The State of Web Accessibility for tourists with disabilities: a comparative study between different tourism supply agents

References

• Bergier B, Bergier J, Kubińska Z. Environmental determinants of participation in tourism and recreation of people with varying degrees of disability. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(17–18):1134–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawijn J, Veenhoven R. The effect of leisure activities on life satisfaction: the importance of holiday trips. In: The human pursuit of well-being; [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2011. p. 39–53. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-1375-8_4
   Google Scholar
• McCabe S, Joldersma T, Li C. Understanding the benefits of social tourism: linking participation to subjective well-being and quality of life. Int J Tourism Res. 2010;12(6):761–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liburd JJ, Benckendorff P, Carlsen J. Tourism and quality-of-life: how does tourism measure up? In: Uysal M, Perdue R, Sirgy M, editors. Handbook of tourism and quality-of-life research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012. p. 105–132.
   Google Scholar
• Dolnicar S, Yanamandram V, Cliff K. The contribution of vacations to quality of life. Ann Tour Res. 2012;39(1):59–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscardo G. Tourism and quality of life: towards a more critical approach. Tour Hosp Res. 2009;9(2):159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn DS, Andrews EE. Person-first and identity-first language: developing psychologists' cultural competence using disability language. Am Psychol. 2015;70(3):255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhalis D, Darcy S. Accessible tourism concepts and issues. UK: Channel View Publications; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Milicchio F, Prosperi M. Accessible tourism for the deaf via mobile apps. Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments – PETRA’16 [Internet]; 2016. p. 1–7. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2910674.2910694
   Google Scholar
• World Tourism Organization. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 21 December 1990. 45/216. Population and development; [Internet]. Popular News; 1991. Available from: https://research.un.org/en/docs/ga/quick/regular/45
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities; [Internet]; 2006. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• Samdahl DM, Jekubovich NJ. A critique of leisure constraints: comparative analyses and understandings. J Leis Res. 1997;29(4):430–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger CÉ, Jolin L. The International Organisation of Social Tourism (ISTO) working towards a right to holidays and tourism for all. Curr Issues Tour. 2011;14(5):475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels MJ, Drogin Rodgers EB, Wiggins BP. “Travel Tales”: an interpretive analysis of constraints and negotiations to pleasure travel as experienced by persons with physical disabilities. Tour Manag. 2005;26(6):919–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BK, Agarwal S, Kim HJ. Influences of travel constraints on the people with disabilities’ intention to travel: an application of Seligman’s helplessness theory. Tour Manag. 2012;33(3):569–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eusébio C, Carneiro MJ, Kastenholz E, et al. The impact of social tourism for seniors on the economic development of tourism destinations. Eur J Tour Res. 2016;12:5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassiot A, Prats L, Coromina L. Tourism constraints for Spanish tourists with disabilities: scale development and validation. Doc d'Anal Geogr. 2018;64(1):49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNWTO. Accessible Tourism [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.unwto.org/accessibility
   Google Scholar
• Nazari Orakani S, Smith K, Weaver A. Reframing the experiences of travellers with mobility impairments: enhancing the leisure constraints model. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2021;47:84–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devile E, Kastenholz E. Accessible tourism experiences: the voice of people with visual disabilities. J Policy Res Tour Leis Events. 2018;10(3):265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waschke S. Labeling im Barrierefreien Tourismus in Deutschland – Vergleichende Analyse auf Basis Europäischer Beispiele Thesis. Universität Lüneburg; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Altinay Z, Saner T, Bahçelerli NM, et al. The role of social media tools: accessible tourism for disabled citizens. Int Forum Educ Technol Soc. 2016;19:89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumbo NJ, Pegg S. Travelers and tourists with disabilities: a matter of priorities and loyalties. Tour Rev Int. 2005;8(3):195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Buhalis D, Michopoulou E. Information-enabled tourism destination marketing: addressing the accessibility market. Curr Issues Tour. 2011;14(2):145–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajadacz A. Sources of tourist information used by deaf people. Case study: the Polish Deaf Community. Curr Issues Tour. 2014;17(5):434–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. Accessibility of ICT products and services; [Internet]; 2019; [cited 2021 Mar 26]. Available from: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/rolling-plan-ict-standardisation/accessibility-ict-products-and-services
   Google Scholar
• Decreto-Lei n.o 83/2018. Diário da República n.o 202/2018, Série I 2018-10-19; [Internet]; 2018. p. 5029–5035. Available from: https://dre.pt/home/-/dre/116734769/details/maximized%0A
   Google Scholar
• Shi Y. The accessibility of Queensland visitor information centres’ websites. Tour Manag. 2006;27(5):829–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asghar I, Cang S, Yu H. An empirical study on assistive technology supported travel and tourism for the people with dementia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(8):933–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro FR, Silva A, Barbosa F, et al. Mobile applications for accessible tourism: overview, challenges and a proposed platform. Inf Technol Tourism. 2018;19(1–4):29–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvado JOMG, Ferreira AMAP, da Costa CMM. Cocriação de valor: uma perspetiva das agências de viagens independentes. Rev Turística Desenvolv. 2014;4:35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang Z, Magnini VP, Fesenmaier DR. Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: insights from travel planning using the internet. J Retail Consum Serv. 2015;22:244–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yau MK, McKercher B, Packer TL. Traveling with a disability – more than an access issue. Ann Tour Res. 2004;31(4):946–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Zahra S. Web accessibility evaluation. In: Harper S, Yesilada Y, editors. Web access human–computer interaction series; [Internet]. London: Springer; 2008. p. 79–106. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-84800-050-6_7
   Google Scholar
• Maia LS, Turine MAS, Da Costa Sandim H, et al. Um modelo para o desenvolvimento de aplicações web acessíveis. An Princ do XVI Simpósio Bras Sist Multimídia e Web. Belo Horizonte: SBC; 2010. p. 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• W3C. Web accessibility evaluation tools list; [Internet]; 2021; [cited 2020 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves MJA, Camarinha AP, Abreu AJ, et al. Web accessibility in the tourism sector: an analysis of the most used websites in Portugal. In: Rocha Á, Abreu A, de Carvalho J, et al. editors. Advances in tourism, technology and smart systems. Smart innovation, systems and technologies. Vol. 171. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Borges I, Costa E, Sousa Pinto A, et al. Infoaccessibility on the websites of inbound markets of Portugal destination. In: Rocha Á, Abreu A, de Carvalho J, et al. editors. Advances in tourism, technology and smart systems. Smart innovation, systems and technologies. Vol. 171. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Silveiro A, Eusébio C, Teixeira L. Heterogeneity in accessibility of travel agency websites: a study in the central Portugal region. RISTI. 2019;35:18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira L, Eusebio C, Silveiro A. Website accessibility of Portuguese travel agents. 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies. IEEE; 2019. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Macedo CF, Sousa BM. A acessibilidade no etourism: um estudo na ótica das pessoas portadoras de necessidades especiais. PASOS Rev Tur y Patrim Cult. 2019;17:709–723.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez Vila T, Alén González E, Darcy S. Website accessibility in the tourism industry: an analysis of official national tourism organization websites around the world. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(24):2895–2906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno L, Martínez P, Muguerza J, et al. Support resource based on standards for accessible e-Government transactional services. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2018;58:146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgül Y. Web content accessibility of municipal web sites in Turkey. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG; 2015. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez Vila T, Brea JAF. A new challenge: the content and the accessibility on the Spanish tourist web [Un nuevo desafío: El contenido y la accesibilidad al contenido de las web turísticas españolas]. Rev Galega Econ. 2009;18:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Brajnik G, Yesilada Y, Harper S. Guideline aggregation: web accessibility evaluation for older users. W4A 2009. International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility; 2009. p. 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez Vila T, Alén González E, Darcy S. Accessibility of tourism websites: the level of countries’ commitment. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2020;19(2):331–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills JE, Han JH, Clay MJ. Accessibility of hospitality and tourism websites: a challenge for visually impaired persons. Cornell Hosp Q. 2008;49(1):28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison AM, Taylor JS, Douglas A. Website evaluation in tourism and hospitality. J Travel Tour Mark. 2004;17:35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Williams R, Rattray R. UK hotel web page accessibility for disabled and challenged users. Tour Hosp Res. 2005;5(3):255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Williams R, Rattray R, Grimes A. Meeting the on-line needs of disabled tourists: an assessment of UK-based hotel websites. Int J Tourism Res. 2006;8(1):59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Williams R, Rattray R, Grimes A. Online accessibility and information needs of disabled tourists: a three country hotel sector analysis. J Electron Commer Res. 2007;8:157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Langa L, Lazar J, Adesina T, et al. Museum web accessibility: a pilot assessment of Mid-Atlantic museums. Int J Incl Museum. 2012;4(1):15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander D. WebWatch: how accessible are Australian University web sites? [Internet]. Ariadne; 2004; [cited 2019 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/38/alexander/
   Google Scholar
• Akgül Y, Vatansever K. Web accessibility evaluation of government websites for people with disabilities in Turkey. J Adv Manage Sci. 2016;4:201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez Vila T, Alén González E, Darcy S. Accessible tourism online resources: a Northern European perspective. Scand J Hosp Tour. 2019;19(2):140–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper S, Yesilada Y. Emerging technologies and web accessibility: research challenges and opportunities focussing on vision issues. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(1):1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobsen JKS, Munar AM. Tourist information search and destination choice in a digital age. Tour Manag Perspect. 2012;1:39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Blichfeldt BS, Nicolaisen J. Disabled travel: not easy, but doable. Curr Issues Tour. 2011;14(1):79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W3C. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 [Internet]; 2018; [cited 2020 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
   Google Scholar
• Kuzma J, Yen D, Oestreicher K. Global e-government web accessibility: an empirical examination of EU, Asian and African sites [Internet]. Second International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies Access. Hammamet, Tunisia; 2009. Available from: http://eprints.worc.ac.uk/591/
   Google Scholar
• W3C. How to meet WCAG 2.0 (quick reference); [Internet]; 2018. [cited 2020 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/
   Google Scholar
• Poria Y, Reichel A, Brandt Y. People with disabilities visit art museums: an exploratory study of obstacles and difficulties. J Herit Tour. 2009;4(2):117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lee BY, Cranage DA. Service failure of intermediary service: impact of ambiguous locus of control. J Travel Tour Mark. 2017;34(4):515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKercher B, Packer T, Yau MK, et al. Travel agents as facilitators or inhibitors of travel: perceptions of people with disabilities. Tour Manag. 2003;24(4):465–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law R, Leung K, Wong R. The impact of the Internet on travel agencies. Int J Contemp Hospital Manage. 2004;16(2):100–107.
   Google Scholar
• Soufi B, Maguire M. Usability and accessibility in e-commerce web sites. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business; 2008. p. 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Worsfold K, Fisher R, McPhail R, et al. Satisfaction, value and intention to return in hotels. Int J Contemp Hospital Manage. 2016;28(11):2570–2588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi TY, Chu R. Determinants of hotel guests’ satisfaction and repeat patronage in the Hong Kong hotel industry. Int J Hosp Manag. 2001;20(3):277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Bi Y, Card JA, Cole ST. Accessibility and attitudinal barriers encountered by Chinese travellers with physical disabilities. Int J Tourism Res. 2007;9(3):205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Avis AH, Card JA, Cole ST. Accessibility and attitudinal barriers encountered by travelers with physical disabilities. Tour Rev Int. 2005;8(3):239–248.
   Google Scholar
• Tantawy A, Kim WG, Pyo S. Evaluation of hotels to accommodate disabled visitors. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour. 2005;5(1):91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar AL, Lambert CU. If you build it will they come? Developing accessible and useful websites for hospitality management graduate programs. J Hosp Tour Educ. 2001;13:20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sun S, Fong DKC, Law R, et al. An updated comprehensive review of website evaluation studies in hospitality and tourism. Int J Contemp Hospital Manage. 2017;29(1):355–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Carrizosa H, Sheehy K, Rix J, et al. Designing technologies for museums: accessibility and participation issues. J Enabling Technol. 2020;14(1):31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handa K, Dairoku H, Toriyama Y. Investigation of priority needs in terms of museum service accessibility for visually impaired visitors. Br J Vis Impair. 2010;28(3):221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Argyropoulos VS, Kanari C. Re-imagining the museum through “touch”: reflections of individuals with visual disability on their experience of museum-visiting in Greece. Alter. 2015;9(2):130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luccio FL, Beltrame L. Accessible tourism for users with hearing loss. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; 2018. p. 243–248.
   Google Scholar
• Mangani A, Bassi L. Web information, accessibility and museum ownership. Int J Tourism Policy. 2019;9(4):265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Silva FM, Borges I. Digital accessibility on institutional websites of Portuguese tourism. In: Ratten V, editor. Technological progress, inequality and entrepreneurship. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 67–85.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira P, Teixeira L, Eusébio C, et al. The impact of ICTs on accessible tourism. In: ICT tools and applications for accessible tourism; [Internet]; 2021. p. 1–25. Available from: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-7998-6428-8.ch001
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira L, Eusebio C, Silveiro A. Website accessibility of Portuguese travel agents: a view using web diagnostic tools. Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI); 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Abascal J, Arrue M, Valencia X. Tools for web accessibility evaluation. Web accessibility human-computer interaction series; [Internet]. London: Springer; 2019. p. 479–503. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26
   Google Scholar
• INE. Anuário Estatístico da Região Centro – 2018. Instituto Nacional de Estatística; [Internet]; 2019; [cited 2021 May 25]. Available from: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOESpub_boui=418945627&PUBLICACOEStema=55481&PUBLICACOESmodo=2
   Google Scholar
• Turismo Centro de Portugal; [Internet]; 2021; [cited 2021 May 19]. Available from: https://turismodocentro.pt/
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer L, Gill A, Seetaram N. Handbook of research methods in tourism; [Internet]. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2012. Available from: http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781781001288.00007.xml
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira P, Lemos D, Carneiro MJ, et al. Web accessibility in Portuguese museums: potential constraints on interaction for people with disabilities. HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Universal Access and Inclusive Design; [Internet]; 2020. p. 371–386. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-60149-2_29
   Google Scholar
• Black G. The engaging museum: developing museums for visitor involvement. London: Routledge; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zajadacz A, Szmal P. Accessible tourism for deaf people in Poland: the SITur and SITex programs as proposals for accessible urban information. Lecture notes in computer science (including lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics); [Internet]; 2017. p. 348–359. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-58700-4_29
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Wu YJ, Yuan C, et al. Use of social media in uncovering information services for people with disabilities in China. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 2018;18:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna G, Varriale L, Ferrara M. Internet for supporting and promoting accessible tourism: evidence from Italy. In: Baghdadi Y, Harfouche A, editors. ICT for an inclusive world. Vol. 35. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Shah K. Disease, disability, and frailty with increasing age. In: Coll P, editor. Healthy aging; [Internet]. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 9–14. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-06200-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Topinková E. Aging, disability and frailty. Ann Nutr Metab. 2008;52:6–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNWTO. Manual on accessible tourism for all: principles, tools and best practices; [Internet]; 2016; [cited 2020 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284418077
   Google Scholar