Feasibility of incorporating functionally relevant virtual rehabilitation in sub-acute stroke care: perception of patients and clinicians

References

• Stroke [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World Heart Federation; 2015 [2015 Mar 21] [cited 2015 Dec 21]. Available from: http://www.world-heart-federation.org/cardiovascular-health/stroke/
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Malouin F, Bourbonnais D, et al. Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:666–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:258–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, et al. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF. Can virtual reality offer enriched environments for rehabilitation? Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11:153–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Kizony R, Feintuch U, et al. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In: Selzer ME, Cohen L, Gage FH, et al. editors. Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 182–197.
   Google Scholar
• Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. The Cochrane Library. 2015;2.
   Google Scholar
• Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, et al. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, et al. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25:29–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saposnik G, Levin MF. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 2011;42:1380–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond GI, Cohn ES. The distinctive features of a feasibility study objectives and guiding questions. OTJR. 2015;35:169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdea G, Cioi D, Martin J, et al. Motor retraining in virtual reality: a feasibility study for upper-extremity rehabilitation in individuals with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Educ. 2011;25:20.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee M, Kim Y, et al. Feasibility of an individually tailored virtual reality program for improving upper motor functions and activities of daily living in chronic stroke survivors: a case series. Eur J Integr Med. 2016;8:731–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JC, Yeh SC, Jung Y, et al. Intervention to enhance skilled arm and hand movements after stroke: a feasibility study using a new virtual reality system. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster-Amft C, Henneke A, Hartog-Keisker B, et al. Intensive virtual reality-based training for upper limb motor function in chronic stroke: a feasibility study using a single case experimental design and fMRI. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:385–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian S, Knaut LA, Beaudoin C, et al. Virtual reality environments for post-stroke arm rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2007;4:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis GN, Rosie JA. Virtual reality games for movement rehabilitation in neurological conditions: how do we meet the needs and expectations of the users? Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1880–1886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson K, Pollock A, Bugge C, et al. Commercial gaming devices for stroke upper limb rehabilitation: A systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:479–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glegg SM, Holsti L, Velikonja D, et al. Factors influencing therapists' adoption of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16:385–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322:1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993;24:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron‐Perrine B, Axelrod BN. Determining an appropriate cutting score for indication of impairment on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27:1189–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Perez C, Kaizer F, Archambault P, et al., editors. A novel approach to integrate VR exer-games for stroke rehabilitation: evaluating the implementation of a ‘games room’. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation; 2017 Jun 19–21; Montreal (QC): IEEE; 2017. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kizony R, Katz N, Rand D, et al. Short feedback questionnaire (SFQ) to enhance client-centered participation in virtual environments. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006;9:687–688.
   Google Scholar
• Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Huberman M, Miles MB, editors. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publishing; 2002; p. 305–329.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadad S, Fung J, Weiss PL, et al. (2012). Rehabilitation tools along the reality continuum: from mock-up to virtual interactive shopping to a living lab. Proceedings of the International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, 2012 Sept 10–12; Laval, France: 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL. Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall: comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1710–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Kizony R, Weiss PTL. The Sony PlayStation II EyeToy: low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32:155–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lourenço CB, Azeff L, Sveistrup H, et al. Effect of environment on motivation and sense of presence in healthy subjects performing reaching tasks. In: Virtual Rehabilitation, IEEE; 2008. p. 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Burke JW, McNeill MD, Charles DK, et al. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput. 2009;25:1085–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar