How college students diagnosed with anxiety disorders and/or depression use everyday technology

References

• [1] Focus: The chronicle of higher education. Mental-health issues in student; 2016. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.chronicle.com/items/biz/pdf/ChronFocus_MentalHealthv5_i.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [2] Gruttadaro D, Crudo D. College students speak: a survey report on mental health. NAMI; 2012. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.nami.org/collegesurvey
   Google Scholar
• [3] American College Health Association. National college health assessment II: reference group executive summary fall 2016. Hanover (MD): American College Health Association; 2017. Available from: http://www.acha-ncha.org/docs/NCHAII_FALL_2016_REFERENCE_GROUP_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [4] Reed GM, Spaulding WD, Bufka L. The relevance of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to mental disorders and their treatment. Eur J Disabil Res. 2009;3:340–359.
   Google Scholar
• [5] Bonder BR. Psychopathology and function. 5th ed. Thorofare (NJ): Slack, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• [6] American Psychological Association. Stress in America: coping with change. Part 1. Stress in America™ Survey; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• [7] Medalia A, Revheim N. Dealing with cognitive dysfunction associated with psychiatric disabilities: a handbook for families and friends of individuals with psychiatric disorders. Forthcoming. Available from: https://www.omh.ny.gov/omhweb/cogdys_manual/CogDysHndbk.htm
   Google Scholar
• [8] World Health Organization. ICF Browser; 2001b. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/
   Google Scholar
• [9] World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001a.
   Google Scholar
• [10] National Institute of Mental Health. Anxiety disorders; 2016a. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/anxiety-disorders/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• [11] Malinowsky C, Almkvist O, Nygård L, et al. Individual variability and environmental characteristics influence older adults’ abilities to manage everyday technology. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24:484–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [12] Pew Center for Research. Mobile fact sheet; 2017a. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/
   Google Scholar
• [13] Pew Center for Research. Social media fact sheet; 2017b. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
   Google Scholar
• [14] Pew Center for Research. Internet/broadband fact sheet; 2017c. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/.
   Google Scholar
• [15] Gardner H, Davis K. The App Generation: how today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy and imagination in a digital world. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• [16] Twenge JM, Martin GN, Campbell WK. Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion. 2018. [Epub ahead of print]; doi: 10.1037/emo0000403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [17] Maras D, Flament M, Murray M, et al. Screen time is associated with depression and anxiety in Canadian youth. Prev Med. 2015;73:133–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [18] World Health Organization. Global cooperation on assistive technology; 2017. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/phi_gate/en/
   Google Scholar
• [19] Fulford H, Mcswiggan L, Kroll T, et al. Exploring the use of information and communication technology by people with mood disorder: a systematic review and metasynthesis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;3:E30.
   Google Scholar
• [20] Gentry T, Kriner R, Sima A, et al. Reducing the need for personal supports among workers with autism using an iPod touch as an assistive technology: delayed randomized control trial. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:669–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [21] Stock S, Davies D, Wehmeyer M, et al. Emerging new practices in technology to support independent community access for people with intellectual and cognitive disabilities. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28:261–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [22] Davies DK, Stock SE, Holloway S, et al. Evaluating a GPS-based transportation device to support independent bus travel by people with intellectual disability. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010;48:454–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [23] Singh G, Manjunatha N, Rao S, et al. Use of mobile phone technology to improve follow-up at a community mental health clinic: a randomized control trial. Indian J Psychol Med. 2017;39:276–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• [24] Nolan C, Quinn S, MacCobb S. Use of text messaging in a mental health service for university students. Occup Therap Ment Health. 2011;27:103–125.
   Google Scholar
• [25] Naslund J, Aschbrenner K, Bartels S. How people with serious mental illness use smartphones, mobile apps, and social media. Psychiat Rehabil J. 2016a;39:364–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [26] Naslund J, Aschbrenner K, Bartels S. Wearable devices and smartphones for activity tracking among people with serious mental illness. Ment Health Phys Activity. 2016b;10:10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [27] Scherer M. Technology adoption, acceptance, satisfaction and benefit: integrating various assistive technology outcomes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:1–2. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1253939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [28] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The promise of assistive technology to enhance activity and work participation. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• [29] Adolfsson P, Lindstedt H, Pettersson I, et al. Perception of the influence of environmental factors in the use of electronic planning devices in adults with cognitive disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;11:1–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [30] Johnston P, Currie L, Drynan D, et al. Getting it right: how collaborative relationships between people with disabilities and professionals can lead to the acquisition of needed assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:421–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• [31] Martin JK, Martin LG, Stumbo NJ, et al. The impact of consumer involvement on satisfaction with and use of assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:225–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• [32] Ostrow L, Manderscheid R, Mojtabai R. Stigma and difficulty accessing medical care in a sample of adults with serious mental illness. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014;25:1956–1965. doi:10.1353/hpu.2014.0185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [33] Bosci S, Kurosu M, Frederici S, et al. Computer systems experiences of users with and without disabilities: an evaluation guide for professionals. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• [34] Lupton E. Beautiful users: designing for people. New York (NY): Princeton Architectural Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• [35] Federici S, Scherer MJ. editors. Assistive technology assessment handbook. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• [36] Gitlow L, Abdelaal FA, Etienne A, et al. Exploring the current usage and preferences for everyday technology among people with serious mental illnesses. OccupTher Ment Health. 2017;33:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [37] Deveau M. Exploration of college students with diagnosed mental disorder’s use of everyday technology [master’s thesis]. New York (NY): Ithaca College; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• [38] National Institute of Mental Health. Depression; 2016b. [cited 2018 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/depression/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• [39] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• [40] Casterlé BD, Gastmans C, Bryon E, et al. QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:360–371. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [41] Onocko-Campos RT, Díaz ARG, Dahl CM, et al. Methodological challenges in the use of focus groups with people with severe mental illness. Cad Saúde Pública. 2017;33:e00187316. Epub July 13, 2017.https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00187316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [42] Redmond R, Curtis E. Focus groups: principles and process. Nurse Researcher. 2009;16:57–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• [43] DePoy E, Gitlin L. Introduction to research: understanding and applying multiple strategies. 5th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier/Mosby; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• [44] Dillaway H, Lysack C, Luborsky M. Qualitative approaches to interpreting and reporting data. In: Taylor RR, editor. Keilhofner’s scholarship in occupational therapy: methods for inquiry for enhancing practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Publishers; 2017. p. 228–243.
   Google Scholar
• [45] Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon. 2001;9:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• [46] Horwath J, Williamson C. The kids are alright – or, are they? The millennial generation’s technology use and intelligence – an assessment of the literature. Partnership. 2009;4:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• [47] Adolfsson P, Lindstedt H, Janeslätt G. How people with cognitive disabilities experience electronic planning devices. Neuro Rehabil. 2015;37:379–392.
   Google Scholar
• [48] American College Health Association. Spring 2012 reference group executive summary. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• [49] Mclean CP, Anderson ER. Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:496–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [50] Twenge J. Does online social media lead to social connection or social disconnection? J College Character. 2013;14:11–20.
   Google Scholar