376
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cross-cultural adaptation of the assistive technology device – Predisposition assessment (ATD PA) for use in Brazil (ATD PA Br)

, &
Pages 160-164 | Received 12 Feb 2016, Accepted 02 Sep 2016, Published online: 24 Nov 2016

References

  • Alves AC, Matsukura TS. Perception of students with cerebral palsy about the use of assistive technology resources in mainstream schools. Rev Bras Ed Esp. 2011;17:287–304.
  • Alves AC, Matsukura TS. The use of assistive technology resources for disabled children in regular schooling: the teachers’ perception. Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2012;20:1–12.
  • Alves ACJ, Emmel MLG, Matsukura TSM. Formation and practice of occupational therapist who uses assistive technology as a therapeutic resource. Rev De Terapia Ocup USP 2012;23:24–33. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.usp.br/rto/article/view/46909/50655.
  • Alves AC, Matsukura TS. Theoretic models for recommendation and implementation of assistive technology. Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2016. 24:591–599.
  • Alves ACJ, Matsukura TS. Review about assessments for indication of assistive technology. Rev Terapia Ocup USP. 2014;25:199–207. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.usp.br/rto/article/view/64494/88139.
  • The Institute for Matching Person & Technology. Improving the match of person and technology. Nova York: Webster; 2008.
  • Scherer MJ, Jutai J, Fuher M, et al. A framework for modeling the selection of assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2007;2:1–8.
  • Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology & disability, special issue: the assessment of assistive technology outcomes. Effects Costs. 2002;14:125–131.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemological measurement instruments. Rev Saúde Pública. 2007;14:665–673.
  • Pasquali L. Principles of elaboration of psychological scales. Rev Psiquiatria Clín. 1998;25:206–213.
  • Coster WJ, Mancini MC. Recommendations for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of instruments for occupational therapy research and practice. Rev Terapia Ocup USP. 2015;26:50–57.
  • Bernd T, Van Der Pijl D, Witte LP. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16:146–158.
  • Scherer MJ, Sax CL. Measures of assistive technology predisposition and use. In: Mpofu E, Oakland T, editors. Rehabilitation and health assessment: applying ICF guidelines. EUA: Springer Publishing Company; 2010. p. 229–254.
  • Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol. 2004;16:1–10.
  • Enders A. Modeling and measuring the framework of independence. Rehab Edu. 2001;15:333–351.
  • Carvalho KEC, Junior MBG, Sá KN. Translation and validation of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) into Portuguese. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54:260–267.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.