Exploring powered wheelchair standing device use in children and adults: a longitudinal case series

References

• Kenyon LK, Harrison KL, Huettner MK, et al. Stakeholder perspectives of pediatric powered wheelchair standing devices: a qualitative study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63(8):969–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Morgan A, Lieberman J, et al. Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society (RESNA) position on the application of wheelchair standing devices: 2013 current state of the literature. Assist Technol. 2016;28(1):57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield C, Evans K, Young H, et al. The development of a consensus statement for the prescription of powered wheelchair standing devices in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(10):1889–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EL, Bibeau C, Holmes TM. Supported standing in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016;28(3):320–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arva J, Paleg G, Lange M, et al. RESNA position on the application of wheelchair standing devices. Assist Technol. 2009;21(3):161–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman LB, Geigle PR, Paleg GS. A systematic review of supported standing programs. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3(3):197–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paleg G, Smith B, Glickman L. Systematic review and evidence-based clinical recommendations for dosing of pediatric supported standing programs. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2013;25(3):232–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordström B, Näslund A, Ekenberg L, et al. The ambiguity of standing in standing devices: a qualitative interview study concerning children and parents experiences of the use of standing devices. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30(7):483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleg G, Livingstone R. Systematic review and clinical recommendations for dosage of supported home-based standing programs for adults with stroke, spinal cord injury and other neurological conditions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin J, Lecouturier J, Crombie S, et al. Understanding frames: a qualitative study of young people’s experiences of using standing frames as part of postural management for cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2018;44(2):203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley K, Parkinson S, Jacoby P, et al. Benefits of powered standing wheelchair devices for adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the first year of use. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;56(9):1419–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen AE, Morville AL, Hansen T. Translating the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure to Danish, addressing face and content validity. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;26(1):33–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 2nd ed. Ottawa: CAOT publications ACE; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(3):647–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, et al. Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):875–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Badia X, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):887–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez Sousa MÁ, Olivares Sánchez-Toledo PR, Gusi Fuerte N. Parent–child discrepancy in the assessment of health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-Y Questionnaire. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017;115(6):541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis P, De La Loge C, Dubois D, et al. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(5):540–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogia PP, Braatz JH, Rose SJ, et al. Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):192–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen TL, Christensen M, Christensen SS, et al. Reliability of knee joint range of motion and circumference measurements after total knee arthroplasty: does tester experience matter? Reliability of knee joint assessment. Physiother Res Int. 2010;15(3):126–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim DH, An DH, Yoo WG. Validity and reliability of ankle dorsiflexion measures in children with cerebral palsy. BMR. 2018;31(3):465–468.
   Google Scholar
• Mutlu A, Livanelioglu A, Gunel MK. Reliability of goniometric measurements in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Med Sci Monit. 2007;13(7):CR323–CR329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mätzke Rasmussen H, Torp-Pedersen L. Manual – Opfølgningsprogram for cerebral parese – Fysioterapeut protokol [Internet]. CPOP; 2014. Available from: http://www.cpop.dk/wp-content/uploads/2014.07.03-Fysioterapeut-manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2016. 571 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Phys Ther. 1988;68(5):672–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permobil. Information about Permobil Connect [Internet]; 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 23]. Available from: https://www.permobil.com/en-us/products/power-wheelchairs/functions/permobil-connect
   Google Scholar
• Rajmil L, López AR, López-Aguilà S, et al. Parent–child agreement on health-related quality of life (HRQOL): a longitudinal study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Harris I, Lu ZK. Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook & Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. xvi, 571 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht E. Application of the Human Activity Assistive Technology model for occupational therapy research. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(4):230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Field D. The child and family experience of power mobility: a qualitative synthesis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(4):317–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudgeon S, Kirk S. Living with a powered wheelchair: exploring children’s and young people’s experiences. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(2):118–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Classification internationale du fonctionnement, du handicap et de la santé: CIF [Internet]; 2001. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42407
   Google Scholar
• Young H, Bray P, McKinnon K, et al. Everyday life participation using powered wheelchair standing devices by boys with DMD. OTJR. 2021;41(3):175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar