Assistive technology outcomes in post-secondary students with disabilities: the influence of diagnosis, gender, and class-level

References

• Cameto R, Levine P, Wagner M. Transition planning for students with disabilities. Menlo Park (CA): SRI International; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder TD, Dillow SA. Digest of Education Statistics, 2012, National Center of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. Students With Disabilities Preparing for Postsecondary Education: Know Your Rights and Responsibilities. Washington, DC; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Heiman T, Shemesh DO. Students with LD in higher education: use and contribution of assistive technology and website courses and their correlation to students' hope and well-being. J Learn Disabil. 2012;45:308–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamiseishvili K, Koch LC. First-to-second-year persistence of students with disabilities in postsecondary institutions in the united states. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2011;54:93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claiborne LB, Cornforth S, Gibson A, et al. Supporting students with impairments in higher education: social inclusion or cold comfort? Int J Inclusive Educ. 2011;15:513–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raue K, Lewis L. Students with Disabilities at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions. First Look. National Center of Education Statistics 2011-018. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Blosnich JR, Kopacz MS, McCarten J, et al. Mental health and self-directed violence among student service members/veterans in postsecondary education. J Am Coll Health. 2015;63:418–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones N, Brown R, Keys CB, et al. Beyond symptoms? Investigating predictors of sense of campus belonging among postsecondary students with psychiatric disabilities. J Community Psychol. 2015;43:594–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BA, Hensley-Maloney L. Meeting the needs of students with coexisting visual impairments and learning disabilities. Interv Sch Clin. 2015;50:226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mull C, Sitlington PL, Alper S. Postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: a synthesis of the literature. Except Child. 2001;68:97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis R, Sykes L, Unadkat D. Qualitative differences in learning disabilities across postsecondary institutions. J Learn Disabil. 2012;45:491–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callens M, Tops W, Brysbaert M. Cognitive profile of students who enter higher education with an indication of dyslexia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt CA, McGoron KD, Vannatta K, et al. Educational and occupational outcomes among young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1385–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann C, DiPrete TA. The growing female advantage in college completion: the role of family background and academic achievement. Am Sociol Rev. 2006;71:515–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer RE, Hodson R, McCloud L. Gender, debt, and dropping out of college. Gend Soc. 2013;27:30–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf LE. College students with ADHD and other hidden disabilities - outcomes and interventions. Adult Attention Deficit Disorder. 2001;931:385–395.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel RD, Jones JA, Markle L, et al. Retention and graduation of students with disabilities: facilitating student success. JPED. 2009;21:116–125.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. 4th ed. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Di Rezze B, Wright V, Curran CJ, et al. Individualized outcome measures for evaluating life skill groups for children with disabilities. Can J Occup Ther. 2008;75:282–287. 286p.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts GI, Derkach-Ferguson AF, Siever JE, et al. An examination of the effectiveness of Handwriting Without Tears® instruction: examen de l’efficacité du programme Handwriting Without Tears®. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:102–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssen I, Beelen A, Dedding C, et al. The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:888–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, et al. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:660–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems; Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Roll MC. The impact of assistive technology services in post-secondary education for students with disabilities: Intervention outcomes, use-profiles, and user-experiences. Assistive Technology. pp. 1–8; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cortiella C, Horowitz SH. The state of learning disabilities: facts, trends and emerging issues. New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. 3rd ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Eyssen I, Steultjens M, Oud T, et al. Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. JRRD. 2011;48:517–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamblet EC. Helping your students with disabilities during their college search. J Coll Admiss. 2009;205:6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Punwar AJ, Peloquin SM. Occupational therapy: principles and practice: Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Norrby E, Bellner AL. The helping encounter. Occupational therapists' perception of therapeutic relationships. Scand J Caring Sci. 1995;9:41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M. Working relationship, participation and outcome in a psychiatric day care unit based on occupational therapy. Scand J Occupat Ther. 1996;3:106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell S, Bennett K, Culleton-Quinn E. Computer use and musculoskeletal symptoms among undergraduate university students. Comput Educ. 2015;85:102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu E, Li Y, Li J, et al. Open educational resources (OER) usage and barriers: a study from Zhejiang University, China. Educ Tech Res Dev. 2015;63:957–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Seters JR, Ossevoort MA, Tramper J, et al. The influence of student characteristics on the use of adaptive e-learning material. Comput Educ. 2012;58:942–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentworth DK, Middleton JH. Technology use and academic performance. Comput Educ. 2014;78:306–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber PJ, Reiff HB, Ginsberg R. Reframing the learning disabilities experience. J Learn Disabil. 1996;29:98–101. 197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannuzza S, Klein RG, Bessler A, et al. Adult psychiatric status of hyperactive boys grown up. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:493–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitlington PL, Frank AR. Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life? Learn Disabil Quart. 1990;13:97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger K. Handbook on supported education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Boud D. Enhancing learning through self-assessment. New York: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Bryen DN. AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23:217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan ZH, Mei H. Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: perceptions and effects on students' learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. Comput Educ. 2013;69:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar