Multilevel barriers to using assistive technology devices among older hispanics from poor and disadvantaged communities: the relevance of a gender analysis

References

• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/430): United Nations. 2019. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Highlights.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter EG, Kearney PJ. Occupational therapy interventions to improve performance of instrumental activities of daily living for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(4):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forjaz MJ, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Ayala A, et al. Chronic conditions, disability, and quality of life in older adults with multimorbidity in Spain. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26(3):176–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy S, Kurichi JE, Pan Q, et al. Disability stage is an independent risk factor for mortality in medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. PM R. 2015;7(12):1215–1225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musich S, Wang SS, Ruiz J, et al. The impact of mobility limitations on health outcomes among older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2018;39(2):162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson W, Lee C, von Schrader S. Disability statistics from the 2018 American community survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI). 2021. Available from Cornell University Disability Statistics website: https://www.disabilitystatistics.org/
   Google Scholar
• Lee DR, Santo EC, Lo JC, et al. Understanding functional and social risk characteristics of frail older adults: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amegbor PM, Kuuire VZ, Robertson H, et al. Predictors of basic self-care and intermediate self-care functional disabilities among older adults in Ghana. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;77:81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark S, Landsbaum A, Palmer JL, et al. Client-centred home modifications improve daily activity performance of older adults. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76(Spec No):235–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeken I, Darre S, Smedslund G, et al. Effect of assistive technology in hand osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(8):1447–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland H, Aaslund MK, Espehaug B, et al. Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:145. 4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark S. Removing environmental barriers in the homes of older adults with disabilities improves occupational performance. Occup Particip Health. 2004;24(1):32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu CW, Man DW. The effect of training older adults with stroke to use home-based assistive devices. Occup Particip Health. 2004;24(3):113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt L, Lucki K, Bach M, et al. Rollator use and functional outcome of geriatric rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(2):151–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson DJ, Mitchell JM, Kemp BJ, et al. Effects of assistive technology on functional decline in people aging with a disability. Assist Technol. 2009;21(4):208–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, et al. Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(4):297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luz C, Bush T, Shen X. Do canes or walkers make any difference? Non use and fall injuries. Gerontologist. 2017;57(2):211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansley P, McCreadie C, Tinker A. Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? Age Ageing. 2004;33(6):571–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, et al. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(3):210–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louise-Bender PT, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornman JC, Freedman VA, Agree EM. Measurement of assistive device use: implications for estimates of device use and disability in late life. Gerontologist. 2005;45(3):347–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA. A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology. Phys Ther. 2011;91(12):1780–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton N. Barriers and facilitators to community mobility for assistive technology users. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:454195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyers AR, Anderson JJ, Miller DR, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(8):1435–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Allen S, Isenstadt D, et al. Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: implications for intervention. Disabil Health J. 2009;2(2):77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Saray P, Peláez-Ballestas I, Ramos-Lira L, et al. Usage problems and social barriers faced by persons with a wheelchair and other aids. Qualitative study from the ergonomics perspective in persons disabled by rheumatoid arthritis and other conditions. Reumatol Clin. 2013;9(1):24–30. English, Spanish.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg DE, Huang DL, Simonovich SD, et al. Outdoor built environment barriers and facilitators to activity among midlife and older adults with mobility disabilities. Gerontologist. 2013;53(2):268–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerasinghe IE, Fonseka P, Dharmaratne S, et al. Barriers in using assistive devices among a group of community-dwelling persons with lower limb disabilities in Sri Lanka. Disab CBR Incl Dev. 2015;26(1):79–96. doi10.5463/dcid.v26i1.410.
   Google Scholar
• Copolillo A, Teitelman JL. Acquisition and integration of low vision assistive devices: understanding the decision-making process of older adults with low vision. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59(3):305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan KJ, Pot AM. Encouraging innovation for assistive health technologies in dementia: barriers, enablers and next steps to be taken. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(4):357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel E, Jowitt F, McIntyre A. Awareness, requirements and barriers to use of assistive technology designed to enable independence of people suffering from dementia. Technol Disabil. 2012;24(2):139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Demain SH, et al. Translation of evidence-based assistive technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellano-Colón EM, Mann WC, Rivero M, et al. Hispanic older adult’s perceptions of personal, contextual and technology-related barriers for using assistive technology devices. J Racial Ethn Health Disparit. 2016;3(4):676–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebbutt E, Brodmann R, Borg J, et al. Assistive products and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Global Health. 2016;12(1):79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Allen S. Racial and ethnic differences in use of assistive devices for mobility: effect modification by age. J Aging Health. 2006;18(1):106–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20(4):194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz ME, Ransford HE. Latino elders reframing familismo: implications for health and caregiving support. J Cult Divers. 2012;19(2):50–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orellano-Colón EM. Gender differences in the adoption and use of assistive technology (at) among hispanics. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73(4, Suppl 1):7311505192p1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell JW, Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (LA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Orellano-Colón EM, Suárez-Pérez EL, Rivero-Méndez M, et al. Sex disparities in the prevalence of physical function disabilities: a population-based study in a low-income community. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation, 4th ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities, 4th ed. Cambridge (MA): Brookline Books; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bernd T, Van Der Pijl D, De Witte LP. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16(3):146–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Gender and Health Group. Guidelines for the analysis of gender and health; [cited 2018 April]. Available from: https://www.lstmed.ac.uk/sites/default/files/pictures/Guidelines%20for%20the%20Analysis%20of%20Gender%20and%20Health.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird HR, Canino G, Stipec MR, et al. Use of the mini-mental state examination in a probability sample of a hispanic population. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987;175(12):731–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, et al. The PROMIS physical function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(5):516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz SH, Spritzer KL, Morales LS, et al. Evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS(®)) spanish-language physical functioning items. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1819–1830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annual Update of the HHS Poverty. [Internet]. Wasington DC. Department of Health and Human Services Guidelines; [cited 2021 July 8]. Department of Health and Human Services from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/01/2021-01969/annual-update-of-the-hhs-poverty-guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Fotteler M, Risch B, Gaugisch P, et al. Obstacles to using assistive technology for older adults – results from a focus group analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021;281:994–998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite ES, Pimenta CJL, Costa MS, et al. Assistive technology and active aging according to professionals working in community groups. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03355. Portuguese, English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Östergren PO. Users’ perspectives on the provision of assistive technologies in Bangladesh: awareness, providers, costs and barriers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(4):301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KT, Marsack-Topolewski C. Examining social determinants in use of assistive technology for race/ethnic groups of older adults. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;17(6):703–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin RM, White-Means SI. Race, disability and assistive devices: sociodemographics or discrimination. Int J Soc Econ. 2001;28(10/11/12):927–941.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhart Q, Elliott MN, Haviland AM, et al. Gender differences in patient experience across medicare advantage plans. Womens Health Issues. 2020;30(6):477–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanti GA. The hispanic family and male-female relationships: an overview. J Transcult Nurs. 2003;14(3):180–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuñez A, González P, Talavera GA, et al. Machismo, marianismo, and negative cognitive-emotional factors: Findings from the hispanic community health study/study of latinos sociocultural ancillary study. J Lat Psychol. 2016;4(4):202–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parette P, Scherer M. Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2004;39(3):217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton A, Thayer C. Latinos and beauty as we age: a cultural reflection. Washington (DC): AARP Research; 2019. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00345.001.
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Cooperation on Disability Issues (NSH). Provision of Assistive Technology in the Nordic Countries. 2007; [cited 2022 Jan 2]. Available from: https://sid.usal.es/idocs/F8/FDO20694/provisionassistivetechnology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Policy brief: Access to assistive technology; [cited 2022 Jan 2]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1278953/retrieve.
   Google Scholar