A map of assistive technology educative instruments in neurodevelopmental disorders

References

• Fuentes J, Hervás A, Howlin P. ESCAP practice guidance for autism: a summary of evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s00787-020-01587-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho H, Perry A, Koudys J. A systematic review of behaviour analytic interventions for young children with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020. DOI:10.1111/jir.12780
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtz PF, Leoni M, Hagopian LP. Behavioral approaches to assessment and early intervention for severe problem behavior in intellectual and developmental disabilities. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2020;67(3):499–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KA, Parikh S, Patel DR. Understanding basic concepts of developmental diagnosis in children. Transl Pediatr. 2020;9(Suppl 1):S9–S22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai MC, Anagnostou E, Wiznitzer M, et al. Evidence-based support for autistic people across the lifespan: maximising potential, minimising barriers, and optimizing the person-environment fit. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(5):434–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski MA, Rose AS. Augmentative communication and early intervention. Myths and realities. Infants Young Child. 2005;18(3):174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim SFSM, Fikry A, Ismail Z, et al. Humanoids in autism therapy: the child perspective. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014;42(2014):351–356.
   Google Scholar
• Zeina R, Al-Ayadhi L, Bashir S. The Impact of IQ on using high –tech Augmentative Alternative Communication AAC in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder ASD. Procedia - Soc BehavSci. 2015;171(2015):366–373.
   Google Scholar
• Cress CJ, Marvin CA. Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augment Altern Commun. 2003;19(4):254–272.
   Google Scholar
• Huijnen CAGJ, Lexis MAS, Jansens R, et al. Mapping robots to therapy and educational objectives for children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(6):2100–2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edyburn DL. Assistive technology and mild disabilities. Special Educ Technol Practice. 2006;8(4):18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim R, Yussof H, Bahrin NLZ. Religious perceptions on use of humanoid for spiritual augmentation of children with autism. Procedia Comput Sci. 2017;105(2017):353–358.
   Google Scholar
• Bharatharaj J, Huang L, Krägeloh C, et al. Social engagement of children with autism spectrum disorder in interaction with a parrot-inspired therapeutic robot. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;133(2018):368–376.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismail LI, et al. Initial response in HRI- a case study on evaluation of child with autism spectrum disorders interacting with a humanoid robot NAO. Procedia Eng. 2012;41(2012):1448–1455.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim R, Yussof H. Humanizing humanoids towards social inclusiveness for children with autism. Procedia Comput Sci. 2017;105(2017):359–364.
   Google Scholar
• Aresti-Bartolome N, Garcia-Zapirain B. Technologies as support tools for persons with autistic spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(8):7767–7802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan M, Khetrapal N. Music inspired framework for remediating emotional deficits in autism. Procedia Comput Sci. 2016;88:469–474.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders MD, Sella AC, Attri D, et al. Establishing a conditional signal for assistance in teenagers with blindness. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(5):1488–1497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiemann-Bourque K, Feldmiller S, Hoffman L, et al. Incorporating a peer-mediated approach into speech-generating device intervention: effects on communication of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(8):2045–2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa RTA, de Oliveira ASB, de Lima Antão JYF, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication in children with Down's syndrome: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jadán-Guerrero J, Guerrero L, López G, et al. Creating TUIs using RFID sensors-a case study based on the literacy process of children with down syndrome. Sensors (Basel). 2015;15(7):14845–14863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb N, Northridge J, Politis Y, et al. Parental intention to support the use of computerized cognitive training for children with genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Public Health. 2018;6:309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis C, Kripke CC, Raymaker D. Primary care for adults on the autism spectrum. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98(5):1169–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J. Using the Choiceboard Creator™ app on an iPad© to teach choice making to a student with severe disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32(1):49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RM, Saunders KJ, Brady NC. Reading instruction for children who use AAC: considerations in the pursuit of generalizable results. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28(3):160–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto G, Clarke MT. Effects of a conversation-based intervention on the linguistic skills of children with motor speech disorders who use augmentative and alternative communication. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(7):1980–1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Kent–Walsh J, King M. Dynamic assessment for 3- and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication: evaluating expressive syntax. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(7):1946–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengoni SE, Irvine K, Thakur D, et al. Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of using a humanoid robot to improve the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorder (Kaspar RCT): a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e017376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumazaki H, Yoshikawa Y, Yoshimura Y, et al. The impact of robotic intervention on joint attention in children with autism spectrum disorders. Mol Autism. 2018;9(2018):46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumazaki H, Warren Z, Swanson A, et al. Brief report: evaluating the utility of varied technological agents to elicit social attention from children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(4):1700–1708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijnen CAGJ, Lexis MAS, Jansens R, et al. How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47(10):3079–3096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson NL, Cottier TV, Kavanagh DJ. Psychosocial health interventions by social robots: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e13203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumazaki H, Warren Z, Muramatsu T, et al. A pilot study for robot appearance preferences among high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Implications for therapeutic use. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung CE, Strother L, Feil-Seifer DJ, et al. Atypical asymmetry for processing human and robot faces in autism revealed by fNIRS. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueyama Y. A Bayesian model of the uncanny valley effect for explaining the effects of therapeutic robots in Autism spectrum disorder. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan SM, Eigsti IM, Gifford T, et al. The effects of embodied rhythm and robotic interventions on the spontaneous and responsive verbal communication skills of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): a further outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2016;27:73–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan SM, Park IK, Neelly LB, et al. A comparison of the effects of rhythm and robotic interventions on repetitive behaviors and affective states of children with Autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2015;18:51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekele E, Crittendon JA, Swanson A, et al. Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism. 2014;18(5):598–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Wang X, Wang Q, et al. The uncanny valley effect in typically developing children and its absence in children with autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan SM, Eigsti IM, Neelly L, et al. The effects of embodied rhythm and robotic interventions on the spontaneous and responsive social attention patterns of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2016;27:54–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen ML, Hartley C, Cain K. iPads and the use of “Apps” by children with autism spectrum disorder: do they promote learning? Front Psychol. 2016;7:1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An S, Feng X, Dai Y, et al. Development and evaluation of a speech-generating AAC mobile app for minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder in Mainland China. Mol Autism. 2017;8(2017):52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurie MH, Warreyn P, Uriarte BV, et al. An international survey of parental attitudes to technology use by their autistic children at home. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(4):1517–1530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri U, Bekele E, Dohrmann E, et al. Design of a virtual reality based adaptive response technology for children with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21(1):55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri U, Warren Z, Sarkar N. Design of a gaze-sensitive virtual social interactive system for children with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011;19(4):443–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice K, Moriuchi JM, Jones W, et al. Parsing heterogeneity in autism spectrum disorders: visual scanning of dynamic social scenes in school-aged children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(3):238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Cai E, Han J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate EEG complexity of children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumazaki H, Muramatsu T, Fujisawa TX, et al. Assessment of olfactory detection thresholds in children with autism spectrum disorders using a pulse ejection system. Mol Autism. 2016;7(1):6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganz JB, Morin KL, Foster MJ, et al. High-technology augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs: a meta-analysis. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33(4):224–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyfield C, Drager K, Light J, et al. Typical toddlers' participation in "Just-in-Time" programming of vocabulary for visual scene display augmentative and alternative communication apps on mobile technology: a descriptive study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(3):737–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad KC, Keppner K, Schanz A, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children: intervention goals and use of technology. Semin Speech Lang. 2008;29(2):83–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunning K, Gona JK, Newton CR, et al. Caregiver perceptions of children who have complex communication needs following a home-based intervention using augmentative and alternative communication in rural Kenya: an intervention note. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(4):344–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahabzadeh A, Keshav NU, Abdus-Sabur R, et al. Improved socio-emotional and behavioral functioning in students with autism following school-based smartglasses intervention: multi-stage feasibility and controlled efficacy study. Behav Sci. 2018;8(10):85.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin NT, Keshav NU, Salisbury JP, et al. Safety and lack of negative effects of wearable augmented-reality social communication aid for children and adults with autism. JCM. 2018;7(8):188.
   Google Scholar
• Barker RM, Akaba S, Brady NC, et al. Support for AAC use in preschool, and growth in language skills, for young children with developmental disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(4):334–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlop-Christy MH, Carpenter M, Le L, et al. Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002;35(3):213–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost L, Bondy A. 2002. PECS. Pyramid Educational Consultants. 2016 Products. The source for products designed to enhance the lives of individuals with autism and related disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Leroy G, Huang J, Chuang S, et al. 2005. Communication Software using Pictures for use with Pocket PCs. AMIA 2005 Symposium Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Thiemann-Bourque K, Brady N, McGuff S, et al. Picture exchange communication system and pals: a peer-mediated augmentative and alternative communication intervention for minimally verbal preschoolers with autism. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(5):1133–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima Antão JYF, Oliveira ASB, Almeida Barbosa RT, et al. Instruments for augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73:e497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellecchia M, Marcus SC, Spaulding C, et al. Randomized trial of a computer-assisted intervention for children with autism in schools. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(3):373–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiemann-Bourque K, McGuff S, Goldstein H. Training peer partners to use a speech-generating device with classmates with autism spectrum disorder: exploring communication outcomes across preschool contexts. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(9):2648–2662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almirall D, DiStefano C, Chang YC, et al. Longitudinal effects of adaptive interventions with a speech generating device in minimally verbal children with ASD. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(4):442–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasari C, Kaiser A, Goods K, et al. Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(6):635–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper L, Van der Meer L, Schäfer MCM, et al. Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17(2):99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer L, Kagohara D, Roche L, et al. Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(3):222–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bono V, Narzisi A, Jouen AL, et al.; MICHELANGELO Study Group. GOLIAH: a gaming platform for home-based intervention in autism - principles and design. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier TW, Krishna J, Klingemier E, et al. A randomized, crossover trial of a novel sound-to-sleep mattress technology in children with autism and sleep difficulties. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(01):95–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wrońska N, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A. An iPad-based tool for improving the skills of children with attention deficit disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):6261–6280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döpfner M, Hautmann C, Dose C, et al. ESCAschool study: trial protocol of an adaptive treatment approach for school-age children with ADHD including two randomised trials. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qian X, Loo BRY, Castellanos FX, et al. Brain-computer-interface-based intervention re-normalizes brain functional network topology in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8(1):149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albrecht JS, Bubenzer-Busch S, Gallien A, et al. Effects of a structured 20-session slow-cortical-potential-based neurofeedback program on attentional performance in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: retrospective analysis of an open-label pilot-approach and 6-month follow-up. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13(2017):667–683.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silver M, Oakes P. Evaluation of a new computer intervention to teach people with autism or Asperger syndrome to recognize and predict emotions in others. Autism. 2001;5(3):299–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore M, Calvert S. Brief report: vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: teacher or computer instruction. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000;30(4):359–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosseler A, Massaro DW. Development and evaluation of a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003;33(6):653–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard-Opitz V, Sriram N, Nakhoda-Sapuan S. Enhancing social problem solving in children with autism and normal children through computer-assisted instruction. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31(4):377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturmey P. Video technology and persons with autism and other developmental disabilities. an emerging technology for PBS. J Pos Behav Interv. 2003;5(1):3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiwara T, Myles BS. A multimedia social story intervention: teaching skills to children with autism. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 1999;14(2):82–95.
   Google Scholar