Robotic assistive and rehabilitation devices leading to motor recovery in upper limb: a systematic review

References

• Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, et al. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci. 1995;130(1):59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara M, Sancho-Bru JL, Gracia-Ibáñez V, et al. An introductory study of common grasps used by adults during performance of activities of daily living. J Hand Ther. 2014;27(3):225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CJL, Barber RM, Foreman KJ, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. The Lancet. 2015; 386(10009):2145–2191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO: stroke, cerebrovascular accident. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/stroke-cerebrovascular-accident/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanne C, Gordon A. Development of hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) for improving bimanual coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(11):931–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comella CL, Stebbins GT, Brown-Toms N, et al. Physical therapy and Parkinson's disease: a controlled clinical trial. Neurology. 1994;44(3 Pt 1):376–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman J, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, et al. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1997;42(2):236–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao H, Zhang D. Soft robotic glove with integrated sEMG sensing for disabled people with hand paralysis. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO); 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, et al. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platz T. [Evidence-based arm rehabilitation-a systematic review of the literature]. Nervenarzt. 2003;74(10):841–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggogeri F, Mikolajczyk T, O’Kane J. Robotics for rehabilitation of hand movement in stroke survivors. Adv Mech Eng. 2019;11(4):168781401984192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro RC, Harwin WS, Nagai K, et al. Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011;49(10):1103–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scassellati B, Admoni H, Matarić M. Robots for use in autism research. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14:275–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuente MPAG, de la Pinta, JR, García, AL. Interoperability systems. In: Service robotics within the digital home. Netherlands: Springe; 2011, p. 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HL. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo DH, Kim SY. Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):677–679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denève A, Moughamir S, Afilal L, et al. Control system design of a 3-DOF upper limbs rehabilitation robot. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;89(2):202–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1772–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang WH, Kim YH. Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. J Stroke. 2013;15(3):174–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, vanWegen EE, et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(2):107–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli P, Morone G, Rosati G, et al. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients' therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:153872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Park HW, Park CH, et al. Special issue on assistive and rehabilitation robotics. Auton Robot. 2017;41(3):513–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak D, Riener R. A survey of sensor fusion methods in wearable robotics. Rob Auton Syst. 2015; 73:155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Motiwala VLRR, et al. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain. 2008;131(2):425–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Wang Z, Galloway KC, et al. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Rob Auton Syst. 2015;73:135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng W, Liu Q, Zhou Z, et al. Recent development of mechanisms and control strategies for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation. Mechatronics. 2015;31:132–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisoli A, Borelli L, Montagner A, et al. Arm rehabilitation with a robotic exoskeleton in virtual reality. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); 2008 Jun 13–15; Noordwijk, Netherlands. IEEE; 2007. p. 631–642.
   Google Scholar
• Rehmat N, Zuo J, Meng W, et al. Upper limb rehabilitation using robotic exoskeleton systems: a systematic review. Int J Intell Robot Appl. 2018;2(3):283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP, et al. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1(1):5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lum PS, Burgar CG, Van der Loos M, et al. The MIME robotic system for upper-limb neuro-rehabilitation: results from a clinical trial in subacute stroke. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2005. Available from: 10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501153.
   Google Scholar
• Formaggio E, Storti SF, Galazzo IB, et al. Time–frequency modulation of ERD and EEG coherence in robot-assisted hand performance. Brain Topogr. 2015;28(2):352–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissolotti L, Villafañe JH, Gaffurini P, et al. Changes in skeletal muscle perfusion and spasticity in patients with poststroke hemiparesis treated by robotic assistance (Gloreha) of the hand. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(3):769–773.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francisco GE, Yozbatiran N, Berliner J, et al. Robot-assisted training of arm and hand movement shows functional improvements for incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(10 Suppl 1):S171–S177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, et al. The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(5):395–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry JC, Rosen J, Burns S. Upper-limb powered exoskeleton design. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2007;12(4):408–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Tu X, He J. Design and evaluation of the RUPERT wearable upper extremity exoskeleton robot for clinical and in-home therapies. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2016;46(7):926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov D, Gaponov I, Ryu JH. Portable exoskeleton glove with soft structure for hand assistance in activities of daily living. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2017;22(2):865–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karam A, Alnajjar F, Gochoo M. Assistive and rehabilitation robotics for upper limb impairments in post-stroke patients: evaluation criteria for the design and functionality. 2020 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET); pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Verhagen AP, De Vet HC, De Bie RA, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(12):1235–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osuagwu BA, Timms S, Peachment R, et al. Taylor J, 2018, October. Clinical trial of the soft extra muscle glove to assess orthotic and long-term functional gain following chronic incomplete tetraplegia: preliminary functional results. International Conference on NeuroRehabilitation. Cham: Springer; pp. 385–389.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou YM, Wagner D, Nuckols K, et al. Soft robotic glove with integrated sensing for intuitive grasping assistance post spinal cord injury. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2019. Available from: 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794367.
   Google Scholar
• Yurkewich A, Hebert D, Wang RH, et al. Hand Extension Robot Orthosis (HERO) glove: development and testing with stroke survivors with severe hand impairment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(5):916–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong W, Li W, Pang M, et al. A Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and robot hybrid system for multi-joint coordinated upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. J. NeuroEng Rehab. 2017;14:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shamy SM. Efficacy of Armeo® Robotic Therapy versus conventional therapy on upper limb function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(3):164–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radder B, Prange-Lasonder GB, Kottink AIR, et al. Home rehabilitation supported by a wearable soft-robotic device for improving hand function in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial. PLOS One. 2019;14(8):e0220544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimolin V, Germiniasi C, Galli M, et al. Robot-assisted upper limb training for hemiplegic children with. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2019;31(1):89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappello L, Meyer JT, Galloway KC, et al. Assisting hand function after spinal cord injury with a fabric-based soft robotic glove. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernocchi P, Mulè C, Vanoglio F, et al. Home-based hand rehabilitation with a robotic glove in hemiplegic patients after stroke: a pilot feasibility study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(2):114–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frullo JM, Elinger J, Pehlivan AU, et al. Effects of assist-as-needed upper extremity robotic therapy after incomplete spinal cord injury: a parallel-group controlled trial. Front Neurorobot. 2017;11:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu H, Chiu H, Kuan T, et al. Robotic‐assisted therapy with bilateral practice improves task and motor performance in the upper extremities of chronic stroke patients: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(5):637–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee BS, Lee HJ, et al. Clinical efficacy of upper limb robotic therapy in people with tetraplegia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(1):49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min-Su K, Sung K, Noh SF, et al. Robotic-assisted shoulder rehabilitation therapy effectively improved poststroke hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Phys. Med. Rehab. 2019;100(6):1015–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Bishop L, Post T, et al. On the feasibility of wearable exotendon networks for whole-hand movement patterns in stroke patients. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016. Available from: 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487560.
   Google Scholar
• Pilla A, Trigili E, McKinney Z, et al. Robotic rehabilitation and multimodal instrumented assessment of post-stroke elbow motor functions—a randomized controlled trial protocol. Front Neurol. 2020;11:1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Park G, Cho DY, et al. Comparisons between end-effector and exoskeleton rehabilitation robots regarding upper extremity function among chronic stroke patients with moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, et al. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2020;17(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinembiri B, Ming Z, Kai S, et al. The fourier M2 robotic machine combined with occupational therapy on post-stroke upper limb function and independence-related quality of life: a randomized clinical trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021;28(1):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Gómez A, Sánchez-Herrera-Baeza P, Oña-Simbaña ED, et al. Effects of virtual reality associated with serious games for upper limb rehabilitation inpatients with multiple sclerosis: randomized controlled trial. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2020;17(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho KH, Song WK. Effects of two different robot-assisted arm training on upper limb motor function and kinematics in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Topics Stroke Rehabil. 2020;1–10. DOI:10.1080/10749357.2020.1804699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Guo S, Sun Q. An assist-as-needed controller for passive, assistant, active, and resistive robot-aided rehabilitation training of the upper extremity. Appl Sci. 2020;11(1):340.
   Google Scholar
• Keeling AB, Piitz M, Semrau JA, et al. Robot enhanced stroke therapy optimizes rehabilitation (RESTORE): a pilot study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2021;18(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aprile I, Germanotta M, Cruciani A, FDG Robotic Rehabilitation Group, et al. Upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehem S, Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, et al. Effectiveness of a single session of dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in combination with upper limb robotic-assisted rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(2):138–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DJ, Cortes M, Rykman-Peltz A, et al. Clinical improvement with intensive robot-assisted arm training in chronic stroke is unchanged by supplementary tDCS. RNN. 2019;37(2):167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Singh N, Saini M, Kumar N, et al. Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton study for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. 2021;1–16. DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-67841/v2
   Google Scholar
• Babaiasl M, Jaryani P, Mahdioun S, et al. Assistive Technology A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot- aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;11:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prange GB, Jannink MJA, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, et al. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(2):171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollar AM, Herr H. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: Challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Robot. 2008;24(1):144–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan T, Cempini M, Oddo CM, et al. Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons. Rob Auton Syst. 2015;64:120–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windrich M, Grimmer M, Christ O, et al. Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions. BioMed Eng Online. 2016;15(S3):5–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckerle P, Salvietti G, Unal R, et al. A human-robot interaction perspective on assistive and rehabilitation robotics. Front Neurorobot. 2017;11:24.
   Google Scholar
• Alnajjar F, Ozaki KI, Itkonen M, et al. Self-support biofeedback training for recovery from motor impairment after stroke. IEEE Access. 2020;8:72138–72157. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2987095
   Google Scholar