Usability of mechanical assistive technologies for performing activities involving the upper extremities in individuals with impairments: a systematic review

References

• Janssen MM, Bergsma A, Geurts AC, et al. Patterns of decline in upper limb function of boys and men with DMD: an international survey. J Neurol. 2014;261(7):1269–1288. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7316-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang J-Y, Ding L, Shu B-B, et al. Associated mirror therapy enhances motor recovery of the upper extremity and daily function after stroke: a randomized control study. Neural Plast. 2021;2021:7266263–7266269. doi: 10.1155/2021/7266263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan P. Upper limb motor impairment after stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin. 2015;26(4):599–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels B, Pangalila RF, Bergen MP, et al. Upper limb function in adults with duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(9):770–775. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan MC, Vucic S, Cheah BC, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):942–955. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61156-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch BM, Simenson RL. Upper extremity strength and function in children with spinal muscular atrophy type II. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(3):241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroksmark A-K, Beckung E, Tulinius M. Muscle strength and motor function in children and adolescents with spinal muscular atrophy II and III. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2001;5(5):191–198. doi: 10.1053/ejpn.2001.0510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer NH, Esquenazi A. Muscle overactivity and movement dysfunction in the upper motoneuron syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin. 2003;14(4):855–883.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Ziegler E, et al. Spasticity after stroke: physiology, assessment and treatment. Brain Inj. 2013;27(10):1093–1105. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.804202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissel J, Schelosky LD, Scott J, et al. Early development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational trial. J Neurol. 2010;257(7):1067–1072. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5463-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videler AJ, Beelen A, van Schaik IN, et al. Limited upper limb functioning has impact on restrictions in participation and autonomy of patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy 1a. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(9):746–750. no doi: 10.2340/16501977-0419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Meeteren J, Roebroeck M, Celen E, et al. Functional activities of the upper extremity of young adults with cerebral palsy: a limiting factor for participation? Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(5):387–395. doi: 10.1080/09638280701355504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudoin M, Lettre J, Routhier F, et al. Long-term use of the JACO robotic arm: a case series. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(3):267–275. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1428692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turgeon P, Dubé M, Laliberté T, et al. Mechanical design of a new device to assist eating in people with movement disorders. Assist Technol. 2022;34(2):170–177. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2020.1734111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil M, Hirslund E, Baiocco-Romano L, et al. A scoping review of the use of intelligent assistive technologies in rehabilitation practice with older adults. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023:1–32. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2239277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandolla M, Antonietti A, Longatelli V, et al. The effectiveness of wearable upper limb assistive devices in degenerative neuromuscular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:450. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karam A, Alnajjar F, Gochoo M. Assistive and rehabilitation robotics for upper limb impairments in post-stroke patients: evaluation criteria for the design and functionality. Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 2020: IEEE. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heide LA, Gelderblom GJ, de Witte LP. Effects and effectiveness of dynamic arm supports a technical review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(1):44–62. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Readioff R, Siddiqui ZK, Stewart C, et al. Use and evaluation of assistive technologies for upper limb function in tetraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(6):809–820. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1878342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heide LA, Gelderblom GJ, de Witte LP. Dynamic arm supports: overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function. IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2013: IEEE. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rozevink SG, Hijmans JM, Horstink KA, et al. Effectiveness of task-specific training using assistive devices and task-specific usual care on upper limb performance after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;18(7):1245–1258. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2001061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmet LM, Cook LS, Lee RC. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. 2004. Available from https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/48b9b989-c221-4df6-9e35-af782082280e
   Google Scholar
• Speyer R, Denman D, Wilkes-Gillan S, et al. Effects of telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(3):225–235. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman T, Sample W, Seliktar R, et al. Design and testing of a functional arm orthosis in patients with neuromuscular diseases. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(2):244–251. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.897026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn M, Shank TM, Eppes M, et al. User evaluation of a dynamic arm orthosis for people with neuromuscular disorders. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;24(12):1277–1283. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2492860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shank T, Eppes M, Hossain J, et al. Outcome measures with COPM of children using a Wilmington robotic exoskeleton. Open J Occup Ther. 2017;5(1):3. doi: 10.15453/2168-6408.1262.
   Google Scholar
• Haumont T, Rahman T, Sample W, et al. Wilmington robotic exoskeleton: a novel device to maintain arm improvement in muscular disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(5):e44–e49. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31821f50b5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins MS, Baumgarten JM, Yasuda YL, et al. Mobile arm supports: evidence-based benefits and criteria for use. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(4):388–393. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebrasseur A, Lettre J, Routhier F, et al. Evaluation of the usability of an actively actuated arm support. Assist Technol. 2021;33(5):271–277. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1629124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essers J, Murgia A, Peters A, et al. Daily life benefits and usage characteristics of dynamic arm supports in subjects with neuromuscular disorders. Sensors. 2020;20(17):4864. doi: 10.3390/s20174864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essers J, Meijer K, Peters A, et al. The effects of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy and dynamic arm support on upper extremity muscle coordination in functional tasks. Neuromuscul Disord. 2023;33(8):651–659. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2022.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund K, Brandt R, Gelderblom G-J, et al. A user-centered evaluation study of a mobile arm support. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IEEE; 2009. p. 582–587.
   Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek B, de Haan E, van den Berg M, et al. Development of a mobile arm support (armon): design evolution and preliminary user experience. IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IEEE; 2007. p. 1114–1120.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz A, Callaway L, Randall M, et al. Mobile arm supports in duchenne muscular dystrophy: a pilot study of user experience and outcomes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(8):880–889. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1749892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Heide L, De Witte L. The perceived functional benefit of dynamic arm supports in daily life. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(6):1139–1150. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.06.0099.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer G, Romer GR, Stuyt HJ. Design of a dynamic arm support (D as) for gravity compensation. 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. IEEE; 2007. p. 1042–1048. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428552.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard J, Lettre J, Campeau-Lecours A, et al. Use of a dynamic arm support to drive a power wheelchair: a case report. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;19(2):506–515. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2102258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooren PN, Dunning AG, Janssen MMHP, et al. Design and pilot validation of A-gear: a novel wearable dynamic arm support (+ Erratum). J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:83.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan MC, Mathie B, Foulds RA. Translation of an upper extremity exoskeleton to home and community use for individuals with duchenne muscular dystrophy. 2017 International Symposium on Wearable Robotics and Rehabilitation (WeRob): IEEE; 2017. p. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Dieruf K, Ewer L, Boninger D. The natural-fit handrim: factors related to improvement in symptoms and function in wheelchair users. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(5):578–585. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11754605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J-X, Li L-F, Zhao Y-L, et al. CONSORT—assistive technology-180° rotating eating spoon improves the ability of eating of self-care patients with upper extremity dyskinesia: rotating eating spoon improves eating ability. Medicine. 2019;98(9):e14597. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi JJ, Sun Y, Pan SS, et al. Manufacture and clinical application of the forearm pronation’s assistant tableware in the severely burned. Burns. 2021;47(3):684–691. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden RBE, Kontson K, Ong M, et al. Diabetes management for the disabled. Assistive device for patients with one functioning arm. RESNA; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nijenhuis SM, Prange GB, Stienentt A, et al. Direct effect of a dynamic wrist and hand orthosis on reach and grasp kinematics in chronic stroke. IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). IEEE; 2015. p. 404–409.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh P-C, Chen C-H, Chen C-S. Using a 3D-printed hand orthosis to improve three-jaw chuck hand function in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:2552–2559. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3273300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villeneuve T, Lemire G, Paquet MP, et al. Handwriting assistive device: helping people living with motion disorders learn to write and learn. Presented at the RESNA; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rostami S, Kim SH, Novoa E, et al. The assist handle: a device to conduct independent floor-to-wheelchair transfers. Presented at the RESNA. 2022. Available from https://www.resna.org/Events/RESNA-Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Lim M, Park J, Lee KJ, et al. Usability of a new writing assistive device for persons with cervical spinal cord injury. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 217:710–717.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland M, Jang S-H, Shin A, et al. Enabling independence in reading with the manual page turning facilitative device. Proceedings of RESNA; 2010. p. 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Talag A, Uta S. RESNA annual conference-2012. 2012. Available from https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2012/Indexes/TitleIndex.html
   Google Scholar
• Lin LY. Versita assistive drawing device: helping people living with motion disorders learn to write and draw. RESNA; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gillman E, Gelle AM, Nguyen T. iDEA – iPad dexterity enhancement apparatus (Loyola Marymount University). Presented at the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America, Los Angeles; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao B, D’Auria K. A locker assistant device. RESNA; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nishinohira Y, Ikeda M, Oshima C, et al. F-ready: a support device that allows disabled people to play the guitar. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019;705(1):012006.Publishingdoi: 10.1088/1757-899X/705/1/012006.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardini F, Petruccioli A, Dalpadulo E, et al. A methodological approach for the design of inclusive assistive devices by integrating co-design and additive manufacturing technologies. 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration, IHSI 2020, February 19, 2020 - February 21, 2020, Modena, Italy, 2020, vol. 1131 AISC: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; p. 816–822. Available from doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_124.
   Google Scholar
• Carhart C, Ciechowski R, Groat D, et al. Development of a one-handed nail clipper for stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(2):156–159. doi: 10.1310/tsr1502-156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen EF, Raunsbæk J, Lund JN, et al. Development and simulation of a passive upper extremity orthosis for amyoplasia. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018;5:2055668318761525. doi: 10.1177/2055668318761525.
   Google Scholar
• Chan F, Gelman JS, Ditchman N, et al. The World Health Organization ICF model as a conceptual framework of disability. In: Chan F, Da Silva Cardoso E, Chronister J, editors. Understanding psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disability: a handbook for evidence-based practitioners in rehabilitation. Cham: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa Y, Shimada S, Eguchi K. Development of wrist support mechanism for muscle weakness person to work on desk work. 2014 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS). IEEE; 2014. p. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/MHS.2014.7006127.
   Google Scholar
• Atigossou OLG, Honado AS, Routhier F, et al. Psychometric properties of the psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): a systematic review. Assistive Technol. 2021;35(3):211–219. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.2010149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aledda S, Galeoto G, Fabbrini G, et al. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;19(4):1228–1235. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2161648.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee WTK, Chan HF, Wong E. Improvement of feeding independence in end-stage cancer patients under palliative care - a prospective, uncontrolled study. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13(12):1051–1056. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0859-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda YL, Bowman K, Hsu JD. Mobile arm supports: criteria for successful use in muscle disease patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67(4):253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Global report on assistive technology. 2022. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/354357.
   Google Scholar