Design and usability evaluation of COOK, an assistive technology for meal preparation for persons with severe TBI

References

• Billette JM, Janz T. Injuries in Canada: insights from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Health at a Glance, June 2011. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 82-624-X. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:987–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majdan M, Plancikova D, Brazinova A, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2016;1:e76–e83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Neurological disorders: public health challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider EB, Sur S, Raymont V, et al. Functional recovery after moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a role for cognitive reserve? Neurology. 2014;82:1636–1642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AIR, Marmarou A, Murray GD, et al. Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT Study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:232–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrochers V. Évaluation neuropsychologique et comportementale des plans d’actions chez des individus ayant subi un traumatisme craniocérébral severe [Mémoire]. Trois-Rivières: Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont C. L’identification des facteurs qui vont favoriser la participation sociale des adultes présentant des séquelles de Traumatisme cranio-cérébral [Thèse de doctorat]. Québec: Université Laval; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Said PZ, Ghosh A, Pal R, et al. Impact of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functions. Arch Ment Health. 2018;19:97.
   Google Scholar
• Vallée M. Prise en charge comportementale de deux patients traumatisés crâniens atteints d’un syndrome dysexécutif: étude d’un cas. Nancy (France): UHP-Université Henri Poincaré; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins E, Cicerone K, Dams-O’Connor K, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation manual; translating evidence-based recommendations into practice. Reston (VA): ACRM; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Beni C, Billieux J, et al. How impulsivity relates to compulsive buying and the burden perceived by caregivers after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Psychopathology. 2011;44:158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vas AK, Spence J, Chapman SB. Abstracting meaning from complex information (gist reasoning) in adult traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37:152–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duclos C, Beauregard MP, Bottari C, et al. The impact of poor sleep on cognition and activities of daily living after traumatic brain injury: a review. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62:2–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juengst S, Skidmore E, Arenth PM, et al. Unique contribution of fatigue to disability in community-dwelling adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:74–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville CM, et al. The IADL Profile: development, content validity, intra-and interrater agreement. Can J Occup Ther. 2010b;77:90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher N, Lanctôt C. Pour un milieu de vie stimulant et une participation sociale accrue des personnes ayant un traumatisme cranio-cérébral. Un portrait quantitatif et qualitatif de formules d’hébergement et de soutien des personnes ayant un traumatisme cranio-cérébral au Québec. Rapport de recherche réalisé pour le Regroupement des Associations de Personnes Traumatisées Cranio-Cérébrales du Québec; 2006. p. 144.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuc É, Gagnon‐Roy M, Couture M, et al. Perceived needs and difficulties in meal preparation of people living with traumatic brain injury in a chronic phase: supporting long‐term services and interventions. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway E, Winkler DF, Sloan S, et al. Models of supported accommodation for people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Australia: Institute of Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux S, Bier N, Pigot H, et al. Cognitive assistance to meal preparation: design, implementation, and assessment in a living lab. 2015 AAAI Spring Symposium Series. 2015 [Cited 2019 Nov 27].
   Google Scholar
• Pigot H, Giroux S. Living labs for designing assistive technologies. Proceedings of 2015 17th International Conference on E-Health Networking, Application & Services (HealthCom); 2015 Oct 14–17; Boston, MA; 2015. p. 170–176.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairment. New York: Springer Publishing Co; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nam JH, Kim H. How assistive devices affect activities of daily living and cognitive functions of people with brain injury: a meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:305–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Joode E, Van Heugten C, Verhey F, et al. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:701–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Joode EA, van Boxtel M, Verhey F, et al. Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1257–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Pigot H, Couture M, et al. Identifying participation needs of people with acquired brain injury in the development of a collective community smart home. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:636–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato A, Coronato A, Paragliola G. Towards a coaching system for daily living activities: the use of kitchen objects and devices for cognitive impaired people. In: Xhafa F, Barolli L, Amato F, editors. Advances on P2P, parallel, grid, cloud and internet computing. 3PGCIC 2016. Vol. 1, Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies. Cham: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Beetz M, Stulp F, Radig B, et al. The Assistive Kitchen – a demonstration scenario for cognitive technical systems. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2008; 2008 Aug 1–3; Munich, Germany. 2008. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Blasco R, Marco Á, Casas R, et al. A smart kitchen for ambient assisted living. Sensors. 2014;14:1629–1653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan H. Development and evaluation of a smart cueing kitchen for individuals with cognitive impairments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:e1–e2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakauchi Y, Suzuki T, Tokumasu A, et al. Cooking procedure recognition and support system by intelligent environments. Proceedings of 2009 IEEE Workshop on Robotic Intelligence in Informationally Structured Space, RiiSS 2009; 2009 Mar 30–Apr 2; Nashville, TN; 2009. p. 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauchet J, Giroux S, Pigot H, et al. Pervasive assistance in smart homes for people with intellectual disabilities: a case study on meal preparation. Int J Assist Robot Mechatronics. 2008;9:53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bauchet J, Pigot H, Giroux S, et al. Designing judicious interactions for cognitive assistance: the acts of assistance approach. Assets ’09: Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; 2009 Oct 26–28; Pittsburgh, PA. New York: ACM Press; 2009. p. 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold A, Lourie A, Petras H, et al. The use of assistive technology for cognition to support the performance of daily activities for individuals with cognitive disabilities due to traumatic brain injury: The current state of the research. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37:359–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brangier E, Barcenilla J. Concevoir un produit facile à utiliser. Paris: Éditions d’Organisation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• LoPresti EF, Simpson RC, Kirsch N, et al. Distributed cognitive aid with scheduling and interactive task guidance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:505–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole E. Patient-centered design of cognitive assistive technology for traumatic brain injury telerehabilitation. Synthesis lectures on assistive, rehabilitative, and health-preserving technologies. Vol. 2. Morgan and Claypool Publishers; 2013. [cited 2019 Dec 2]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2200/S00478ED1V01Y201302ARH003
   Google Scholar
• Groussard PY, Pigot H, Giroux S. From conception to evaluation of mobile services for people with head injury: a participatory design perspective. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28:667–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paccoud B, Pache D, Pigot H, et al. Report on the impact of a user-centered approach and usability studies for designing mobile and context-aware cognitive orthosis. In Okadome T, Yamazaki T, Mokhtari M, editors. Pervasive computing for quality of life enhancement. ICOST 2007. Vol. 4541, Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• De Vito Dabbs A, Myers BA, Mc Curry KR, et al. User-centered design and interactive health technologies for patients. Comput Inform Nurs. 2009;27:175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinard S, Bottari C, Morellec L, et al. Maximizing safety during meal preparation in persons with TBI. 29; 2016a. Banff (AB): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapist (CAOT).
   Google Scholar
• Gould J, Lewis C. Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun ACM. 1985;28:300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivares M, Giroux S, De Loor P, et al. An ontology model for a context-aware preventive assistance system: reducing exposition of individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury to dangerous situations during meal preparation. Proceedings of the 2nd IET International Conference on Technologies for Active and Assisted Living (TechAAL 2016); 2016 Oct 24–25; London, UK. 2016. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville C, et al. The factorial validity and internal consistency of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile in individuals with a traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19:177–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas S. Revisiting the iterative incremental Mona Lisa. It’s a delivery thing. 2012 [cited 2019 Apr 19]. Available from: http://itsadeliverything.com/revisiting-the-iterative-incremental-mona-lisa
   Google Scholar
• McGee-Lennon M, Smeaton A, Brewster S. Designing home care reminder systems: lessons learned through co-design with older users. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops; 2012 May 21–24; San Diego, CA; 2012. p. 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Spinsante S, Antonicelli R, Mazzanti I, et al. Technological approaches to remote monitoring of elderly people in cardiology: a usability perspective. Int J Telemed Appl. 2012;2012:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, et al. The influence of a robot’s social abilities on acceptance by elderly users. Proceedings of ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2006 Sep 6–8; Hatfield, UK; 2006. p. 521–526.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley JF. An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 1984;2:26–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu AL, Hile H, Kautz H, et al. Indoor wayfinding: developing a functional interface for individuals with cognitive impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008;3:69–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulz R, Wahl HW, Matthews JT, et al. Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2015;55:724–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Training use of compensatory memory books: a three stage behavioral approach. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989;11:871–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeault H, Gagnon L, Pigot H, et al. Impact of AP@LZ in the daily life of three persons with Alzheimer’s disease: long-term use and further exploration of its effectiveness. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28:755–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier N, Sablier J, Briand C, et al. Special issue on technology and neuropsychological rehabilitation: overview and reflections on ways to conduct future studies and support clinical practice. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28:864–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 11: usability: definitions and concepts. 2nd ed. 2018. (ISO 9241-11:2018(E)).
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, et al. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in the Netherlands. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:187–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8:3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12:96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreault AL, Bouchard J, Bouchard B, et al. Validation of a smart stove for traumatic brain injury patients in a cooking task. Proceedings of the 2016 12th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE); 2016 Sep 14–16; London, UK. 2016. p. 230–233.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, et al. Using the cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP) with adults with executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandich AD, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation in children: the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) approach. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Alliger GM, Dwight SA. A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educ and Psychol Meas. 2000;60(1):59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Dassa C, Rainville C, et al. A generalizability study of the instrumental activities of daily living profile. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010a;91:734–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke WH, Zencius AH, Wesolowski MD, et al. Improving executive function disorders in brain-injured clients. Brain Inj. 1991;5:241–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohlberg M, Mateer C. Cognitive rehabilitation: an integrative neuropsychological approach. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Crosson B, Barco PP, Velozo CA, et al. Awareness and compensation in postacute head injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1989;4:46.
   Google Scholar
• Starkhammar S, Nygård L. Using a timer device for the stove: experiences of older adults with memory impairment or dementia and their families. Technol Disabil. 2008;20:179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer M, High WM. Characteristics of Impaired awareness after traumatic brain injury Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation after Traumatic Brain Injury with Donepezil (MEMRI-TBI-D Study) View project Post-traumatic Confusional State View project. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4(4):380–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasiewicz J, Kearns WD, Craighead J, et al. Smart rehabilitation for the 21st century: the Tampa smart home for veterans with traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(8):vii–xviii.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L. Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Deruyter F. Treatment efficacy for cognitive-communication disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury in adults. Discourse following TBI View project Aphasia Treatment Dosage View project. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:S5–S17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Julien-Gauthier F, Héroux J. Stratégies de “résilience assistée” auprès des personnes qui ont des incapacités cognitives dans le cadre des services de réadaptation. Développement humain, handicap et changement social. 2011;19(1) 193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Pinard S, Bouchard K, Adelise Y, et al. Valorization of assistive technologies for cognition: lessons and practices. In: Ravulakollu K, Khan M, Abraham A, editors. Trends in Ambient Intelligent Systems. Vol. 633, Studies in computational intelligence. Cham: Springer; 2016b.
   Google Scholar