Promoting disability employment with avail® – a pilot study for feasibility and preliminary efficacy

References

• U.S. Department of Labor. Disability employment statistics; 2022. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/odep/research-evaluation/statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda S, Raboud J, Mustard C, et al. Employment status is associated with both physical and mental health quality of life in people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2011;23(4):435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta A, Gervey R, Chan F, et al. Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for people with disabilities: a United States study. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Ericzén MJ, Fitch MA, Kinnear M, et al. Development of the supported employment, comprehensive cognitive enhancement, and social skills program for adults on the autism spectrum: results of initial study. Autism. 2018;22(1):6–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns T, Catty J, Becker T, et al. The effectiveness of supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9593):1146–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueser KT, McGurk SR. Supported employment for persons with serious mental illness: current status and future directions. Encephale. 2014;40(Suppl 2):S45–S56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall T, Goldberg RW, Braude L, et al. Supported employment: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(1):16–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rössler W, Kawohl W, Nordt C, et al. ‘Placement budgets’ for supported employment: impact on employment rates in a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;216(6):308–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond GR, Mueser KT. Supported employment. In: Sowers WE, McQuistion HL ,Ranz JM ,Feldman JM, Runnels PS, editors. Textbook of community psychiatry: American Association for Community Psychiatry. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 513–524.
   Google Scholar
• Bond GR. Principles of the individual placement and support model: empirical support. Psychiatric Rehabil J. 1998;22(1):11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blitz CL, Mechanic D. Facilitators and barriers to employment among individuals with psychiatric disabilities: a job coach perspective. Work. 2006;26(4):407–419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueser KT, Cook JA. Why can’t we fund supported employment? Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016;39(2):85–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker DR, Xie H, McHugo GJ, et al. What predicts supported employment program outcomes? Community Ment Health J. 2006;42(3):303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waghorn G, Collister L, Killackey E, et al. Challenges to implementing evidence-based supported employment in Australia. J Vocational Rehabil. 2007;27(1):29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Becker D, Swanson S, Reese S, et al. Supported employment fidelity review manual. 3rd ed. Rockville, MD: Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Centre; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sasnett G, Wesley C. Stress and burnout: how to manage your time and avoid stress as an employment specialist. J Vocational Rehabil. 1996;6(1):31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brausch C, Bühler C, Feldmann A, et al. Supported employment – electronic job-coach (EJO). In Miesenberger K, Bühler C, Penaz P, editors. Computers helping people with special needs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, et al. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for high school students with autism: results of a community-based trial. J Vocational Rehabil. 2010;32(2):101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laarhoven T, Johnson JW, Van Laarhoven-Myers T, et al. The effectiveness of using a video ipod as a prompting device in employment settings. J Behav Educ. 2009;18(2):119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lord SE, McGurk SR, Nicholson J, et al. The potential of technology for enhancing individual placement and support supported employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014;37(2):99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke J. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 1995;189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, et al. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, Iwanaga K, Chan F, et al. Psychometric validation of the job satisfaction of persons with disabilities scale in a sample of peer support specialists. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2021;44(1):93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns B, von Collani G. A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2002;11(2):219–241.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML. The arc’s self-determination scale: procedural guidelines; 1995. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED441322.
   Google Scholar
• Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueser KT, Aalto S, Becker DR, et al. The effectiveness of skills training for improving outcomes in supported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(10):1254–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor A, Kuo H-J, Leahy MJ. Assistive technology in pre-service rehabilitation counselor education: a new approach to team collaboration. Rehabil Res Policy Educ. 2018;32(1):20–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo HJ, Kosciulek J. Rehabilitation counsellor perceived importance and competence in assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie H, Carmien S, Lewis A. Assistive technology abandonment: research realities and potentials. In: Miesenberger K, Kouroupetroglou G, editors. Computers helping people with special needs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 532–540.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5(1):36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The matching person and technology model. In: Connecting to learn: educational and assistive technology for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo HJ, Sung C, Newbutt N, et al. Current trends in technology and wellness for people with disabilities: an analysis of benefit and risk. In: Brooks AL, Brahman S, Kapralos B, Nakajima A, Tyerman J, Jain LC, editors. Recent advances in technologies for inclusive well-being: virtual patients, gamification and simulation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 353–371.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy S, Green J, Maxwell H. I’ve got a mobile phone too! hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(4):341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng C, Gaumer Erickson A, Kingston NM, et al. The relationship among self-determination, self-concept, and academic achievement for students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2014;47(5):462–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Maggio I, Santilli S, Nota L, et al. The predictive role of self-determination and psychological empowerment on job satisfaction in persons with intellectual disability. Adv Neurodev Disord. 2019;3(2):197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML. The importance of self-determination to the quality of life of people with intellectual disability: a perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(19):7121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar