Appropriateness of advanced upper limb prosthesis prescription for a patient with cognitive impairment: a case report

References

• Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31:236–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52:247–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:346–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFarland L, Hubbard Winkler S, Heinemann A, et al. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and service members from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:299–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:977–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Meucci M, Liberman Klinger S, et al. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:710–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Latlief G, Klinger SL, et al. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm. J Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38:456–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Adams L, Borgia M, et al. Development and evaluation of the activities measure for upper limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:488. e4–494. e4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K. The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm. J Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38:492–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, et al. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20:310–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novitski J, Steele S, Karantzoulis S, et al. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status effort scale. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27:190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak M, Howieson D, Bigler E, et al. Neuropsychological assessment. New York (NY): Oxford; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stern R, White T. NAB, neuropsychological assessment battery: administration, scoring, and interpretation manual. Lutz (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Delis D, Kaplan E, Kramer J. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• RM R. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8:271–276.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan RM. Trail Making Test: manual for administration and scoring. Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale. 4th edition (WAIS–IV). San Antonio (TX): NCS Pearson; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Smith A. Symbol digit modalities test. Torrence (CA): Western Psychological Services; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Benton A, Hamsher K, Varney N, et al. Judgment of line orientation. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard J, Benedict R, Salthouse T, et al. Normative data for equivalent, parallel forms of the Judgment of Line Orientation Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20:457–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rider B, Linden C. Comparison of standardized and non-standardized administration of the Jebsen Hand Function Test. J Hand Ther. 1988;2:121–123.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson E, Scott R. UNB Test of Prosthetics Function: a test for unilateral upper extremity amputees, ages 2-13. Fredericton: University of New Brunswick; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Burger H, Franchignoni F, Heinemann AW, et al. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Bode RK, O'Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27:191–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayan GM, Brentlinger A, Purnell D, et al. Functional assessment of bilateral wrist arthrodeses. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12:1020–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, et al. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Canada. 1995;47:258–263.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Amadio P, Bombardier C; The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond D, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burckhardt C, Anderson K. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik L, Plow M, Jette A. Development of CRIS: measure of community reintegration of injured service members. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46:469–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuppy D. The Faces Pain Scale: reliability and validity with mature adults. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley P, Jackson K, editors. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications Limited; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M, Latlief G, et al. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51:351–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowsky JS, Shimamura AP, Kritchevsky M, et al. Cognitive impairment following frontal lobe damage and its relevance to human amnesia. Behav Neurosci. 1989;103:548–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Levine B, Alexander MP, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38:388–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Bisschop SM, Alexander MP, et al. The Trail Making Test: a study in focal lesion patients. Psychol Assess. 2001;13:230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimamura AP, Jurica PJ, Mangels JA, et al. Susceptibility to memory interference effects following frontal lobe damage: findings from tests of paired-associate learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995;7:144–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill S, Swick D, Farah M, et al. Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:15855–15860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill SL, Jonides J, Marshuetz C, et al. Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002;2:109–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovitch M, Winocur G. Frontal lobes, memory, and aging. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1995;769:119–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine B, Stuss DT, Milberg WP, et al. The effects of focal and diffuse brain damage on strategy application: evidence from focal lesions, traumatic brain injury and normal aging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4:247–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander M, Stuss D, Fansabedian N. California Verbal Learning Test: performance by patients with focal frontal and non-frontal lesions. Brain. 2003;126:1493–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M, Latlief G, et al. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm. J Rehabil Res Develop. 2014;51:351–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar