Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Volume 16, 2021 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
503
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device

Mariele Coluccia Occupational Therapist, Rehabilitation Center Terranuova Bracciolini, La Gruccia Hospital, Montevarchi, Italy
,
Marco Tofanib Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Neurorehabilitation, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-4513
ORCID Icon,
Devis Trioschic Clinical and Product Specialist, Sunrise Medical s.r.l., Occupational Therapy Course at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Piacenza, Italy
,
Domenico Guarinod Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute S.p.A, Imola, Italy
,
Anna Berardie “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-5303
ORCID Icon &
Giovanni Galeotof Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, ItalyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9043-5686
ORCID Icon
Pages 251-254 | Received 17 Jun 2019, Accepted 13 Sep 2019, Published online: 25 Sep 2019

References

  • Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Miller-Pogar J. Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:275–285.
  • Caligari M, Godi M, Guglielmetti S, et al. Eye tracking communication devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Impact on disability and quality of life. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Front Degener. 2013;14:546–552.
  • Lee S-H. Users’ satisfaction with assistive devices in South Korea. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:509–512.
  • Deruyter F. Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment? Assist Technol. 1995;7(1):3.
  • Smith RO. Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assist Technol. 1996;8(2):71.
  • Ganesh S, Hayter A, Kim J, et al. Wheelchair use by veterans newly prescribed a manual wheelchair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(4):434–439.
  • Mortenson WB, Miller WC. The wheelchair procurement process: perspectives of clients and prescribers. Can J Occup Ther. 2008;75(3):167.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Demers L, et al. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8(1):3.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;8(1):101.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B, et al. Item Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12(2):96.
  • Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: A cross-validation of a Canadian measure in the Netherlands. Assist technol Res Ser. 2011;27:250–258.
  • Koumpouros Y, Karavasili A, Papageorgiou E, et al. Validation of the Greek version of the device subscale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0). Assist Technol. 2016;28(3):152.
  • Carvalho Kec de G, Júnior MB, Sá KN. Tradução e validação do Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) para o idioma português do Brasil. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;5:260–267.
  • Mao HF, Chen WY, Yao G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(5):412.
  • Wessels RD, De Witte LP. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:267–272.
  • Hwang WJ, Hwang S, Chung Y. Test-retest reliability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0-Korean version for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(5):1291.
  • Galeoto G, Colucci M, Guarino D, et al. Exploring validity, reliability, and factor analysis of the quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology in an Italian population: a cross-sectional study. Occup Ther Heal Care. 2018;32:380–392. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07380577.2018.1522682
  • Strumento QUEST (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology) – versione italiana [Internet]. 2013. [cited 2018 Jan 11]. Available from: http://portale.siva.it/itIT/databases/libraries/detail/id-9
  • Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S. The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:516–526.
  • Desideri L, Stefanelli B, Bitelli C, et al. Satisfaction of users with assistive technology service delivery: An exploratory analysis of experiences of parents of children with physical and multiple disabilities. Dev Neurorehabil. 2016;19:255–266
  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
  • Galeoto G, Mollica R, Astorino O, et al. [Informed consent in physiotherapy: proposal of a form]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2015;37(4):245–254.
  • Galeoto G, De Santis R, Marcolini A, et al. II consenso informato in Terapia Occupazionale: Proposta di una modulistica. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2016;38(2):107–115.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539.
  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory. 1994;3:248–292.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.