44
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluating the delivery of physical activity for people with developmental disabilities using an online knowledge translation approach: part 2 – content quality

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 06 Sep 2023, Accepted 30 Apr 2024, Published online: 22 May 2024

References

  • Jaarsma EA, Haslett D, Smith B. Improving communication of information about physical activity opportunities for people with disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2019;36(2):185–201. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2018-0020.
  • Rimmer JH, Riley B, Wang E, et al. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(5):419–425. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.002.
  • Neil-Sztramko SE, Belita E, Levinson AJ, et al. Evaluation of an online knowledge translation intervention to promote cancer risk reduction behaviours: findings from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6361-2.
  • Plantin L, Daneback K. Parenthood, information and support on the internet. A literature review of research on parents and professionals online. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-34.
  • Richardson CG, Hamadani LG, Gotay CC. Quantifying Canadians’ use of the internet as a source of information on behavioural risk factor modifications related to cancer prevention. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2013;33(3):123–128. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.33.3.02.
  • Tennant B, Stellefson M, Dodd VJ, et al. eHealth literacy and web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3992.
  • O’Brien OA, McCarthy M, Gibney ER, et al. Technology-supported dietary and lifestyle interventions in healthy pregnant women: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(7):760–766. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.59.
  • Chan TM, Dzara K, Dimeo SP, et al. Social media in knowledge translation and education for physicians and trainees: a scoping review. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;9(1):20–30. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-00542-7.
  • Torrance H. Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res. 2012;6(2):111–123. doi: 10.1177/1558689812437185.
  • Boyd CO. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. In: Munhall PL, Boyd CO, editors. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. 2nd ed. Burlington (MA): Jones & Bartlett; 2000. p. 454–475.
  • Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Venice: Aldine Publishing Company; 1970.
  • Denzin NK. Triangulation 2.0. J Mixed Methods Res. 2012;6(2):80–88. doi: 10.1177/1558689812437186.
  • Heale R, Forbes D. Understanding triangulation in research. Evid Based Nurs. 2013;16(4):98–98. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101494.
  • Kimchi J, Polivka B, Stevenson JS. Triangulation: operational definitions. Nurs Res. 1991;40(6):364–366. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199111000-00009.
  • Mitchell ES. Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8(3):18–26. doi: 10.1097/00012272-198604000-00004.
  • Molina‐Azorín JF. Mixed methods in strategy research: applications and implications in the resource-based view. In: Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD, editors. Research methodology in strategy and management. Leeds: Emerald; 2007, p. 37–73. doi: 10.1016/s1479-8387(07)04003-9.
  • Bans-Akutey A, Tiimub BM. Triangulation in research. Acad Lett. 2021, Article 3392. doi: 10.20935/AL3392.
  • Given LM. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2008.
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 1985.
  • Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56(2):81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016.
  • Foss C, Ellefsen B. The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. J Adv Nurs. 2002;40(2):242–248. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02366.x.
  • Heesen R, Bright LK, Zucker A. Vindicating methodological triangulation. Synthese. 2019;196(8):3067–3081. doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1294-7.
  • Williamson GR. Illustrating triangulation in mixed-methods nursing research. Nurse Res. 2005;12(4):7–18. doi: 10.7748/nr2005.04.12.4.7.c5955.
  • Neumann MM, Herodotou C. Evaluating YouTube videos for young children. Educ Inf Technol. 2020;25(5):4459–4475. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10183-7.
  • Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am Psychol. 2008;63(8):760–769. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760.
  • Nomura M, Nielsen GS, Tronbacke B. Guidelines for easy-to-read materials [IFLA professional reports, no. 120]. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions; 2010.
  • Banda DR, Dogoe MS, Matuszny RM. Review of video prompting studies for persons with developmental disabilities. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2011;46(4):514–527. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3787433
  • McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–282. doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031.
  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1993.
  • Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretive phenomenological analysis: theory, method, and research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2006.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Wiltshire G, Ronkainen NJ. A realist approach to thematic analysis: making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes. J Crit Real. 2021;20(2):159–180. doi: 10.1080/14767430.2021.1894909.
  • Singh A, Viner M, Yeh CJ. Special education design and development tools for school rehabilitation professionals. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2019.
  • Gibson J. The senses considered as perceptual systems. revised ed. Westport (CT): Praeger; 1983.
  • Sutherland RJ, Isherwood T. The evidence for easy-read for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic literature review. Policy Practice Intel Disabil. 2016;13(4):297–310. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12201.
  • United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. 2006. [cited 2023 Apr 25]. www.un.org. https://social.desa.un.org/issues/disability/crpd/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-crpd.
  • Mazeas A, Duclos M, Pereira B, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of gamification on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e26779. doi: 10.2196/26779.
  • Koivisto J, Hamari J. Gamification of physical activity: a systematic literature review of comparison studies. GamiFIN conferenceAt; 2019. p. 106–117.
  • Herzmann G, Schweinberger SR, Sommer W, et al. What’s special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology. 2004;41(5):688–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00196.x.
  • Vila J, Morato C, Lucas I, et al. The affective processing of loved familiar faces and names: integrating fMRI and heart rate. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0216057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216057.
  • Dunkley RR. Teaching feedback responsiveness to adults with intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorder: Using prompting and modelling to teach soft skills [doctoral dissertation]. ResearchSpace@ Auckland; 2022.
  • Spooner F, Knight V, Browder DM, et al. Evaluating evidence-based practice in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Res Practice Persons Severe Disabil. 2011;36(1–2):62–75. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.62.
  • Tassé MJ, Wagner JB, Kim M. Using technology and remote support services to promote independent living of adults with intellectual disability and related developmental disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020;33(3):640–647. doi: 10.1111/jar.12709.
  • Cannella-Malone HI, Mizrachi SB, Sabielny LM, et al. Teaching physical activities to students with significant disabilities using video modeling. Dev Neurorehabil. 2013;16(3):145–154. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2012.763192.
  • Fukuoka Y, Haskell W, Lin F, et al. Short-and long-term effects of a mobile phone app in conjunction with brief in-person counseling on physical activity among physically inactive women: the mPED randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e194281-e194281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4281.
  • Goldstein SP, Forman EM, Butryn ML, et al. Differential programming needs of college students preferring web-based versus in-person physical activity programs. Health Commun. 2018;33(12):1509–1515. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1372048.
  • Lian X, Sunar MS. Mobile augmented reality technologies for autism spectrum disorder interventions: a systematic literature review. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(10):4550. doi: 10.3390/app11104550.
  • Takahashi Y, Ito Y, Inoue K, et al. 2012). Haptic device system for upper limb and cognitive rehabilitation – application for development disorder children. London: InTech eBooks. doi: 10.5772/25450.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.