Possibilities of intelligent textiles in AAC – perspectives of speech and language therapists

References

• DeRuyter F, McNaughton D, Caves K, et al. Enhancing AAC connections with the world. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(3):258–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D, Beukelman D, et al. Challenges and opportunities in augmentative and alternative communication: research and technology development to enhance communication and participation for individuals with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady NC, Bruce S, Goldman A, et al. Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: guidance for assessment and intervention. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016;121(2):121–138.    
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Light J. Augmentative & alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 5th ed. Baltimore (MA): Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Creer S, Enderby P, Judge S, et al. Research report prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the UK: determining the need. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;51(6):639–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MM. Innovations for supporting communication: opportunities and challenges for people with complex communication needs. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2019;71(4):156–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook A. Communication devices. In: Webster JG, editor. Encyclopedia of medical devices and instrumentation. 2nd ed., Vol. 2, Capacitive microsensors for biomedical applications – drug infusion systems. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2006. p. 202–210.
   Google Scholar
• Myrden A, Schudlo L, Weyand S, et al. Trends in communicative access solutions for children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(8):1108–1118.    
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsahar Y, Hu S, Bouazza-Marouf K, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) advances: a review of configurations for individuals with a speech disability. Sensors. 2019;19(8):1911.  
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Fager S, Nordness A. Communication support for people with ALS. Neurol Res Int. 2011;2011:714693.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganz JB, Earles-Vollrath TL, Mason RA, et al. An aggregate study of single-case research involving aided AAC: participant characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2011;5(4):1500–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz JB, Morin KL, Foster MJ, et al. High-technology augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs: a meta-analysis. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33(4):224–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, et al. Interventions using high-technology communication devices: a state of the art review. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(3):137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin KL, Ganz JB, Gregori EV, et al. A systematic quality review of high-tech AAC interventions as an evidence-based practice. Augment Altern Commun. 2018;34(2):104–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Light J. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(2):107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin O, Diken IH. Studies comparing augmentative and alternative communication systems (AAC) applications for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2020;55(2):119–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grynszpan O, Weiss PL, Perez-Diaz F, et al. Innovative technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Autism. 2014;18(4):346–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge S. Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disabil Soc. 2007;22(5):457–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancliffe RJ, Larson S, Auerbach K, et al. Individuals with intellectual disabilities and augmentative and alternative communication: analysis of survey data on uptake of aided AAC, and loneliness experiences. Augment Altern Commun. 2010;26(2):87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Douglas SN, Garcia-Melgar A, et al. A scoping review of AAC research conducted in segregated school settings. Res Dev Disabil. 2022;120(1):104141.[34875549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, et al. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22(2):85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(2):115–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato C, Spencer E, Arthur-Kelly M. A critical synthesis of barriers and facilitators to the use of AAC by children with autism spectrum disorder and their communication partners. Augment Altern Commun. 2018;34(3):242–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorcroft A, Scarinci N, Meyer C. A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(7):710–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager SK, Fried-Oken M, Jakobs T, et al. New and emerging technologies for adults with complex communication needs and severe motor impairments: state of the science. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Bryen D, Blackstone S, et al. Young adults with complex communication needs: research and development in AAC for a “diverse” population. Assist Technol. 2011;24(1):45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D, Caron J. New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: state of the science and future research directions. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):26–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane HC, Blackstone S, Vanderheiden G, et al. Using AAC technology to access the world. Assist Technol. 2011;24(1):3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneviratne S, Hu Y, Nguyen T, et al. A survey of wearable devices and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials. 2017;19(4):2573–2620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismar E, Kurşun Bahadir S, Kalaoglu F, et al. Futuristic clothes: electronic textiles and wearable technologies. Glob Chall. 2020;4(7):1900092.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teferra MN, Ramos JS, Kourbelis C, et al. Electronic textile-based electrocardiogram monitoring in cardiac patients: a scoping review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019;17(10):1958–1998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sequeira L, Perrotta S, LaGrassa J, et al. Mobile and wearable technology for monitoring depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a scoping review. J Affect Disord. 2020;265:314–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Caramés TM, Fraga-Lamas P. Towards the internet of smart clothing: a review on IoT wearables and garments for creating intelligent connected E-Textiles. Electronics. 2018;7(12):405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed M, Zaidan B, Zaidan A, et al. A review on systems-based sensory gloves for sign language recognition state of the art between 2007 and 2017. Sensors. 2018;18(7):2208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood A, Han H, Chen X, et al. Development, fabrication and evaluation of passive interface gloves. Text Res J. 2021;91(23-24):3023–3032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury A, Wu G, Chau T. A wearable fabric-based speech-generating device: system design and case demonstration. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(5):434–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theil A, Buchweitz L, Gay J, et al. Tactile board: a multimodal augmentative and alternative communication device for individuals with deafblindness In: Cauchard J, Löchtefeld M, editors. Proceedings on the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM 2020); 2020 Nov 22–25; Essen, Germany. New York (NY): ACM; 2020. p. 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Lubas M, Mitchell J, De Leo G. User-centered design and augmentative and alternative communication apps for children with autism spectrum disorders. SAGE Open. 2014;4(2):215824401453750.
   Google Scholar
• Shah SGS, Robinson I, Al Shawi S. Developing medical device technologies from users’ perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(4):514–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper M, Hourcade JP, Gilutz S. Interactive technologies for children with special needs. In: Wilske S, editor. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2012); 2012 Jun 12–15; Bremen, Germany. New York (NY): ACM; 2012. p. 363–366.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan FA, Light J. A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assist Technol. 2010;22(4):200–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Boster JB, McCarthy JW. Designing augmentative and alternative communication applications: the results of focus groups with speech-language pathologists and parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(4):353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens JS. Accessible information for people with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22(3):196–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen RL. A practical guide to focus-group research. J Geogr High Educ. 2006;30(3):463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton P. The workshop book. How to design and lead successful workshops. Harlow (UK): Pearson Education; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gray LM, Wong-Wylie G, Rempel GR. Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: zoom video communications. Qual Rep. 2020;25(5):1292–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor C, Joffe H. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Leung B, Brian JA, Chau T. Learning and mastery behaviours as risk factors to abandonment in a paediatric user of advanced single-switch access technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):426–433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caron J, Light J, Drager K. Operational demands of AAC mobile technology applications on programming vocabulary and engagement during professional and child interactions. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32(1):12–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron J, Light J, Davidoff BE, et al. Comparison of the effects of mobile technology AAC apps on programming visual scene displays. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33(4):239–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyfield C, Caron J, Light J. Programing AAC just-in-time for beginning communicators: the process. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(4):309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Shane HC, Allen AA, et al. Just-in-time supports in augmentative and alternative communication. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2016;28(1):177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Newman L, Cameto R, et al. After high school: a first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park (CA): SRI International; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert ME, Brock ME, Barczak MA, et al. Efficacy of peer-network interventions for high school students with severe disabilities and complex communication needs. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabil. 2020;45(2):98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite ES, Rodrigues TP, Moreira MASP, et al. Influence of assistive technology for the maintenance of the functionality of elderly people: an integrative review. Int Arch Med. 2016;9(21):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper B, Verdonck M, Amsters D, et al. Smart-device environmental control systems: experiences of people with cervical spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):724–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Rincon JA, Carrascosa C, et al. Emotions detection on an ambient intelligent system using wearable devices. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2019;92:479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelova RA, RA. Sofronova D. E-textile for non-invasive control of the body movement of bedridden patients. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021;1031(1):012029.
   Google Scholar
• Sipilӓ E, Rauhala EL, Elo C, et al. Technology-related challenges in smart clothing – viewpoints from ideation workshops. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH 2021); 2021 Aug 4–6; Dubai, United Arab Emirates. New York (NY): IEEE, 2021. p. 216–222.
   Google Scholar
• Thoring K, Mueller RM, Badge-Schaub P. Workshops as a research method: guidelines for designing and evaluating artifacts through workshops In Bui TX, editor. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); 2020 Jan 7–10; Maui, HI. Honolulu (HI): HICSS Conference Office; 2020. p. 5036–5045.
   Google Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Weber MB. What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(10):1483–1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, et al. Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer P. Focus group methodology. Part 2: considerations for analysis. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2017;24(8):345–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampoulou E. Speech and language therapists’ views about AAC system acceptance by people with acquired communication disorders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(5):471–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry A, Malinin L, Sanders E, et al. Explore consumer needs and design purposes of smart clothing from designers’ perspectives. Int J Fash Des Technol Educ. 2017;10(3):372–380.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler D, Wood J, Sabir T, et al. Wearable electronic textiles. Text Prog. 2019;51(4):299–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Ma Y, Song J, et al. Smart clothing: connecting human with clouds and big data for sustainable health monitoring. Mobile Netw Appl. 2016;21(5):825–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneteau E. Who are you asking?: Qualitative methods for involving AAC users as primary research participants. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2020); 2020 Apr 25–30; Honolulu, HI. New York (NY): ACM; 2020. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Vihriӓlӓ T, Leino M, Merilampi S, et al. Wireless communication textile based on passive UHF RFID. In: Chew WC, He S, editors. Proceedings of the 2021 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS 2021); 2021 Nov 21–25; Hangzhou, China. New York (NY): IEEE; 2021. p. 1613–1619.
   Google Scholar