Exploring the inclusion of teaching and learning on assistive products in undergraduate curricula of health sciences faculties at three South African Universities

References

• Republic of South Africa. National development plan. Vision for 2030. Pretoria; 2011. (RP270/2011).
   Google Scholar
• Provincial government of the Western Cape. Provincial strategic plan 2014–2019. Cape Town; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015 [downloaded 2018 Apr 29]. (A/RES/70/1). Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
   Google Scholar
• Schneider M, Nkoli MI. Affirmative action and disability in South Africa. Transformation. 2011;77:90–106.
   Google Scholar
• Borg J, Larsson S, Ostergren P. The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disabil Soc. 2011;26:151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisselle AK, Grajo LC. They said: a global perspective on access to assistive technology. Open J Occup Ther. 2018. 2018;6:2.
   Google Scholar
• Tebbutt E, Brodmann R, Borg J, et al. Assistive products and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Global Health. 2016;12:79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE). 2018 [cited 2018 Apr 30]. Section [about 3 screens]. Available from: http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/phi_gate/en/
   Google Scholar
• Smith RO, Scherer M, Cooper R, et al. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2018;13:473–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 9999. Assistive products for persons with disability – classification and terminology, 6th ed. Geneva (Switzerland); 2016. Reference number ISO 9999:2016(E).
   Google Scholar
• Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard JR, Bloom DE. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. Lancet. 2015;385:658–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garçon L, Khasnabis C, Walker L, et al. Medical and assistive health technology: meeting the needs of aging populations. Gerontologist. 2016;56:S293–S302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers TD, Kirkland S, Guaraldi G, et al. Frailty in people aging with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:1170–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayosi BM, Lawn JE, Van Niekerk A, et al. Health in South Africa: changes and challenges since 2009. Lancet. 2012;380:2029–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Scherer MJ. Systems thinking for assistive technology: a commentary on the GREAT summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:492–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:454–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Department of Health. Framework and strategy for disability and rehabilitation services in South Africa 2015–2020. Pretoria: South African Government; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41:212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Eide AH, Mannan H, et al. A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:705–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Priority assistive products list. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon R, Fry R, Schroeder R. The ethics of internet research. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The Sage handbook on online research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor H, Madge C, Shaw R, et al. Internet based interviewing. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The Sage handbook on online research methods. London: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 271–289.
   Google Scholar
• Matter RA, Eide AH. Access to assistive technology in two Southern African countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawood J, Visagie S. Environmental factors influencing participation of stroke survivors in a Western Cape setting. Afr J Disabil. 2015;4:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler E, Mash R. Surviving a stroke in South Africa: outcomes of home-based care in a low-resource rural setting. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26:423–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasnabis C, Mirza Z, MacLachlan M. Opening the GATE to inclusion for people with disabilities. Lancet. 2015;386:2229–2230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler E, Visagie S. Wheelchair Service Delivery Programme. Wheelchair service delivery manual. Basic (professional) course. Basic level. 3rd ed. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler E. Wheelchair Service Delivery Programme. Wheelchair service delivery manual. Intermediate (professional) course. Intermediate level. 3rd ed. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler E. Wheelchair Service Delivery Programme. Wheelchair service delivery manual. Advanced (professional) course. Advanced level. 3rd ed. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Khasnabis C, Mines K. Wheelchair service training package: basic level. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Khasnabis C, Mines K. Wheelchair service training package: intermediate level. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001;24:S40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cloake T, Gardner A. The management of scoliosis in children with cerebral palsy: a review. J Spine Surg. 2016;2:299–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angsupaisal M, Maathuis CG, Hadders-Algra M. Adaptive seating systems in children with severe cerebral palsy across International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth version domains: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57:919–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan B, Luximon A, Al-Jumaily A, et al. Ponseti method in the management of clubfoot under 2 years of age: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bus SA, Van Deursen RW, Armstrong DG, et al. Footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:99–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarakis-Doyle E, Doyle PC. The ICF as a framework for interdisciplinary doctoral education in rehabilitation: implications for speech-language pathology. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10:83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng CN, Huang GS, Yu PJ, et al. A qualitative study of family caregiver experiences of managing incontinence in stroke survivors. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Standardisation of provision of assistive devices. A guideline for use in the public sector. Pretoria, Republic of South Africa; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. Health component. Geneva; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Joint position paper on the provision of mobility devices in less-resourced settings: a step towards implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) related to personal mobility. Geneva; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO standards for prosthetics and orthotics. Part 1. Geneva; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO standards for prosthetics and orthotics. Part 2. Geneva; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in health systems. Geneva; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk K, Dada S, Tönsing K. Influences on selection of assistive technology for young children in South Africa: perspectives from rehabilitation professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:912–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lindstrom A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: national and international responsibilities to implement the *Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Lancet. 2009;374:1863–1865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar