Caregivers’ experiences with the selection and use of assistive technology

References

• Agree EM, Freedman VA, Sengupta M. Factors influencing the use of mobility technology in community-based long-term care. J Aging Health. 2004;6:267–307.
   Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Caregiving & the AARP Public Policy Institute. 2015 report: caregiving in the U.S. [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.caregiving.org/caregiving2015/
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard SC, Friss Feinberg L, Choula R, et al. Valuing the invaluable: undeniable progress, but big gaps remain, 2015 update. [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.aarp.org/ppi/info-2015/valuing-the-invaluable-2015-update.html
   Google Scholar
• Vitaliano P, Zhang J, Scanlan JM. Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical Health? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:946–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinquart M, S˙rensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18:250–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assistive Technology Act of 2004, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1707–1737. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, et al. How assistive technology use by individuals with disabilities impacts their caregivers: a systematic review of the research evidence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:984–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasinghe K. Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Reinharz D, Deaudelin I, et al. Public telesurveillance service for frail elderly living at home, outcomes and cost evolution: a quasi experimental design with two follow-ups. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, et al. Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen S, Resnik L, Roy J. Promoting independence for wheelchair users: the role of home accommodations. Gerontologist. 2006;46:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch J, Downs M, Baldwin C, et al. A case study in the use of technology to reassure and support a person with dementia. Dementia. 2004;3:371–392.
   Google Scholar
• Allen SM, Foster A, Berg K. Receiving help at home: the interplay of human and technological assistance. The J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56:S374–S382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai J, et al. A conceptual framework of outcomes for caregivers of assistive technology users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88:645–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkhammar S, Nygård L. Using a timer device for the stove: experiences of older adults with memory impairment or dementia and their families. Technol Diasabil. 2008;20:179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Berndtsson I, Apperlos P, et al. Lifeworld perspectives on assistive devices: lived experiences of spouses of persons with stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2005;12:159–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rushton PW, Kairy D, Archambault P, et al. The potential impact of intelligent power wheelchair use on social participation: perspectives of users, caregivers and clinicians. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:191–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riikonen M, Mäkelä K, Perälä S. Safety and monitoring technologies for the homes of people with dementia. Gerontechnology. 2005;9:32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Southall K, Jutai J, et al. Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: a multiple stakeholder analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:294–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank A, Neophytou C, Frank J, et al. Electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): users' views of influence on family, friends and carers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:327–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Sixsmith A, Beringer R. No place like home? Surveillance technologies and the meaning of home among older adults. Can J Aging. 2016;35:103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman S, Hooker K, Stegall CD, et al. Perceptions of communication and monitoring technologies among older rural women: problem or panacea? J Hous Elderly. 2013;27:48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Mortenson WB, Fuhrer M, et al. Effect of a tailored assistive technology intervention on older adults and their family caregiver: a pragmatic study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:103–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. Effect of assistive technology interventions on users and their caregivers. Paper presented at: 45th Annual Scientific and Educational Meeting of the Canadian Association on Gerontology; 2016 Oct 20–22; Montreal, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320:50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss TM, Finlayson M. Responses to the acquisition and use of power mobility by individuals who have multiple sclerosis and their families. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60:348–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeandle S. Caring for carers: an international perspective on policy developments in the U.K. Juncture. 2016;23:57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S. The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenel V, Guay M, Jutai J, et al. Reliability and acceptability of an online decision support application for the self-selection of assistive technologies by older Canadians: a research protocol. Paper presented at: Meeting of the IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS 2016); 2016 May 13–14; Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Hurd Clarke L, Best K. Prescribers' experiences with powered mobility prescription among older adults. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67:100–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantert TW, McWilliam CL, Ward-Griffin C, et al. Working it out together: family caregivers’ perceptions of relationship-building with in-home service providers. Can J Nurs Res. 2009;41:44–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose N. The politics of life. Theor Cult and Soc. 2001;19:1–30.
   Google Scholar