The influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among older adults with age-related vision loss (ARVL)

References

• Webb SA. Social work in a risk society: social and political perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bornat J, Bytheway B. Perceptions and presentations of living with everyday risk in later life. Br J Social Work. 2010;40(4):1118–1134. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh P, Kelly L. Dignity of risk in the community: a review of and reflections on the literature. Health Risk Soc. 2018;20(5-6):297–311. doi:10.1080/13698575.2018.1519115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick RJ, Foster D. Negotiating risky bodies: childbirth and constructions of risk. Health Risk Soc. 2014;16(1):68–83. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.863852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, et al. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):334. doi:10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyman SR, Ballinger C, Phillips JE, et al. Characteristics of outdoor falls among older people: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13(1):125. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laliberte RD, Egan MY, McGrath CE, et al. Low vision rehabilitation, age-related vision loss, and risk: a critical interpretive synthesis. Gerontologist. 2016;56(3):e32–e45. doi:10.1093/geront/gnv685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS, et al. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018;9(1):1–65. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rush KL, Murphy MA, Kozak JF. A photovoice study of older adults’ conceptualizations of risk. J Aging Stud. 2012;26(4):448–458. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2012.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, et al. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(2):267–286. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton D, editor. Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Pawelec G. Immunity and ageing in man. Exp Gerontol. 2006;41(12):1239–1242. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2006.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee L, Hillier LM, Lu SK, et al. Person-centered risk assessment framework: assessing and managing risk in older adults living with dementia. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2019;9(1):47–57. doi:10.2217/nmt-2018-0031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lliffe S, Manthorpe J. The hazards of early recognition of dementia: a risk assessment. Aging Ment Health. 2004;8(2):99–105. doi:10.1080/13607860410001649653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane ML, Holup JL. Risk as value: combining affect and analysis in risk judgments. J Risk Res. 2006;9(2):141–164. doi:10.1080/13669870500166930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalker K. Managing risk and uncertainty in social work: a literature review. J Social Work. 2003;3(2):211–233. doi:10.1177/14680173030032006.
   Google Scholar
• Adams T. The social construction of risk by community psychiatric nurses and family carers for people with dementia. Health Risk Soc. 2001;3(3):307–319. doi:10.1080/13698570120079903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines TP, Lee DCA, O’connell B, et al. Why do hospitalized older adults take risks that may lead to falls? Health Expect. 2015;18(2):233–249. doi:10.1111/hex.12026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz DA, Latham NK. Prevention of falls in community-dwelling older adults. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):734–743. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1903252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moylan KC, Binder EF. Falls in older adults: risk assessment, management and prevention. Am J Med. 2007;120(6):493-e1–493.e6. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.07.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Who.int. [Internet]. Visual impairment and blindness [cited 2023, February]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Aljied R, Aubin MJ, Buhrmann R, et al. Prevalence and determinants of visual impairment in Canada: cross-sectional data from the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(3):291–297. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.01.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vision Rehabilitation Evidence Based Review Team. Vision rehabilitation: evidence-based review. Toronto: Canadian National Institute for the Blind; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Copolillo A. Low vision intervention: decision making for acquiring and integrating assistive technology. In: Soderback I, editor. International handbook of occupational therapy interventions. Stockholm, Sweden: Springer; 2009. p. 147–157.
   Google Scholar
• McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(01):91–110. doi:10.1017/S0144686X0400248X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek ST, Wouters EJ, van Hoof J, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):235–248. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath C, Astell A. The benefits and barriers to technology acquisition: understanding the decision-making processes of older adults with age-related vision loss (ARVL). Br J Occup Ther. 2016;80(2):123–131. doi:10.1177/0308022616667959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielandt T, Strong J. Compliance with prescribed adaptive equipment: a literature review. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2000;63(2):65–75. doi:10.1177/030802260006300204.
   Google Scholar
• Strong G, Jutai JW, Bevers P, et al. The psychosocial impact of closed-circuit television low vision aids. Visual Impairm Res. 2003;5(3):179–190. doi:10.1080/1388235039048694.
   Google Scholar
• Fok D, Polgar JM, Shaw L, et al. Low vision assistive technology device usage and importance in daily occupations. Work. 2011;39(1):37–48. doi:10.3233/WOR-2011-1149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Copolillo A, Teitelman JL. Acquisition and integration of low vision assistive devices: understanding the decision-making process of older adults with low vision. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59(3):305–313. doi:10.5014/ajot.59.3.305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport RD, Mann W, Lutz B. How older adults make decisions regarding smart technology: an ethnographic approach. Assist Technol. 2012;24(3):168–181. doi:10.1080/10400435.2012.659792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(12):1851–1862. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00422-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape TLB, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):5–20. doi:10.1080/09638280110066235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard R. Statistics on vision impairment: a resource manual. 5th ed. Arlene R. New York, NY: Gordon Research Institute of Lighthouse International. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kraskowsky LH, Finlayson M. Factors affecting older adults’ use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55(3):303–310. doi:10.5014/ajot.55.3.303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook KE. Using critical ethnography to explore issues in health promotion. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):129–138. doi:10.1177/1049732304267751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon R, Dippo D. On critical ethnographic work. Anthropol Edu Quarterly. 1986;17(4):195–202. doi:10.1525/aeq.1986.17.4.04x0613o.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J. Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications Inc; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Carspecken PF. Critical ethnography in educational research: a theoretical and practical guide. New York, NY: Routledge; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Baillie L, Benyon D. Place and technology in the home. Comput Supported Coop Work. 2008;17(2-3):227–256. doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9063-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusenbach M. Street phenomenology: the go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography. 2003;4(3):455–485. doi:10.1177/146613810343007.
   Google Scholar
• Hakobyan L, Lumsden J, O’Sullivan D, et al. Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(6):513–528. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjari K, Verma M, Singal G. A survey on assistive technology for visually impaired. Internet Things. 2020;11:100188. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100188.
   Google Scholar
• Butler SE, Crudden A, Sansing WK, et al. Employment barriers: access to assistive technology and research needs. J Visual Impairm Blindness. 2002;96(9):664–667. doi:10.1177/0145482X0209600908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crudden A, Sansing W, Butler S. Overcoming barriers to employment: strategies of rehabilitation providers. J Visual Impairm Blindness. 2005;99(6):325–335. doi:10.1177/0145482X0509900602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble MJ, Dowler DL, Hirsh AE. Informed decision making on assistive technology workplace accomdodations for people with visual impairments. Work. 2004;23(2):123–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorenzini MC, Wittich W. Factors related to the use of magnifying low vision aids: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(24):3525–3537. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1593519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor S, Iftikhar S, Ayub I, et al. Range sensor-based assistive technology solutions for people with visual impairment: a review. Disabil Rehabil Assistive Technol. 2024; 19(3):576–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos ADP, Ferrari ALM, Medola FO, et al. Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment. Disabil Rehabil Assistive Technol. 2022;17(2):152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh M. Cane use and late onset visual impairment. TAD. 2015;27(3):103–116. doi:10.3233/TAD-150432.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes N. Visual impairment and fashion: breaking barriers. In Engaging with fashion; 2015. p. 258–268.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Beeman I, Southall K, et al. Stereotyping as a barrier to the social participation of older adults with low vision: a qualitative focus group study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e029940. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek ST, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, et al. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology. 2016;62(2):226–237. doi:10.1159/000430949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell P. The psycho-social challenge of adapting to visual impairment. Br J Visual Impairm. 2012;30(2):108–114. doi:10.1177/0264619612441766.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath C, Rudman DL, Spafford M, et al. The environmental production of disability for seniors with age-related vision loss. Can J Aging. 2017a;36(1):55–66. doi:10.1017/S0714980816000623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath C, Rudman DL, Trentham B, et al. Reshaping understandings of disability associated with age-related vision loss (ARVL): incorporating critical disability perspectives into research and practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2017b;39(19):1990–1998. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1212116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath CE, Rudman DL. Factors that influence the occupational engagement of older adults with low vision: a scoping review. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76(5):234–241. doi:10.4276/030802213X13679275042762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed-Jones RJ, Solis GR, Lawson KA, et al. Vision and falls: a multidisciplinary review of the contributions of visual impairment to falls among older adults. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):22–28. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock A. Interactive maps for visually impaired people: design, usability and spatial cognition (Doctoral dissertation, Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier); 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh MA, Johnson MA. Mobility: an overview. In Assistive technology for visually impaired and blind people. London, UK: Springer Publisher; 2008. p. 167–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jafri R, Ali SA, Arabnia HR, et al. Computer vision-based object recognition for the visually impaired in an indoors environment: a survey. Vis Comput. 2014;30(11):1197–1222. doi:10.1007/s00371-013-0886-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas G, Pavey S, Corcoran C, et al. Evaluating the use of the ICF as a framework for interviewing people with a visual impairment about their mobility and travel. Br J Visual Impairm. 2012;30(1):6–21. doi:10.1177/0264619611428932.
   Google Scholar
• McIlvane JM, Reinhardt JP. Interactive effect of support from family and friends in visually impaired elders. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(6):P374–P382. doi:10.1093/geronb/56.6.p374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong S. Traveling with blindness: a qualitative space-time approach to understanding visual impairment and urban mobility. Health Place. 2018;49:85–92. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worth N. Visual impairment in the city: young people’s social strategies for independent mobility. Urban Stud. 2013;50(3):574–586. doi:10.1177/0042098012468898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meaidi A, Jennum P, Ptito M, et al. The sensory construction of dreams and nightmare frequency in congenitally blind and late blind individuals. Sleep Med. 2014;15(5):586–595. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2013.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar