An exploration of usability issues in telecare monitoring systems and possible solutions: a systematic literature review

References

• Suman MC, Prathyusha K. Wireless ECG system based on ARM LPC 2103 processor. Int J Electronics Commun Technol. 2012;3:115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsell, Simon, and David Bradley. Assistive technology and telecare: forging solutions for independent living. Policy Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini D. The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2754–2767.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson C. An economic evaluation of telehealth and telecare in England. London School Economics Polit Sci 2018. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3830/
   Google Scholar
• DeSalvo KB, Petrin C. Towards a 21st century health care system: advancing the case for telecare. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2018;7:9.
   Google Scholar
• Maresca G, et al. Moving towards novel multidisciplinary approaches for improving elderly quality of life: the emerging role of telemedicine in Sicily. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;5:1357633X17753057.
   Google Scholar
• Albahri O, et al. Systematic review of real-time remote health monitoring system in triage and priority-based sensor technology: taxonomy, open challenges, motivation and recommendations. J Med Syst. 2018;42:80.
   Google Scholar
• Haslwanter JDH, et al. Future Perspectives for Aging Well: AAL Tools, Products, Services. in International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. 2018. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paul LR, et al. Web-based videoconferencing for rural palliative care consultation with elderly patients at home. Support Care Cancer. 2019;1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gokalp H, de Folter J, Verma V, et al. Integrated telehealth and telecare for monitoring frail elderly with chronic disease. Telemed e-Health. 2018;24:940–957.
   Google Scholar
• Bohingamu Mudiyanselage S, et al. Personalised telehealth intervention for chronic disease management: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;1357633X18775850. https://link-springer-com.proxy.library.ju.se/journal/520/onlineFirst/page/4
   Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue J, Herbert J. Profile based sensor data acquisition in a ubiquitous medical environment. in Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2006. PerCom Workshops 2006. Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on. 2006. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan C, Roberts C, Mort M. Telecare and older people: who cares where? Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe MA, Monk AF, Doughty K. Socially dependable design: The challenge of ageing populations for HCI. Interact Comput. 2005;17:672–689.
   Google Scholar
• Curry R, Tinoco MT, Wardle D. The use of information and communication technology (ICT) to support independent living for older and disabled people. 2002. Department of Health London. http://www.rehabtool.com/forum/discussions/ictuk02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Durick J, et al. Dispelling ageing myths in technology design. In: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration. 2013. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Baharin H, Nor RM, Mühlberger R. It's the thought that counts: Content vs. Contact. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat. 2008. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kao H-Y, Wei C-W, Yu M-C, et al. Integrating a mobile health applications for self-management to enhance Telecare system. Telematics Inform. 2018;35:815–825.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley-Hague H, Boulton E, Hall A, et al. Older adults’ perceptions of technologies aimed at falls prevention, detection or monitoring: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:416–426.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista LS, Moser DK, Lee J-A, et al. Examining older adults’ perceptions of usability and acceptability of remote monitoring systems to manage chronic Heart failure. Gerontol Geriat Med. 2015;1:233372141561805.
   Google Scholar
• Cook EJ, et al. Exploring factors that impact the decision to use assistive telecare: perspectives of family care-givers of older people in the United Kingdom. Ageing Soc. 2018;38:1912–1932.
   Google Scholar
• Hallewell Haslwanter JD, Fitzpatrick G, Miesenberger K. Key factors in the engineering process for systems for aging in place contributing to low usability and success. J Enabling Technol. 2018;12:186–196.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia MAM, Martha SFR, Eduardo LD, et al. Telemonitoring system for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis: usability assessment based on a case study. PloS One. 2018;13:e0206600.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybowski W, Minkowski A, Olszewski J. Research Methods of Utility of Smartphones in Mobile Telecare. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. 2017. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor L, Capling H, Portnoy JM. Administering a telemedicine program. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2018;18:57.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert F, MacCallum D, Hillier J. Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, 2013. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. The diffusion of innovation. 5th edition. 2003, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daily A. Social Innovation and Innovation Champions: An analysis of public and private processes. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 2004. 33(2004): p. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Br Med J. 1997;315:672.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Fam Med Primary Care. 2013;2:9.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen C, McElroy LM, Abecassis MM, et al. The use of technology for urgent clinician to clinician communications: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi P, Rezvani A, Wiewiora A. The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:594–603.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeijer A, Frederiks B, Depla M, et al. The place of surveillance technology in residential care for people with intellectual disabilities: is there an ideal model of application. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57:201–215.
   Google Scholar
• CCP. CORE conference portal. 2017 [cited 2017 15 Nov]; Available from: http://portal.core.edu.au/conf-ranks/.
   Google Scholar
• JCR. Journal Citation Reports. 2017 [cited 2017 11 Nov]; Available from: https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Bowyer KW. Mentoring advice on “conferences versus journals” for CSE faculty. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lilholt PH, Jensen MH, Hejlesen OK. Heuristic evaluation of a telehealth system from the Danish TeleCare North Trial. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:319–326.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Morillo D, Crespo M, León A, et al. A novel multimodal tool for telemonitoring patients with COPD. Inform Health Soc Care. 2015;40:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Morak J, Kumpusch H, Hayn D, et al. Near Field Communication-based telemonitoring with integrated ECG recordings. Appl Clin Inform. 2011;2:481–498.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters JM, de Veer AJE, van der Hoek L, et al. Factors influencing the adoption of home telecare by elderly or chronically ill people: a national survey. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21:3183–3193.
   Google Scholar
• Horton K. The use of telecare for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: implications for management. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16:173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Klack L, Ziefle M, Wilkowska W, et al. Telemedical versus conventional heart patient monitoring: a survey study with German physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:378–383.
   Google Scholar
• Sugarhood P, et al. Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mara van Osch A, et al. User preferences and usability of iVitality: optimizing an innovative online research platform for home-based health monitoring. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:857.
   Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Lee CC, Arana N, et al. Use of a telehealth system by older adults with hypertension. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20:184–191.
   Google Scholar
• Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C, et al. ‘Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it’: older rehabilitation patients' experiences of telerehabilitation. Health Expect. 2017;20:120–129.
   Google Scholar
• Aranki D, Kurillo G, Yan P, et al. Real-time tele-monitoring of patients with chronic heart-failure using a smartphone: lessons learned. IEEE Trans Affective Comput. 2016;7:206–219.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Fernandez S, De Toledo P, Del Pozo F. Usability and interoperability in wireless sensor networks for patient telemonitoring in chronic disease management. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60:3331–3339.
   Google Scholar
• Prescher S, et al. Ubiquitous ambient assisted living solution to promote safer independent living in older adults suffering from co-morbidity. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2012. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Magrabi F, Lovell NH, Celler BG. Methodology for designing telecare systems: A case study in cystic fibrosis monitoring. In: Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 2000. Proceedings. 2000 IEEE EMBS International Conference on. 2000. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cesarini D, et al. Simplifying tele-rehabilitation devices for their practical use in non-clinical environments. In: International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. 2015. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Abran A, Khelifi A, Suryn W, et al. Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Software Qual J. 2003;11:325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A. Home telemonitoring in COPD: a systematic review of methodologies and patients’ adherence. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:249–263.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce SC, Hardisty AR, Preece AD, et al. Designing and implementing telemonitoring for early detection of deterioration in chronic disease: defining the requirements. Health Inform J. 2011;17:173–190.
   Google Scholar