https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7228-5338
References
- Toro ML, Eke C, Pearlman J. The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):1.
- Borg J, Larsson S, Ostergren PO. The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disabil Soc. 2011;26(2):131–167.
- Visagie S, Mlambo T, van der Veen J, et al. Is any wheelchair better than no wheelchair? A Zimbabwean perspective. Afr J Disabil. 2016;4(1):201.
- Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;12(2):105–114.
- Van der Veen J, Tigere D, Nhunzvi C, et al. Is any wheelchair better than no wheelchair? A Zimbabwean perspective. Afr J Disabil. 2015;4(1):1–10.
- Bray N, Noyes J, Edwards RT, et al. Wheelchair interventions, services and provision for disabled children; a mixed-method systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):309.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:20–79.
- Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: An important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(7):551–558.
- Harris F. Conceptual issues in the measurement of participation among wheeled mobility device users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(3):137–148.
- Rispin K, Tutt E, Sosa-Saenz S. Reliability and discriminatory ability of the Wheelchair Components Questionnaire for users. Annual meeting of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America and the National Coalition for Assistive and Rehab Technology; 2016. Paper-ID 107. p. 1–4.
- Mills TL, Holm MB, Schmeler M. Test-retest reliability and cross validation of the functioning every day with a wheelchair instrument. Assist Technol. 2007;19(2):61–77.
- Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Smith C. The Wheelchair Skills Test, Version 2.4: validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(3):416–423.
- Rushton P, Miller W, Kirby R, et al. Measure for the assessment of confidence with manual wheelchair use (WheelCon-M) version 2.1: reliability and validity. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(1):61–67.
- Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14(3):101–105.
- Rispin K, Dittmer M, McLean J, et al. Preliminary reliability and internal consistency of the wheelchair components questionnaire for condition. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(8):852–885.
- Rispin K, Schein R, Wee J. A modification of the Functional Mobility Assessment for use with school children in Kenya. Paper Presented at the 29th Annual International Seating Symposium; 2013; Nashville, TN.
- Funk L, Thiessen D, Wright V, et al. Reliability and validity of the Lower Limb Function Questionnaire when completed by young adult orthotic and prosthetic device users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(3):262–271.
- Reips UD, Funke F. Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in internet-based research: VAS Generator. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):699–704.
- Neale J, Strang J. Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods to optimize patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Addiction. 2015;110(8):1215–1216.
- Ebel R. Must all tests be valid? American Psychologist. 1961;16(10):640–647.
- Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):661–671.
- Haynes S, Richard D, Kubany E. Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):238–247.