Service delivery for complex rehabilitation technology: a scoping review

References

• National Coalition for Assistive & Rehab Technology. Complex rehab technology definition the products Complex Rehab Technology (CRT) products include [Internet]. 2016. www.ncart.us
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DM. Americans with disabilities: 2014 household economic studies current population reports [Internet] 2018. http://factfinder.census.gov
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon S, Jacobs NA. ISPO consensus conference on wheelchairs for developing countries: Conclusions and recommendations. Prosthetics Orthotics Inter. 2007;31(2):217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Cooper R, Boninger ML. Trends and issues in wheelchair technologies. Assist Technol. 2008;20(2):61–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM, Encarnacao P. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 5th ed. Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri USA; 2020..
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF the international classification of functioning, disability and health. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Arledge S, Armstrong W, Babinec M, et al. RESNA wheelchair service provision guide. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Inter J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294. Dec
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. Oct 2;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anslow R, Ottewell S. Ekectrically powered wheelchairs: prescribing guidelines. Br J Ther Rehabil. 1998;5(Sup2):7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bamer AM, Connell FA, Dudgeon BJ, et al. Frequency of purchase and associated costs of assistive technology for Washington state medicaid program enrollees with spina bifida by age. Disability Health J. 2010;3(3):155–161. Jul
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Östergren P-O. Users’ perspectives on the provision of assistive technologies in Bangladesh: awareness, providers, costs and barriers. Disab Rehabilit Assistive Technol. 2015;10(4):301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss TM, Finlayson M. Responses to the acquisition and use of power mobility by individuals who have multiple sclerosis and their families. Am J Occupat Ther. 2006;60(3):348–358. doi:10.5014/ajot.60.3.348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray N, Yeo ST, Noyes J, et al. Prioritising wheelchair services for children: a pilot discrete choice experiment to understand how child wheelchair users and their parents prioritise different attributes of wheelchair services. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:32. Published 2016 Jul 19. doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0074-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen LJ, Perling R. Barriers to mobility device access. Topics Geriatric Rehabil. 2015;31(1):19–25. Jan;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Greer N, Berliner E, et al. mobilityRERC state of the science conference: considerations for developing an evidence base for wheeled mobility and seating service delivery. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(6):462–471. Nov 14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Tovey E. Power mobility device provision: Understanding medicare guidelines and advocating for clients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(6):807–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Marco A, Russell M, Masters M. Standards for wheelchair prescription. Aust Occ Ther J. 2003;50(1):30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan MJ. Clinical standards for national health service wheelchair and seating services in Scotland. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):363–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eagles CP. Technology and disability ELSEVIER a comparison of state medicaid policies regarding the purchase process, rental and repair of wheelchairs. TAD. 1996;5(1):35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers SL, Myaskovsky L, Burkitt KH, et al. A preliminary model of wheelchair service delivery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(6):1030–1038. Jun
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman B, Mishra S, Pupulin A, et al. Sustainable and equitable provision of wheelchairs in low- and Middle-income countries: an economic assessment of the models for wheelchair provision in Tajikistan. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(8):865–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson-Pell M, Nicholson G, Bain D, et al. The role of wheelchair seating standards in determining clinical practices and funding policy. Assist Technol. 2005;17(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher A, Cleary G, Clifford A, et al. Unknown world of wheelchairs” a mixed methods study exploring experiences of wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision for people with spinal cord injury in an irish context. Disab Rehabil. 2022;44(10):1946–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geilen BG, de Witte L, Norman G, et al. Quality of wheelchair services as perceived by users in rural bangalore district, India: a cross-sectional survey. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;1–9. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Nov 27]. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.183957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin JS, Nguyen-Oghalai TU, Kuo Y-F, et al. Epidemiology of medicare abuse: the example of power wheelchairs. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2007;55(2):221–226. Feb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowran RJ, Clifford A, Gallagher A, et al. Wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision: a gateway to freedom. Disab Rehabil. 2022;44(3):370–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer N, Brasure M, Wilt TJ. Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(2):141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groah SL, Ljungberg I, Lichy A, et al. Disparities in wheelchair procurement by payer among people with spinal cord injury. PM&R. 2014;6(5):412–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerette P, Tefft D, Furumasu J. Pediatric powered wheelchairs: results of a national survey of providers. Assist Technol. 2005;17(2):144–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home A, Ham R. Provision of powered mobility equipment to young children: the Whizz-Kidz experience. Inter J Ther Rehabil. 2003;10(11):511–519.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard Winkler SL, Cowper Ripley DC, Wu S, et al. Demographic and clinical variation in veterans health administration provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):369–377.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson M. Best practices by occupational and physical therapists performing seating and mobility evaluations. Assistive Technol. 2011;23(1):13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelier P, Turner-Smith A. Review of wheelchair services in England. Br J Occup Ther. 1997;60(4):150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Rader J. Seating and wheeled mobility for older adults living in nursing homes. Topics Geriatric Rehabil. 2015;31(1):10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaraj DC, Bray N, Rispin K, et al. A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision. Afr J Disabil. 2017;6:355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmarkar AM, Dicianno BE, Graham JE, et al. Factors associated with provision of wheelchairs in older adults. Assistive Technol. 2012;24(3):155–167. Sep
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Doucette SP. Relationships between wheelchair services received and wheelchair user outcomes in Less-Resourced settings: a Cross-Sectional survey in Kenya and the Philippines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(9):1648–1654.e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz O, Persson D, Lindgren B, et al. Prescribers’ experience of active wheelchair provisioning in Sweden: Analysis of a postal questionnaire. TAD. 2011;23(4):191–204.
   Google Scholar
• LaPlante MP, Kaye HS. Demographics and trends in wheeled mobility equipment use and accessibility in the community. Assist Technol. 2010;22(1):3–17; quiz 19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis S. Access denied: Consequences of federal policy on seating and wheeled mobility 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Medicare Rights Center. Forcing isolation: medicare’s “in the home” coverage standard for wheelchairs. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Minkel JL. Integration of complex rehabilitation technology (CRT) into long-term care supports. Topics Geriatric Rehabil. 2015;31(1):3–9. Jan;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paguinto S-G, Kasparian NA, Bray P, et al. Multidisciplinary perspectives and practices of wheelchair prescription for children with neuromuscular conditions. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;1–9. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Nov 4]. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1839793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen JP, Harmon D, Kirschner KL. Is an appropriate wheelchair becoming out of reach? PM&R. 2014;6(7):643–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perotti L, Klebbe R, Maier A, et al. Evaluation of the quality and the provision process of wheelchairs in Germany. Results from an online survey. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020:1–10. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Nov 9]. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1841837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis JP, Ballerini K, O'Farrell S, et al. Is an appropriate wheelchair becoming out of reach? - Part 2. PM&R. 2014;6(10):934–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson D, Place M. Evaluation of the powered wheelchair and voucher schemes. Br J Ther Rehabil. 2001;8(2):46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EM, Roberts L, McColl MA, et al. National evaluation of policies governing funding for wheelchairs and scooters in Canada. Can J Occup Ther. 2018;85(1):46–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneed RC, May WL, Stencel C. Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):e612–e625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprigle S, Johnson Taylor S. Data-mining analysis of the provision of mobility devices in the United States with emphasis on complex rehab technology. Assistive Technol. 2019;31(3):141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley RJ. Medicare and complex rehabilitation technology. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2015;31(1):74–87. Jan;
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund T, Iwarsson S, Andersen MC, et al. Documentation of and satisfaction with the service delivery process of electric powered scooters among adult users in different national contexts. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(2):151–160. Mar 17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki KM, Lockerte G, Braun KL. Client satisfaction survey of a wheelchair seating clinic. Phys Occup Ther Geriatrics. 2000;17(2):55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Toro-Hernández ML, Kankipati P, Goldberg M, et al. Appropriate assistive technology for developing countries. Phys Med Rehabil Clinics North America. 2019;30(4):847–865. Nov
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Scheffler E, Schneider M. Policy implementation in wheelchair service delivery in a rural South African setting. Afr J Disabil. 2013;2(1):63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visagie S, Mlambo T, van der Veen J, et al. Impact of structured wheelchair services on satisfaction and function of wheelchair users in Zimbabwe. Afr J Disabil. 2016;5(1):222. 19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitcombe-Shingler M. The history of the wheelchair assessment service in New Zealand: from client centred to client directed. N Z J Occup Ther. 2006;52(2):27–31.
   Google Scholar
• White E, Lemmer B. Effectiveness in wheelchair service provision. Br J Occup Ther. 1998;61(7):301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Widehammar C, Lidström Holmqvist K, Pettersson I, et al. Attitudes is the most important environmental factor for use of powered mobility devices – users’ perspectives. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(4):298–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams E, Hurwitz E, Obaga I, et al. Perspectives of basic wheelchair users on improving their access to wheelchair services in Kenya and Philippines: a qualitative study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017;17(1):22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkler SLH, Vogel B, Hoenig H, et al. Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by medicare and VA. Medical Care. 2010;48(6):558–562. Jun;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JL, Agree EM, Kasper JD. Wheelchairs, walkers, and canes: What does medicare pay for, and who benefits? Health Affairs. 2005;24(4):1140–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG. Foundations of clinical research: applications to Evidence-Based practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis Company; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• CMS. MDCR ENROLL AB 1 total medicare enrollment: total, original medicare, and medicare advantage and other health plan enrollment, Calendar Years 2014-2019. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schein RM, Yang A, McKernan GP, et al. Effect of the assistive technology professional on the provision of mobility assistive equipment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(10):1895–1901. Oct
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogaboom NS, Worobey LA, Houlihan B V, et al. Wheelchair breakdowns are associated with pain, pressure injuries, rehospitalization, and Self-Perceived health in Full-Time wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(10):1949–1956. Oct;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisberg E, Wallace S, O’Hara S. Defining and implementing Value-Based health care: a strategic framework. Acad Med. 2020;95(5):682–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans D, Evans Bn D. Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(1):77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappolt S. The role of professional expertise in Evidence-Based occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(5):589–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar