A scoping review of the use of intelligent assistive technologies in rehabilitation practice with older adults

References

• United Nations. Ageing and disability [internet]. Department of Economic and Social Affairs - Disability. [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/disability-and-ageing.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the global burden of disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2021;396(10267):2006–2017 [cited 2022 Dec 6]; Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673620323400/fulltext. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H, et al. Home-based virtual reality training after discharge from hospital-based stroke rehabilitation: a parallel randomized feasibility trial. Trials [Internet]. 2019;20(1):333. [cited 2022 Dec 6]; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31174579/. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3438-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krishnaswami A, Beavers C, Dorsch MP, et al. Gerotechnology for older adults with cardiovascular diseases: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(22):2650–2670. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arim R. Canadian survey on disability, 2012: a profile of persons with disabilities among Canadians aged 15 years or older. [Internet]. Statistics Canada. 2015. Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2015001-eng.pdf?st=PZ3et3Qxhttps://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2015001-eng.pdf?st=PZ3et3Qx.
   Google Scholar
• Assistive Devices and Technologies. 2021 [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/en/
   Google Scholar
• Agree E. The potential for technology to enhance independence for those aging with a disability. Disabil Health J. 2014;7(1 Suppl): s 33–9. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Chabot M, Delaware L, McCarley S, et al. Living in place: the impact of smart technology. Curr Geri Rep. 2019;8(3):232–238. [cited 2023 Apr 18]; Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13670-019-00296-4. doi:10.1007/s13670-019-00296-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore PG, Kingston A, Johnson GR, et al. New horizons in the compression of functional decline. Age Ageing. 2018;47(6):764–768. [cited 2023 Apr 18]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/47/6/764/5079486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal M, Jacobs J, Biggs WS. Mobility assistive device use in older adults. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(12):737–744. [cited 2023 Feb 27]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34128609/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molteni F, Gasperini G, Cannaviello G, et al. Exoskeleton and End-Effector robots for upper and lower limbs rehabilitation: narrative review. PM R. 2018;10(9 Suppl 2):S174–S188. [cited 2023 Feb 27]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30269804/ doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World report on disability. [Internet]. Geneva; 2011 [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182.
   Google Scholar
• Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:112–116. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolfsson P, Lindstedt H, Pettersson I, et al. Perception of the influence of environmental factors in the use of electronic planning devices in adults with cognitive disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(6)::493–500. [cited 2023 Apr 18] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25434402/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel EJ, Layton NA, Foster MM, et al. Challenges of user-centred assistive technology provision in Australia: shopping without a prescription. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(3):235–240. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.941953.[Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 27]; Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/17483107.2014.941953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel D, Gray M. Baby boomers’ use and perception of recommended assistive technology: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(3):129–136. doi:10.1080/17483100902767175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ienca M, Fabrice J, Elger B, et al. Intelligent assistive technology for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(4):1301–1340. doi:10.3233/JAD-161037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer DD, Ory M. Emerging issues of intelligent assistive technology use among people with dementia and their caregivers: a U.S. Perspective. Front Public Health. 2020;8:191. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATscale. The Case for Investing in Assistive Technology [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Dec 6]. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b3f6ff1710699a7ebb64495/t/5fbf5c44eaf37e3b64932e6c/1606376534765/Case_for_Investing_in_AT_a11y.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maresova P, Režný L, Bauer P, et al. An effectiveness and cost-estimation model for deploying assistive technology solutions in elderly care. Int J Healthcare Manag. 2022; 1–16 [cited 2023 Feb 20]; Available from : [Internet]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20479700.2022.2134635. doi:10.1080/20479700.2022.2134635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Hansen E, Christensen J. The effects of assistive technology service delivery processes and factors associated with positive outcomes–a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(5):590–603. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1682067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk K, Dada S, Tönsing K, et al. Factors perceived by rehabilitation professionals to influence the provision of assistive technology to children: a systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(2):168–189. doi:10.1080/01942638.2017.1337661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Global report on assistive technology [Internet]. Geneva; 2022 [cited 2023 May 7]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/media/120836/file/%20Global%20Report%20on%20Assistive%20Technology%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Technavio. Assistive Technology Market Size, Share & Trends to 2027 [Internet]. 2022; [cited 2023 May 7]. Available from: https://www.technavio.com/report/assistive-technology-market-report-analysis?utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pressrelease&utm_campaign=Auto-V7_VSG_wk26_2022_004_report&utm_content=IRTNTR40244
   Google Scholar
• Okonji PE, Ogwezzy DC. Awareness and barriers to adoption of assistive technologies among visually impaired people in Nigeria. Assist Technol. 2019;31(4):209–219. doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1421594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garçon L, Khasnabis C, Walker L, et al. Medical and assistive health technology: meeting the needs of aging populations. Gerontologist. 2016;56 Suppl 2: S293–S302. doi:10.1093/geront/gnw005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Viriyathorn S, et al. Improving access to assistive technologies: challenges and solutions in low- and Middle-income countries. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018;7(2):84–89. doi:10.4103/2224-3151.239419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattison CA, Wilson MG, Wang RH, et al. Enhancing equitable access to assistive technologies in Canada: insights from citizens and stakeholders. Can J Aging. 2020;39(1):69–88. doi:10.1017/S0714980819000187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbe C, AboJabel H. Empowering people with dementia via using intelligent assistive technology: a scoping review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022;101:104699. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2022.104699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ienca M, Wangmo T, Jotterand F, et al. Ethical design of intelligent assistive technologies for dementia: a descriptive review. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(4):1035–1055. [cited 2023 Apr 10]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-017-9976-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada S, van der Walt C, May AA, et al. Intelligent assistive technology devices for persons with dementia: a scoping review. Assist Technol. 2022; 1–14. [cited 2023 Apr 10]. Available from: doi:10.1080/10400435.2021.1992540.[Internet]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10400435.2021.1992540.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen B, Ma H, Qin LY, et al. Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons. J Orthop Translat. 2016;5:26–37. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2015.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalita B, Narayan J, Dwivedy SK. Development of active lower limb robotic-based orthosis and exoskeleton devices: a systematic review. Int J of Soc Robotics. 2021;13(4):775–793. [cited 2023 Apr 10Available fromhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12369-020-00662-9. doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00662-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Zi B, Qin L, et al. State-of-the-art research in robotic hip exoskeletons: a general review. J Orthop Translat. 2020;20:4–13. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2019.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Jesus TS, O’Brien KK, et al. Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(9):1249–1256. doi:10.1177/0269215516688514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Rehabilitation [Internet]. 2023; [cited 2023 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rehabilitation.
   Google Scholar
• The UN Refugee Agency. UNHCR Emergency Handbook: Older persons [Internet]. 2023; [cited 2023 Feb 27]. Available from: https://emergency.unhcr.org/entry/43935/older-persons.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Smallfield S, Berger S, Hillman B, et al. Living with low vision: strategies supporting daily activity. Occup Ther Health Care. 2017;31(4):312–328. doi:10.1080/07380577.2017.1384969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherniack E. Not just fun and games: applications of virtual reality in the identification and rehabilitation of cognitive disorders of the elderly. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(4):283–289. doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.542570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bedaf S, Gelderblom G, De Witte L. Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: what activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assist Technol. 2015;27(2):88–100. doi:10.1080/10400435.2014.978916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharucha AJ, Anand V, Forlizzi J, et al. Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations, and future challenges. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17(2):88–104. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e318187dde5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan M, Estève D, Escriba C, et al. A review of smart homes-present state and future challenges. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;91(1):55–81. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan R, Pugazhenthi S. Mobility assistive devices and self-transfer robotic systems for elderly, a review. Intel Serv Robotics. 2014;7(1):37–49. doi:10.1007/s11370-013-0142-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Bharti D, Chakravarty S, et al. Internet of things and robotics in transforming current-day healthcare services. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:9999504. doi:10.1155/2021/9999504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inskip JA, Lauscher HN, Li LC, et al. Patient and health care professional perspectives on using telehealth to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation. Chron Respir Dis. 2018;15(1):71–80. doi:10.1177/1479972317709643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips B, Smits C, Govaerts PJ, et al. Empowering senior cochlear implant users at home via a tablet computer application. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(3S):417–430. doi:10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gélinas-Bronsard D, Mortenson WB, Ahmed S, et al. Co-construction of an internet-based intervention for older assistive technology users and their family caregivers: stakeholders’ perceptions. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(6):602–611. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1499138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holthe T, Jentoft R, Arntzen C, et al. Benefits and burdens: family caregivers’ experiences of assistive technology (at) in everyday life with persons with young-onset dementia (YOD). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):754–762. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1373151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment DW, Ali YHK, Ferguson MA. Applying the COM-B model to assess the usability of smartphone-connected listening devices in adults with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019;30(5):417–430. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeault H, Langlois F, Bocti C, et al. Can people with Alzheimer’s disease improve their day-to-day functioning with a tablet computer? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(5):779–796. doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1133431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupal BS, Rafique S, Singla A, et al. Lower-limb exoskeletons: research trends and regulatory guidelines in medical and non-medical applications. Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2017;14:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanuja K, Joki J, Bachmann G, et al. Gait and balance in the aging population: fall prevention using innovation and technology. Maturitas. 2018;110:51–56. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.01.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SL, Phelan S, Leonard M, et al. A qualitative case study of smartphone-connected hearing aids: influences on patients, clinicians, and patient-clinician interactions. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017;28(6):506–521. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek STM, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJM, et al. Origins and consequences of technology acquirement by independent-living seniors: towards an integrative model. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):189. doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0582-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott RA, Callisaya ML, Duque G, et al. Assistive technologies to overcome sarcopenia in ageing. Maturitas. 2018;112:78–84. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson L, Gibson G, Kingston A, et al. Assistive technologies in caring for the oldest old: a review of current practice and future directions. Aging Health. 2013;9(4):365–375. doi:10.2217/ahe.13.35.
   Google Scholar
• Alqahtani S, Joseph J, Dicianno B, et al. Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(4):362–376. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1650300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Vroman KG, Lysack C, et al. Multi-stakeholder perspectives on information communication technology training for older adults: implications for teaching and learning. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(5):453–461. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1493752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall A, Boulton E, Stanmore E. Older adults’ perceptions of wearable technology hip protectors: implications for further research and development strategies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(7):663–668. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1491647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath C, Corrado AM. The environmental factors that influence technology adoption for older adults with age-related vision loss. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(8):493–501. doi:10.1177/0308022618813247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram V, Jenkinson C, Peters M. Informal carers’ experience of assistive technology use in dementia care at home: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):160. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1169-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuisku O, Pekkarinen S, Hennala L, et al. “Robots do not replace a nurse with a beating heart”: the publicity around a robotic innovation in elderly care. ITP. 2019;32(1):47–67. doi:10.1108/ITP-06-2018-0277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virgili G, Acosta R, Grover LL, et al. Reading aids for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J. Mobile and connected health technology needs for older adults aging in place. J Gerontol Nurs. 2018;44(6):3–5. doi:10.3928/00989134-20180509-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong C, Astell A, Mihailidis A, et al. Needs and preferences for technology among Chinese family caregivers of persons with dementia: a pilot study. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018;5:2055668318775315. doi:10.1177/2055668318775315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaborn K, Pennefather P, Fels D. “Learn what we’re going through”: attitudes of older powered chair users towards mixed reality games that involve power mobility. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2016;15(4):699–711. doi:10.1007/s10209-015-0450-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurkewich A, Hebert D, Wang RH, et al. Hand extension robot orthosis (HERO) glove: development and testing with stroke survivors with severe hand impairment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019;27(5):916–926. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2910011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson A, Skovdahl K, Engstrom M. Using diffusion of innovation theory to describe perceptions of a passive positioning alarm among persons with mild dementia: a repeated interview study. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:3. doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0183-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanov D, Bien Z, Bang W-C. The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2004;12(2):228–250. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2004.828423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftring H, Frennert S. Designing a social and assistive robot for seniors. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;49(4):274–281. doi:10.1007/s00391-016-1064-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo K, Stephenson M, Lockwood C. The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019;17(4):520–547. doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003896.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang RH, Sudhama A, Begum M, et al. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(1):67–79. doi:10.1017/S1041610216001435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YH, Cristancho-Lacroix V, Fassert C, et al. The attitudes and perceptions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment toward an assistive robot. J Appl Gerontol. 2016;35(1):3–17. doi:10.1177/0733464813515092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Lesende I, Orruño E, Mateos M, et al. Telemonitoring in-home complex chronic patients from primary care in routine clinical practice: impact on healthcare resources use. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017;23:135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Patten R, Keller AV, Maye JE, et al. Home-Based cognitively assistive robots: maximizing cognitive functioning and maintaining independence in older adults without dementia. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:1129–1139. doi:10.2147/CIA.S253236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Houten MML, Spruijt S, Fokkenrood HJP, et al. User preferences for mobile health interventions: a survey among intermittent claudication patients and their physical therapists. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;46:249–256. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.08.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattink BJJ, Meiland FJM, Overmars-Marx T, et al. The electronic, personalizable rosetta system for dementia care: exploring the user-friendliness, usefulness and impact. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(1):61–71. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.932022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crea S, Cempini M, Mazzoleni S, et al. Phase-II clinical validation of a powered exoskeleton for the treatment of elbow spasticity. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:261. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Bian D, Zheng Z, et al. A robotic coach architecture for elder care (ROCARE) based on multi-user engagement models. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(8):1153–1163. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2608791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans J, Papadopoulos A, Silvers CT, et al. Remote health monitoring for older adults and those with heart failure: adherence and system usability. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(6):480–488. doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr N, Leon B, Mountain G, et al. The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(8):653–660. doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1036469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia JC, Coutinho JFV, De Sousa CR, et al. Assistive technologies for demented elderly: a systematic review. Acta Paul. enferm. 2018;31(6):651–658. doi:10.1590/1982-0194201800089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedesco Triccas L, Burridge JH, Hughes AM, et al. A qualitative study exploring views and experiences of people with stroke undergoing transcranial direct current stimulation and upper limb robot therapy. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25:1–9. doi:10.1080/10749357.2018.1493072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øksnebjerg L, Woods B, Ruth K, et al. A tablet app supporting self-management for people with dementia: explorative study of adoption and use patterns. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(1):e14694. doi:10.2196/14694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordoch E, Osterreicher A, Guse L, et al. Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: a literature review. Maturitas. 2013;74(1):14–20. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen E, Lefeber N, Willaert W, et al. Motivation, expectations, and usability of a driven gait orthosis in stroke patients and their therapists. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(4):299–308. doi:10.1080/10749357.2016.1266750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou B, Zhang J, Zhao Y, et al. Caregiver-delivered stroke rehabilitation in rural China. Stroke. 2019;50(7):1825–1830. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsrud L, Holthe T, Karterud D, et al. Perspectives on assistive technology among older norwegian adults receiving community health services. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;18(5):685–692. doi:10.1080/17483107.2021.1906962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorini L, De Mul M, Fabbricotti I, et al. Assistive robots to improve the independent living of older persons: results from a needs study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(1):92–102. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1642392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cinini A, Cutugno P, Ferraris C, et al. Final results of the NINFA project: impact of new technologies in the daily life of elderly people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(5):1213–1222. doi:10.1007/s40520-019-01357-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Soler Á, Facal D, Díaz-Orueta U, et al. Inclusion of service robots in the daily lives of frail older users: a step-by-step definition procedure on users’ requirements. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;74:191–196. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2017.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley-Hague H, Tacconi C, Mellone S, et al. Smartphone apps to support falls rehabilitation exercise: app development and usability and acceptability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(9):e15460. doi:10.2196/15460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen TS, Skougaard M, Taylor PC, et al. The parker model: applying a qualitative three-step approach to optimally utilize input from stakeholders when introducing new device technologies in the management of chronic rheumatic diseases. Patient. 2018;11(5):515–526. doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0306-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raghunath N, Dahmen J, Brown K, et al. Creating a digital memory notebook application for individuals with mild cognitive impairment to support everyday functioning. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(4):421–431. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1587017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Cammen TJM, Albayrak A, Voûte E, et al. New horizons in design for autonomous ageing. Age Ageing. 2017;46:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomšič M, Domajnko B, Zajc M. The use of assistive technologies after stroke is debunking the myths about the elderly. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(1):28–36. doi:10.1080/10749357.2017.1376845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaf S, Marti P, Amirabdollahian F, et al. A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: the voice of different stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(6):592–599. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1358300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amlani AM, Smaldino J, Hayes D, et al. Feasibility of using a Smartphone-Based hearing aid application to improve attitudes toward amplification and hearing impairment. Am J Audiol. 2019;28(1):125–136. doi:10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke M, Rodríguez Ramírez E, Robinson B, et al. Motivators and barriers to using information and communication technology in everyday life following stroke: a qualitative and video observation study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(14):1954–1962. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1543460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thilo FJS, Hahn S, Halfens RJG, et al. Usability of a wearable fall detection prototype from the perspective of older people-A real field testing approach. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(1-2):310–320. doi:10.1111/jocn.14599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana M, Anderberg P, Berglund JS, et al. Feasibility-usability study of a tablet app adapted specifically for persons with cognitive impairment-SMART4MD (support monitoring and reminder technology for mild dementia). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sejunaite K, Lanza C, Ganders S, et al. Augmented reality: sustaining autonomous way-finding in the community for older persons with cognitive impairment. J Frailty Aging. 2017;6(4):206–211. doi:10.14283/jfa.2017.25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauha L, Keränen NS, Kangas M, et al. Assistive technologies at home for people with a memory disorder. Dementia (London). 2018;17(7):909–923. doi:10.1177/1471301216674816.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawstorn JC, Gant N, Rolleston A, et al. End users want alternative intervention delivery models: usability and acceptability of the REMOTE-CR exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(11):2373–2377. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuhara Y, Tanioka T, Kai Y, et al. Potential legal issues when caring healthcare robot with communication in caring functions are used for older adult care. Enferm Clin. 2020;30:54–59. doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pludwinski S, Ahmad F, Wayne N, et al. Participant experiences in a smartphone-based health coaching intervention for type 2 diabetes: a qualitative inquiry. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(3):172–178. doi:10.1177/1357633X15595178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie LJ, Jamin G, Smit K, et al. Design of the user interface for “Stappy”, a sensor-feedback system to facilitate walking in people after stroke: a user-centred approach. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(8):959–967. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1629654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerling K, Hebesberger D, Dondrup C, et al. Robot deployment in long-term care: case study on using a mobile robot to support physiotherapy. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;49(4):288–297. doi:10.1007/s00391-016-1065-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaf S, Marti P, De Witte L. What are the preferred characteristics of a service robot for the elderly? A multi-country focus group study with older adults and caregivers. Assist Technol. 2019;31(3):147–157. doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1402390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searcy RP, Summapund J, Estrin D, et al. Mobile health technologies for older adults with cardiovascular disease: current evidence and future directions. Curr Geri Rep. 2019;8(1):31–42. doi:10.1007/s13670-019-0270-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkas H, Hennala L, Pekkarinen S, et al. Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions. Int J Med Inform. 2020;134:104041. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes A, Qin P, Brown CA. Standardized review of smartphone applications to promote balance for older adults. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(6):690–696. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1250124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio G, Fiorini L, Hoshino H, et al. Assistive robots for socialization in elderly people: results pertaining to the needs of the users. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(9):1313–1329. doi:10.1007/s40520-018-1073-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braley R, Fritz R, Van Son CR, et al. Prompting technology and persons with dementia: the significance of context and communication. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):101–111. doi:10.1093/geront/gny071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kringle EA, Setiawan IMA, Golias K, et al. Feasibility of an iterative rehabilitation intervention for stroke delivered remotely using mobile health technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(8):908–916. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1629113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallet K, Shamloul R, Pugliese M, et al. RecoverNow: a patient perspective on the delivery of mobile tablet-based stroke rehabilitation in the acute care setting. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(2):174–179. doi:10.1177/1747493018790031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner C, Kardaris N, Koutras P, et al. Improving gesture-based interaction between an assistive bathing robot and older adults via user training on the gestural commands. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;87:103996. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2019.103996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etingen B, Martinez RN, Vallette MA, et al. Patient perceptions of environmental control units: experiences of veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders receiving inpatient VA healthcare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(4):325–332. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1312574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerson KB, Harding KE, Lockwood KJ, et al. Home exercise programs supported by video and automated reminders for patients with stroke: a qualitative analysis. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018;65(3):187–197. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cajita MI, Hodgson NA, Budhathoki C, et al. Intention to use mHealth in older adults with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017;32(6):E1–E7. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Span M, Hettinga M, Groen-van de Ven L, et al. Involving people with dementia in developing an interactive web tool for shared decision-making: experiences with a participatory design approach. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(12):1410–1420. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1298162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaković M, Sedlar U, Volk M, et al. Usability pitfalls of diabetes mHealth apps for the elderly. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1604609. doi:10.1155/2016/1604609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson J, Ungar R, Albright L, et al. Robotic pet use among community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020;75(9):2018–2028. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, Goffredo M, Pournajaf S, et al. Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193235. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang T, Huang C. Attitudes of the elderly living independently towards the use of robots to assist with activities of daily living. Work. 2021;69(1):55–65. doi:10.3233/WOR-205166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choukou MA, Shortly T, Leclerc N, et al. Evaluating the acceptance of ambient assisted living technology (AALT) in rehabilitation: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform. 2021;150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge C, Wetle TF. Why older adults and their children disagree about in-home surveillance technology, sensors, and tracking. Gerontologist. 2020;60(5):926–934. doi:10.1093/geront/gnz068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong J, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly 2012;36:157–178. doi:10.2307/41410412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Accius J, Suh J. The longevity economy outlook: how people ages 50 and older are fueling economic growth, stimulating jobs, and creating opportunities for all. DC; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Housing for older Canadians. The definitive guide to the over-55 market [Internet]. Ottawa; 2015. Available from: http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.696164/publication.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grignon M, Spencer B. The funding of long-term care in Canada: what do we know, what should we know? Can J Aging. 2018;37(2):110–120. doi:10.1017/S0714980818000028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, et al. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(13):1024–1032. doi:10.2340/16501977-0451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista G, Oliveira T. Understanding mobile banking: the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;50:418–430. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisman D, Bogoch I, Lapointe-Shaw L, et al. Risk factors associated with mortality among residents with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in long-term care facilities in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e2015957. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel A. Rehab facilities preparing for COVID-19 crunch as more patients recover. CMAJ News [Internet]; [2020 Jun 12]. Available from: http://cmajnews.com/2020/06/12/covid-rehab-1095878/
   Google Scholar
• Armitage R, Nellums LB. COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(5):e256. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30061-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar