Participatory design for selection of icons to represent daily activities of living for a vision-based rehabilitation-cum-assistance system for locked-in patients

References

• Smith E, Delargy M. Locked-in syndrome. BMJ. 2005;330:406–409.
   Google Scholar
• Santosh C. Locked-in syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll J, Chatelle C, Carter O, et al. Pupil responses allow communication in locked-in syndrome patients. Curr Biol. 201323:647–648.
   Google Scholar
• Laureys S, Pellas F, Van Eeckhout P, et al. The locked-in syndrome: what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:495–511.
   Google Scholar
• Hocker S, Wijdicks EFM. Recovery from locked-in syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:832–833.
   Google Scholar
• Sureshkumar K, Murthy GVS, Munuswamy S, et al. Care for stroke, a web-based, smartphone-enabled educational intervention for management of physical disabilities following stroke: feasibility in the Indian context. BMJ Innov. 2015;1:127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lulé D, Zickler C, Häcker S, et al. Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. In: Laureys S, Schiff ND, Adrian MO, editors. Progress in brain research. Vol. 177. Netherlands: Elsevier B.V.; 2009. p. 339–351.
   Google Scholar
• Ahamed NU, Sundaraj K, Ahmad B, et al. Rehabilitation systems for physically disabled patients: a brief review of sensor-based computerised signal-monitoring systems. Biomed Res. 2013;24:370–376.
   Google Scholar
• Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, et al. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J Neuro Eng Rehabil. 2012;9:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cameirão MS, Badia SB, Oller ED, et al. The rehabilitation gaming system: a review. Studies in health technology and informatics. Advance technologies in rehabilitation. Vol. 145. The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2009. p. 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Katz S, Down TD, Cash HR, et al. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;10:20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Roper N, Logan WW, Tierney AJ. Model of nursing: explanatory booklet. Dublin, Ireland: Eastern Health Board; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Yao R, Cai J. Efficient eye typing with 9-direction gaze estimation. J Multimed Tools Appl. 2018;77:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Guestrin ED, Sayenko D, et al. Typing with eye-gaze and tooth-clicks. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications; 2012 Mar 28–30; Santa Barbara (CA): ACM; 2012. p. 341–344.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Li M, Mohapatra P, et al. iType: using eye gaze to enhance typing privacy. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications; 2017 May; Atlanta (GA): IEEE; 2017. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mirametrix, S2 Eye Tracker. [Internet]. Canada: Mirametrix Inc. [cited 2014 Feb 25]. Available from: http://mirametrix.com/products/eye-tracker/
   Google Scholar
• Gazepoint Products [Internet]. New York: Gazpoint. [cited 2014 Feb 15]. Available from: http://gazept.com/products/
   Google Scholar
• Tobii Glasses 2. [Internet]. Sweden: Tobii AB. [cited 2014 May 22]. Available from: www.tobii.com/en/eye-tracking-research/global/landingpages/tobii-glasses-2/our-offering
   Google Scholar
• International Standard Organisation. ISO 3864-1: graphical symbols — safety colours and safety signs – part 1: design principles for safety signs and safety markings. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2011. p. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Allen M, McGrenere J, Purves B. The design and field evaluation of PhotoTalk: a digital image communication application for people. In: Pontelli E, editor. Proceedings of the 9th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; 2007 Oct 14–17; Phoenix (AZ): ACM Inc.; 2007. p. 187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Moffatt K, McGrenere J, Purves B, et al. The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2004 Apr 24–29; Vienna, Austria: ACM Inc.; 2004. p. 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Gatsou C, Politis A, Zevgolis D. From icons perception to mobile interaction. In: Ganzha M, Maciaszek L, Paprzycki M, editors. Proceedings of the 2011 Federated Conference on Comp. Sc. and Information System; 2011 Sep 18-21; Szczecin, Poland: IEEE; 2011. p. 705–710.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder S, Ziefle M, Effects of icon concreteness and complexity on semantic transparency: younger vs. older users. In: Miesenberger K, Klaus J, Zagler W, et al. editors. Proceedings of Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 5105; 2008 Jul 9–11; Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag; 2008. p. 90 –97.
   Google Scholar
• Kascak L, Rébola CB, Braunstein R, et al. Icon design for user interface of remote patient monitoring mobile devices. Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication; 2013 Sep 30–Oct 01; Chapel Hill (NC): ACM; 2013. p. 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lee A, Gudex C, Larsen T. Resuming everyday life after stroke and early home supported discharge. Unpublished manuscript. 2005. Centre for applied health services research and technology assessment (CAST), University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Yan R. Icon design study in computer interface. Proc Eng. 2011;15:3134–3138.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan TA, Schwartz CB. Speed of perception as a function of mode of representation. Am J Psychol. 1956;69:60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Boyd-Graber JL, Nikolova SS, et al. Speaking through pictures: images vs. icons. Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; 2009 Oct 25–28; Pittsburgh (PA): ACM; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mirsarraf MR, Khazaei M, Ahmadpanah A. Role of pictorial symbols in the web interface design. Int J Arts. 2017;7:17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mackett-Stout J, Dewar R. Evaluation of symbolic public information signs. Hum Factors. 1981;23:139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Heard E. A symbol study –1972, SAE paper No 740304. New York (NY): Society of Automotive Engineers; 1974. [cited 2016 Jul 9].
   Google Scholar
• Easterby R, Zwaga H. Information design: the design and evaluation of signs and printed material. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1984. p. 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J, Sano D. SunWeb: user interface design for sun microsystem’s internal web. J Comput Netw ISDN Syst. 1995;28:179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Howell WC, Fuchs AH. Population stereotypy in code design. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1968;3:310–339.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Patterson PE. Iconic hyperlinks on e-commerce websites. Appl Ergon. 2007;38:65–69.
   Google Scholar