Rehabilitation clinicians’ use of mainstream wireless technologies in practice: a scoping review

References

• Global Report on Assistive Technology. Geneva: World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Forecast Number of Mobile Devices Worldwide from 2020 to 2025 (in Billions). 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/245501/multiple-mobile-device-ownership-worldwide/
   Google Scholar
• Field MJ, Jette AM. Chapter 7, Assistive and Mainstream Technologies for People with Disabilities In: The future of disability in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), Institute of medicine (US) committee on disability in America; 2007. p. 186–189.
   Google Scholar
• Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standards and Guidelines. Federal Register. 2024. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/02/27/2015-03467/information-and-communication-technology-ict-standards-and-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Telehealth and remote patient monitoring. Telehealth.hhs.gov. 2023. https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/preparing-patients-for-telehealth/telehealth-and-remote-patient-monitoring
   Google Scholar
• GARI. Use What’s at Hand: accessible Consumer Electronics for Assistive Technology and Service Delivery. 2023. https://www.mwfai.org/docs/eng/2023_06_GARI-Use%20What%20is%20At%20Hand.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld M, Patomella AH, Asaba E, et al. The use of information and communication technology in healthcare to improve participation in everyday life: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(23):3416–3423. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1592246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman M, Mináriková J, Batalik L, et al. Effects of home-based training with internet telehealth guidance in COPD patients entering pulmonary rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023;18:2305–2319. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S425218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou V, Davos CH, Kapreli E, et al. Effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation, using wearable sensors, as a multicomponent, Cutting-Edge intervention: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(13):3772. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalik L, Filakova K, Sladeckova M, et al. The cost-effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation intervention: a systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;59(2):248–258. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07773-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J, Jones M, Wallace T, et al. Clinician perspectives on mRehab interventions and technologies for people with disabilities in the United States: a national survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(21):4220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Morris L, Messina K, et al. Providing mainstream smart home technology as assistive technology for persons with disabilities: a qualitative study with professionals. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;18(7):1192–1199. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1998673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabanifar N, Hoseini MA, Abdi K. Exploring barriers to implementing telerehabilitation from experiences of managers, policymakers, and providers of rehabilitation services in Iran: a qualitative study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022;36:157. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon NW, Griffiths PC, LaForce S, et al. Wireless device use by individuals with disabilities: findings from a national survey. J Technol Pers Disabil. 2020;8:14.
   Google Scholar
• Fitbit History. Fitbit. 2023. https://www.zippia.com/fitbit-careers-4549/history/
   Google Scholar
• Betz M, DiGiovine CP, Galbreath P, et al. Service delivery for complex rehabilitation technology: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17(8):853–871. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2111609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioerger M, Flanders RM, Goss KD, et al. Developing a systematic search strategy related to people with disability: a brief report testing the utility of proposed disability search terms in a search about opioid use. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(2):318–322. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah DR, Lautsch BA. Counting in qualitative research: why to conduct it, when to avoid it, and when to closet it. J Manag Inq. 2011;20(1):14–22. doi: 10.1177/1056492610375988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach-Mortensen AM, Verboom B. Barriers and facilitators systematic reviews in health: a methodological review and recommendations for reviewers. Res Synth Methods. 2020;11(6):743–759. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews JA, Craven MP, Lang AR, et al. The impact of data from remote measurement technology on the clinical practice of healthcare professionals in depression, epilepsy and multiple sclerosis: survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01640-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Cheshire R, Cogar C, Collier D, et al. Occupational therapy utilisation of apps in practice in the United States. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;17(8):948–956. online October 21, 19 doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1834629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert AM, Stotz N, Metz AE. Apps in therapy: occupational therapists’ use and opinions. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(8):772–779. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1262912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedon TA. Speech-Language pathologists’ practices and attitudes toward app use in therapy [Theses and Dissertations]. 2018. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1748
   Google Scholar
• Walthers K, Zimmer J. The utility of smart home technology within occupational therapy practice. Occup Ther Capstones. 454:113.
   Google Scholar
• Aboujaoudé A, Bier N, Lussier M, et al. Canadian occupational therapists’ use of technology with older adults: a nationwide survey. OTJR. 2021;41(2):67–79. doi: 10.1177/1539449220961340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greasley A, Crook H, Fulford R. Music listening and hearing aids: perspectives from audiologists and their patients. Int J Audiol. 2020;59(9):694–706. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1762126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan HS, Anjum A, Rao PKS. A survey of telepractice in speech-Language pathology and audiology in India. Int J Telerehabil. 2017;9(2):69–80. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrinda R, Reni PS. Survey based analysis of Tele-Rehabilitation in the field of speech language pathology during COVID 19 outbreak in Kerala. Biosci Biotech Res Comm. 2021;14(1):366–374. doi: 10.21786/bbrc/14.1/52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puli L, Layton N, Mont D, et al. Assistive technology provider experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. IJERPH. 2021;18(19):10477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblin A, Shettian M, Cortelyou-Ward K, et al. Exploring physical therapists’ perceptions of mobile application usage utilizing the FITT framework. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017;42(2):180–193. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2016.1178118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton C, McCluskey A, Hassett L, et al. Patient and therapist experiences of using affordable feedback-based technology in rehabilitation: a qualitative study nested in a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(9):1258–1270. doi: 10.1177/0269215518771820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakerabasali S, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Baniasadi T, et al. Mobile health technology and healthcare providers: systemic barriers to adoption. Healthc Inform Res. 2021;27(4):267–278. doi: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett A, Kelly JT, Wright C, et al. Technology-supported models of nutrition care: perspectives of health service providers. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221104670. doi: 10.1177/20552076221104670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weakley A, Tam JW, Van Son C, et al. Effectiveness of a video-based aging services technology education program for health care professionals. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2019;40(3):339–356. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2017.1281805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel C, Sezier A, Terry G. What helps or hinders clinicians in their decision-making processes when using or prescribing mhealth apps in practice? An exploratory study. N Z J Physiother. 2018;46(2):73–78. doi: 10.15619/NZJP/46.2.04.
   Google Scholar
• Morse H, Biggart L, Pomeroy V, et al. Exploring perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians on virtual reality as a precursor to using telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. Published Online September. 2020;32(5):767–791. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1819827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton E, Torous J, Murray G, et al. Using apps for bipolar disorder—an online survey of healthcare provider perspectives and practices. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;137:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns Á, Kelly H. ICT usage in aphasia rehabilitation – beliefs, biases, and influencing factors from the perspectives of speech and language therapists. Aphasiology. 2022;37(3):456–478. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2030462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwaa MN, Kristensen HK, Guidetti S, et al. Physiotherapists’ and occupational therapists’ perspectives on information and communication technology in stroke rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0236831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerst A, Zielasek J, Gaebel W. Smartphone applications for depression: a systematic literature review and a survey of health care professionals’ attitudes towards their use in clinical practice. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;270(2):139–152. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0974-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson AC, Boman IL, Dahlberg L, et al. Lack of time and dependence on significant others: occupational therapists’ experiences of prescribing time assistive technology for persons with dementia. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(8):614–624. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1751875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gately ME, Tickle-Degnen L, Voydetich DJ, et al. Video telehealth occupational therapy services for older veterans: national survey study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8(2):e24299. doi: 10.2196/24299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellstén T, Arokoski J, Sjögren T, et al. The current state of remote physiotherapy in Finland: Cross-sectional Web-Based questionnaire study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;9(2):e35569. doi: 10.2196/35569.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korpershoek YJG, Vervoort SCJM, Trappenburg JCA, et al. Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their health care providers towards using mHealth for self-management of exacerbations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3545-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nygård L, Rosenberg L. How attention to everyday technology could contribute to modern occupational therapy: a focus group study. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79(8):467–474. doi: 10.1177/0308022615613354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Ghasemi P, Stolee P, et al. Clinicians and older adults’ perceptions of the utility of patient-Generated health data in caring for older adults: exploratory mixed methods study. JMIR Aging. 2021;4(4):e29788. doi: 10.2196/29788.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowe M, Sauls B. The use of smartphone apps in clinical practice: a survey of South African physiotherapists. S Afr J Physiother. 2020;76(1):1327. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v76i1.1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biebl JT, Huber S, Rykala M, et al. Attitudes and expectations of health care professionals toward app-based therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: questionnaire study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(10):e21704. doi: 10.2196/21704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch R. Occupational therapists use smartphone applications with service users: implications for clinical practice. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82:68–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne S, Close H, Richards N, et al. Maximizing telerehabilitation for patients with visual loss after stroke: interview and focus group study with stroke survivors, carers, and occupational therapists. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e19604. doi: 10.2196/19604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorup CB, Villadsen A, Andreasen JJ, et al. Perspectives on participation in a feasibility study on Exercise-Based cardiac telerehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: qualitative interview study among patients and health professionals. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(6):e35365. doi: 10.2196/35365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews JA, Craven MP, Jamnadas-Khoda J, et al. Health care professionals’ views on using remote measurement technology in managing Central nervous system disorders: qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e17414. doi: 10.2196/17414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel S, Schmid A, Keller F, et al. Investigating the use of digital health tools in physiotherapy: facilitators and barriers. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;39(7):1449–1468. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2042439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuschmann A, Nayar R, Lowit A, et al. The use of technology in the management of children with phonological delay and adults with acquired dysarthria: a uk survey of current speech-language pathology practice. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;23(2):145–154. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1750700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski A, Smith E, Franklin AD. Speech-Language pathologists’ feelings and practices regarding technological apps in school service delivery. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2, 2022;53(4):1051–1073. doi: 10.1044/2022_lshss-21-00150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Glegg S, Colquhoun H, et al. Virtual reality and active Videogame-Based practice, learning needs, and preferences: a Cross-Canada survey of physical therapists and occupational therapists. Games Health J. 2017;6(4):217–228. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2016.0089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese J, Macdonald GG, Tran BC, et al. Using physical activity trackers in arthritis self-management: a qualitative study of patient and rehabilitation professional perspectives. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71(2):227–236. doi: 10.1002/acr.23780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuperus P, de Kok D, de Aguiar V, et al. Understanding user needs for digital aphasia therapy: experiences and preferences of speech and language therapists. Aphasiology. Published. 2022;37(7):1016–1038. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2066622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni P, Duffy O, Synnott J, et al. Speech and language practitioners’ experiences of commercially available voice-Assisted technology: web-Based survey study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;9(1):e29249. doi: 10.2196/29249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandey V, Vaughn L. The potential of virtual reality in social skills training for autism: bridging the gap between research and adoption of virtual reality in occupational therapy practice. Open J Occup Ther OJOT. Summer. 2021;9(3):1–12. doi: 10.15453/2168-6408.1808.
   Google Scholar
• Morley M, Smith J, Lock L. Things are looking app: introducing iPads to complement occupational therapy interventions…college of occupational therapists conference, june 28-30, 2016. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:26–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson K, Zimmerman E. Pediatric speech-Language pathologists’ use of mobile health technology: qualitative questionnaire study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;6(2):e13966. doi: 10.2196/13966.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hensley CP, Millican D, Hamilton N, et al. Video-Based motion analysis use: a national survey of orthopedic physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2020;100(10):1759–1770. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakubova G, Kellems RO, Chen BB, et al. Practitioners’ attitudes and perceptions toward the use of augmented and virtual reality technologies in the education of students with disabilities. J Spec Educ Technol. 2022;37(2):286–296. doi: 10.1177/01626434211004445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark MLE, Austin DW, Craike MJ. Professional and parental attitudes toward iPad application use in autism spectrum disorder. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2015;30(3):174–181. doi: 10.1177/1088357614537353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai P, Newton-John T, Phillips JL. Apps for older people’s pain self-management: perspectives of primary care and allied health clinicians. Pain Med. 2020;21(4):686–694. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brepohl PCA, Leite H. Virtual reality applied to physiotherapy: a review of current knowledge. VIRTUAL Real. 27(1):71–95. doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00654-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albahrouh SI, Buabbas AJ. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of and willingness to use telerehabilitation in Kuwait during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01478-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho F, Bosisio ME, Brown EJ, et al. Facilitators and barriers to the use of iPads as a therapy tool: a Canadian survey of pediatric occupational therapists. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2017;10(3):266–283. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2017.1325815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole A. Occupational therapy intervention to address handwriting deficit in elementary-aged school children: how to, how much, and how often? A scoping review. J Occup Ther Sch EARLY Interv. 16(3):368–381. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2022.2054487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanatta F, Giardini A, Pierobon A, et al. A systematic review on the usability of robotic and virtual reality devices in neuromotor rehabilitation: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07821-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster JB, McCarthy JW. Designing augmentative and alternative communication applications: the results of focus groups with speech-language pathologists and parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(4):353–365. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1324526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi S, Aravamudhan S, Jagdish A, et al. Transitioning ABA services from in clinic to telehealth: Case study of an indian organization’s response to COVID-19 lockdown. Behav Anal Pract. 2021;14(4):893–912. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00600-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairapareddy KC, Alaparthi GK, Jitendra RS, et al. “We are so close; yet too far”: perceived barriers to smartphone-based telerehabilitation among healthcare providers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in India. Heliyon. 2021;7(8):e07857. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh A, Johnston W, Ashton M, et al. “It’s not as simple as just looking at one chart”: a qualitative study exploring clinician’s opinions on various visualisation strategies to represent longitudinal actigraphy data. Digit Biomark. 2020;4(Suppl 1):87–99. doi: 10.1159/000512044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheehy L, Pilon I, Coyle D, et al. A brief multi-faceted knowledge translation strategy increases therapists’ use of virtual reality for outpatient stroke rehabilitation. Int J STROKE. 2017;12:65–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen H, Andersen MB, Hansen GM, et al. Patients’ and health professionals’ experiences of using virtual reality technology for upper limb training after stroke: a qualitative substudy. Rehabil Res Pract. 2018;2018:4318678. doi: 10.1155/2018/4318678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloyuni S, Alharbi R, Kashoo F, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and barriers to telerehabilitation-based physical therapy practice in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare. 2020;8(4):460. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews JA, Craven MP, Lang AR, et al. Making remote measurement technology work in multiple sclerosis, epilepsy and depression: survey of healthcare professionals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01856-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman C, Gustafsson L, Gomura C. The perspectives of stroke survivors and health professionals on the use of augmented reality for inpatient stroke rehabilitation: an anticipatory exploration. BRAIN Impair. Published Online. 2021;23(2):206–215. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2021.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorrink S, Huisman C, Kort H, et al. Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their physiotherapists regarding the use of an eHealth intervention. JMIR Hum Factors. 2017;4(3):e20. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.7196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yaddaden A, Couture M, Gagnon-Roy M, et al. Using a cognitive orthosis to support older adults during meal preparation: Clinicians’ perspective on COOK technology. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020;7:2055668320909074. doi: 10.1177/2055668320909074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuerwald W, Windmill I, Scott M, et al. Stories from the webcams: Cincinnati children’s hospital medical center audiology telehealth and pediatric auditory device services. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(3s):391–402. doi: 10.1044/2018_aja-imia3-18-0010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandt CJ, Søgaard GI, Clemensen J, et al. Determinants of successful eHealth coaching for consumer lifestyle changes: qualitative interview study among health care professionals. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(7):e237. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Aldridge D, Koenig S, et al. “It’s really exciting to think where it could go”: a mixed-method investigation of clinician acceptance, barriers and enablers of virtual reality technology in communication rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(15):3946–3958. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1895333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionísio Corrêa AG, de Assis GA, do Nascimento M, et al. Perceptions of clinical utility of an augmented reality musical software among health care professionals. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(3):205–216. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1089328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szczepura A, Holliday N, Neville C, et al. Raising the digital profile of facial palsy: National surveys of patients’ and clinicians’ experiences of changing UK treatment pathways and views on the future role of digital technology. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e20406. doi: 10.2196/20406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Zhang Z. Pediatric OTs’ experience in using mobile applications in practice…2020 American occupational therapy association annual conference & expo. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(4_Supplement_1):7411505106p1–7411505106p1. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.74S1-PO2131.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball SH, Singh G, John AB, et al. Implications and attitudes of audiologists towards smartphone integration in hearing healthcare. Hear Res. 2018;369:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Joseph J, Eckstein S, et al. The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(4):338–345. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1448470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawn C, Dettman S, Dowell R, et al. Wearable technology to support early child language experiences: what’s important to parents and clinicians?…health informatics conference, august 12-14, 2019, melbourne, Australia. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;266:51–56. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190772.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watt A, Swainston K, Wilson G. Health professionals’ attitudes to patients’ use of wearable technology. Digit Health. 2019;5:2055207619845544. doi: 10.1177/2055207619845544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter I, Elers P, Lockhart C, et al. Issues associated with the management and governance of sensor data and information to assist aging in place: focus group study with health care professionals. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(12):e24157. doi: 10.2196/24157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal A, Aldersey H, Wittich W, et al. Factors that influence the participation of individuals with deafblindness: a qualitative study with rehabilitation service providers in India. Br J Vis Impair. 2022;40(1):3–17. doi: 10.1177/0264619620941886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis F, Clemson LM, Mackenzie L. Technology for dementia: attitudes and practices of occupational therapists in providing assistive technology for way finding. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(4):373–377. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2016.1173729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merolli M, Gray K, Choo D, et al. Use, and acceptability, of digital health technologies in musculoskeletal physical therapy: a survey of physical therapists and patients. Musculoskeletal Care. 2022;20(3):641–659. Published online March 12, doi: 10.1002/msc.1627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber SM, Schütz N, Uslu AS, et al. Therapist-Guided tablet-based telerehabilitation for patients with aphasia: proof-of-Concept and usability study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;6(1):e13163. doi: 10.2196/13163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isaki E, Fangman Farrell C. Provision of speech-Language pathology telepractice services using apple iPads. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(7):538–549. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick Lorio A, Friend Huggins C, Leo SA, et al. Smartphones and generational differences… are smartphones a barrier to successful patient interactions in the physical therapy clinic? JOPTE. 2018;32(2):151–158. doi: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000034.
   Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout L, Joseph C, Thurston C, et al. Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: a survey of use and perceptions among physiotherapists treating people with neurological diseases or older adults. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07968-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal J, Wilkinson A, Chignell M. Physiotherapists’ and physiotherapy students’ perspectives on the use of mobile or wearable technology in their practice. Physiother Can. 2018;70(3):251–261. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-100.e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson VA, Chan V, Cruz-Coble B, et al. A pilot study of a sensor enhanced activity management system for promoting home rehabilitation exercise performed during the COVID-19 pandemic: therapist experience, reimbursement, and recommendations for implementation. IJERPH. 2021;18(19):10186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allouch SB, van Velsen L. Fit by bits: an explorative study of sports physiotherapists’ perception of quantified self technologies. Stud Health Technol Inf. 2018;247:296–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganesan B, Fong KNK, Meena SK, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on occupational therapy practice and use of telerehabilitation - A cross sectional study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25(9):3614–3622. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202105_25845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajc M, Istenič Starčič A, Lebeničnik M, et al. Tablet game-supported speech therapy embedded in children’s popular practices. Behav Inf Technol. 2018;37(7):693–702. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1474253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins ME. Occupational therapists’ experience with assistive technology in provision of service to clients with alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2018;36(2-3):179–188. doi: 10.1080/02703181.2018.1458770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timurtaş E, Polat MG. Usability of mobile health application for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and clinicians. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2020;10(1):54–59. doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards J, Dukhovny E. Technology training in speech-Language pathology: a focus on tablets and apps. Perspect ASHA SIGs. 2017;2(10):33–48. doi: 10.1044/persp2.SIG10.33.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Liu X, Peng S, et al. A review of wearable and unobtrusive sensing technologies for chronic disease management. Comput Biol Med. 2021;129:104163. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smuck M, Odonkor CA, Wilt JK, et al. The emerging clinical role of wearables: factors for successful implementation in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00418-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdie F, Woo K. The use of mHealth technology for chronic disease management the challenges and opportunities for practical application. Wounds Int. 2020;11(2):32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell J, Shirota C, Clanchy K. Factors that influence the adoption of rehabilitation technologies: a multi-disciplinary qualitative exploration. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2023;20(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01194-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil M, Hirslund E, Baiocco-Romano L, et al. A scoping review of the use of intelligent assistive technologies in rehabilitation practice with older adults. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. online 2023;:1–32. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2239277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridging Apps. 2023. https://bridgingapps.org
   Google Scholar
• M-health Index and Navigation Database. 2023. https://mindapps.org
   Google Scholar
• TherAppx. 2023. https://therappx.com/for-healthcare
   Google Scholar
• App Guide. 2023. https://appguide.ca/
   Google Scholar
• Global Accessibility Reporting Initiative. 2023. https://www.gari.info/.
   Google Scholar
• App Advisor. 2023. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/mental-health-apps/the-app-evaluation-model
   Google Scholar
• Erickson K. App-based mobile devices in the occupational therapy process. OT Pract. 2017;22(17):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical Device Home Use Initiative. 2023. https://www.fda.gov/media/78647/download.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Perrin A. Disabled Americans less likely to use technology. Pew Research Center. 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/09/10/americans-with-disabilities-less-likely-than-those-without-to-own-some-digital-devices/.
   Google Scholar
• Satpute S, Cooper R, Dicianno BE, et al. Mini-review: rehabilitation engineering: research priorities and trends. Neurosci Lett. 2021;764:136207. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Cunha NM, Isbel S, Gibson D, et al. Information Asymmetry and Assistive Technology: the Role of Brokerage Services. Report for AHA, unpublished; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann-Sass C, Richter L, Silberzahn T, et al. The european path to reimbursement for digital health solutions. McKinsey Co. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Parmanto B, Fairman AD, et al. Perspectives on the evolution of mobile (mHealth) technologies and application to rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):397–405. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar