Motor learning in hemi-Parkinson using VR-manipulated sensory feedback

References

• Buchman AS, Goetz CG, Klawans HL. Hemiparkinsonism with hemiatrophy. Neurology. 1988;38(4):527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giladi N, Burke RE, Kostic V, et al Hemiparkinsonism-hemiatrophy syndrome: clinical and neuroradiologic features. Neurology. 1990;40(11):1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1974;7:13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu A-L, Tang P-F, Jan M-H. Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(8):1185–1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badke MB, Duncan PW. Patterns of rapid motor responses during postural adjustments when standing in healthy subjects and hemiplegic patients. Phys Ther. 1983;63(1):13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabari JS. Motor learning concepts applied to activity-based intervention with adults with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(6):523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. 3rd ed. Oxford (England): Butterworth-Heinemann; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Cifu DX, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(5 Suppl. 1):S35–S39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst E. A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke. 1990;21(7):1081–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell RW, Foley NC, Bhogal SK, et al. An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Grotta JC, Noser EA, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2004;35(11 Suppl. 1):2699–2701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation – a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36(3):237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296(17):2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoare BJ, Wasiak J, Imms C, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy in the treatment of the upper limb in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy:a Cochrane systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(8):675-685.
   Google Scholar
• Mattar AA, Gribble PL. Motor learning by observing. Neuron. 2005;46(1):153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossmy O, Mukamel R. Activity in superior parietal cortex during training by observation predicts asymmetric learning levels across hands. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(9):661–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukamel R, Ekstrom AD, Kaplan J, et al. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Curr Biol. 2010;20(8):750–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M, Cattaneo L. Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2009;5(1):24–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 7):1693–1710.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong JD, Kistemaker DA, Chin A, et al. Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning? J Neurophysiol. 2012;108(12):3313–3321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, et al. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 4):866–872.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ossmy O, Mukamel R. Neural network underlying intermanual skill transfer in humans. Cell Rep. 2016;17(11):2891–2900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darainy M, Vahdat S, Ostry DJ. Perceptual learning in sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2013;110(9):2152–2162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdat S, Darainy M, Ostry DJ. Structure of plasticity in human sensory and motor networks due to perceptual learning. J Neurosci. 2014;34(7):2451–2463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, et al. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(6):915–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg P, Schmitz C, Forssberg H, et al. Effects of passive-active movement training on upper limb motor function and cortical activation in chronic patients with stroke: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(3):117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;14(6):745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picelli A, Tamburin S, Passuello M, et al. Robot-assisted arm training in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scripture E, Smith TL, Brown EM. On the education of muscular control and power. Stud Yale Psychol Lab. 1894;2:114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Sainburg RL, Wang J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res. 2002;145(4):437–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguera JA, Russell CA, Noll DC, et al. Neural correlates associated with intermanual transfer of sensorimotor adaptation. Brain Res. 2007;1185:136–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendy AM, Spittle M, Kidgell DJ. Cross education and immobilisation: mechanisms and implications for injury rehabilitation. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(2):94–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farthing JP. Cross-education of strength depends on limb dominance: implications for theory and application. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37(4):179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan P, Krakauer JW, Gordon AM. Impaired anticipatory control of fingertip forces in patients with a pure motor or sensorimotor lacunar syndrome. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 6):1415–1425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urbin M, Harris-Love ML, Carter AR, et al. High-intensity, unilateral resistance training of a non-paretic muscle group increases active range of motion in a severely paretic upper extremity muscle group after stroke. Front Neurol. 2015;6:119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruddy KL, Carson RG. Neural pathways mediating cross education of motor function. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howatson G, Zult T, Farthing JP, et al. Mirror training to augment cross-education during resistance training: a hypothesis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann R, et al. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50(6):311–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage. 2004;23:S208–S219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate – a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B Met. 1995;57(1):289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Grillner S, Hellgren J, Menard A, et al Mechanisms for selection of basic motor programs—roles for the striatum and pallidum. Trends Neurosci. 2005;28(7):364–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan JR. Hand and brain: the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bard G, Hirschberg G. Recovery of voluntary motion in upper extremity following hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1965;46:567–572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, et al. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46(1):5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén B, Lundborg G. Training with a mirror in rehabilitation of the hand. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39(2):104–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagce HF, Saleh S, Adamovich SV, et al. Visuomotor discordance in virtual reality: effects on online motor control. 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2011; Boston, MA. p. 7262–7265.
   Google Scholar
• Sathian K, Greenspan AI, Wolf SL. Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14(1):73–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selles RW, Schreuders TA, Stam HJ. Mirror therapy in patients with causalgia (complex regional pain syndrome type II) following peripheral nerve injury: two cases. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(4):312–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartur G, Pratt H, Dickstein R, et al. Electrophysiological manifestations of mirror visual feedback during manual movement. Brain Res. 2015;1606:113–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossmy O, Mukamel R. Short term motor-skill acquisition improves with size of self-controlled virtual hands. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0168520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weghorst S. Augmented reality and Parkinson's disease. Commun ACM. 1997;40(8):47–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(8):1247–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, et al. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):898–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, et al. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2004;1(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• You SH, Jang SH, Kim Y-H, et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1166–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman N, Wilson P, Stanton D. VR and spatial awareness in disabled children. Commun ACM. 1997;40(8):76–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden M, Todorov E, Callahan J, et al. Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report. J Neurol Phys Ther. 1999;23(2):57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Robles-García V, Corral-Bergantiños Y, Espinosa N, et al. Effects of movement imitation training in Parkinson's disease: a virtual reality pilot study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;26:17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossmy O, Mukamel R. Using virtual reality to transfer motor skill knowledge from one hand to another. JoVE. 2017;127(127):e55965.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Banovic N, Zimmerman J. Mapping machine learning advances from HCI research to reveal starting places for design innovation. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York (NY): ACM; 2018. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman J, Cody F, Schady W. The influence of external timing cues upon the rhythm of voluntary movements in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(10):1078–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe TE, Lövgreen B, Cody F, et al. Auditory cues can modify the gait of persons with early-stage Parkinson's disease: a method for enhancing Parkinsonian walking performance. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(4):363–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Norman KE. Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait initiation in people with Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(1):36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JP. The basal ganglia and posture. London: Pitman Medical; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh GC, Brown SH, Rice RR, et al. Rhythmic auditory-motor facilitation of gait patterns in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62(1):22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris ME, Iansek R, Matyas TA, et al. Ability to modulate walking cadence remains intact in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(12):1532–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR, et al. Rhythmic auditory stimulation in gait training for Parkinson's disease patients. Mov Disord. 1996;11(2):193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel-Toledo S, Bentin S, Perry A, et al. Dynamics of the EEG power in the frequency and spatial domains during observation and execution of manual movements. Brain Res. 2013;1509:43–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15(1):20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-H, van Donkelaar P. Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(4):440–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof KR, Van Den Wildenberg WP, Segalowitz SJ, et al. Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain Cogn. 2004;56(2):129–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe JB, Toni I, Josephs O, et al. The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science. 2000;288(5471):1656–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadland K, Rushworth M, Passingham R, et al. Interference with performance of a response selection task that has no working memory component: an rTMS comparison of the dorsolateral prefrontal and medial frontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001;13(8):1097–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Long X, Wang L, et al. Functional connectivity of cortical motor areas in the resting state in Parkinson's disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32(9):1443–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudrexel S, Witte T, Seifried C, et al Resting state fMRI reveals increased subthalamic nucleus-motor cortex connectivity in Parkinson's disease. NeuroImage. 2011;55(4):1728–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker C, Perlmutter J, Criswell S, et al. Resting state functional connectivity of the striatum in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2012;135(12):3699–3711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helmich RC, Derikx LC, Bakker M, et al. Spatial remapping of cortico-striatal connectivity in Parkinson's disease. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20(5):1175–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak Y, Peltier S, Bohnen NI, et al. Altered resting state cortico-striatal connectivity in mild to moderate stage Parkinson's disease. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010;4:143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo C, Song W, Chen Q, et al. Reduced functional connectivity in early-stage drug-naive Parkinson's disease: a resting-state fMRI study. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(2):431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar