Underpinning implications of instructional strategies on assistive technology for learning disability: a meta-synthesis review

References

• Raskind M. Assistive technology and adults with learning disabilities: a blueprint for exploration and advancement. Learning Disability Quarterly. 1993;16(3):185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poplin MS. The dialectic nature of technology and holism: use of technology to liberate individuals with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Q. 1995;18(2):131–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir A, Shlafer I. E-books effectiveness in promoting phonological awareness and concept about print: a comparison between children at risk for learning disabilities and typically developing kindergarteners. Comput Educ. 2011;57:1989–1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crealock C, Kronick D. Children and young people with specific learning disabilities association of Canada. Guid Spec Educ. 1993;9:84.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly C, Gentaz E. Analysis of cursive letters, syllables, and words handwriting in a French second-grade child with developmental coordination disorder and comparison with typically developing children. Front Psychol. 2013;4:1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneck CM. Comparison of pencil-grip patterns in first graders with good and poor writing skills. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(8):701–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetzroni OE, Shrieber B. Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing academic outcomes of students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. J Learn Disabil. 2004;37(2):143–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakhar J, Madhvanath S. JollyMate: assistive technology for young children with dyslexia. In Proceedings - 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR 2010; Kolkata. 2010. p. 576–580.
   Google Scholar
• LoPresti EF, Mihailidis A, Kirsch N. Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: state of the art. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14(1-2):5–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarejo B. Lifelong kindergarten: cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. REMIE. 2019;9(3):349.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby B, Miles TR. The effects of a dyslexia-centred teaching programme. Br J Educ Psychol. 1980;50(Pt 3):236–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horne JK. Reading comprehension: a computerized intervention with primary-age poor readers. Dyslexia. 2017;23(2):119–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskind MH, Higgins E. Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Q. 1995;18(2):141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanberry BK, Raskind MH. Assistive technology for kids with learning disabilities: an overview. 2009. Available from: https://www.readingrockets.org/article/assistive-technology-kids-learning-disabilities-overview
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer MJ. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(13):731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nganji JT, Brayshaw M. Disability-aware adaptive and personalised learning for students with multiple disabilities. Int J Inform Learn Technol. 2017;34(4):307–321. DOI:10.1108/IJILT-08-2016-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroesbergen EH, Van T Noordende JE, Kolkman ME. Training working memory in kindergarten children: effects on working memory and early numeracy. Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(1):23–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman KN. Case study explaining teachers’ perceptions and experiences in developing morphological awareness among English learners in intermediate grades. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins EL, Raskind MH. The compensatory effectiveness of the quicktionary reading pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. J Spec Educ Technol. 2004;20(1):31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Belo N, McKenney S, Voogt J, et al. Teacher knowledge for using technology to foster early literacy: a literature review. Comput. Human Behav. 2016;60:372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary DC, Hoard MK, Byrd-Craven J, et al. Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Dev. 2007;78(4):1343–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caute A, Woolf C. Using voice recognition software to improve communicative writing and social participation in an individual with severe acquired dysgraphia: an experimental single-case therapy study. Aphasiology. 2015;30:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmo Rodrigues Almeida I, Ribeiro J, Moreira A. Assistive technologies for children with cognitive and/or motor disabilities: interviews as a means to diagnose the  training needs of informal caregivers. Disabil Rehabil Assistive Technol. 2019;1–10. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2019.1680750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Trussell RP, Gallegos B, et al. Using math apps for improving student learning: an exploratory study in an inclusive fourth grade classroom. Techtrends Tech Trends. 2015;59(2):32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Hamid SS, Admodisastro N, Kamaruddin A. A study of computer-based learning model for students with dyslexia. In 20,159th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference, MySEC 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Räsänen P, Salminen J, Wilson AJ, et al. Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cogn. Dev. 2009;24(4):450–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant DP, Bryant BR, Raskind MH. Using assistive technology to enhance the skills of students with learning disabilities. Interv School Clinic. 1998;34(1):53–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy MM, Mazzocco MMM, Hanich LB, et al. Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. J Learn Disabil. 2007;40(5):458–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morash-Macneil V, Johnson F, Ryan JB. A systematic review of assistive technology for individuals with intellectual disability in the workplace. J Spec Educ Technol. 2018;33(1):15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anttila H, Samuelsson K, Salminen AL, et al. Quality of evidence of assistive technology interventions for people with disability: an overview of systematic reviews. TAD. 2012;24(1):9–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis RB. Assistive technology and learning disabilities: today's realities and tomorrow's promises. J Learn Disabil. 1998;31(1):16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuster SM, van Weerdenburg M, Gompel M, et al. Dyslexie font does not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia. 2018;68(1):25–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanvinde G, Rello L, Baeza-Yates R. IDEAL: a dyslexic-friendly eBook Reader. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and accessibility - ASSETS ’12, 2012. p. 205.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn EK, Joshi RM, Binks-Cantrell ES. Teacher knowledge of basic language concepts and dyslexia. Dyslexia. 2011;17(2):165–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker TA, Moody AK, McKenna MC. The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students’ literacy and language outcomes: a research synthesis. J Educ Comput Res. 2009;40(1):47–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mull CA, Sitlington PL. The role of technology in the transition to postsecondary education of students with learning disabilities: a review of the literature. J Spec Educ. 2003;37(1):26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinumol KP, Chowdhury A, Kambam R, and V. Muralidharan Augmented reality based interactive text book: an assistive technology for students with learning disability. In Proceedings - 2013 15th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, SVR 2013, 2013..
   Google Scholar
• de Santana VF, de Oliveira R, Almeida LDA, Ito M. Firefixia: an accessibility web browser customization toolbar for people with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility - W4A ’13, 2013. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Perelmutter B, McGregor KK, Gordon KR. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Educ . 2017;114:139–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange AA, Mulhern G, Wylie J. Proofreading using an assistive software homophone tool: compensatory and remedial effects on the literacy skills of students with reading difficulties. J Learn Disabil. 2009;42(4):322–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison AB, Chein JM. Does working memory training work? the promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011;18(1):46–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitrago JA, Bolaños AM, Caicedo Bravo E. A motor learning therapeutic intervention for a child with cerebral palsy through a social assistive robot. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;15(3):1–6. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2019.1578999
   Google Scholar
• De la Paz S. Composing via dictation and speech recognition systems: Compensatory technology for students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Q. 1999;22(3):173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang HY, Liu CH. Evaluation of the benefits of assistive reading software: Perceptions of high school students with learning disabilities. Assist Technol. 2011;23(4):199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurumeh MS. Effect of cuisenaire rods’ approach on students’ interest in decimal fractions in Junior Secondary School, Makurdi Metropolis. Gl Jnl Educ Res. 2010;9(1-2):25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Amiripour P, Bijanzadeh MH, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, et al. The effects of assistive technology on increasing capacity of mathematical problem solving in dyscalculia students. J Appl Math. 2012;8(4(31)):47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Best C, O’Neill B, Gillespie A. Assistive technology for cognition: an updated review. In: Emerging theory and practice in neuroprosthetics. IGI Global; 2014. p. 215–236. DOI:10.4018/978-1-4666-6094-6.ch011
   Google Scholar
• Poobrasert O, Gestubtim W. Development of assistive technology: when learning disability is no barrier. In HEALTHINF 2014 - 7th International Conference on Health Informatics, Proceedings; Part of 7th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ok MW, Bryant DP. Effects of a strategic intervention with iPad practice on the multiplication fact performance of fifth-grade students with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Q. 2016;39(3):146–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar