New musical interfaces for older adults in residential care: assessing a user-centred design approach

References

• De Jong Gierveld J. A review of loneliness: concept and definitions, determinants and consequences. Rev Clin Gerontol. 1998;8(1):73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy K, Baker F, Dumaresq E, et al. Creative arts interventions to address depression in older adults: a systematic review of outcomes, processes, and mechanisms. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2655–2624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke H, Collins L, Sidani S. Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):214.
   Google Scholar
• Creech A, Hallam S, McQueen H, et al. Active ageing with music: supporting well being in the third and fourth ages. London: IOE Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dinh D. Increasing social participation in senior center through program development. Student Capstone Projects. 4. 2019. https://soar.usa.edu/capstones/4.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido S, Dunne L, Perz J, et al. The use of music in aged care facilities: a mixed-methods study. J Health Psychol. 2020;25(10–11):1425–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider C, Hunter E, Bardach S. Potential cognitive benefits from playing music among cognitively intact older adults: a scoping review. J Appl Gerontol. 2019;38(12):1763–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macritchie J, Breaden M, Milne A, et al. Cognitive, motor and social factors of music instrument training programs for older adults’ improved wellbeing. Front Psychol. 2020;10(January):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge D. Music therapy in dementia care: more new voices. London: Jessica Kingsley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Koger S, Chapin K, Brotons M. Is music therapy an effective intervention for dementia? A meta-analytic review of literature. J Music Ther. 1999;36(1):2–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor DW, Ames D, Gardner B, et al. Psychosocial treatments of behavior symptoms in dementia: a systematic review of reports meeting quality standards. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(2):225–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ros P, Cubero-Plazas L, Mejías-Serrano T, et al. Preferred music listening intervention in nursing home residents with cognitive impairment: a randomized intervention study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(2):433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svansdottir H, Snaedal J. Music therapy in moderate and severe dementia of Alzheimer’s type: a case-control study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2006;18(4):613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke M, Moyle W, Shum D, et al. A randomized controlled trial exploring the effect of music on quality of life and depression in older people with dementia. J Health Psychol. 2010b;15(5):765–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes C, Knights A, Dean C, et al. Keep music live: music and the alleviation of apathy in dementia subjects. Int Psychogeriatr. 2006;18(4):623–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitenweg J, Murre J, Ridderinkhof K. Brain training in progress: a review of trainability in healthy seniors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6(2012):183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joseph D, Southcott J. Singing and companionship in the Hawthorn University of the Third-Age Choir, Australia. Int J Lifelong Educ. 2015;34(3):334–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seinfeld S, Figueroa H, Ortiz-Gil J, et al. Effects of music learning and piano practice on cognitive function, mood and quality of life in older adults. Front Psychol. 2013;4:Article 810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Cai J, An L, et al. Does music therapy enhance behavioral and cognitive function in elderly dementia patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;35:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villeneuve M, Penhune V, Lamontagne A. A piano training program to improve manual dexterity and upper extremity function in chronic stroke survivors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:662.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider S, Schönle P, Altenmüller E, et al. Using musical instruments to improve motor skill recovery following a stroke. J Neurol. 2007;254(10):1339–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido S, Dunne L, Chang E, et al. The use of music playlists for people with dementia: a critical synthesis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(3):1129–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido S, Stevens C, Chang E, et al. Musical features and affective responses to personalized playlists in people with probable dementia. Am J Alzheimer Dis Other Demen. 2019;34(4):247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creech A. Using music technology creatively to enrich later-life: a literature review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:117–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz M, Martin P, Margrett J, et al. Perceptions of technology among older adults. J Gerontol Nurs. 2013;39(1):42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahna N, Hadley S, Miller V, et al. Music technology usage in music therapy: a survey of practice. Arts Psychother. 2012;39(5):456–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krout R. Music technology used in therapeutic and health settings. In: Magee, editor. Music technology in therapeutic and health settings. 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.
   Google Scholar
• Frid E. Accessible digital musical instruments – a survey of inclusive instruments. Presented at: the NIME, SMC and ICMC Conferences. International Computer Music Conference, 2018 August 5–10; Daegu, Korea; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Topo P. Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers: a literature review. J Appl Gerontol. 2009;28(1):5–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward A, Davis T, Bevan A. Music technology and alternate controllers for clients with complex needs. Music Ther Perspect. 2019;37(2):151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancient C, Good A. Considering people living with dementia when designing interfaces. In: Design, user experience, and usability. User experience design practice. Cham: Springer; 2014. p. 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Dopp A, Parisi K, Munson S, et al. Integrating implementation and user-centred design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: protocol from a concept mapping study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendriks N, Truyen F, Duval E. Designing with Dementia: guidelines for participatory design together with persons with dementia. Presented at the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Cape Town, South Africa. 2013. p. 649–666.
   Google Scholar
• Kopec W, Nielek R, Wierzbicki A. Guidelines towards better participation of older adults in software development processes using a new SPIRAL method and participatory approach. Presented at the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE 2018), Gothenburg, Sweden; 2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3195836.3195840.
   Google Scholar
• Muller M, Kuhn S. Participatory design. Commun ACM. 1993;36(6):24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward A, Woodbury L, Davis T. Design considerations for instruments for users with complex needs in SEN settings. Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), May 2017, Aalborg, Denmark; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda E, Wanderley M. New digital musical instruments. Middleton (WI): A-R Editions, Inc.; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott O, Orrell M, Ridder H. The development of Music in Dementia Assessment Scales (MiDAS). Nord J Music Ther. 2015;24(3):232–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler D, Namioka A, Suchman L. Participatory design: principles and practices. Mahwah: CRC Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Franz R, Neves B. Usability is ageless: conducting usability tests with older adults. In Neves B, Vetere F, editors. Aging and digital technology. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2019. p. 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Jiancaro T, Jaglal S, Mihailidis A. Technology, design and dementia: an exploratory survey of developers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(6):573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orpwood R, Bjørneby S, Hagen I, et al. User involvement in dementia product development. Dementia. 2004;3(3):263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Orpwood R, Chadd J, Howcroft D, et al. Designing technology to improve quality of life for people with dementia: user-led approaches. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2010;9(3):249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Besouw RM, Oliver BR, Hodkinson SM, et al. Participatory design of a music aural rehabilitation programme. Cochlear implants int. 2015;16(sup3):S39–S50. DOI:10.1179/1467010015Z.000000000264.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardization. Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (Standard No. 9241-210:2019). 2019. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-2:v1:en.
   Google Scholar
• SoundBeam UK Ltd. Homepage. [2019; cited 2019 Nov 30]. https://www.soundbeam.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Nath A, Young S. Vesball – a ball-shaped instrument for music therapy. Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME); Baton Rouge: The School of Music and the Center for Computation and Technology (CCT), Louisiana State University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour P, Matejka J, Foulds G. The 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS), 2017. AMI: An Adaptable Music Interface to Support the Varying Needs of People with Dementia. 2017 30 Oct–1 Nov 2017. Baltimore, MA; 2017. DOI:10.1145/3132525.
   Google Scholar
• Takehara N, Okuno R, Ichinose T, et al. A novel system for the elderly to learn playing electronig [sic] Musical Instrument in Ensemble. 2017 International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture and Computing), 2017, 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Challis B. Assistive synchronised music improvisation. In: De Michelis G, Tisato F, Bene A, Bernini D, editors. Arts and technology. ArtsIT 2013. Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering. Vol 116. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeck J. Applications of music technology in a children’s hospice setting. In: Magee W, editor. Music Technology in Therapeutic H  lth Settings. 2014. p. 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Jack R, Mehrabi A, Stockman T, et al. Action-sound latency and the perceived quality of digital musical instruments. Music Percep. 2018;36(1):109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfordresher P. Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2006;2(2):183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Humberstone J, Taylor J. Making music learning fun: designing an interactive iBook for informal learning. ACMC 2015-Make!: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Music Association, University of Technology Sydney, 2015 Nov 18–21. 2015. p. 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Vahia I, Kamat R, Vang C, et al. Use of tablet devices in the management of agitation among inpatients with dementia: an open-label study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;25(8):860–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido S, Stevens C, Chang E, et al. Music and dementia: individual differences in response to personalized playlists. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(3):933–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favilla S, Pedell S. Touch screen collaborative music - designing NIME for older people with dementia. Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Norman D. The design of everyday things. Rev. and expanded ed. New York (NY): Basic Books; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Roli. Blocks. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 30]. https://roli.com/products/blocks.
   Google Scholar
• Novation Music. LaunchPad. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 30]. https://novationmusic.com/launch/launchpad-mk2.
   Google Scholar
• Akai. APC Mini. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 30]. https://www.akaipro.com/apc-mini.
   Google Scholar
• Waycott J, Pedell S, Vetere F, et al. Actively engaging older adults in the development and evaluation of tablet technology. Presented at the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2012. p. 643–652.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen B, Anderson A. Designing four generations of musicking tangibles. In: Stansaeth K, editor. Music, health, technology and design. Oslo: NMH-publications; 2014. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Apple. Logic Pro X overview. 2019a [cited 2019 Dec 12]. https://www.apple.com/au/logic-pro/.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg. Cubase, overview. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 12]. https://new.steinberg.net/cubase/.
   Google Scholar
• Apple. GarageBand for Mac. 2019b [cited 2019 Dec 12]. https://www.apple.com/au/mac/garageband/.
   Google Scholar
• Cycling’74. What is Max? 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 12]. https://cycling74.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor J. An ARTISAN perspective for software development, commercialisation and artistic co-creation: a case study. In: Lugmayr A, Stojmenova E, Stanoevska K, Wellington R, editors. Information systems and management in media and entertainment industries. International series on computer entertainment and media technology. Cham: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Skoog. Skoog Music. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 30]. https://skoogmusic.com/specialeducation/.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin A, Rogers W, Fisk A. Using direct and indirect input devices: attention demands and age-related differences. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2009;16(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels R, Boekhorst S, Postma A. The contribution of implicit and explicit memory to the effects of errorless learning: a comparison between young and older adults. J Int’l Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(2):144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimura M, Komatsu S. Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for mild dementia. Psychogeriatrics. 2007;7(3):137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner PC. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package BRMS. R J. 2018;10(1):395–411.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD, et al. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J Stat Soft. 2017;76(1):1–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multi-level/hierarchical models. In: Analytical methods for social research. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar