References
- Quist R, Lloyd L. Principles and uses of technology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Handbook of Principles and Practices, L Lloyd, D Fuller, H Arvidson. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 1997; 107–126
- Wasson C, Arvidson H, Lloyd L. Low technology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Handbook of Principles and Practices, L Lloyd, D Fuller, H Arvidson. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 1997; 127–136
- Blackstone S. Re-thinking the basics. Augmentative Commun News. 1992; 1–12
- Allaire J, Gressard R, Blackman J, Hostler S. Children with severe speech impairments: caregiver survey of AAC use. Augmentative Alternative Commun 1991; 7: 248–255
- Murphy J, Marková I, Moodie E, Scott J, Boa S. Augmentative and alternative communication systems used by people with cerebral palsy in Scotland: demographic survey. Augmentative Alternative Commun 1995; 11: 26–36
- Ko M, McConachie H, Jolleff N. Outcome of recommendations for augmentative communication in children. Child Care Health Dev 1998; 24: 195–205
- Murphy J. Direct work with adults who use AAC: comparison of attitudes and activities of speech and language therapists and non-speech and language therapists. Augmentative Alternative Commun 1997; 13: 92–98
- Scherer M. Living in the State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with disabilities. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA 2005
- Kittel A, Di Marco A, Stewart H. Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 106–114
- Pape TL-B, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 5–20
- Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol 1993; 5: 36–45
- Scherer M. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 1–4
- Verza R, Carvalho M, Battagia M, Uccelli M. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Multiple Sclerosis 2006; 12: 88–93
- Scherer M, Jutai J W, Fuhrer M, Demers L, DeRuyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil: Assistive Technol 2007; 2: 1–8
- Johnson J, Inglebret E, Jones C, Ray J. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative Alternative Commun 2006; 22: 85–99
- Murphy J, Marková I, Collins S, Moodie E. AAC systems: obstacles to effective use. Eur J Disord Commun 1996; 31: 31–44
- Bailey R, Parette H, Stoner J, Angell M, Carroll K. Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools 2006; 37: 50–60
- Clarke M, McConachie H, Price K, Wood P. Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Int J Language Commun Disord 2001; 36: 107–115
- Balandin S, Morgan J. Adults with cerebral palsy: what's happening?. J Intellectual Dev Disabil 1997; 22: 109–124
- McCall F, Markova I, Murphy J, Moodie E, Collins S. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. Eur J Disord Commun 1997; 32: 235–256