version 1.0 for adults with physical disability using wheelchairs. RESNA 2007 Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Smith R O. OTFACT: Multi-level performance-oriented software with an Assistive Technology Outcomes Assessment Protocol. Technol Disabil 2002; 14(3)133–139
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn D, Smith R O. Creating an Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System: Validating the components. Assist Technol Outcomes Benefits (electronic journal) 2004; 1(1)6–15
   Google Scholar
• Smith R. OTFACT: Questions and answers. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Accessed in 2007 from the website: http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/otfact/qa.html
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H, Campbell K A. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of Assistive Devices: Lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(1–3)31–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technol Disabil 2002; 14: 107–111
   Google Scholar
• Stickel M S. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living (EADLs): Evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(1–3)115–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G H, Jutai J. Hearing specific and generic measures of the psychosocial impact of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15(3)238–248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devitt R, Chau B, Jutai J. Psychosocial impact of wheelchairs in multiple sclerosis. Occupat Ther Health Care 2003; 17(3–4)63–80
   Google Scholar
• Currier D P. Elements of research in physical therapy. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1990
   Google Scholar
• Lenker J A, Paquet V L. A review of conceptual models for Assistive Technology Outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2003; 15(1)1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker J A, Paquet V L. A new conceptual model for Assistive Technology Outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2004; 16(1 Summer)1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. ‘Optimal’ participation: A reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28(19)1231–1235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim E, Lenker J A. Evaluating the clinical utility of the PIADS with computer-based Assistive Technology device user, Accessed 28 January 2006 from the website: http://www.utoronto.ca/atrc/reference/atoutcomes/1_PIADS.html
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J W. The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses. Optometry 2003; 74(5)299–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim E, Lenker J A. Evaluating the clinical utility of the PIADS with computer-based Assistive Technology device users. 1–5, Accessed 28 January 2006 from the ATRC website: http://www.utoronto.ca/atrc/reference/atoutcomes/1_PIADS.html
   Google Scholar
• Ripat J. Function and impact of electronic aids to daily living for experienced users. Technol Disabil 2006; 18(2)79–87
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J W, Gryfe P. Impacts of assistive technology on clients with ALS. RESNA, Minneapolis, MN, 1998
   Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Booth A. Characteristics of Assistive Technology service delivery models: Stakeholder perspectives and preferences. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(24)1461–1470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K. User satisfaction with mobility Assistive Devices. Scand J Occupat Ther 2004; 22: 143–150
   Google Scholar
• Rust K L, Smith R O. Assistive Technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 780–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(1/3)21–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M J, Cushman L A. Predicting satisfaction with Assistive Technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries. Psychological Rep 2000; 87: 981–987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R. IPPA, a user centered approach to assess effectiveness of AT provision. Technol Disabil 2000; 13(2)105–115
   Google Scholar
• Crane B A. Development of a consumer-driven Wheelchair Seating Discomfort Assessment Tool (WcS-DAT). Int J Rehabil Res 2004; 27(1)85–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar