Assistive technology applications for students with reading difficulties: special education teachers’ experiences and perceptions

References

• Svensson I, Nordström T, Lindeblad E, et al. Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities. Submitted to journal
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen JK. Avoiding the devastating downward spiral: The evidence that early intervention prevents reading failure. American Educ. 2004;28:6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs D, Fuchs LS, Compton DL. Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Except Child. 2012;78:263–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bast J, Reitsma P. Mathew effects in reading: A comparison of latent growth curve models and simplex models with structured means. Multivari Behav Res. 1997;32:135–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis DJ, Shaywitz SE, Stuebing KK, et al. Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. J Educ Psychol. 1996;88:3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton C. (2009). Intervention for Dyslexia. Retrieved from http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/files/SingletonReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Marder C, Blackorby J, et al. The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS-2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fälth L, Gustafson S, Tjus T, et al. Computer–assisted interventions targeting reading skills of children with reading disabilities–A longitudinal study. Dyslexia. 2013;19(1):37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen JK. The Response to Intervention Instructional Model: Some outcomes from a large‐scale implementation in reading first schools. Child Develop Perspect. 2009;3:38–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen JK, Alexander AW, Wagner RK, et al. Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. J Learn Disabil. 2001;34:33–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba S, Fuchs D. Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention. Remed Special Educ. 2002;23:300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel L. (2013). Understanding dyslexia and other learning disabilities. Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn DL. Technology-enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda. Read Res Quart. 2007;42:146–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenna MC, Walpole S. Assistive technology in the reading clinic: Its emerging potential. Read Res Quart. 2007;42:140–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edyburn, D. L. (Ed.). Efficacy of Assistive Technology Interventions (Vol. 1). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing: 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Reid G, Strnadová I, Cumming T. Expanding horizons for students with dyslexia in the 21st century: Universal design and mobile technology. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2013;13:175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Winters DC, Cheesman EA. Mobile instructional and assistive technology for literacy. Perspect Lang Literacy. 2013;39:42.
   Google Scholar
• Bell S, McLean B. Good practice in training specialist teachers and assessors of people with dyslexia. In Peer, L., & Reid, G. editors. Special Educational Needs: a guide for inclusive practice. London: SAGE. 2016: p. 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor P. (2009). Text-to-speech synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 13066-1:2011 Information technology — Interoperability with assistive technology (AT). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO/IEC: 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning disability and health-ICF, Geneva, WHO: 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Connecting to learn: Educational and assistive technology for people with disabilities. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association: 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wise BW, Ring J, Olson RK. Individual differences in gains from computer- assisted remedial reading. J Experiment Child Psychol. 2000;77:197–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melhuish M, Falloon G, Melhuish K. Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Comput New Zealand Schools Learning Leading Technol. 2010;22:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering, SBU [Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment]. . Dyslexi hos barn och ungdomar: tester och insatser; en systematisk översikt. No. 225/2014. Mölnycke: Elanders Sverige AB: 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Perelmutter B, McGregor KK, Gordon KR. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2017;114:139–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong CE, Lawrence SA, Mongillo G, et al. Using iPads to support K-12 struggling readers. A case study of iPad implementation in a university reading clinic. In H. An, S. Alon, & A. Fuentes editors. Tablets in K-12 Education: Integrated Experiences and Implications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 2015. p. 296–309.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeblad E, Nilsson S, Gustafson S, et al. Assistive technology as reading interventions for children with reading impairments with a one-year follow-up. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(7):713–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Scientific research in education. Washington: National Academies Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Odom SL, Brantlinger E, Gersten R, et al. Research in special education: scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Except Child. 2005;71:137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd KK, Smith Canter LL, Jeffs T, et al. Assistive technology and emergent literacy for preschoolers: a literature review. Assist Technol Outcomes Benefits. 2008;5:92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Saksida A, Iannuzzi S, Bogliotti C, et al. Phonological skills, visual attention span, and visual stress in developmental dyslexia. Develop Psychol. 2016;52:1503–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster SL, Mash EJ. Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research: issues and procedures. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:308–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edyburn DL. Response to intervention (RTI): Is there a role for assistive technology?; 2009. http://harvard2009group5.wikispaces.com/file/view/EdyburnHandout.pdf
   Google Scholar