Users’ satisfaction and experiences in using assistive devices distributed by a rehabilitation centre in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study

References

• World Health Organization. Assistive technology [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2020 May 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Assistive devices and technologies [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2019. [cited 2019 Sep 10]. Available from: www.who.int/disabilities/technology/en/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Assistive technology [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 28]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-policy-and-standards/assistive-and-medical-technology/assistive-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong W, Reisinger KD, Smith WK. Evaluation of CIR-Whirlwind wheelchair and service provision in Afghanistan. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(11–12):935–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson S, Skelton H, Rosenbaum P. Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: impact on child and caregiver function. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(2):89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramstrand N, Maddock A, Johansson M, et al. The lived experience of people who require prostheses or orthoses in the Kingdom of Cambodia: a qualitative study. Disabil Health J. 2021;14(3):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore SL. Use of an economical wheelchair in India and Peru: impact on health and function. Med Sci Monit. 2008;14(12):71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro ML, Eke C, Pearlman J. The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Viriyathorn S, et al. Improving access to assistive technologies: challenges and solutions in low-and middle-income countries. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018;7(2):84–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ameratunga S, Officer A, Temple B, et al. Rehabilitation of the injured child. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(5):327–8328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requejo PS, Furumasu J, Mulroy SJ. Evidence-based strategies for preserving mobility for elderly and aging manual wheelchair users. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2015;31(1):26–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldersey HM, Quadir MM, Akter S, et al. Barriers and facilitators for wheelchair users in bangladesh: a participatory action research project. DCID. 2018;29(2):24–44.
   Google Scholar
• Vergunst R, Swartz L, Mji G, et al. You must carry your wheelchair’–barriers to accessing healthcare in a South African rural area. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):29003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(7):551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Demain SH, et al. Translation of evidence-based assistive technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):124–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinpell RM. Whose outcomes. Patients, providers, or payers? Nurs Clin North Am. 1997;32(3):513–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CL, Teng YL, Lou SZ, et al. User satisfaction with orthotic devices and service in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–1748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Kelleher A, et al. Satisfaction related to wheelchair use in older adults in both nursing homes and community dwelling. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(5):337–343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas JW, Penchansky R. Relating satisfaction with access to utilization of services. Med Care. 1984;22(6):553–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perotti L, Klebbe R, Maier A, et al. Evaluation of the quality and the provision process of wheelchairs in Germany. Results from an online survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;1–10. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1841837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S, Neophytou C, De Souza L, et al. Young people’s experiences using electric powered indoor–outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): potential for enhancing users’ development? Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(16):1281–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11(3):143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson D, Sweeney F, Landry M. Provision of rehabilitation services for children with disabilities living in low-and Middle-income countries: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:861–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchiori C, Bensmail D, Gagnon D, et al. Manual wheelchair satisfaction among long-term users and caregivers: a French study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):181–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarour M, Jacob T, Kram N. Wheelchair satisfaction among elderly Arab and Jewish patients–a cross-sectional survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;1–6. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1853830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson L, Ahlström G. Patients’ satisfaction with lower-limb prosthetic and orthotic devices and service delivery in Sierra Leone and Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallagher A, Cleary G, Clifford A, et al. “Unknown world of wheelchairs” a mixed methods study exploring experiences of wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision for people with spinal cord injury in an Irish context. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;44(10):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Ranada Å, Lidström H. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—a systematic review. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel EJ, De Witte LP. Advances in European assistive technology service delivery and recommendations for further improvement. TAD. 2011;23(3):131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Hansen EM, Christensen JR. The effects of assistive technology service delivery processes and factors associated with positive outcomes–a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(5):590–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Imam MH, Jahan I, Das MC, et al. Situation analysis of rehabilitation services for persons with disabilities in Bangladesh: identifying service gaps and scopes for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:5571–5584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Östergren PO. Users’ perspectives on the provision of assistive technologies in Bangladesh: awareness, providers, costs and barriers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(4):301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandaker G, Muhit M, Karim T, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in Bangladesh: a population‐based surveillance study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(5):601–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuri RP, Aldersey HM, Ghahari S, et al. The Bangladeshi Rights and Protection of Persons with Disability Act of 2013: a policy analysis. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2021;1–10. doi:10.1177/10442073211066789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor W, Nguyen L, Islam QN, et al. Unmet needs and use of assistive products in two districts of Bangladesh: findings from a household survey. IJERPH. 2018;15(12):2901–2910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuri RP, Aldersey HM, Ghahari S, et al. Experience of families in accessing government-led support for children with disabilities in Bangladesh. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:1354–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, et al. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(22):1243–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kassa T, Dego T, Suleyman J, et al. Factors of lower limb prosthesis and orthosis user’s satisfaction in Amhara National Regional State Rehabilitation Center, Ethiopia: an institution-based cross-sectional study. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;8:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsdottir B, Gudmundsdottir SB. Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;1–8. doi:10.1080/17483107.2021.1913519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Children’s perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(2):95–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borade N, Ingle A, Nagarkar A. Lived experiences of people with mobility-related disability using assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(7):730–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Darrah J, Hollis V, et al. Mothers’ perceptions of their children’s use of powered mobility. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2004;24(4):3–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMillen AM, Söderberg S. Disabled persons’ experience of dependence on assistive devices. J Occup Ther. 2002;9(4):176–183.
   Google Scholar
• Carver J, Ganus A, Ivey JM, et al. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(6):468–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggblom-Kronlöf G, Sonn U. Use of assistive devices–a reality full of contradictions in elderly persons’ everyday life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(6):335–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frank AO, De Souza LH, Frank JL, et al. The pain experiences of powered wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(9):770–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budai M, Farrell E, Michael E. Manual wheelchair configuration and seating considerations in the spinal cord injury population. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2018;6(3):204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Best KL, Routhier F, Miller WC. A description of manual wheelchair skills training: current practices in Canadian rehabilitation centers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(5):393–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schyndel R, Furgoch AB, Previl T, et al. The experience of speech recognition software abandonment by adolescents with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(6):513–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tu CJ, Liu L, Wang W, et al. Effectiveness and safety of wheelchair skills training program in improving the wheelchair skills capacity: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(12):1573–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerasinghe IE, Fonseka P, Dharmaratne S, et al. Barriers in using assistive devices among a group of community-dwelling persons with lower limb disabilities in Sri Lanka. DCID. 2015;26(1):79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Rights and Protection of Persons with Disability Act. [Internet]. 39 Bangladesh; 2013. p. 1–25. Available from: https://msw.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/msw.portal.gov.bd/page/47a560c1_9371_4067_9c9c_e0f11a225a77/ব্যক্তিরঅধিকারওসুরক্ষাআইন%2C২০১৩.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Giacobbi P, Levy CE. Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(3):159–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: children & youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Krizack M, et al. Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27(2):12–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Wheelchair charity: a useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(10):591–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Eide AH, Mannan H, et al. A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(7):705–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney E, Gowran RJ. Wheelchair service provision education and training in low and lower Middle income countries: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(1):33–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Wheelchair service training of trainers package. [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2022 May 28]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/258701/9789241512398-managers-eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eide AH, Øderud T. Assistive technology in low-income countries. In: Disability & international development. New York (NY): Springer; 2009. p. 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8(1):3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar