3,129
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Feeling controlled or being in control? Apps for self-management among older people with neurological disability

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 603-608 | Received 28 Jun 2019, Accepted 22 Oct 2019, Published online: 11 Nov 2019

References

  • Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Using stroke to explore the Life Thread Model: an alternative approach to understanding rehabilitation following an acquired disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):150–159.
  • Arntzen C, Borg T, Hamran T. Long-term recovery trajectory after stroke: an ongoing negotiation between body, participation and self. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(18):1626–1634.
  • Audulv Å, Packer T, Versnel J. Identifying gaps in knowledge: a map of the qualitative literature concerning life with a neurological condition. Chronic Ill. 2014;10(3):192–243.
  • Roberts A, Charlesworth A. Future demand for health care: a modelling study. The Lancet. 2012;380:S20.
  • Riggare S, Höglund P, Hvitfeldt Forsberg H, et al. Patients are doing it for themselves: a survey on disease-specific knowledge acquisition among people with Parkinson’s disease in Sweden. Health Informatics J. 2017;25(1):91–105.
  • Van der Eijk M, Nijhus F, Faber M, et al. Moving from physician-centred care towards patient-centered care for Parkinson’s disease patients. Parkinson Relat Disord. 2013;19(11):923–927.
  • World Health Organization [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland). [cited 2019 May 20]. Available from: www.who.com.
  • Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, et al. How should we define health?. BMJ. 2011;26:343.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy - the exercise of control. Basingstoke (UK): W. H. Freeman & Co. Ltd.; 2007.
  • Lorig K, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcome, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.
  • Dicianno BE, Parmanto B, Fairman AD, et al. Perspectives on the evolution of mobile (mHealth) technologies and application to rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):397–405.
  • World Health Organization. mHealth New horizons for health through mobile technologies. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2011.
  • The Pew Research Center [Internet]. Washington (DC): Pew Research Center; 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 18]. Available from: http://www.pewresearch.org/
  • Internetstiftelsen. [The Internet Foundation]. Svenskarna och internet [The Swedes and the internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 18]. Available from: http://svenskarnaochinternet.se/rapporter/svenskarna-och-internet-2019/
  • Whitehead L, Seaton P. The effectiveness of self-management mobile phone and tablet apps in long-term condition management: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):e97.
  • Griffin N, Kehoe M. A questionnaire study to explore the views of people with multiple sclerosis of using smartphone technology for health care purposes. Disab Rehab. 2018;40(12):1434–1442.
  • Stellefson M, Chaney B, Barry A, et al. Web 2.0 chronic disease self-management for older adults: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e35.
  • Wildevuur S, Simonse L. Information and communication technology-enabled person-centered care for the “Big five” chronic conditions: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3):e77.
  • Haase R, Schultheiss T, Kempcke R, et al. Use and acceptance of electronic communication by patients with multiple sclerosis: a multicentre questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e135.
  • Winberg C, Kylberg M, Pettersson C, et al. The use of apps for health in persons with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke - barriers and facilitators. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:638–641.
  • Krueger R, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2014.
  • Clarke V, Braun V. 2014. Thematic analysis. In: Teo T, editor. Encyclopaedia of critical psychology. New York (NY): Springer.
  • Ryan G, Bernard R. Techniques to identify themes. Field Meth. 2003;15(1):85–109.
  • Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitatvie descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405.
  • Rowe J, Kahn R. Successful aging. New York (NY): Random House; 1998.
  • Minkler M, Fadem P. “Successful aging”: a disability perspective. J Disab Policy Stud. 2002;12(4):229–235.
  • Molton I, Yorkston K. Growing older with disabilities acquired in early adulthood: a special application of the successful aging paradigm. J Gerontol: Social Sci. 2017;72(2):290–299.
  • Ekman I, et al. Personcentrering inom hälso- och sjukvård (Person-centered care within healthcare). Stockholm: Liber AB; 2014.
  • Myndigheten för vårdanalys [Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis]. För säkerhets skull- Befolkningens inställning till nytta och risker med digitala hälsouppgifter [For safety reasons- The population’s attitudes to benefits and risks with digital health Data]. Stockholm (Sweden): Myndigheten för vårdanalys; 2017. (Report no. 2017:10).
  • Rimmer JH, Marques AC. Physical activity for people with disability. The Lancet. 2012;380(9838):193–195.
  • Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health. 2013;11(3):256–270.
  • Zhang W, Radhakrishnan K. Evidence on selection, optimization, and compensation strategies to optimize aging with multiple chronic conditions: a literature review. Geriatric Nurs. 2018;39(5):534.
  • Statens medicinsk etiska råd [The Swedish National Council on Medical Ethics]. Den kvantifierbara människan. 2017. Stockholm (Sweden): Ministry of Social Affairs.
  • Green M, Mattsson T. Health, rights and the state. Scand Stud in Law. 2017;62:177–197.
  • The Health and Medical Services Act (SFS 2017:30). 2017. 30. Chapter 3; Sec 1.