Accessible autonomous transportation and services: a focus group study

References

• Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Issue Brief: travel Patterns of American Adults with Disabilities. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman BR, Kitchener M, Mullan JT, et al. Paid personal assistance services: an exploratory study of working-age consumers’ perspectives. J Aging Soc Policy. 2007;19(3):27–45. doi: 10.1300/J031v19n03_03.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roessler RT, Bishop M, Rumrill PD, et al. Specialized housing and transportation needs of adults with multiple sclerosis. Work. 2013;45(2):223–235. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitra M, Bogen K, Long-Bellil LM, et al. Unmet needs for home and community-based services among persons with disabilities in Massachusetts. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(4):219–228. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolo MC, Friedman C, Lulinski-Norris A, et al. Home and community based services (HCBS) waivers: a nationwide study of the states. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;51(1):1–21. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-51.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Joseph JM, Eckstein S, et al. The voice of the consumer: a survey of veterans and other users of assistive technology. Mil Med. 2018; 183(11–12):e518–e525. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkley J, Huff EW, Jr Posadas B, et al. Exploring the needs, preferences, and concerns of persons with visual impairments regarding autonomous vehicles. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 2020;13(1):1–34. doi: 10.1145/3372280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzio J. Autonomous vehicles and paratransit: examining the protective framework of the americans with disabilities act. Case Stud Transp Policy. 2021;9(3):1130–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Identifying automated driving systems-dedicated vehicles (ADS-DVs) passenger issues for persons with disabilities. Standard No.: J3171. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang J, Li W, Stough L, et al. A focus group study on the potential of autonomous vehicles as a viable transportation option: perspectives from people with disabilities and public transit agencies. Transp Res F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2020;70:260–274. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff Jr EW, DellaMaria N, Posadas B, et al. editors. Am I too old to drive? opinions of older adults on self-driving vehicles. Proceedings of The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gluck A, Huff Jr EW, Zhang M, et al. editors. Lights, camera, autonomy! exploring the opinions of older adults regarding autonomous vehicles through enactment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 2020: Los Angeles, CA : SAGE Publications. doi: 10.1177/1071181320641475.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkley J, Posadas B, Woodward J, et al. editors. Opinions and preferences of blind and low vision consumers regarding self-driving vehicles: results of focus group discussions. Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer RN, Kameswaran V. editors. Understanding the power of control in autonomous vehicles for people with vision impairment. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; 2018. doi: 10.1145/3234695.3236347.
   Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Sivakanthan S, Sundaram SA, et al. Systematic review: automated vehicles and services for people with disabilities. Neurosci Lett. 2021;761:136103. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martelaro N, Carrington P, Fox S, et al. editors. Designing an inclusive mobile app for people with disabilities to independently use autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications; 2022. doi: 10.1145/3543174.3546850.
   Google Scholar
• Duboz A, Mourtzouchou A, Grosso M, et al. Exploring the acceptance of connected and automated vehicles: focus group discussions with experts and non-experts in transport. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav.. 2022;89:200–221. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S Department of Transportation. DOT Inclusive Design Challenge 2022. Available from: https://www.transportation.gov/accessibility/inclusivedesign.
   Google Scholar
• Ding D, Cooper RA, Pearlman J, editors. Incorporating participatory action design into research and education. International Conference on Electrical Engineering; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ando H, Cousins R, Young C. Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: development and refinement of a codebook. Comprehensive Psychology. 2014;3(03):03.CP.3.4. doi: 10.2466/03.CP.3.4.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaux D. From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. 1981. (Biography and society: the life history approach in the social sciences).
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Fact sheet on the EEOC’s final regulation implementing the ADAA. 2008. p. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. How disability data are collected from the American community survey. Guidance for Disability Data Users 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Egan AF, Jones SB, Luloff AE, et al. The value of using multiple methods: an illustration using survey, focus group, and delphi techniques. Soc Nat Res. 1995;8(5):457–465. doi: 10.1080/08941929509380936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups: theory and practice. Vol. 20. California, USA: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin JM. Grounded theory in practice. California, USA: Sage; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Schaltz E, Soylu S. Electrical vehicle design and modeling. Electr Veh-Model. Simul. 2011;1:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tabattanon K, D’Souza C. editorsAccessibility retrofit of a shared automated vehicle: challenges and lessons learned. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2021. doi: 10.1177/1071181321651168.
   Google Scholar
• Cheryl A. Wheelchair-Accessible Autonomous Vehicles Are Here. Now What? 2023 [cited 2023 July 22]. Available from: https://newmobility.com/wheelchair-accessible-autonomous-vehicles/.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran AL, Chatman DG. Use of app-based ridehailing services and conventional taxicabs by adults with disabilities. Travel Behav Soc. 2021;24:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang P, Chen X. Towards autonomous driving: review and perspectives on configuration and control of four-wheel independent drive/steering electric vehicles. Actuators. 2021;10. doi: 10.3390/act10080184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker J, D’Souza C, Paquet V. Vehicle design. Accessible public transportation: Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge; 2017. p. 54–67.
   Google Scholar