How would I live with a disability? Expectations of bio-psychosocial consequences and assistive technology use

References

• WHO (World Health Organization). Disability and health. Fact sheet N°352. Geneva, CH: WHO; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). World report on disability. Geneva, CH: WHO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Lai J-S, Heller T. The impact of assistive technology and environmental interventions on function and living situation status with people who are ageing with developmental disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:93–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, et al. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federici S, Tiberio L, Scherer MJ. Ambient assistive technology for people with dementia: an answer to the epidemiologic transition. New research on assistive technologies: uses and limitations. New York, NY: Nova Publishers 2014:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN. Assistive technology in the home and community for older people: Psychological and social considerations. In: Scherer MJ, editor. Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2002. p. 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat JD, Woodgate RL. The role of assistive technology in self-perceived participation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012;35:170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA. A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1780–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA, Cornman JC, et al. Reconsidering substitution in long-term care: when does assistive technology take the place of personal care? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60:S272–S280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand CD. Availability and accessibility of the nation’s research infrastructure: the transfer of assistive technologies by federal laboratories. J Technol Transfer 2003;28:197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Day JJ, W. Woolrich G, Strong, et al. The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijcks B, De Witte L, Gelderblom G, et al. Non-use of assistive technology in The Netherlands: a non-issue? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:97–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federici S, Borsci S. The use and non-use of assistive technology in Italy: A pilot study. In: Gelderblom GJ, Soede M, Adriaens L, Miesenberger K, editors. Everyday Technology for Independence and Care: AAATE 2011. Amsterdam (Netherlands): IOS Press; 2011. p. 979–986.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer A, Longenecker Rust K, Smith RO. Factors in Assistive Technology Device Abandonment: Replacing “Abandonment” with “Discontinuance”. [Internet]. ATOMS Project Technical Report; 2006 [cited 2016 Aug 7]. Available from http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technitr-discontinuance.h/tr-discontinuance.html
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva, CH: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Batavia AI, Hammer GS. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1989;27:425–436.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8:3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12:96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JP, Usiak D, Moffat JA, et al. Consumer criteria for assistive devices: operationalizing generic criteria for specific ABLEDATA categories. Paper presented at: RESNA 96. Proceedings of the RESNA'96 annual conference; 1996 June 7–12; Salt Lake City, UT, p. 146–148.
   Google Scholar
• Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31:236–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Borsci S. Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assis Technol. 2016;11:22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravaud J-F, Madiot B, Ville I. Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:951–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone DL, Colella A. A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21:352–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Stigma; notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1963. p. 147.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker J, Major B, Steele C. Social stigma. In: Gilbert D, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, editors. The handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. Vol 2. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Rohmer O, Louvet E. Describing persons with disability: salience of disability, gender, and ethnicity. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54:76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohmer O, Louvet E. Implicit measures of the stereotype content associated with disability. Br J Soc Psychol. 2012;51:732–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier-fiagnon C, Grise M-C, Potvin D. Predisposing factors related to prosthetic use by people with a transtibial and transfemoral amputation. JPO: J Prosthet Orthot. 1998;10:99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Parette P, Scherer M. Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2004;217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubarsky MR. Sociocultural Factors Shaping Technology UsageFulfilling the Promise. Technology and Disability 1993;2:71–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornicroft G, Rose D, Kassam A, et al. Stigma: ignorance, prejudice or discrimination? Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:192–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon I, Howard L. Coaches’ views of risk, pain, and injury in sport, with special reference to gender differences. Sociol Sport J. 1994;11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderick M. Adding insult to injury: workplace injury in English professional football. Sociol Health Illn. 2006;28:76–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Clément J, Nassif R, Léger J, et al. Mise au point et contribution à la validation d'une version française brève de la Geriatric Depression Scale de Yesavage [Development and contribution to the validation of a brief French version of Yesavage's Geriatric Depression Scale]. L'encéphale. 1997;23:91–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24:709–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamonet C, Magalhães T. Système d'identification et de mesure des handicaps (SIMH): manuel pratique: une proposition d'identification quantifiée internationale des éléments constitutifs des handicaps [Identification and measurement system of disability (SIMH): Practice manual: a proposal for an international quantified identification of disability components]. Paris (France): Editions Eska; 2000. 151 p.
   Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage 1993. p. 136–162.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Balla JR, Hau K-T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques 1996;315–353.
   Google Scholar
• Meloni F, Federici S, Dennis JL. Parents’ education shapes, but does not originate, the disability representations of their children. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0128876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordeleau L-P. Un nouveau paradigme: le corps sportif [A new paradigm: the sporting body]. Philosophiques. 1985;12:33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Louveau C. Le corps sportif: un capital rentable pour tous? [The sporting body: A profitable capital for all?] Actuel Marx. 2007;41:55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Duesund L, Skårderud F. Use the body and forget the body: treating anorexia nervosa with adapted physical activity. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003;8:53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler CA. The psychology of commitment: experiments linking behavior to belief. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1971. 190 p.
   Google Scholar