“Re-identifying yourself”: a qualitative study of veteran views on implantable BCI for mobility and communication in ALS

References

• Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8(2):164–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kübler A, Mushahwar VK, Hochberg LR, et al. BCI Meeting 2005-workshop on clinical issues and applications. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006;14(2):131–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soekadar SR, Birbaumer N. Brain-machine interfaces for communication in complete paralysis: ethical implications and challenges. In: Clausen J, Levy N, editors. Handbook of neuroethics. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 705–724.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteensel MJ, Pels EG, Bleichner MG, et al. Fully implanted brain-computer interface in a locked-in patient with ALS . N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2060–2066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins JE, Wren PA, Gruis KL. What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011;12(5):318–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Holz EM, Riccio A, et al. The user-centered design as novel perspective for evaluating the usability of BCI-controlled applications. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e112392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati G, Pizzimenti A, Simione L, et al. Developing brain-computer interfaces from a user-centered perspective: assessing the needs of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, caregivers, and professionals. Appl Ergon. 2015;50:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Sellers EW, Mellinger J, et al. A P300-based brain-computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(8):1909–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpaw JR, Bedlack RS, Reda DJ, et al. Independent home use of a brain-computer interface by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2018;91(3):e258–e267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan LS, Klein E, Brown T, et al. Keeping disability in mind: a case study in implantable brain-computer interface research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(2):479–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T, Thompson MC, Herron J, et al. Controlling our brains – a case study on the implications of brain-computer interface-triggered deep brain stimulation for essential tremor. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2016;3(4):165–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein E, Goering S, Gagne J, et al. Brain-computer interface-based control of closed-loop brain stimulation: attitudes and ethical considerations. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2016;3(3):140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VA Secretary Establishes ALS as a Presumptive Compensable Illness. VA.gov. Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs; 2016 [cited 2020 May 25]. Available from: https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=1583.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN). VA.gov. VA Providence Healthcare System; 2016 [cited 2020 May 25]. Available from: https://www.providence.va.gov/research/CfNN/.
   Google Scholar
• Klein E. Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identifying risks and exploring meaning. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22(5):1299–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Blain-Moraes S, Schaff R, Gruis KL, et al. Barriers to and mediators of brain-computer interface user acceptance: focus group findings. Ergonomics. 2012;55(5):516–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kageyama Y, Hirata M, Yanagisawa T, et al. Severely affected ALS patients have broad and high expectations for brain-machine interfaces. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15(7-8):513–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwin S. Foundations, frameworks, lenses: the role of theories in bioethics. Bioethics. 1999;13(3-4):198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland KL. High-tech brains: a history of technology-based analogies and models of nerve and brain function. Perspect Biol Med. 2002;45(2):212–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugman J. Brain metaphor and brain theory. In: Bechtel W, Mandik P, Mundale J, et al., editors. Philosophy and the neurosciences: a reader. Malden (MA): Blackwell; 2001. p. 162–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann B, Solbakk JH, Holm S. Teaching old dogs new tricks: the role of analogies in bioethical analysis and argumentation concerning new technologies. Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(5):397–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz-Plaschg C. The power of analogies for imagining and governing emerging technologies. Nanoethics. 2018;12(2):139–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmerman S. A technology unlike any other: BCIs and the analogies to understand its ethical implications. Penn Bioethics J. 2018;14(1):11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer F. Me, myself and my brain implant: deep brain stimulation raises questions of personal authenticity and alienation. Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):483–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis F. "I Am Who I Am": on the perceived threats to personal identity from deep brain stimulation”. Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):513–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael C, Carmichael P. BNCI systems as a potential assistive technology: ethical issues and participatory research in the BrainAble project. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(1):41–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hariz GM, Limousin P, Tisch S, et al. Patients' perceptions of life shift after deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia – a qualitative study. Mov Disord. 2011;26(11):2101–2106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiò A, Gauthier A, Calvo A, et al. Caregiver burden and patients' perception of being a burden in ALS. Neurology. 2005;64(10):1780–1782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein LH, Atkins L, Landau S, et al. Predictors of psychological distress in carers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Psychol Med. 2006;36(6):865–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke T, Galvin M, Pinto-Grau M, et al. Caregivers of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: investigating quality of life, caregiver burden, service engagement, and patient survival. J Neurol. 2017;264(5):898–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogden A, Greenfield D, Nugus P, et al. What are the roles of carers in decision-making for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis multidisciplinary care? Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:171–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo-Martín I, Ho A. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(3):202–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavroulakis T, Baird WO, Baxter SK, et al. Factors influencing decision-making in relation to timing of gastrostomy insertion in patients with motor neurone disease. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014;4(1):57–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mak JN, Wolpaw JR. Clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces: current state and future prospects. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;2:187–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCullagh P, Lightbody G, Zygierewicz J, et al. Ethical challenges associated with the development and deployment of brain computer interface technology. Neuroethics. 2014;7(2):109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar