Repair strategies for assistive technology in low resource settings

References

• Rohwerder B. Assistive technologies in developing countries. Brighton (UK): Institute of Development Studies; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):454–466. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbareschi G, Daymond S, Honeywill J, et al. Value beyond function: analyzing the perception of wheelchair innovations in Kenya. In Proceedings of the ASSETS 2020 – 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.; 2020. doi: 10.1145/3373625.3417017.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway C, Barbareschi G. Disability interactions: creating inclusive innovations. Disabil Int. 2021;14(6):i–198. doi: 10.2200/S01141ED1V01Y202111HCI053.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway C, Morgado Ramirez DZ, Bhatnagar T, et al. A review of innovation strategies and processes to improve access to at: looking ahead to open innovation ecosystems. Assist Technol. 2021;33(sup1):68–86. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1970653.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Assistive product specifications and how to use them; [cited 2022 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020283.
   Google Scholar
• Assistive technology; [cited 2021 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Tebbutt E, Brodmann R, Borg J, et al. Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Global Health. 2016;12(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0220-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumbo NJ, Martin JK, Hedrick BN. Assistive technology: impact on education, employment, and independence of individuals with physical disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2009;30(2):99–110. doi: 10.3233/JVR-2009-0456.
   Google Scholar
• Right to Repair Europe Right to Repair Europe; [cited 2022 Jun 22]. Available from: https://repair.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Right to Repair Regulations – House of Commons Library; [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Available from: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9302/.
   Google Scholar
• Toro ML, Dausey D, Pearlman J. 4R model for lifelong mobility: increasing wheelchair lifecycle in less resourced settings. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Seating Symposium. 2013;PS4.1.
   Google Scholar
• Toro ML, Garcia Y, Ojeda AM, et al. Quantitative exploratory evaluation of the frequency, causes and consequences of rehabilitation wheelchair breakdowns delivered at a paediatric clinic in Mexico. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J. 2012;23(3):48–64. doi: 10.5463/dcid.v23i3.167.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez MLT. Development, implementation, and dissemination of a wheelchair maintenance training program; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kam S, Kent M, Khodaverdian A, et al. The influence of environmental and personal factors on participation of lower-limb prosthetic users in low-income countries: prosthetists’ perspectives. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(3):245–251. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.905643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide AH, Loeb ME, Nhiwatiwa S, et al. Living conditions among people with disabilities in developing countries. In Disability and poverty. Swaziland: Policy Press; 2011. p. 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wyss D, Lindsay S, Cleghorn WL, et al. Priorities in lower limb prosthetic service delivery based on an international survey of prosthetists in low- and high-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015;39(2):102–111. doi: 10.1177/0309364613513824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson L, Ramstrand N, Fransson EI, et al. Mobility and satisfaction with lower-limb prostheses and orthoses among users in Siera Leone: a cross-sectional study. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(5):438–446. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson L, Ahlström G. Patients’ satisfaction with lower-limb prosthetic and orthotic devices and service delivery in Sierra Leone and Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2044-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• rapid Assistive Technology Assessment tool (rATA); [cited 2021 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MHP-HPS-ATM-2021.1.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. UNICEF Global report on assistive technology. 2022; [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/reports/global-report-assistive-technology.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Scherer MJ. Systems thinking for assistive technology: a commentary on the GREAT summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):492–496. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1472306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(1):20–29. doi: 10.1177/0309364610389351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):105–114. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1188170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glumac LK, Pennington SL, Sweeney JK, et al. Guatemalan caregivers’ perceptions of receiving and using wheelchairs donated for their children. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009;21(2):167–175. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0B013E3181A34A2B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney E, Gowran RJ. Wheelchair service provision education and training in low and lower Middle income countries: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(1):33–45. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1392621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney L, Ssekitoleko R, Chadwell A, et al. Prosthetics services in Uganda: a series of studies to inform the design of a low cost, but fit-for-purpose, body-powered prosthesis. Glob Perspect Assist Technol. 2019;2019:414–426.
   Google Scholar
• Product Narrative: A Market Landscape and Strategic Approach to Increasing Access to Prosthetic Devices and Related Services in Low and Middle-Income Countries. | AT2030 Programme; [cited 2021 Jul 16]. Available from: https://at2030.org/product-narrative-prostheses/.
   Google Scholar
• Product Narrative: A Market Landscape and Strategic Approach to Increasing Access to Hearing Aids and Related Services in Low and Middle Income Countries. | AT2030 Programme; [cited 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://at2030.org/product-narrative:-hearing-aids/.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen R, Tresse S, Gunnarsson RK. Fewer accidents and better maintenance with active wheelchair check-ups: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(6):631–639. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr777oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worobey L, Oyster M, Nemunaitis G, et al. Increases in wheelchair breakdowns, repairs, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(6):463–469. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825ab5ec.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worobey LA, Heinemann AW, Anderson KD, et al. Factors influencing incidence of wheelchair repairs and consequences among individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(4):779–789. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005–2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, et al. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil. Rehabil. 2004;26:60–63. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001645094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blough DK, Hubbard S, Mcfarland LV, et al. Prosthetic cost projections for servicemembers with major limb loss from Vietnam and OIF/OEF. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):387–402. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2009.04.0037.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Etter K, Borgia M, Resnik L. Prescription and repair rates of prosthetic limbs in the VA healthcare system: implications for national prosthetic parity. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:493–500. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.921246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AM, Pramana G, Mhatre A, et al. Development of a wheelchair repair registry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(7):1416–1419. doi: 10.1016/J.APMR.2021.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AM, Pramana G, Schein RM, et al. A descriptive analysis of wheelchair repair registry data. Assist Technol. 2022;2022:1–9. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2044407.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher A, Cleary G, Clifford A, et al. Unknown world of wheelchairs. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(10):1946–1958. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1814879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowran RJ, Clifford A, Gallagher A, et al. Wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision: a gateway to freedom. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(3):370–381. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1768303/SUPPL_FILE/IDRE_A_1768303_SM6058.PDF.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. S. The Norwegian Model of Assistive Technology Provision. Presentation at the Global Research, Innovationand Education on Assistive Technology (GREAT). In Proceedings of the GREAT Summit August Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• What we want – Right to Repair Europe; [cited 2021 Feb 6]. Available from: https://repair.eu/what-we-want/.
   Google Scholar
• Jin C, Yang L, Zhu C. Right to repair: pricing, welfare, and environmental implications. Manage Sci. 2023;69(2):1017–1036. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khavul S, Bruton GD. Harnessing innovation for change: sustainability and poverty in developing countries. J Manag Stud. 2013;50(2):285–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Karlan JA. More than good intentions: improving the ways the world’s poor borrow, save, farm, learn, and stay healthy. New York: Plume; 2012. ISBN 9780452297562.
   Google Scholar
• Barbareschi G, Oldfrey B, Xin L, et al. Bridging the divide: exploring the use of digital and physical technology to aid mobility impaired people living in an informal settlement. ASSETS 2020 – 22nd Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conf. Comput. Access; 2020. p. 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3373625.3417021.
   Google Scholar
• Walker J, Sallam N, Sesay S, et al. Country capacity assessment for assistive technologies: informal markets study, Sierra Leone (Global Disabil. Innov. Hub Report, 2030 Program, pp. 0–71). UK: GDI Hub London. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Walker J, Ossul-Vermehren I, Carew M. Assistive technology in urban low-income communities in Sierra Leone and Indonesia: rapid assistive technology assessment (rATA) survey results. London (UK): UCL (university coll. London); 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Walker J, Rifai A, Fuad J, et al. Country capacity assessment for assistive technologies: informal markets study, Indonesia (Global Disabil. Innov. Hub Report, 2030 Program, pp. pp. 1–69). UK: GDI Hub London; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Deere BM, McCormack SW, Ssekitoleko RT, et al. An initial exploration of the impact of ugandan prosthetic provision and repair services on users. Int. Soc. Prosthetics Orthot. UK Annu. Sci. Meet. (ISPO UK ASM), Salford; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics, KNB. of The 2009 Kenya Population and Housing Census; 2009. Available from: https://www.knbs.or.ke/download-category/population-and-housing-census-2009/
   Google Scholar
• Mutisya E, Yarime M. Understanding the grassroots dynamics of slums in Nairobi: the dilemma of Kibera informal settlements. Int Trans J Eng. 2011;2:197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Okello TR, Magada SM, Atim P, et al. Major limb loss (MLL): an overview of etiology, outcomes, experiences and challenges faced by amputees and service providers in the post-conflict period in Northern Uganda. J Glob Health Reports. 2019;3:e2019028. doi: 10.29392/joghr.3.e2019028.
   Google Scholar
• Andrysek J. Lower-Limb prosthetic technologies in the developing world: a review of literature from 1994–2010. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(4):378–398. doi: 10.3109/03093646.2010.520060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins CS, McGarry A, Buis A. Provision of prosthetic and orthotic services in low-income countries: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013;37(5):353–361. doi: 10.1177/0309364612470963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwell A, Diment L, Micó-Amigo M, et al. Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2020;17(1):1–26. doi: 10.1186/S12984-020-00711-4/FIGURES/3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haboubi NHJ, Heelis M, Woodruff R, et al. The effect of body weight and age on frequency of repairs in lower-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(4):375–377.
   Google Scholar
• Toro ML, Bird E, Oyster M, et al. Development of a wheelchair maintenance training programme and questionnaire for clinicians and wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(8):843–851. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1277792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar