Development of a new tool: progression of paediatric powered mobility- 3PM

References

• Currier BA, Jones MA, DeGrace BW. Experiences of families with young power wheelchair users. J Early Interv. 2019;41(2):125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen L, Plummer T, Sabet A, et al. RESNA position on the application of power mobility devices for pediatric users. Assist Technol. 2018;:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Campos JJ, Anderson DI, Barbu-Roth M, et al. Travel broadens the mind. Infancy. 2000;1(2):149–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MA, Mcewen IR, Neas BR. Effects of power wheelchairs on the development and function of young children with severe motor impairments. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottos M, Bolcati C, Sciuto L, et al. Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43(11):769–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler C. Effects of powered mobility on self‐initiated behaviors of very young children with locomotor disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986;28(3):325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet PD. Assessment and training of children for powered mobility in the UK‏. TAD. 2002;14(4):173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone RW, Field DA. Exploring change in young children’s power mobility skill following several months’ experience. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;0(0):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livingstone R, Field D. The child and family experience of power mobility: a qualitative synthesis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(4):317–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L. Powered mobility for people with profound cognitive disabilities leads to developing occupational performance. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(11):655–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Durkin J. Assessment of learning powered mobility use-applying grounded theory to occupational performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(6):963–974.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field DA, Livingstone RW. Power mobility skill progression for children and adolescents: a systematic review of measures and their clinical application. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(10):997–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Massingill B, Farris JP. Using a child’s power mobility learner group to tailor power mobility interventions: a case series. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;0(0):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Best KL, Smith EM, Pellichero A, et al. International research priorities on the role of cognition in power mobility device use: in pursuit of informed clinical practices and knowledge translation. Assist Technol. 2021;:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furumasu J, Guerette P, Tefft D. The development of a powered wheelchair mobility program for young children. Technol Disabil. 1996;5(1):41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen N, Rigbi A, Weiss PLT. Reliability and validity of pediatric powered mobility outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;0(0):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krasovsky T, Shammah C, Addes A, et al. The development and evaluation of the powered mobility function scale (PMFS) for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021;24(5):338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra L. Focus group discussion in qualitative research. TechnoLearn. 2016;6(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers J, Armour M. The delphi technique. In: Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 715–735.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, et al. Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(11):1357–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris C, Kurinczuk JJ, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Reliability of the manual ability classification system for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(12):950–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidecker MJC, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the communication function classification system for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(8):704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E, Nilsson L. Inter-rater reliability of the assessment of learning powered mobility use, version 2.0, when applied with children and adults engaged in driving to learn in a powered wheelchair. Aust Occup Ther J. 2021;68(2):115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler C, Okamoto GA, McKay TM. Motorized wheelchair driving by disabled children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65(2):95–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48(6):1273–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Maeir A, Gilboa Y. Evaluating a therapeutic powered mobility camp for children with severe cerebral palsy: évaluation d’un camp thérapeutique de mobilité motorisée pour les enfants atteints de paralysie cérébrale grave. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88(4):294–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Paleg G. Enhancing function, fun and participation with assistive devices, adaptive positioning, and augmented mobility for young children with infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy: a scoping review and illustrative case report. Disabilities. 2021;1(1):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Farris JP, Gallagher C, et al. Power mobility training for young children with multiple, severe impairments: a case series. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;2638:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone R. A critical review of powered mobility assessment and training for children. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):392–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Cohen R, Maeir A, et al. Effects of a powered mobility summer camp as perceived by school staff: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;0(0):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Maeir A, Gilboa Y. Evaluating a therapeutic powered mobility camp for children with severe cerebral palsy. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;48:294–305.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Paleg G. Practice considerations for the introduction and use of power mobility for children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(3):210–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Miller WC, Lee Kirby R, et al. Development and content validation of the wheelchair use confidence scale: a mixed-methods study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(1):57–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;22(140):55.
   Google Scholar
• Simms LJ, Zelazny K, Williams TF, et al. Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychol Assess. 2019;31(4):557–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox EP. The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review. J Mark Res. 1980;17(4):407–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Fleck MP, Green A, et al. The response scale for the intellectual disability module of the WHOQOL: 5-point or 3-point? J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011;55(6):537–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacoby J, Matell MS. Three-point likert scales are good enough. J Mark Res. 1971;8(4):495–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, et al. The wheelchair skills test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(1):10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar