Autonomy, independence, and participation of nursing home habitants addressed by assistive technology: a scoping review

References

• Dramé M, Lang P-O, Barbe C, et al. Entrée dans la dépendance : comprendre pour agir. Les Cahiers De L’année Gérontologique. 2011;3(1):33.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization; 2015b. 9789240694811_eng.pdf (who.int)
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHOQOL - Measuring Quality of Life. 2012. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol
   Google Scholar
• Holup AA, Hyer K, Meng H, et al. Profile of nursing home residents admitted directly from home. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017;18(2);131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onder G, Carpenter I, Finne-Soveri H, et al. Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the services and health for elderly in long TERm care (SHELTER) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanford A, Orrell M, Tolson D, et al. An international definition for “nursing home”. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015. 16:181–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.12.013.
   Google Scholar
• Direction de la Recherche, des Études et de l’Évaluation des Statistiques (DRESS), L’hébergement des personnes âgées en établissement Les chiffres clés. L’enquête auprès des établissements d’hébergements pour personnes âgées. 2015. https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/sources-outils-et-enquetes/07-lenquete-aupres-des-etablissements-dhebergement-pour-personnes-agees.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe M, Byers J, Busija L, et al. How important are choice, autonomy, and relationships in predicting the quality of life of nursing home residents? J Appl Gerontol. 2021;40(12):1743–1750. doi: 10.1177/0733464820983972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. Long-term care report: trends, challenges, and opportunities in an ageing society. Vol. I. Publications Office of the European Union; 2021. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/677726
   Google Scholar
• Miron de l’Espinay A, Roy D. Perte d’autonomie : À pratiques inchangées, 108 000 seniors de plus seraient attendus en ehpad d’ici à 2030 : projections de population âgée en perte d’autonomie selon le modèle lieux de vie et autonomie (LIVIA). Études et résultats. DREES. 2020;1172:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard C, Orrell M, YongZhong S, et al. Impact of antipsychotic review and nonpharmacological intervention on antipsychotic use, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and mortality in people with dementia living in nursing homes: a factorial cluster-randomized controlled trial by the well-being and health for people with dementia (WHELD) program. AJP. 2016;173(3):252–262. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15010130.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services : an overview of evidence. 2015a. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Global%20strategy%20on%20people-centred%20and%20integrated%20health%20services%3A%20An%20overview%20of%20evidence&publication_year=2015
   Google Scholar
• Cordner Z, Blass DM, Rabins PV, et al. Quality of life in nursing home residents with advanced dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(12):2394–2400., doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03170.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drageset J, Eide GE, Ranhoff AH. Mortality in nursing home residents without cognitive impairment and its relation to self-reported health-related quality of life, sociodemographic factors, illness variables and cancer diagnosis: a 5-year follow-up study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(2):317–325. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0143-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin DS, Özer Ö, Yanardağ MZ. Perceived social support, quality of life and satisfaction with life in elderly people. Educ Gerontol. 2019;45(1):69–77. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2019.1585065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkay A, Tabak N. Elderly residents’ participation and autonomy within a geriatric ward in a public institution. Int J Nurs Pract. 2002;8(4):198–209. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172X.2002.00363.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies S, Laker S, Ellis L. Promoting autonomy and independence for older people within nursing practice: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26(2):408–417. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026408.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane RL, Rockwood T, Hyer K, et al. Rating the importance of nursing home residents’ quality of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(12):2076–2082. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00493.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight T, Ricciardelli LA. Successful aging: perceptions of adults aged between 70 and 101 years. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2003;56(3):223–245. doi: 10.2190/CG1A-4Y73-WEW8-44QY.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shippee TP. On the edge: balancing health, participation, and autonomy to maintain active independent living in two retirement facilities. J Aging Stud. 2012;26(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2011.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedman M, Pöder U, Mamhidir A-G, et al. Life memories and the ability to act: the meaning of autonomy and participation for older people when living with chronic illness. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015; 29(4), 824–833. doi: 10.1111/scs.12215.
   Google Scholar
• Heide SK. Autonomy, identity and health: defining quality of life in older age. J Med Ethics. 2022;48(5), 353–356. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107185.
   Google Scholar
• Paque K, Goossens K, Elseviers M, et al. Autonomy and social functioning of recently admitted nursing home residents. Aging & Mental Health. 2017;21(9), 910–916. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1181711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welford C, Murphy K, Rodgers V, et al. Autonomy for older people in residential care: a selective literature review: autonomy for older people in residential care. Int J Older People Nurs. 2012;7(1):65–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00311.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moilanen T, Kangasniemi M, Papinaho O, et al. Older people’s perceived autonomy in residential care : an integrative review. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(3):414–434. doi: 10.1177/0969733020948115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlin Marceta J. A non-ideal authenticity-based conceptualization of personal autonomy. Med Health Care Philos. 2019;22(3):387–395. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9879-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowsky S, Musto A, Suteu K, et al. Independence: an analysis of a complex and core construct in occupational therapy. Br J Occupat Therapy. 2012;75(4):188–195. doi: 10.4276/030802212X13336366278176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piškur B, Daniëls R, Jongmans MJ, et al. Participation and social participation : are they distinct concepts? Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(3):211–220. doi: 10.1177/0269215513499029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification… Google Scholar. Consulté 14 novembre 2023, à l’adresse. 2013. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=International+Classification+of+Functioning%2C+Disability+and+Health&publication_year=2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A, Marterella A. Powerful practice: a model for authentic occupational therapy. Centre for innovative OT solutions; Fort Collins; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Aquino J, Bourquin M. Les innovations numériques et technologiques dans les établissements et services pour personnes âgées. 2019. Filière Silver Economie.
   Google Scholar
• Camp N, Lewis M, Hunter K, et al. Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(163):1–18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010163.
   Google Scholar
• Demiris G, Skubic M, Rantz MJ, et al. Facilitating interdisciplinary design specification of “smart” homes for aging. In Ubiquity : Technologies for Better Health in Aging Societies. 2006. IOS Press, Vol. 124, p. 45.
   Google Scholar
• Ecarnot F, Sanchez S, Berrut G, et al. Defining Your “Life Territory” : The Meaning of Place and Home for Community Dwellers and Nursing Home Residents—A Qualitative Study in Four European Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1), 157:1–10. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010517.
   Google Scholar
• Kenigsberg P-A, Aquino J-P, Bérard A, et al. Assistive technologies to address capabilities of people with dementia: from research to practice. Dementia. 2019;18(4), 1568–1595. doi: 10.1177/1471301217714093.
   Google Scholar
• Krick T, Huter K, Domhoff D, et al. Digital technology and nursing care: a scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4238-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daly Lynn J, Rondón-Sulbarán J, Quinn E, et al. A systematic review of electronic assistive technology within supporting living environments for people with dementia. Dementia (London). 2019;18(7-8):2371–2435. doi: 10.1177/1471301217733649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Q, Pluye P, Fabregues S, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schlomann A, Seifert A, Zank S, et al. Use of information and communication technology (ICT) devices among the oldest-old: loneliness, anomie, and autonomy. Innov Aging. 2020;4(2):1–10. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz050.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeijer AR, Depla MF, Frederiks BJ, et al. The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22(3):307–320. doi: 10.1177/0969733014533237.
   Google Scholar
• Buss S, Westlund A. Personal autonomy. In: Edward N. Zalta, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. (Spring Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/personal-autonomy/
   Google Scholar
• Hall A, Brown Wilson C, Stanmore E, et al. Moving beyond « safety » versus ‘autonomy’: a qualitative exploration of the ethics of using monitoring technologies in long-term dementia care. BMC Geriatrics. 2019;19(1), 145:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1155-6.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeijer AR, Depla M, Frederiks B, et al. The use of surveillance technology in residential facilities for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: a study among nurses and support staff. Am J Nurs. 2014;114(12):28–37. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000457408.38222.d0.
   Google Scholar
• Aloulou Mokhtari M, Tiberghien T, Biswas J, et al. Deployment of assistive living technology in a nursing home environment: methods and lessons learned. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:42; 1–17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-42.
   Google Scholar
• Bradwell HL, Edwards KJ, Baines R, et al. Facial recognition lock technology for social care settings: a qualitative evaluation of implementation of facial recognition locks at two residential care sites. Front Digit Health. 2023;5:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1066327.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsten AM, Sifford KS, Bharucha A, et al. Ethical perspectives on emerging assistive technologies: insights from focus groups with stakeholders in long-term care facilities. J Empir Res Human Res Ethics. 2009;4(1):25–36. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.25.
   Google Scholar
• Gullsett MK, Nilsen ER, Dugstad J. Next of kin’s experiences with and attitudes towards digital monitoring technology for ageing people with dementia in residential care facilities. A qualitative study based on the voices of next of kin and care providers. Scand J Caring Sci. 2022. Gullslett; 36(4):1094–103. doi: 10.1111/scs.13009.
   Google Scholar
• Hung L, Mann J, Perry J, et al. Technological risks and ethical implications of using robots in long-term care. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022;9:1–10. doi: 10.1177/20556683221106917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallinen M, Hentonen O, Teeri S. Ethical dilemmas related to the use of safety technology in service house environments. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020;34(1):199–205. doi: 10.1111/scs.12721.
   Google Scholar
• Neimejer AR, Depla MFIA, Frederiks BJM, et al. The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22(3):307–20.
   Google Scholar
• Obayashi K, Kodate N, Masuyama S. Measuring the impact of age, gender and dementia on communication-robot interventions in residential care homes. Geriatr Gerontol Int.. 2020;20(4):373–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel V, Seibert K, Domhoff D, et al. Social health among german nursing home residents with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the role of technology to promote social participation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):1956. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tak SH, Beck C, Hong SH. Feasibility of providing computer activities for nursing home residents with dementia. Non Pharmacol Ther Dement. 2013; 3:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sapci AH, Sapci HA. Innovative assisted living tools, remote monitoring technologies, artificial Intelligence-Driven solutions, and robotic systems for aging societies: systematic review. JMIR Aging. 2019;2(2):e15429. doi: 10.2196/15429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luijkx K, Peek S, Wouters E. “Grandma, you should do It—it’s cool” older adults and the role of family members in their acceptance of technology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(12):15470–15485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121214999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portz JD, Fruhauf C, Bull S, et al. “Call a teenager… that’s what I do!” - Grandchildren help older adults use new technologies: qualitative study. JMIR Aging. 2019;2(1):e13713. doi: 10.2196/13713.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Fu Y, Lou V, et al. A systematic review of factors influencing attitudes towards and intention to use the long-distance caregiving technologies for older adults. Int J Med Inform. 2021;153:104536. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guner H, Acarturk C. The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2020;19(2):311–330. doi: 10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zander V, Gustafsson C, Landerdahl Stridsberg S, et al. Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;18(6):1–16. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1938707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangunić N, Granić A. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2015;14(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas C, Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, et al. Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definition and distinctions. Public Health Res Pract. 2022;32(2):1–7. doi: 10.17061/phrp3222211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kip H, Keizer J, da Silva MC, et al. Methods for human-Centered eHealth development: narrative scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e31858. doi: 10.2196/31858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):141–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald M, Yu Z, Weeks LE, et al. Assistive technologies that support social interaction in long-term care homes: a scoping review. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2021;19(10):2695–2738. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budak KB, Atefi G, Hoel V, et al. Can technology impact loneliness in dementia? a scoping review on the role of assistive technologies in delivering psychosocial interventions in long-term care. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2023;18(7):1107–19. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1984594.
   Google Scholar
• Brims L, Oliver K. Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health. 2019;23(8):942–951. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1455805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DJ, Mitchell JM, Kemp BJ, et al. Effects of assistive technology on functional decline in people aging with a disability. Assist Technol. 2009;21(4):208–217. doi: 10.1080/10400430903246068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatji WR, Eck RV, Zuva T. Understanding the usage, modifications, limitations and criticisms of technology acceptance model (TAM). Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst J. 2020;5(6):113–7. https://astesj.com/v05/i06/p12/.
   Google Scholar
• Almasi S, Bahaadinbeigy K, Ahmadi H, et al. Usability evaluation of dashboards: a systematic literature review of tools. Biomed Res Int. 2023;1–11. doi: 10.1155/2023/9990933.
   Google Scholar
• Pagé I, Roos M, Collin O, et al. UTAUT2-based questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation to Canadian french. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;45(4):709–716. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2037746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malatji WR, Eck RV, Zuva T. Understanding the usage, modifications, limitations and criticisms of technology acceptance model (TAM). Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst j. 2020;5(6):113–117. doi: 10.25046/aj050612.
   Google Scholar
• Borgnis F, Desideri L, Converti RM, et al. Available assistive technology outcome measures: systematic review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;10(1):e51124. doi: 10.2196/51124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salatino C, Pigini L, Andrich R. 2018. How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person’s quality of life? Proceedings of the 4th EAI. International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good, 238–242. doi: 10.1145/3284869.3284910.
   Google Scholar
• Peetoom KKB, Lexis MAS, Joore M, et al. Literature review on monitoring technologies and their outcomes in independently living elderly people. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2014;10(4):271–294. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.961179.
   Google Scholar