Enabling appropriate personnel skill-mix for progressive realization of equitable access to assistive technology

References

• UN General Assembly. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Treaty Ser. [Internet]. A/RES/61/1:3. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/45f973632.html
   Google Scholar
• Tebbutt E, Brodmann R, Borg J, et al. Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Global Health. 2016;12:79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Executive Board. Resolution EB142.R6 improving access to assistive technology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Assembly. World Health Assembly Resolution WHO 58.23 on disability, including prevention, management and rehabilitation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global disability action plan 2014–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lansley PR, McCreadie C, Tinker A. Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? Age Age. 2004;33:571–576.
   Google Scholar
• Cho HY, MacLachlan M, Clarke M, et al. Accessible home environments for people with functional limitations: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garçon L, Khasnabis C, Walker L, et al. Medical and assistive health technology: meeting the needs of aging populations. Gerontologist. 2016;56:S293–S302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelmutter B, McGregor KK, Gordon KR. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2017;114:139–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Community-based rehabilitation guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Eide AH, Mannan H, et al. A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;12:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould M, Leblois A, Cesa Bianchi F, et al. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, assistive technology and information and communication technology requirements: where do we stand on implementation? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Castillo-Laborde C, Landry MD. Health-related rehabilitation services: assessing the global supply of and need for human resources. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in health systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gowran RJ, Kennan A, Marshall S, et al. Adopting a sustainable community of practice model when developing a service to support patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB): a stakeholder-centered approach. Patient. 2014;8:51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Gowran RJ, McKay EA, O’Regan B. Sustainable solutions for wheelchair and seating. Assistive technology provision: presenting a cosmopolitan narrative with rich pictures. Technol Disabil. 2014;26(2–3):137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Muller D. Foreword: global perspectives and emerging themes in assistive technology assessment. In: Federici S, Scherer MJ, editors. Assistive technology assessment handbook. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012. p. ix–xii.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich R, Mathiassen NE, Hoogerwerf EJ, et al. Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: an AAATE/EASTIN position paper. Technol Disabil. 2013;25(3):127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer S, Elsaesser L-J, Scherer M, et al. Promoting a standard for assistive technology service delivery. Technol Disabil. 2008;20(3):39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Scherer MJ, Borsci S. An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technol Disabil. 2014;26(1):27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Scherer MJ. Assistive technology assessment handbook. Rehabilitation science in practice series; 2012. p. xxii, 446 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers SL, Myaskovsky L, Burkitt KH, et al. A preliminary model of wheelchair service delivery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1030–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manduchi R, Krniawan S. Assistive technology for blindness & low vision. USA: CRC Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Cook and Hussey’s Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice technologies: principles and practice. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015. 592 pp.
   Google Scholar
• World Health O. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced-settings. Geneva: Switzerland; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gowran RJ. Building a sustainable wheelchair and seating provision community – meeting people’s primary needs now and in the future. Limerick: University of Limerick; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau-Harrison K, Rochette A, Routhier F, et al. Perceived impacts of a first wheelchair on social participation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toro ML, Eke C, Pearlman J. The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;16:26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney E, Gowran RJ. Wheelchair service provision education and training in low and lower middle income countries: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017. Epub ahead.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fulton BD, Scheffler RM, Sparkes SP, et al. Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: a review of recent evidence. Hum Resour Health. 2011;9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurn P, Dal Poz MR, Stilwell B, et al. Imbalance in the health workforce. Hum Resour Health. 2002;2:13.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Mannan H, McAuliffe E. Staff skills not staff types for community-based rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;277:1988–1989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jans LH, Scherer MJ. Assistive technology training: diverse audiences and multidisciplinary content. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:69–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ. Recognition and management of medical complexity. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batavia M, Batavia AI., Friedman R. Changing chairs: anticipating problems in prescribing wheelchairs. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:539–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasinghe KM, Lapitan JM, Ross A. Assistive technologies for ageing populations in six low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Innov. 2015;1:182–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Churchill J, Hoogerwerf E-J. Promoting Assistive Technology Competence among Care Staff in Europe. Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice – Proceedings of AAATE; 2013. p. 458–463.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogerwerf E-J, Gresswell A. Guidelines for lifelong learning in AT. In: Eizmendi G, Azkoitia J, Craddock G, editors. Challenges for assistive technology. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2007. p. 623–627.
   Google Scholar
• Health W. Priority assistive products list: improving access to assistive technology for everyone, everywhere. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer SM, Elsaesser L-J, Arthanat S. Assistive technology device classification based upon the World Health Organization’s, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:243–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eide A, Oderud T. Assistive technology in low-income countries. In: Maclachlan M, Schwarts L, editors. Disability and international development: towards inclusive global health. New York (NY): Springer Publishing Company; 2009. p. 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Busse R, Geissler A, Aaviksoo A, et al. Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? BMJ. 2013;346:f3179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopfe M, Stucki G, Marshall R, et al. Capturing patients’ needs in casemix: a systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;16:40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan H, Boostrom C, Maclachlan M, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of alternative cadres in community based rehabilitation. Hum Resour Health. 2012;10:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan M, Ford N, Schneider H. A systematic review of task-shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa. Hum Resour Health. 2010;8:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore B, McAuliffe E. Effectiveness of community health workers delivering preventive interventions for maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinyemi RO, Owolabi MO, Adebayo PB, et al. Task-shifting training improves stroke knowledge among Nigerian non-neurologist health workers. J Neurol Sci. 2015;359:112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi R, Alim M, Kengne AP, et al. Task shifting for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income countries – a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ginneken N, Tharyan P, Lewin S, et al. Non-specialist health worker interventions for mental health care in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD009149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizarondo L, Kumar S, Hyde L, et al. Allied health assistants and what they do: a systematic review of the literature. J Multidisc Healthc. 2010;3:143–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adya M, Samant D, Scherer MJ, et al. Assistive/rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models. Cogn Process. 2012;13:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannan H, Maclachlan M, McAuliffe E. The human resources challenge to community based rehabilitation: the need for a scientific, systematic and coordinated global response. DCID. 2012;23:6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore B, MacLachlan M, McVeigh J, et al. A realist synthesis of rehabilitation human resources in resource-poor areas. Hum Resour Heal. 17AD; in press.
   Google Scholar
• Munthali A, Mannan H, Maclachlan M, et al. Non-use of formal health services in Malawi: perceptions from non-users. Malawi Med J. 2015;26(4):126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide A, Mannan H, Khogali M, et al. Perceived barriers for accessing health services among individuals with disability in four African countries. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenton C, Colvin CJ, Carlsen B, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD010414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: what does it mean and does it make a difference? Can J Occup Ther. 1995;62:250–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:125–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliksen J, Göransson B, Boivie I, et al. Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav Inf Technol. 2003;22:397–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson E. What active users and designers contribute in the design process. Interact Comput. 2004;16:377–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SGS, Robinson I. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2006;19:500–515.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Holz EM, Riccio A, et al. The user-centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell S, Morse S. Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: a case study relating to a “Blue Plan” project in Malta. Sust Dev. 2004;12:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus TS, Landry MD, Dussault G, et al. Human resources for health (and rehabilitation): six rehab-workforce challenges for the century. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Accreditation Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Education (RESNA-CAAHEP). Standards and guidelines for the accreditation of educational programs in assistive technology [Internet]; 2016. Available from: http://www.caahep.org/CAAHEP/media/CAAHEP-Documents/AssistiveTechnologyStandards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gresswell A, Hoogerwerf EJ, editors. Guidelines for lifelong learning in assistive technology. Bologna, Italy: KPT Consortium; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• World Health O. Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetics and orthotics services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
   Google Scholar