A survey of research trends in assistive technologies using information modelling techniques

References

• McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(1):91–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Scherer MJ. Assistive technology assessment handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Limbrick L. A review of the use of touch-screen mobile devices by people with developmental disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(12):3777–3791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck EC, Flanagan SM. Exploring assistive technology and post-school outcomes for students with severe disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(8):645–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Roest HG, Wenborn J, Pastink C, et al. Assistive technology for memory support in dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD009627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O'Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18(1):1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velázquez R. Wearable assistive devices for the blind. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 331–349.
   Google Scholar
• Asghar I, Cang S, Yu H. Impact evaluation of assistive technology support for the people with dementia. Assist Technol. 2019;31(4):180–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallcook S, Nygård L, Kottorp A, et al. The use of everyday information communication technologies in the lives of older adults living with and without dementia in Sweden. Assist Technol. 2019;1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, et al. Systematic review of the literature on barriers and facilitators to use of high technology augmentative and alternative communication devices. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(2):115–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherniack EP. Not just fun and games: applications of virtual reality in the identification and rehabilitation of cognitive disorders of the elderly. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(4):283–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson Ranada Å, Lidström H. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—a systematic review. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherrer MJ. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(13):731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koumpouros Y. A systematic review on existing measures for the subjective assessment of rehabilitation and assistive robot devices. J Healthc Eng. 2016;2016:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madara Marasinghe K. Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang R, Regester A, Lauderdale S, et al. Treatment of anxiety in autism spectrum disorders using cognitive behaviour therapy: a systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(1):53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White A, Schmidt K. Systematic literature reviews. Complement Ther Med. 2005;13(1):54–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Pearl Brereton O, Budgen D, et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol. 2009;51(1):7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuna B, Mladenič D, Grobelnik M. Semi-automatic construction of topic ontologies. In: Semantics, web and mining. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Rani M, Dhar AK, Vyas OP. Semi-automatic terminology ontology learning based on topic modeling. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2017;63:108–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcinkaya M, Singh V. Patterns and trends in building information modeling (BIM) research: a latent semantic analysis. Autom Constr. 2015;59:68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehra S, Singh J, Rai H. Using latent semantic analysis to identify research trends in OpenStreetMap. Int J Geo-Inf. 2017;6(7):195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro AM, McNamara DS. The use of latent semantic analysis as a tool for the quantitative assessment of understanding and knowledge. J Educ Comput Res. 2000;22(1):1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberger J, Jezek K. Using latent semantic analysis in text summarization and summary evaluation. Proc ISIM. 2004;4:93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelopoulos N, Zhang X, Prybutok VR. Latent semantic analysis: five methodological recommendations. Eur J Inf Syst. 2012;21(1):70–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltz PW, Kintsch W, Landauer TK. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Process. 1998;25(2–3):285–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch W, Bowles AR. Metaphor comprehension: what makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor Symb. 2002;17(4):249–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu A, Jain V, Kumar S, et al. A journey from normative to behavioral operations in supply chain management: a review using latent semantic analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2015;42(2):796–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltz PW. Latent semantic analysis for text-based research. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1996;28(2):197–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ding CHQ. A probabilistic model for latent semantic indexing. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2005;56(6):597–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J. Biased reflections: principles of sampling and analysis in qualitative inquiry. Moving beyond effectiveness in evidence synthesis. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006. p. 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman R, Sanger J. The text mining handbook: advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jones KS. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J Doc. 2004;28(1):11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, et al. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1990;41(6):391–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidin TF, Yusuf B, Umran M. Singular value decomposition for dimensionality reduction in unsupervised text learning problems. ICETC 2010–2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer; 2010. p. 4–422.
   Google Scholar
• Kuandykov AA, Rakhmetulayeva SB, Baiburin YM, et al. Usage of singular value decomposition matrix for search latent semantic structures in natural language texts. 2015 54th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan, SICE; 2015. p. 286–291.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1958;23(3):187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorova E, Valacich R. Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. Mis Q. 2008;32(3):467–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, et al. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2012;9(1):1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto K, Morishita T, Kamada S, et al. Feasibility of rehabilitation using the single-joint hybrid assistive limb to facilitate early recovery following total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study. Assist Technol. 2017;29(4):197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Q, Markopoulos P, Yu B, et al. Interactive wearable systems for upper body rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):20–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adapa A, Nah FFH, Hall RH, et al. Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2018;34(5):399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Cooper RA, Pasquina PF, et al. Sensor technology for smart homes. Maturitas. 2011;69(2):131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovčič A, Rogelj A, Dolničar V. Smart but not adapted enough: heuristic evaluation of smartphone launchers with an adapted interface and assistive technologies for older adults. Comput Human Behav. 2018;79:123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Samuelsson K, Töytäri O, et al. Activity and participation, quality of life and user satisfaction outcomes of environmental control systems and smart home technology: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):189–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sultan N. Making use of cloud computing for healthcare provision: opportunities and challenges. Int J Inf Manage. 2014;34(2):177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MS, Hoda M, Muhammad G, et al. Cloud-supported framework for patients in post-stroke disability rehabilitation. Telemat Informatics. 2018;35(4):826–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham M, Mengistu Y, Do H, et al. Delivering home healthcare through a Cloud-based Smart Home Environment (CoSHE). Fut Gener Comput Syst. 2018;81:129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HJ, Song AG. Architectural design of a cloud robotic system for upper-limb rehabilitation with multimodal interaction. J Comput Sci Technol. 2017;32(2):258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KL, Bamer AM, Yorkston KM, et al. Use of cognitive aids and other assistive technology by individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seelye AM, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Das B, et al. Application of cognitive rehabilitation theory to the development of smart prompting technologies. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;5:29–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Joode E, Proot I, Slegers K, et al. The use of standard calendar software by individuals with acquired brain injury and cognitive complaints: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(5):389–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aresti-Bartolome N, Garcia-Zapirain B. Cognitive rehabilitation system for children with autism spectrum disorder using serious games: a pilot study. BME. 2015;26(s1):S811–S824.
   Google Scholar
• Athanaselis T, Bakamidis S, Dologlou I, et al. Making assistive reading tools user friendly: a new platform for Greek dyslexic students empowered by automatic speech recognition. Multimed Tools Appl. 2014;68(3):681–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattupalli S, Ebert D, Papkostas M, et al. CogniLearn: a deep learning-based interface for cognitive behavior assessment. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI; 2017. p. 577–587.
   Google Scholar
• Creed C. Assistive technology for disabled visual artists: exploring the impact of digital technologies on artistic practice. Disabil Soc. 2018;33(7):1103–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers MM, Alon G, Pai VM, et al. Wearable technologies for active living and rehabilitation: current research challenges and future opportunities. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019;6:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Appelboom G, Camacho E, Abraham ME, et al. Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring. Arch Public Health. 2014;72(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leutheuser H, Lang NR, Gradl S, et al. Textile integrated wearable technologies for sports and medical applications. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2017. p. 359–382.
   Google Scholar
• Bagot KS, Matthews SA, Mason M, et al. Current, future and potential use of mobile and wearable technologies and social media data in the ABCD study to increase understanding of contributors to child health. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam M, Hamida E. Surveying wearable human assistive technology for life and safety critical applications: standards, challenges and opportunities. Sensors (Switzerland). 2014;14(5):9153–9209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Here to help – TracPatch – wearable device for post-op total joint patients; [Internet]; 2020; [cited 2020 May 17]. Available from: https://www.tracpatch.com/here-to-help/
   Google Scholar
• Willy RW. Innovations and pitfalls in the use of wearable devices in the prevention and rehabilitation of running related injuries. Phys Ther Sport. 2018;29:26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halson SL, Peake JM, Sullivan JP. Wearable technology for athletes: information overload and pseudoscience? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016;11(6):705–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid A, Hasan O. Wearable technologies for hand joints monitoring for rehabilitation: a survey. Microelectron J. 2019;88:173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalid N, Zaidan AA, Zaidan BB, et al. Based real time remote health monitoring systems: a review on patients prioritization and related “Big Data” using body sensors information and communication technology. J Med Syst. 2018;42(2):30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Xue M, Mei Z, et al. A review of wearable sensor systems for monitoring body movements of neonates. Sensors (Switzerland). 2016;16(12):2134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebbutt E, Brodmann R, Borg J, et al. Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Global Health. 2016;12(1):79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen AL, Brandt Å, Samuelsson K, et al. Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(9):697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Au L, Jordan B, et al. The SmartCane system: an assistive device for geriatrics. BODYNETS 2008 – 3rd International ICST Conference on Body Area Networks; 2011. p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Faruqui SR, Jaeblon T. Ambulatory assistive devices in orthopaedics: uses and modifications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(1):41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost KL, Bertocci G, Salipur Z. Wheelchair securement and occupant restraint system (WTORS) practices in public transit buses. Assist Technol. 2013;25(1):16–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodine C, Scherer MJ. Technology for improving cognitive function. A workshop sponsored by the U.S. Interagency Committee on Disability Research (ICDR): reports from working groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(24):1567–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiribesheli M, Bouchachia H. A tailored smart home for dementia care. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput. 2018;9(6):1755–1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20(4):194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Federici S. Why people use and don’t use technologies: introduction to the special issue on assistive technologies for cognition/cognitive support technologies. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(3):315–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brose SW, Weber DJ, Salatin BA, et al. The role of assistive robotics in the lives of persons with disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(6):509–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson RC, LoPresti EF, Cooper RA. How many people would benefit from a smart wheelchair? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(1):53–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara DM, Smith RM. The effects of unilateral grab rail assistance on the sit-to-stand performance of older aged adults. Hum Mov Sci. 2006;25(2):257–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmannai W, Elleithy K. Sensor-based assistive devices for visually-impaired people: current status, challenges, and future directions. Sensors (Switzerland). 2017;17(3):565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maimone A, Fuchs H. Computational augmented reality eyeglasses. 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2013; 2013. p. 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nahar L, Jaafar A, Ahamed E, et al. Design of a Braille learning application for visually impaired students in Bangladesh. Assist Technol. 2015;27(3):172–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker SB, Xiang W, Atkinson I. Internet of Things for smart healthcare: technologies, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access. 2017;5:26521–26544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manogaran G, Varatharajan R, Lopez D, et al. A new architecture of Internet of Things and Big Data ecosystem for secured smart healthcare monitoring and alerting system. Fut Gener Comput Syst. 2018;82:375–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz K, Tarapiah S, Ismail SH, et al. Smart real-time healthcare monitoring and tracking system using GSM/GPS technologies. 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City, ICBDSC 2016; 2016. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Li W, Hao Y, et al. Edge cognitive computing based smart healthcare system. Fut Gener Comput Syst. 2018;86:403–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TD, Rizzo AA, Rogers S, et al. Virtual reality in paediatric rehabilitation: a review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12(4):224–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon M, Wagner SR, Pedersen CF, et al. Ambient assisted living healthcare frameworks, platforms, standards, and quality attributes. Sensors (Switzerland). 2014;14(3):4312–4341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorrink SNW, Antonietti A, Kort HSM, et al. Technology use by older adults in the Netherlands and its associations with demographics and health outcomes. Assist Technol. 2017;29(4):188–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DJ. Learning setting-generalized activity models for smart spaces. IEEE Intell Syst. 2012;99.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Tiberio L, Scherer MJ. Ambient assistive technology for people with dementia: an answer to the epidemiologic transition. In: Deborah C, Editor. New research on assistive technologies: uses and limitations. New York (NY): Nova Scientific Publishers; 2014. p. 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pool SM, Hoyle JM, Malone LA, et al. Navigation of a virtual exercise environment with Microsoft Kinect by people post-stroke or with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol. 2016;28(4):225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghoubzadeh R, Kramer M, Pitsch K, et al. Virtual agents as daily assistants for elderly or cognitively impaired people: studies on acceptance and interaction feasibility. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2013. p. 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Yu L, Lu Y, Zhu XJ. Smart hospital based on Internet of Things. J Netw. 2012;7(10):1654.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson G, Dickinson C, Brittain K, et al. The everyday use of assistive technology by people with dementia and their family carers: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbate S, Avvenuti M, Bonatesta F, et al. A smartphone-based fall detection system. Pervasive Mob Comput. 2012;8(6):883–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Asghar MZ, Jämsä T, et al. Canderoid: a mobile system to remotely monitor travelling status of the elderly with dementia. 2013 International Joint Conference on Awareness Science and Technology and Ubi-Media Computing: Can We Realize Awareness via Ubi-Media? iCAST 2013 and UMEDIA 2013; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sposaro F, Danielson J, Tyson G. IWander: an Android application for dementia patients. 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC’10; 2010. p. 3875–3878.
   Google Scholar
• Malavika L, Soundari G, Sathya G. Message conveyer device for paralysis patient. Stud Indian Place Names. 2020;40(60):2535–2543.
   Google Scholar
• Cubo J, Nieto A, Pimentel E. A cloud-based Internet of Things platform for ambient assisted living. Sensors (Switzerland). 2014;14(8):14070–14105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Zafra A, Noguera M, Benghazi K, et al. A mobile cloud-supported e-rehabilitation platform for brain-injured patients. Proceedings of the 2013 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops, PervasiveHealth 2013; 2013. p. 352–355.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Zeng Q, Zhu W, et al. Remote rehabilitation model based on BAN and cloud computing technology. 2012 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, Healthcom 2012; 2012. p. 119–123.
   Google Scholar
• Fardoun HM, Altalhi AH, Cipres AP, et al. CRehab: a cloud-based framework for the management of rehabilitation processes. Proceedings of the 2013 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops, PervasiveHealth 2013; 2013. p. 397–400.
   Google Scholar
• Aisen ML, Kerkovich D, Mast J, et al. Cerebral palsy: clinical care and neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(9):844–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S, Armstrong E, Thomson E, et al. A qualitative study adopting a user-centered approach to design and validate a brain computer interface for cognitive rehabilitation for people with brain injury. Assist Technol. 2018;30(5):233–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: the use of assistive devices at school by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2009;35(5):698–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploughman M. Exercise is brain food: the effects of physical activity on cognitive function. Dev Neurorehabil. 2008;11(3):236–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh MN, Korner-Bitensky N, Snider L, et al. Actual vs. best practices for young children with cerebral palsy: a survey of paediatric occupational therapists and physical therapists in Quebec, Canada. Dev Neurorehabil. 2008;11(1):60–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver TS, Krug MK, Chiew KS, et al. Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014;14(2):443–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Särkämö T. Cognitive, emotional, and neural benefits of musical leisure activities in aging and neurological rehabilitation: a critical review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(6):414–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihvonen AJ, Särkämö T, Leo V, et al. Music-based interventions in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):648–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Ding L, Zhao J, et al. Cellphone augmented reality game-based rehabilitation for improving motor function and mental state after stroke. 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, BSN 2019 – Proceedings; 2019. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Corrêa AGD, De Assis GA, Do Nascimento M, et al. GenVirtual: an augmented reality musical game for cognitive and motor rehabilitation. 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation, IWVR; 2007. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(3):241–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rybarczyk Y, Deters JK, Cointe C, et al. Smart web-based platform to support physical rehabilitation. Sensors (Switzerland). 2018;18(5):1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong D, Sinclair K, Seabrook E, et al. Smartphones as assistive technology following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of what helps and what hinders. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2387–2394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Kizony R, Weiss PTL. The Sony playStation II eye toy: low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32(4):155–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez J, Tadres A. Augmented reality application for the navigation of people who are blind. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2011;10(1):75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lange B, Koenig S, Chang CY, et al. Designing informed game-based rehabilitation tasks leveraging advances in virtual reality. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1863–1870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han H, Chong U. Neural network based detection of drowsiness with eyes open using AR modelling. IETE Tech Rev (Institution Electron Telecommun Eng India). 2016;33(5):518–524.
   Google Scholar
• Penn PR, Rose FD, Johnson DA. Virtual enriched environments in paediatric neuropsychological rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: feasibility, benefits and challenges. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12(1):32–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghese NA, Pirovano M, Lanzi PL, et al. Computational intelligence and game design for effective at-home stroke rehabilitation. Games Health J. 2013;2(2):81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proulx MJ, Ptito M, Amedi A. Multisensory integration, sensory substitution and visual rehabilitation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;41:1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CY, Patterson RM. Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: a narrative review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, et al. Tracking mobility-related assistive technology in an outcomes study. Assist Technol. 2008;20(2):73–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukas C, Maglogiannis I. Bringing IoT and cloud computing towards pervasive healthcare. Proceedings – 6th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, IMIS 2012; 2012. p. 922–926.
   Google Scholar
• Tawalbeh LA, Mehmood R, Benkhlifa E, et al. Mobile cloud computing model and Big Data analysis for healthcare applications. IEEE Access. 2016;4:6171–6180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwish A, Hassanien AE, Elhoseny M, et al. The impact of the hybrid platform of Internet of Things and cloud computing on healthcare systems: opportunities, challenges, and open problems. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. 2019;10(10):4151–4156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani AM, Gia TN, Negash B, et al. Exploiting smart e-Health gateways at the edge of healthcare Internet-of-Things: a fog computing approach. Fut Gener Comput Syst. 2018;78:641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlag AA, Abd Ghani MK, Arunkumar N, et al. Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems. Fut Gener Comput Syst. 2019;90:62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, et al. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch T, van Eck J, Knitel K, et al. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Appl Ergon. 2016;54:212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RO, Scherer MJ, Cooper R, et al. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedyan M, Al-Jumaily A, Alnajjar F, et al. A wearable robotics assistive device: design, technical solutions, and implementation. 2017 International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications, ICECTA 2017; 2017. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bächlin M, Plotnik M, Roggen D, et al. Wearable assistant for Parkinson’s disease patients with the freezing of gait symptom. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 2010;14(2):436–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoppa M, Chiolerio A. Wearable electronics and smart textiles: a critical review. Sensors. 2014;14(7):11957–11992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecotti H. A multimodal gaze-controlled virtual keyboard. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2016;46(4):601–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Parsons R, et al. Eye gaze performance for children with severe physical impairments using gaze-based assistive technology—a longitudinal study. Assist Technol. 2016;28(2):93–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alva M, Castellino N, Deshpande R, et al. An image based eye controlled assistive system for paralytic patients. 2017 2nd International Conference on Communication Systems, Computing and IT Applications, CSCITA 2017 – Proceedings; 2017. p. 178–183.
   Google Scholar
• Majumder S, Aghayi E, Noferesti M, et al. Smart homes for elderly healthcare—recent advances and research challenges. Sensors. 2017;17(11):2496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atayero AA, Ozara R, Popoola SI, et al. Development of smart assistive DTMF home automation system for ageing population. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (Vol. 1); 2016; San Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh M. Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethic Theory Moral Pract. 2010;13(2):181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo P, Gu GM, Lee SJ, et al. Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2012;13(5):817–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanov E, Milenkovic A, Otto C, et al. A wireless body area network of intelligent motion sensors for computer assisted physical rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2005;2(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):811–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draffan EA, Evans DG, Blenkhorn P. Use of assistive technology by students with dyslexia in post-secondary education. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(2):105–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fälth L, Svensson I. An app as ‘Reading Glasses’ – a study of the interaction between individual and assistive technology for students with a dyslexic profile. Int J Teach Educ. 2015;III(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sandlund M, Waterworth EL, Häger C. Using motion interactive games to promote physical activity and enhance motor performance in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14(1):15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DJ, Mitchell JM, Kemp BJ, Adkins RH, et al. Effects of assistive technology on functional decline in people aging with a disability. Assist Technol. 2009;21(4):208–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer AL, Parks A, Heyn PC. Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):377–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Niekerk K, Dada S, Tönsing K. Influences on selection of assistive technology for young children in South Africa: perspectives from rehabilitation professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(8):912–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messinger-Willman J, Marino MT. Universal design for learning and assistive technology: leadership considerations for promoting inclusive education in today’s secondary schools. NASSP Bull. 2010;94(1):5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Snider L, Majnemer A, Darsaklis V. Virtual reality as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(2):120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramdoss S, MacHalicek W, Rispoli M, et al. Computer-based interventions to improve social and emotional skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15(2):119–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumrill P, Elias E, Hendricks DJ, et al. Promoting cognitive support technology use and employment success among postsecondary students with traumatic brain injuries. J Vocation Rehabil. 2016;45(1):53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf SA, Scherer MJ, Baxter MF, et al. Validating a measure to assess factors that affect assistive technology use by students with disabilities in elementary and secondary education. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(1):38–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satsangi R, Bouck EC, Taber-Doughty T, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Q. 2016;39(4):240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqualotto E, Matuz T, Federici S, et al. Usability and workload of access technology for people with severe motor impairment: a comparison of brain–computer interfacing and eye tracking. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):950–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, et al. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments – an intervention study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):129–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amantis R, Corradi F, Molteni AM, et al. Eye-tracking assistive technology: is this effective for the developmental age? Evaluation of eye-tracking systems for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. In: Gert JG, Mathijs S, Leon A, et al., editors. Assistive technology research series. Amsterdam (Netherlands): IOS Press; 2011. p. 489–496.
   Google Scholar
• Mele ML, Federici S. Gaze and eye-tracking solutions for psychological research. Cogn Process. 2012;13(S1):261–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashaie SA, Cherney LR. Eye tracking as a tool to identify mood in aphasia: a feasibility study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34(5):463–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognolato M, Atzori M, Müller H. Head-mounted eye gaze tracking devices: an overview of modern devices and recent advances. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018;5.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Chen Y, Zhang Z, et al. An EOG-based wheelchair robotic arm system for assisting patients with severe spinal cord injuries. J Neural Eng. 2019;16(2):26021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, He S, Yang X, et al. An EOG-based human–machine interface to control a smart home environment for patients with severe spinal cord injuries. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;66(1):89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas P, Jeevithashree DV. Eye gaze controlled MFD for military aviation. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI; 2018. p. 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler C. Virtual reality and learning: where is the pedagogy? Br J Educ Technol. 2015;46(2):412–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloréns R, Noé E, Colomer C, et al. Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):418–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bennekom MJ, Kasanmoentalib MS, De Koning PP, et al. A virtual reality game to assess obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(11):718–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Using smartphones to help people with intellectual and sensory disabilities perform daily activities. Front Public Health. 2017;5:282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar