Measure It Super Simple (MISS) activity tracker: (re)design of a user-friendly interface and evaluation of experiences in daily life

References

• Renders C, Boots T, Visser K, et al. Smart health monitor: onderzoek naar gebruik van apps, wearables en meters. 1st ed. ’s-Hertogenbosch (The Netherlands): Multiscope; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Public Health and the Environment [Internet]. Bilthoven (The Nethwrlands): National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2017 [cited 2018 September 26]. Available from: https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/sites/default/files/hoeveel_mensen_voldoen_aan_gr_beweegrichtlijnen_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Public Health and the Environment [Internet]. Bilthoven (The Netherlands): National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2018 [cited 2019 June 03]. Available from: https://www.rivm.nl/leefstijlmonitor/bewegen
   Google Scholar
• Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel T, Brechat PH, Lepretre PM, et al. Health benefits of physical activity in older patients: a review. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(2):303–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello E, Kafchinski M, Vrazel J, et al. Motivators, barriers, and beliefs regarding physical activity in an older adult population. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2011;34(3):138–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn MP, de Hollander EL. Belemmeringen en drijfveren voor sport en bewegen bij ondervertegenwoordigde groepen. Bilthoven (The Netherlands): National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Maher C, Ryan J, Ambrosi C, et al. Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan AN, Lachman ME. Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: a review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Front Public Health. 2016;4:289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ummels D, Beekman E, Moser A, et al. Patients’ experiences with commercially available activity trackers embedded in physiotherapy treatment: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Brien T, Troutman-Jordan M, Hathaway D, et al. Acceptability of wristband activity trackers among community dwelling older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2015;36(2):S21–S25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preusse KC, Mitzner TL, Fausset CB, et al. Older adults’ acceptance of activity trackers. J Appl Gerontol. 2017;36(2):127–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer K, Giangregorio L, Schneider E, et al. Acceptance of commercially available wearable activity trackers among adults aged over 50 and with chronic illness: a mixed-methods evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(1):e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausset CB, Mitzner TL, Price CE, et al. Older adults’ use of and attitudes toward activity monitoring technologies. Proc Human Factors Ergonomics Soc. 2013;57(1):1683–1687.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rasche P, Schäfer K, Theis S, et al. Age-related usability investigation of an activity tracker. Int J Human Factors Ergon. 2016;4(3–4):187.
   Google Scholar
• Puri A, Kim B, Nguyen O, et al. User acceptance of wrist-worn activity trackers among community-dwelling older adults: mixed method study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(11):e173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maastricht Instruments [Internet]. Maastricht (The Netherlands): Maastricht Instruments BV; 2019 [cited 2019 November 01]. Available from: http://www.accelerometry.eu/mox2/
   Google Scholar
• Ummels D, Bijnens W, Aarts J, et al. The validation of a pocket worn activity tracker for step count and physical behaviour in older adults during simulated activities of daily living. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Alley S, Schoeppe S, Guertler D, et al. Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e011243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebron J, Escalante K, Coppola J, et al. Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference proceedings. Farmingdale (NY):; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg D, Kadokura EA, Bouldin ED, et al. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings. Chicago (IL): AMIA; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shih PC, Han K, Poole ES, et al. iConference proceedings. Newport Beach (CA): IDEALS; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Armağan K, Çiğdem E. Conference of Engineering Design proceedings. Milano (Italy): Politecnico di Milano, School of Design; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin C, Bock B. Desired features of smartphone applications promoting physical activity. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(10):801–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verwey R. Get moving! Self-management support using mobile technology [disseratation]. Maastricht (The Netherlands): Maastricht University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Karapanos E, Gouveia R, Hassenzahl M, et al. Wellbeing in the making: peoples’ experiences with wearable activity trackers. Psychol Well Being. 2016;6:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weegen S, Verwey R, Spreeuwenberg M, et al. The development of a mobile monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity of people with a chronic disease in primary care: a user-centered design. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013;1(2):e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project Catalyst [Internet]. Washington (DC): AARP Research; 2016 [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/home-and-family/personal-technology/2015-07/innovation-50-project-catalyst-tracker-study-AARP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco S, Barton J, O’Flynn B. A review of activity trackers for senior citizens: research perspectives, commercial landscape and the role of the insurance industry. Sensors. 2017;17(6). DOI:10.3390/s17061277
   Google Scholar
• Wang JB, Cadmus-Bertram LA, Natarajan L, et al. Wearable sensor/device (Fitbit One) and SMS text-messaging prompts to increase physical activity in overweight and obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(10):782–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlomann A. A case study on older adults’ long-term use of an activity tracker. Gerontechnology. 2017;16(2):115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz T, Huang EM, Murphy GC, et al. CHI proceedings. Vancouver (Canada): ACM; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council [Internet]. London (UK): British Design Council; 2015 [2020 June 18]. Available from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond
   Google Scholar
• Clegg D, Barker R. Case method fast-track: a RAD approach. Boston (MA): Addison-Wesley; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Maastricht Instruments [Internet]. Maastricht (The Netherlands): Maastricht Instruments BV; 2019 [2019 February 22]. Available from: https://www.accelerometry.eu/miss-activity/
   Google Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12(1):6–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compendium of physical activities [Internet]. Tempe (AZ): Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University; 2011 [cited 2020 October 26]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/Activity-Categories/home-activity.
   Google Scholar
• Health Council of the Netherlands [Internet]. Den Haag (The Netherlands): Health Council of the Netherlands; 2017 [cited 2018 January 20]. Available from: https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/sites/default/files/grpublication/beweegrichtlijnen_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pharmacy [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): The Noun Project; 2020 [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=pharmacy&i=399860.
   Google Scholar
• Help [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): The Noun Project; 2020 [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=help&i=2854287
   Google Scholar
• App [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): The Noun Project; [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=app&i=1295151
   Google Scholar
• Mobile Settings [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): The Noun Project; [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=mobile%20settings&i=1018566
   Google Scholar
• Privacy [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): The Noun Project; [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=privacy&i=2804339
   Google Scholar
• Graph [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): The Noun Project; [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=graphs&i=2243582
   Google Scholar
• Walking [Internte]. Los Angeles (CA): The Noun Project; [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=walking&i=95239
   Google Scholar
• Kujala S. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav Inform Technol. 2003;22(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abras C, Maloney-Krichmar D, Preece J. Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Public Health and the Environment [Internet]. Bilthoven (The Netherlands): National Institute for Public Health and the Environment; 2019 [cited 2019 June 21]. Available from: https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/bevolking/cijfers-context/vergrijzing#node-totaal-aantal-ouderen
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands [Internet]. Heerlen (The Netherlands): Statistics Netherland; 2016 [cited 2020 June 18]. Available from: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2016/52/75-plussers-sterkst-groeiende-groep-internetters
   Google Scholar
• Wouters M, Huygens M, Voogdt H, et al. E-health monitor: samen aan zet!. Utrecht (The Netherlands): Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research; 2019.
   Google Scholar