Tensions between closure of the digital divide and acts of care in residential settings for persons with disabilities. A study of adopting customised information and communication technology

References

• Keränen NS, Kangas M, Immonen M, et al. Use of information and communication technologies among older people with and without frailty: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(2):e29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk J. The digital divide. Hoboken (NJ): john Wiley & Sons; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dobransky K, Hargittai E. Unrealized potential: exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics. 2016;58:18–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson S, Gulliksen J, Gustavsson C. Disability digital divide: the use of the internet, smartphones, computers and tablets among people with disabilities in Sweden. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2021;20(1):105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva N, Tuikka AM, Kimppa KK, et al. Digital disability divide in information society: a framework based on a structured literature review. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc. 2015;13(3/4):283–298.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy S, Green J, Maxwell H. I’ve got a mobile phone too! hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(4):341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybalka M, Brevik R, Fremmerlid M, et al. 2022 Digital exclusion: who has the risk to fall outside? Statistics Norway. Reports 2022/35. https://www.ssb.no/en/teknologi-og-innovasjon/informasjons-og-kommunikasjonsteknologi-ikt/artikler/digital-exclusion-who-has-a-risk-to-fall-outside
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2017. Nine in ten use internet every day. https://www.ssb.no/en/teknologi-og-innovasjon/artikler-og-publikasjoner/nine-in-ten-use-internet-every-day
   Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Enticott J, Farnworth L, et al. The use of electronic assistive technology for social networking by people with disability living in shared supported accommodation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonneveld M, Patomella AH, Asaba E, et al. The use of information and communication technology in healthcare to improve participation in everyday life: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(23):3416–3423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrou K, Meletiou-Mavrotheris M, Kärki A, et al. Opportunities and challenges related to ICT and ICT-AT use by people with disabilities: an explorative study into factors that impact on the digital divide. TAD. 2017;29(1-2):63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ali MA, Alam K, Taylor B. Determinants of ICT usage for healthcare among people with disabilities: the moderating role of technological and behavioural constraints. J Biomed Inform. 2020;108:103480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Martin L, Dag M, et al. A balance of social inclusion and risks: staff perceptions of information and communication technology in the daily life of young adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability in a social care context. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019;16(3):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsten C, Blomberg H. Staff as advocates, moral guardians and enablers – using ICT for independence and participation in disability services. Scand J Disabil Res. 2019;21(1):271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waycott J, Vetere F, Ozanne E. Building social connections: a framework for enriching older adults’ social connectedness through information and communication technologies. In: Neves B, Vetere F, editors. Ageing and digital technology. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2019. p. 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen LEF, Engebretsen E, Greenhalgh T, et al. Protocol for ‘virtual presence’: a qualitative study of the cultural dialectic between loneliness and technology. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e047157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg A, Myren GES. Digital teknologi for sosial kontakt: en deskriptiv studie av de eldste eldres erfaringer med KOMP. NorTidHelse. 2021;17(2):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Børve Rasmussen E, Askheim C, Oppedal B, et al. Varm teknologi mot ensomhet blant eldre? TfS. 2021;62(4):353–372.
   Google Scholar
• Badawy A, Solberg M, Obstfelder AU, et al. Improvised use of a digital tool for social interaction in a norwegian care facility during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björnsdóttir K, Stefánsdóttir GV, Stefánsdóttir Á. ‘It’s my life’ autonomy and people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2015;19(1):5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guddingsmo H. Da må jeg spørre boligen først. Opplevelsen av selvbestemmelse i bofellesskap. In: J. Tøssebro, editor. Hverdag i velferdsstatens bofellesskap. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2019. p. 78–94.
   Google Scholar
• Löve L, Traustadóttir R, Rice JG. Trading autonomy for services: perceptions of user and providers of services for disables people in Iceland. Alter Euro J Disab Res. 2018;12(4):193–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J. Independent living and community care: a disempowering framework. Disab Soc. 2004;19(5):427–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy K, Bantry-White E. Behind closed doors: human rights in residential care for people with an intellectual disability in Ireland. Disab Soc. 2020;36(5):750–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tøssebro J. Bakteppet- politiske idealer og utviklingslinjer. In: J. Tøssebro, editor. Hverdag i velferdsstatens bofellesskap. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2019. p. 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Witsø AE, Hauger B. ‘It’s our everyday life’–the perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities in Norway. J Intellect Disabil. 2020;24(2):143–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and their inmates. London: Penguin; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Richards K, Andrew R, Hemphill MA. A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. J Teach Phys Educ. 2018;37(2):225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melbøe L, Hardonk S. Expanding opportunities for work and citizenship: participation of people with intellectual disabilities in voluntary work. Scand J Disabil Res. 2022;24(1):109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø H. Collective qualitative analysis. NOST. 2020;4(2):106–122. (V. Szepessy, Trans) Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Barlott T, Aplin T, Catchpole E, et al. Connectedness and ICT: opening the door to possibilities for people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2020;24(4):503–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvinen M, Mik-Meyer N. 2003) Indledning: at skabe en klient. In M. Järvinen, N. Mik-Meyer, editors. At skabe en klient. Institutionelle identiteter I socialt arbejde. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag; 2003. p. 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen M. Alkoholfortællinger I et institusjonelt landskap. In: M. Järvinen, N. Mik-Meyer, editors. At skabe en klient. Institusjonelle identiteter i socialt arbejde. Copenhagen: hans Reitzels forlag; 2003. p. 30–58.
   Google Scholar
• Guddingsmo H. Selvbestemmelse som gave. Fontene forskning: et tidsskrift fra fellesorganisasjonen FO (FO). 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Helsepersonell loven. Lov om helsepersonell m.v. 1999: (LOV-1999-07-02-64) https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1999-07-02-64.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgstjenesteloven. Lov om kommunale helse -og omsorgstjenester m.m. 2011: (LOV-2022-11-25-86). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2011-06-24-30.
   Google Scholar
• The Constitution of Norway. https://www.stortinget.no/globalassets/pdf/english/constitutionenglish.pdf.,
   Google Scholar
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli O, Husby VS, Witsø AE, et al. Using welfare technology for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Expectations, experiences, and challenges of intellectual disability nursing students during clinical placement. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuek A, Hakkennes S. Healthcare staff digital literacy levels and their attitudes towards information systems. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(1):592–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar