Wearable rehabilitation exoskeletons of the lower limb: analysis of versatility and adaptability

References

• United Nations DoE, Social Affairs PD. World population ageing 2017 highlights; 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 16]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall D, Greenwood B, Chee HL, et al. Science and technology for disease control: past, present, and future. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2006. p. 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:877–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of neural science. Vol. 4. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Brugge F. Neurorehabilitation for central nervous system disorders. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Umphred DA, Lazaro RT, et al. Neurological rehabilitation. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2014;9:e87987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Amatya B. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:353–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8:187–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonnechere B, Jansen B, Omelina L, et al. Can serious games be incorporated with conventional treatment of children with cerebral palsy? A review. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:1899–1913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Bracalenti M, et al. The effectiveness of powered, active lower limb exoskeletons in neurorehabilitation: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37:321–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisahn C, Aach M, Jansen O, et al. The effectiveness and safety of exoskeletons as assistive and rehabilitation devices in the treatment of neurologic gait disorders in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2016;6:822–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AJ, Ferris DP. State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017; 25:171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popović DB. Hybrid FES-robot devices for training of activities of daily living. In: Colombo R, Sanguineti V, editors. Rehabilitation robotics. London (UK): Academic Press; 2018. p. 277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Wandercraft; 2020. [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: http://www.wandercraft.eu
   Google Scholar
• Gurriet T, Finet S, Boeris G, et al. Towards restoring locomotion for paraplegics: realizing dynamically stable walking on exoskeletons. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2018 May 21–25; Brisbane, QLD. 2018. p. 2804–2811.
   Google Scholar
• Marsi bionics [online]; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: http://www.marsibionics.com/
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly A, Sanz-Merodio D, Puyuelo G, et al. Wearable pediatric gait exoskeleton – a feasibility study. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2018 Oct 1–5; Madrid, Spain. 2018. p. 4667–4672.
   Google Scholar
• Ekso bionics [online]; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: https://eksobionics.com/
   Google Scholar
• Swank C, Almutairi S, Wang-Price S, et al. Immediate kinematic and muscle activity changes after a single robotic exoskeleton walking session post-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27:503–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojek A, Mika A, Oleksy L, et al. Effects of exoskeleton gait training on balance, load distribution, and functional status in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2020;10:1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliandro P, Molteni F, Simbolotti C, et al. Exoskeleton-assisted gait in chronic stroke: an EMG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of muscle activation patterns and prefrontal cortex activity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131:1775–1781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berriozabalgoitia R, Sanz B, Fraile-Bermúdez AB, et al. An overground robotic gait training program for people with multiple sclerosis: a protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Front Med. 2020;7:238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen GKK, Jørgensen V, Normann B. “Back at the same level as everyone else” – user perspectives on walking with an exoskeleton, a qualitative study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019;5:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swank C, Sikka S, Driver S, et al. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15:409–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poritz JM, Taylor HB, Francisco G, et al. User satisfaction with lower limb wearable robotic exoskeletons. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15:322–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamro RA, Chisholm AE, Williams AM, et al. Overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton elicits trunk muscle activity in people with high-thoracic motor-complete spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baunsgaard CB, Nissen UV, Brust AK, et al. Exoskeleton gait training after spinal cord injury: an exploratory study on secondary health conditions. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50:806–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal T, Kern M, Tseng SC, et al. Cognitive demands during wearable exoskeleton assisted walking in persons with multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Wearable Robotics and Rehabilitation (WeRob); 2017 Nov 5–8; Houston, TX. IEEE; 2017. p. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrò RS, Naro A, Russo M, et al. Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2018;15:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molteni F, Gasperini G, Gaffuri M, et al. Wearable robotic exoskeleton for overground gait training in sub-acute and chronic hemiparetic stroke patients: preliminary results. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:676–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandolla M, Guanziroli E, D’Angelo A, et al. Automatic setting procedure for exoskeleton-assisted overground gait: proof of concept on stroke population. Front Neurorob. 2018;12:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgey AS, Wade R, Sumrell R, et al. Exoskeleton training may improve level of physical activity after spinal cord injury: a case series. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017;23:245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baunsgaard CB, Nissen UV, Brust AK, et al. Gait training after spinal cord injury: safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso bionics. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale P, Russo EF, Russo M, et al. Effects on mobility training and de-adaptations in subjects with spinal cord injury due to a wearable robot: a preliminary report. BMC Neurology. 2016;16:12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozlowski A, Bryce T, Dijkers M. Time and effort required by persons with spinal cord injury to learn to use a powered exoskeleton for assisted walking. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21:110–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cyberdyne Inc. [online]; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: https://www.cyberdyne.jp/english/
   Google Scholar
• Setoguchi D, Kinoshita K, Kamada S, et al. Hybrid assistive limb improves restricted hip extension after total hip arthroplasty. Assistive Technol. 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadone H, Miura K, Kubota S, et al. Dropped head syndrome attenuation by hybrid assistive limb: a preliminary study of three cases on cervical alignment during walking. Medicina. 2020;56:291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okawara H, Sawada T, Matsubayashi K, et al. Gait ability required to achieve therapeutic effect in gait and balance function with the voluntary driven exoskeleton in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: a clinical study. Spinal Cord. 2020;58:520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Marushima A, Kawamoto H, et al. Intensive gait treatment using a robot suit hybrid assistive limb in acute spinal cord infarction: report of two cases. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;42:395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno T, Watanabe H, Kawamoto H, et al. Feasibility and safety of robot suit HAL treatment for adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;68:101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sczesny-Kaiser M, Trost R, Aach M, et al. A randomized and controlled crossover study investigating the improvement of walking and posture functions in chronic stroke patients using HAL exoskeleton – the HALESTRO study (HAL-exoskeleton stroke study. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota S, Abe T, Kadone H, et al. Hybrid assistive limb (HAL) treatment for patients with severe thoracic myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (opll) in the postoperative acute/subacute phase: a clinical trial. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;42:517–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz E, Schmidt CK, Mayadev A, et al. Does treadmill training with hybrid assistive limb (HAL) impact the quality of life? A first case series in the United States. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14:521–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa K, Mutsuzaki H, Sano A, et al. Training with hybrid assistive limb for walking function after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentes S, Kadone H, Kubota S, et al. Reshaping of gait coordination by robotic intervention in myelopathy patients after surgery. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüneberg P, Kadone H, Kuramoto N, et al. Robot-assisted voluntary initiation reduces control-related difficulties of initiating joint movement: a phenomenal questionnaire study on shaping and compensation of forward gait. Plos One. 2018;13:e0194214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentes S, Kadone H, Watanabe H, et al. Reshaping of bilateral gait coordination in hemiparetic stroke patients after early robotic intervention. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan CK, Kadone H, Watanabe H, et al. Lateral symmetry of synergies in lower limb muscles of acute post-stroke patients after robotic intervention. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatsugi A, Morishita T, Fukuda H, et al. Feasibility of neurorehabilitation using a hybrid assistive limb for patients who underwent spine surgery. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018;2018:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen O, Grasmuecke D, Meindl RC, et al. Hybrid assistive limb exoskeleton HAL in the rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury: proof of concept; the results in 21 patients. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:e73–e78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen O, Schildhauer TA, Meindl RC, et al. Functional outcome of neurologic-controlled HAL-exoskeletal neurorehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot with one year treatment and variable treatment frequency. Global Spine J. 2017;7:735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sczesny-Kaiser M, Kowalewski R, Schildhauer TA, et al. Treadmill training with HAL exoskeleton—a novel approach for symptomatic therapy in patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy—preliminary study. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grasmücke D, Zieriacks A, Jansen O, et al. Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled hybrid assistive limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level. Neurosurgical Focus. 2017;42:E15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Goto R, Tanaka N, et al. Effects of gait training using the Hybrid Assistive Limb® in recovery-phase stroke patients: a 2-month follow-up, randomized, controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40:363–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura M, Kobayashi S, Kinjo Y, et al. Factors leading to improved gait function in patients with subacute or chronic central nervous system impairments who receive functional training with the robot suit hybrid assistive limb. Neurol Med Chir. 2018;58:39–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu Y, Kadone H, Kubota S, et al. Voluntary ambulation by upper limb-triggered HAL® in patients with complete quadri/paraplegia due to chronic spinal cord injury. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsurushima H, Mizukami M, Yoshikawa K, et al. Effectiveness of a walking program involving the hybrid assistive limb robotic exoskeleton suit for improving walking ability in stroke patients: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8:e14001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmücke D, Cruciger O, Meindl RC, et al. Experiences in four years of HAL exoskeleton SCI rehabilitation. In: Ibáñez J, González-Vargas J, Azorín JM, et al., editors. Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation II. Biosystems & Biorobotics. Vol. 15. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 1235–1238.
   Google Scholar
• Kasai R, Takeda S. The effect of a hybrid assistive limb on sit-to-stand and standing patterns of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28:1786–1790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukuda H, Morishita T, Ogata T, et al. Tailor-made rehabilitation approach using multiple types of hybrid assistive limb robots for acute stroke patients: a pilot study. Assist Technol. 2016;28:53–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizukami M, Yoshikawa K, Kawamoto H, et al. Gait training of subacute stroke patients using a hybrid assistive limb: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sczesny-Kaiser M, H ¨Offken O, Aach M, et al. Hal® exoskeleton training improves walking parameters and normalizes cortical excitability in primary somatosensory cortex in spinal cord injury patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:68. Aug
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimoto T, Shimizu I, Hiroi Y, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of high-speed gait training with a voluntary driven exoskeleton robot for gait and balance dysfunction in patients with chronic stroke: nonrandomized pilot study with concurrent control. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chihara H, Takagi Y, Nishino K, et al. Factors predicting the effects of hybrid assistive limb robot suit during the acute phase of central nervous system injury. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2016;56:33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata T, Abe H, Samura K, et al. Hybrid assistive limb (HAL) rehabilitation in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55:901–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruciger O, Schildhauer TA, Meindl RC, et al. Impact of locomotion training with a neurologic controlled hybrid assistive limb (HAL) exoskeleton on neuropathic pain and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in chronic SCI: a case study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:529–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson A, Vreede KS, Häglund V, et al. Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton – the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2014;11:92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aach M, Cruciger O, Sczesny-Kaiser M, et al. Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Spine J. 2014;14:2847–2853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker hannifin corporation [online]; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: http://www.indego.com/indego/en/home
   Google Scholar
• Tefertiller C, Hays K, Jones J, et al. Initial outcomes from a multicenter study utilizing the indego powered exoskeleton in spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018;24:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan C, Kandilakis C, Dalley S, et al. Mobility outcomes following five training sessions with a powered exoskeleton. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015; 21:93–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rewalk robotics [online]; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 4]; Available from: https://rewalk.com/
   Google Scholar
• Kwon SH, Lee BS, Lee HJ, et al. Energy efficiency and patient satisfaction of gait with knee-ankle-foot orthosis and robot (rewalk)-assisted gait in patients with spinal cord injury. Ann Rehabil Med. 2020;44:131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manns PJ, Hurd C, Yang JF. Perspectives of people with spinal cord injury learning to walk using a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16:94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijzer-Witteveen H, Sibum N, van Dijsseldonk R, et al. Questionnaire results of user experiences with wearable exoskeletons and their preferences for sensory feedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guanziroli E, Cazzaniga M, Colombo L, et al. Assistive powered exoskeleton for complete spinal cord injury: correlations between walking ability and exoskeleton control. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55:209–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijsseldonk RB, Rijken H, van Nes IJ, et al. A framework for measuring the progress in exoskeleton skills in people with complete spinal cord injury. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson I, Hart K, Tussler D, et al. Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonini L, Shawen N, Scanlan K, et al. Accelerometry-enabled measurement of walking performance with a robotic exoskeleton: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T, Gillner A, Borgwaldt N, et al. Device-training for individuals with thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injury using a powered exoskeleton for technically assisted mobility: achievements and user satisfaction. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8459018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang A, Asselin P, Knezevic S, et al. Assessment of in-hospital walking velocity and level of assistance in a powered exoskeleton in persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21:100–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asselin P, Knezevic S, Kornfeld S, et al. Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52:147–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fineberg DB, Asselin P, Harel NY, et al. Vertical ground reaction force-based analysis of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with motor-complete paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talaty M, Esquenazi A, Briceno JE. Differentiating ability in users of the rewalk tm powered exoskeleton: an analysis of walking kinematics. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th InternationalConference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); 2013 Jun 24–26; Seattle, WA. IEEE; 2013. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, et al. The rewalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:911–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeilig G, Weingarden H, Zwecker M, et al. Safety and tolerance of the rewalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex Bionics Ltd. [online]; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: https://www.rexbionics.com/
   Google Scholar
• Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Jayaraman A. Powered exoskeletons for walking assistance in persons with central nervous system injuries: a narrative review. PM R. 2017;9:46–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbareschi G, Richards R, Thornton M, et al. Statically vs dynamically balanced gait: analysis of a robotic exoskeleton compared with a human. Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2015. p. 6728–6731.
   Google Scholar
• Birch N, Graham J, Priestley T, et al. Results of the first interim analysis of the rapper ii trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the rex powered walking aid. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf17/K173530.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Read E, Woolsey C, McGibbon CA, et al. Physiotherapists’ experiences using the Ekso bionic exoskeleton with patients in a neurological rehabilitation hospital: a qualitative study. Rehabil Res Pract. 2020;2020:2939573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. National Library of Medicine [online]; 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04110561
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration [online]; 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN130034.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farris RJ. Design of a powered lower-limb exoskeleton and control for gait assistance in paraplegics [dissertation]. Nashville (TN): Vanderbilt University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Goffer A. Enhanced safety of gait in powered exoskeletons. Dynamic walking conference abstract-available online. 2014. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.681.8848&rep=rep1&type=.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sanz-Merodio D, Cestari M, Arevalo JC, et al. Generation and control of adaptive gaits in lower-limb exoskeletons for motion assistance. Adv Rob. 2014;28:329–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asselin PK, Avedissian M, Knezevic S, et al. Training persons with spinal cord injury to ambulate using a powered exoskeleton. J Vis Exp. 2016;112:54071.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Oka H, Nakayama S, et al. Improvement of walking ability during postoperative rehabilitation with the hybrid assistive limb after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. SAGE Open Med. 2017;5:205031211771288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyberdyne Inc. [online]; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 26]. Available from: https://www.cyberdyne.jp/english/products/SingleJoint.html
   Google Scholar