A technology-focused service within a rehabilitation setting: exploring the experiences and current technology demands of people with disabilities

References

• Raja DS. Bridging the disability divide through digital technologies 2016 [cited. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/123481461249337484-0050022016/original/WDR16BPBridgingtheDisabilityDividethroughDigitalTechnologyRAJA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Khasnabis C, Mirza Z, MacLachlan M. Opening the GATE to inclusion for people with disabilities. Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2229–2230. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01093-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Assistive technology 201810 June 2021]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson Ranada A, Lidstrom H. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process-A systematic review. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82–97. doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1367737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on disability 2011 [cited. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Global report on assistive technology2022cited. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, organizational, and technological factors impacting clinicians’ adoption of mobile health tools: systematic literature review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 20;8(2):e15935. doi:10.2196/15935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Fowler S, van Gool K. Decision makers’ perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level. Aust Health Rev. 2008 Aug;32(3):520–527. doi:10.1071/ah080520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselman KE, Shah M, Zariffa J. Rehabilitation technologies and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: translational potential of current trends. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):40. doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0386-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendall E, Oh S, Amsters D, et al. HabITec: a sociotechnical space for promoting the application of technology to rehabilitation. Societies. 2019;9(4):74. doi:10.3390/soc9040074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqahtani S, Joseph J, Dicianno B, et al. Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Sep 19;16(4):362–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns B, Meesters JJL, Wentink MM, et al. Why the uptake of eRehabilitation programs in stroke care is so difficult-a focus group study in The Netherlands. Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 29;13(1):133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proffitt R, Glegg S, Levac D, et al. End-user involvement in rehabilitation virtual reality implementation research. J Enabling Technol. 2019;13(2):92–100. doi:10.1108/JET-10-2018-0050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds WA, Kennedy TD. An applied guide to research designs: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. 2017 2023/04/26. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. Second Edition. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/an-applied-guide-to-research-designs-2e.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall MB, Wallace MA. Measuring goal attainment within a community-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation setting for people with spinal cord injury. Edorium J Disability Rehabil. 2016;2:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Martin KE, Cox RJ, Kendall MB, et al. Leisure therapy: exploring leisure-specific goals and outcomes in a spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2017;24(6):263–267. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2017.24.6.263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Warren J. Methods for descriptive studies. 2017. In: Handbook of eHealth evaluation: an evidence-based approach [internet] [internet]. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: University of Victoria. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481606/.
   Google Scholar
• Nayar S, Stanley M. Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Nierling L, Maia M. Assistive technologies: Social barriers and Socio-Technical pathways. Societies. 2020;10(2):41. doi:10.3390/soc10020041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glegg SMN, Levac DE. Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support virtual reality implementation in rehabilitation: a scoping review. Pm R. 2018 Nov;10(11):1237–1251 e1. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.07.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20(4):194–203. doi:10.1080/10400435.2008.10131946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B, Leach L, et al. PDA and smartphone use by individuals with moderate-to-severe memory impairment: application of a theory-driven training programme. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(3):408–427. doi:10.1080/09602011.2011.652498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JJ, Wilson BA, Needham P, et al. Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Sep;9(6):925–935. doi:10.1017/S1355617703960127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager SK, Burnfield JM. Patients’ experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Mar;9(2):121–127. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.787124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wentink MM, Prieto E, de Kloet AJ, et al. The patient perspective on the use of information and communication technologies and e-health in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Oct;13(7):620–625. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1358302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Callaway L, Ackerl J, et al. Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: implications for occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(2):89–98. doi:10.1177/0308022616678634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David ME, Roberts JA. Smartphone use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Social versus physical distancing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 25;18(3):1034. doi:10.3390/ijerph18031034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassin V, Shimizu HE, Fachin-Martins E. Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):597–607. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1804-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. Household use of information technology 2018 [cited 2021 10 June]. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/technology-and-innovation/household-use-information-technology/latest-release#data-download.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Maylor H, Shaw S, et al. The NASSS-CAT tools for understanding, guiding, monitoring, and researching technology implementation projects in health and social care: protocol for an evaluation study in Real-World settings. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(5):e16861. doi:10.2196/16861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinger JL, Boninger ML, Bruns TM, et al. Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(2):145–160. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2011.11.0213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armannsdottir AL, Beckerle P, Moreno JC, et al. Assessing the involvement of users during development of lower limb wearable robotic exoskeletons: a survey study. Hum Factors. 2020 Jan 13;62(3):351–364. doi:10.1177/0018720819883500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar