Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit

References

• Khasnabis C, Mirza Z, MacLachlan M. Opening the GATE to inclusion for people with disabilities. Lancet. 2015;386:2229–2230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas R, Pantazis C, Fahmy E, et al. The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. Bristol: Bristol Institute for Public Affairs, University of Bristol; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. United Nations; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCAP. Statistical Yearbook for Asia and the Pacific, Country Profiles. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization and World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO global disability action plan 2014–2021: better health for all people with disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health (2016–2020). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Borg J, Larsson S, Östergren PO. The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disabil Soc. 2011;26:151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRPD. General comment No. 2: Accessibility. Committee on the rights of persons with disabilities. Eleventh Session. New York: CRPD; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. Sustainable Development Goals: UNDP; 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/brochure/SDGs_Booklet_Web_En.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tebbutt E, Brodmann R, Borg J, et al. Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Global Health. 2016;12:79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practice. US: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogerwerf E-J. Digital inclusion. A white paper: ENTELIS consortium; 2016. Available from: http://www.entelis.net/sites/all/files/digital_inclusion-a_white_paper_final_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Scherer M. Systems thinking for assistive technology: a commentary on the GREAT Summit. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Mji G, Chataika T, et al. Facilitating disability inclusion in poverty reduction processes: group consensus perspectives from disability stakeholders in Uganda, Malawi, Ethiopia, and Sierra Leone. Disabil Global South. 2014;1:20.
   Google Scholar
• Boot FH, Dinsmore J, Khasnabis C, et al. Intellectual disability and assistive technology: opening the GATE wider. Front Public Health. 2017;5:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owuor J, Larkan F, MacLachlan M. Leaving no-one behind: using assistive technology to enhance community living for people with intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:426–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowran RJ, McKay EA, O'Regan B. Sustainable solutions for wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision: presenting a cosmopolitan narrative with rich pictures. Technol Disabil. 2014;26:137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Huss T, MacLachlan M. Equity and inclusion in policy processes (EquIPP): a framework to support equity & inclusion in the process of policy development, implementation and evaluation. Dublin: Global Health Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Speer J. Participatory Governance Reform: a good strategy for increasing government responsiveness and improving public services? World Dev. 2012;40:2379–2398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slutsky J, Tumilty E, Max C, et al. Patterns of public participation: opportunity structures and mobilization from a cross-national perspective. J Health Org and Mgt. 2016;30:751–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund T. The Norwegian Model of Assistive Technology Provision. Presentation at the Global Research, Innovation and Education on Assistive Technology (GREAT) Summit; August; Geneva, Switzerland 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Cooperation on Disability Issues. Provision of assistive technology in the Nordic countries. Vällingby, Sweden: Nordic Cooperation on Disability Issues (NSH); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service. Assistive Technology in Norway – a part of a larger system: Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service 2016. Available from: https://www.nav.no/en/Home/About+NAV/Publications/_attachment/429663?_download=true&_ts =15a5f9dfd90
   Google Scholar
• Scholl M, MacLachlan M. Towards the development of a Framework for Supporting National Assistive Technology Policies. Geneva (unpublished report): WHO GATE 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Borg J, Östergren P-O. Users’ perspectives on the provision of assistive technologies in Bangladesh: awareness, providers, costs and barriers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Eide AH, Mannan H, et al. A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:705–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wazakili M, Chataika T, Mji G, et al. Social inclusion of people with disabilities in poverty reduction policies and instruments: initial impressions from Malawi and Uganda. In: Eide AH, Ingstad B, editors. Disability & poverty: a global challenge. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35:20–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Eide AH, Mannan H, et al. A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;12:705–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussey M, MacLachlan M, Mji G. Barriers to the implementation of the health and rehabilitation articles of the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in South Africa. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6:207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Larsson S, Östergren P-O, et al. User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachaje R, Dube K, MacLachlan M, et al. The African Network for evidence-to-action on disability: a role player in the realisation of the UNCRPD in Africa. Ajod. 2014;3:5.
   Google Scholar
• Mji G, Gcaza S, Swartz L, et al. An African way of networking around disability. Disabil Soc. 2011;26:365–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowran RJ, Kennan A, Marshall S, et al. Adopting a sustainable community of practice model when developing a service to support patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB): a stakeholder-centered approach. Patient. 2015;8:51–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orellano-Colón EM, Rivero-Méndez M, Lizama M, et al. Assistive technology unmet needs of independent living older Hispanics with functional limitations. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yan T, You L, et al. Functional activities and social participation after stroke in rural China: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators. Clin Rehabil. 2017;32:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro ML, Eke C, Pearlman J. The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia [journal article]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18:151–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochkin S, Rogin CM. Quantifying the obvious: the impact of hearing instruments on quality of life. Hear Rev. 2000;7:6–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes P, Cruickshanks KJ, Fischer ME, et al. Hearing-aid use and long-term health outcomes: hearing handicap, mental health, social engagement, cognitive function, physical health, and mortality. Int J Audiol. 2015;54:838–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, McGwin G, Scilley K, et al. Effect of refractive error correction on health-related quality of life and depression in older nursing home residents. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1471–1477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson DJ, Mitchell JM, Kemp BJ, et al. Effects of assistive technology on functional decline in people aging with a disability. Assistive Technol. 2009;21:208–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho HY, MacLachlan M, Clarke M, et al. Accessible home environments for people with functional limitations: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:pii E826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson-Pell M, Nicholson G, Bain D, et al. The role of wheelchair seating standards in determining clinical practices and funding policy. Assist Technol. 2005;17:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase CA, Mann K, Wasek S, et al. Systematic review of the effect of home modification and fall prevention programs on falls and the performance of community-dwelling older adults. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66:284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensi N, Bitelli C, Hoogerwerf E-J. Assistive technologies and other solutions for independence: cost or investment? Proceedings of the 11th European Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (AAATE). Maastricht, The Netherlands 2011. p. 270–277.
   Google Scholar
• Enable Ireland and the Disability Federation of Ireland. Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities and Older People: A Discussion Paper. Dublin: Enable Ireland and the Disability Federation of Ireland; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard S. Technology Care on the Cheap? 2014. Available from: http://easpd.all2all.org/en/content/building-better-services-getting-best-technology#sthash.shC487YE.dpu
   Google Scholar
• Snell T, Fernandez J-L, Forder J. Building a business case for investing in adaptive technologies in England. PSSRU Discussion Paper 2831. London: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. Eyeglasses for Global Development: Bridging the Visual Divide 2016 [cited 2017 Aug 27]. Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_2016_EYElliance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cupples L, Ching TY, Button L, et al. Language and speech outcomes of children with hearing loss and additional disabilities: identifying the variables that influence performance at five years of age. Int J Audiol. 2016;1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Zhou Z, Yi H, et al. Effect of providing free glasses on children’s educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349:g5740.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Work Without Limits. Employing people with disabilities. Massachusetts: Work Without Limits; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Parry J. The business case for 2014; accommodating employees with disabilities [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.bcbusiness.ca/the-business-case-for-accommodating-employees-with-disabilities
   Google Scholar
• Coherent Market Insights. Elderly and Disabled Assistive Devices Market to Surpass US$26.0 Billion by 2024 Seattle, 2017; Available from: https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/press-release/elderly-and-disabled-assist-devices-market-to-surpass-us-260-billion-by-2024-9
   Google Scholar
• The State Council of The People’s Republic of China. China to promote industry of rehabilitation and assistive products 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 3]. Available from: http://english.gov.cn/policies/latest_releases/2016/10/27/content_281475476-503586.htm
   Google Scholar
• McPherson B. Hearing assistive technologies in developing countries: background, achievements and challenges. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:360–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLachlan M. Access to assistive technology, systems thinking, and market shaping: a response to Durocher et al. Ethics Behav. 2018.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasser K, MacLachlan M, McVeigh J. Social inclusion and mental health of children with physical disabilities in Gaza, Palestine. Dcid. 2017;27:5–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens L. “Users First.” Symposium on Assistive Technologies for All; May; Cape Town, South Africa: International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney P. Four obstacles to evidence-based policymaking. 2014 [cited 2017 Oct 2]. Available from: https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2014/05/13/four-obstacles-to-evidence-based-policymaking-ebpm/
   Google Scholar
• Clarke D. Law, regulation and strategizing for health. In: Schmets G, Rajan D, Kadandale S, editors. Strategizing national health in the 21st century: a handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• McVeigh J, MacLachlan M, Gilmore B, et al. Promoting good policy for leadership and governance of health related rehabilitation: a realist synthesis. Global Health. 2016;12. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0182-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore B, MacLachlan M, McVeigh J, et al. A study of human resource competencies required to implement community rehabilitation in less resourced settings. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E, MacLachlan M, Mannan M. Assistive technology in State’s reports to the CRPD Committee: The need for a systematic approach to reporting, evaluation and responding. Maynooth University, Ireland: ALL (Assisting Living & Learning) Institute Working Paper; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global priority research agenda for improving access to high-quality affordable assistive technology. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar